Re: [Tagging] Jewelry/jewellery shops

2016-01-14 Thread Marc Gemis
I know it is about consistency, but for a data consumer that does not matter, they still have to cope with the change in exactly the same way as for power=sub_station -> power=substation. (which is also a matter of consistency). No gain and a lot of pain :-) IMHO instead of discussing this

Re: [Tagging] Jewelry/jewellery shops

2016-01-14 Thread Marc Gemis
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Stephan Knauss wrote: > On 13.01.2016 23:46, Matthijs Melissen wrote: >> >> We currently use British English for almost all OSM tags. Jewellery >> shops however are typically tagged with the American English variant >> shop=jewelry (20083

Re: [Tagging] Jewelry/jewellery shops

2016-01-14 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2016-01-14 9:24 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis : > +1 to accept the current tagging. Please do not bother our data > consumers with a change. No need to repeat the sub_station/substation > story again. > please note that this is not similar to the power=sub_station / substation