Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Piste:type=connection

Hi Marc, I did send an RFC, over a year ago: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-September/030270.html Caused some positive comments on the discussion page and quite some people actually using the tag. As for the text on the proposal page itself: I intended it for the

Re: [Tagging] How to tag shop areas in a shopping mall ?

On 2018-01-24 20:46, OSMDoudou wrote: > > Following the discussion here, I changed the mapping of the mall to > move tags from individual nodes to an area. > > > > For one shop, it attracted feedback from the commercial entity who > maintains its data on OpenStreetMap saying the change broke

Re: [Tagging] How to tag shop areas in a shopping mall ?

sent from a phone > On 24. Jan 2018, at 22:01, André Pirard wrote: > > The advantage of a node is best seen when you try to add several shops tags > to the same building/area: a nightmare. with the level tag and josms level filtering it is possible to keep things

Re: [Tagging] How to tag shop areas in a shopping mall ?

sent from a phone > On 24. Jan 2018, at 20:46, OSMDoudou > <19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238...@gmx.com> wrote: > > But as they're asking to maintain their shops tagged as node, this is > effectively asking the community refrains itself from improving the tagging > of the mall As areas

Re: [Tagging] How to tag shop areas in a shopping mall ?

Following the discussion here, I changed the mapping of the mall to move tags from individual nodes to an area. For one shop, it attracted feedback from the commercial entity who maintains its data on OpenStreetMap saying the change broke something at their side. See the discussion on the

Re: [Tagging] How to tag shop areas in a shopping mall ?

If of course all of their shops are mapped in detail as areas, they still get a consistent target. -- Andrew From: OSMDoudou <19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238...@gmx.com> Sent: 24 January 2018 19:46:26 To: 'Tag discussion, strategy and related tools' Subject:

Re: [Tagging] AutoEdit rename roof:slope:direction to roof:direction

Here the missing overpass links for "roof:ridge:direction".     gabled -> 1120 ways        https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/vks     hipped -> 100 ways          https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/vku     half-hipped -> 68 ways https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/vkv     gambrel -> 9 ways

Re: [Tagging] Short-term parking zones

yes, it was. But nobody bothered since the speed was the same in the whole country. I do not know when it was moved to the regional government, even not whether this was before or after the first source:maxspeed was entered in OSM> m. On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:16 AM, Colin Smale

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Piste:type=connection

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Piste:type%3Dconnection Hi, I'd like to start voting on Piste:type=connection, which is needed for walk-overs and other types of connections between lifts. The tag is already in use 102 times in four alpine countries. It is essential for ski

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Piste:type=connection

Hello, Le 24. 01. 18 à 10:42, Helge Fahrnberger a écrit : > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Piste:type%3Dconnection > I'd like to start voting you forget to make a request for comment :) end end date look wrong (January <> February) my comment : the definition is strange.

Re: [Tagging] Proposed features - Voting - Pressurized waterways

2018-01-23 18:17 GMT+01:00 Janko Mihelić : > I would like to add tunnel=headrace to the waterway=drain because that's > how they are called. Just google "headrace tunnel" and this is exactly what > you will get. > This is a great add, thank you. I've missed this terminology,

Re: [Tagging] Proposed features - Voting - Pressurized waterways

Le 23. 01. 18 à 14:25, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > I would prefer waterway=canal + pressurised=yes + tunnel=* rather > than waterway=pressurised. trivial in appearance, this change would imply a huge change of meaning. today common sense is that waterway=canal is a canal :-) thus not