Re: [Tagging] Waterway equivalent of noexit=yes?

On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 19:42, Alan Mackie wrote: > > I'd be tempted to just put culvert tagging on the node and add a barrier > tag for any gratings. I'm sure that will also annoy the validators, but it > should at least indicate to other mappers that it goes somewhere. > It will annoy

Re: [Tagging] Waterway equivalent of noexit=yes?

On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:53:09PM -0700, Tod Fitch wrote: > > >> What I’d like is one or two tags to indicate that all visible indications > >> of a water way ends at this point and that the QA tools should not flag > >> them as errors to be fixed. > >> > > The desert ones aren’t sink holes.

Re: [Tagging] Waterway equivalent of noexit=yes?

On 18/07/2020 19:41, Alan Mackie wrote: On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 19:09, Paul Allen > wrote: On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 18:53, Tod Fitch mailto:t...@fitchfamily.org>> wrote: What I’d like is one or two tags to indicate that all visible indications of

[Tagging] Waterway equivalent of noexit=yes?

During this period of “social distancing” I’ve been trying to work down the number of errors that tools like Osmose have reported about my editing. I am getting close to starting on the warnings about waterways not connecting properly. There are a couple of situations that I’ve mapped that I

Re: [Tagging] Waterway equivalent of noexit=yes?

> On Jul 18, 2020, at 12:24 PM, Andy Townsend wrote: > > On 18/07/2020 19:41, Alan Mackie wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 19:09, Paul Allen wrote: >> On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 18:53, Tod Fitch wrote: >> >> What I’d like is one or two tags to indicate that all visible indications of >>

Re: [Tagging] Edited the wiki for building=terrace

On 18/7/20 3:29 pm, Skyler Hawthorne wrote: Hi everyone, A couple weeks ago, I started a thread regarding how to tag terrace buildings when the entire building has a name. I proposed an alternative tagging scheme to handle such cases, and others where it's clear that the building is one

Re: [Tagging] Waterway equivalent of noexit=yes?

On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 18:53, Tod Fitch wrote: > > What I’d like is one or two tags to indicate that all visible indications > of a water way ends at this point and that the QA tools should not flag > them as errors to be fixed. > One of the things we need is an anti-spring. Marked on Ordnance

Re: [Tagging] Waterway equivalent of noexit=yes?

On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 19:09, Paul Allen wrote: > On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 18:53, Tod Fitch wrote: > >> >> What I’d like is one or two tags to indicate that all visible indications >> of a water way ends at this point and that the QA tools should not flag >> them as errors to be fixed. >> > > One

Re: [Tagging] Waterway equivalent of noexit=yes?

Jul 18, 2020, 19:52 by t...@fitchfamily.org: > During this period of “social distancing” I’ve been trying to work down the > number of errors that tools like Osmose have reported about my editing. I am > getting close to starting on the warnings about waterways not connecting > properly.