Brian M. Sperlongano:
Niels, thanks for the list.
I found another Danish hazard
Crossing golfers:
https://hopcycling.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/L9720954.jpg
--
Niels Elgaard Larsen
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
I am thinking this case (crossing golfers) is more of a highway=crossing
rather than a hazard? There appear to be no existing values of hazard for
indicating crossing golfers to lean on here.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:23 AM Niels Elgaard Larsen
wrote:
> Brian M. Sperlongano:
> > Niels, thanks
sent from a phone
> On 4. Dec 2020, at 17:42, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote:
>
> I am thinking this case (crossing golfers) is more of a highway=crossing
> rather than a hazard?
I think it is a warning that a golf ball might eventually hit your
vehicle, and if you’re prepared you won’t be
I agree that the indoor or semi-indoor inclined elevators, which are fully
enclosed and look completely similar to a vertical elevator, should be
tagged as highway=elevator.
Once they are outdoors and there are visible tracks it gets ambiguous.
Since the Montmarte "funicular" is tagged as
sent from a phone
> On 4. Dec 2020, at 21:43, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote:
>
> Does that satisfy your concern?
yes, very reasonable, maybe could add that unsigned hazards can not only be
found in the developing world, but the probability of encountering them will
raise the farther you move
Re: "However, in some cases, notably in the developing world, these types
of hazards may be tagged even if unsigned."
While this is certainly a true statement which represents the actual
situation in OpenStreetMap, I think it isn't needed in the proposal.
Mappers will always feel free to add
I've looked into these.
Most inclined elevators seem to also operate with cables, with the
difference being that in a funicular there are 2 cars attached to 1 cable,
so one ascends while the other descends, but in an inclined elevator each
car (or there might only be 1 car) is attached to a
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 19:56, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> They do not imply that you have to fear airplanes on the street, they
> are meant to prepare you for low flying aircraft.
>
Up until around ten years ago, a minor road went past the end of the
runway at what passes for an airport. The
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020, 5:00 PM Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> The wiki page text says that a railway=funicular is "A funicular, also
> known as an inclined plane or cliff railway, is a cable railway in which a
> cable attached to a pair of tram-like vehicles on rails moves them up and
> down a steep
My main issue with this is not technical details about how they work,
but about how they are used. They look like an elevator, act like one
and serve exactly the same purpose. You press a button, they come, the
doors open, you press a button inside to go up or down, etc.
They are used on
There's a few usages of hazard=golf_balls, which is more like what you're
describing and actually a hazard. It seems a bit nebulous, but perhaps the
sign could be mapped. That's different from a golf crossing, which is a
place where golfers and golf carts would cross a road.
I've already added
On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 at 07:13, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
>
> This will make it easier to fix problems with mappers who want to add
> hazard=curve to every single curve on a long curvy road, or add very
> subjective hazard features which cannot be confirmed or denied even when
> visiting the
Sorry for spamming.
I also think it's fine if the Montmarte funicular is tagged as a
funicular. But I'm asking because of things that are clearly elevators,
like this one:
https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-tekniska-hgskolan-metro-station-stermalm-district-stockholm-sweden-41948022.html
. It
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020, 6:30 PM Guillaume Chauvat wrote:
> Sorry for spamming.
>
> I also think it's fine if the Montmarte funicular is tagged as a
> funicular. But I'm asking because of things that are clearly elevators,
> like this one:
>
While hazard=yes is certainly in use (like barrier=yes and even
amenity=yes), it shouldn't be included in the proposal.
In every case it will be more helpful if users make up a new tag. If there
is a sign warning of monkeys which are prone to steal tourist's purses,
then
This was a concern of mine as well. I did not want someone micromapping
every bend in a road with hazard=curve for example. The intent is for
officially declared hazards rather than vague interpretations. However, I
also recognize that, particularly in the developing world, formal signage
or
As long as your frost heave conforms to verifiability guidelines by being
either:
a) signposted (possibly)
b) fenced off, with a sign (no, because it's in the road)
c) a government-declared hazardous area (no)
I'm concerned that this hazard tagging proposal will encourage subjective
tagging over
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 8:50 PM Brian M. Sperlongano
wrote:
> I poked into the existing usages of hazard=landslide, and they seem to
> mostly be on hiking trails or at best track roads, rather than regular
> roads. I don't think anyone would quibble with tagging a landslide hazard
> on this [1]
18 matches
Mail list logo
