Re: [Tagging] Urbex

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:31 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > are we encouraging / supporting / recommending something because we map > it? > Some seem to think so. Witness municipalities asking us to remove their streets from the map, public land managers asking us not

Re: [Tagging] Urbex

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:35 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Should it be mapped at all? Hi, I don't think it should be mapped. I used to take part in it years ago and I can tell you that the environments where UrbEx can be practiced are so highly varied I can't think of any meaningful

Re: [Tagging] Urbex

On 09-Jan-18 08:51 AM, OSMDoudou wrote: Hello, I stumbled upon this place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2994322059. I initially thought Urbex would be the former name of the factory ("Exploitation de craie abandonée" = "abandoned clay exploitation" in English), but it seems it rather

Re: [Tagging] Kerbs

> Maybe there's a good middle ground: a kerb height ranking, in lieu of taking > out a ruler and/or guessing a true kerb:height value. > kerb:height=low/medium/high, with corresponding ranges in cm (0-3, 3-10, 10+). That's actually very similar to mountable/semi-mountable/non-mountable or

Re: [Tagging] AutoEdit rename roof:slope:direction to roof:direction

Hello, Le 08. 01. 18 à 17:07, User Rebo a écrit : > what do you think of renaming all *roof:slope:direction* to > *roof:direction* as the first one is not an official tag and has the > exact same meaning as the second. it look like a good idea since both terms are synonymous and the

Re: [Tagging] AutoEdit rename roof:slope:direction to roof:direction

Hi Marc, thanks for your help. 08.01.2018 at 18:59 marc wrote: if enought ppl agree with it, create a wiki page with a one-line proposal/rationale. see others AE for a template. Do you mean at this page? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Automated_edits_log Silly question: What

[Tagging] Urbex

Hello, I stumbled upon this place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2994322059. I initially thought Urbex would be the former name of the factory ("Exploitation de craie abandonée" = "abandoned clay exploitation" in English), but it seems it rather stands for "Urban Exploration":

[Tagging] route/forward/backward members in all types of routes

Hello, A user recently questioned me about adding members with role "forward" to subway routes in my area. It is my understanding that, if the route runs in a single direction, this is allowed and desirable [1]. However, specific articles [2][3] on different types of railways seem to suggest that

Re: [Tagging] Urbex

On 9 January 2018 at 07:51, OSMDoudou < 19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238...@gmx.com> wrote: > Hello, > I stumbled upon this place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2994322059. > >From reading the Wiki article, in conjunction with the little I already knew of the concept, it strikes me as a

Re: [Tagging] route/forward/backward members in all types of routes

Are we talking about the PTv1 or the PTv2 schema here? On 09/01/18 08:50, Fernando Trebien wrote: Hello, A user recently questioned me about adding members with role "forward" to subway routes in my area. It is my understanding that, if the route runs in a single direction, this is allowed and

Re: [Tagging] Urbex

That's the question - are we? If we're showing a spot on the map that you can go exploring potentially hazardous, possibly out-of-bounds areas, then are we supporting the idea, & if so, should we be? It's one thing to say "this is an abandoned factory", but should we then be pointing out that

Re: [Tagging] Urbex

2018-01-08 23:12 GMT+01:00 Graeme Fitzpatrick : > I don't know if OSM should be seen to be possibly supporting / > recommending / encouraging it? > are we encouraging / supporting / recommending something because we map it? Cheers, Martin

[Tagging] AutoEdit rename roof:slope:direction to roof:direction

Hello Taggers, what do you think of renaming all *roof:slope:direction* to *roof:direction* as the first one is not an official tag and has the exact same meaning as the second. Usage: roof:direction -> 12 025 roof:slope:direction -> 7672 Discussion was here: