2010/4/8 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
From http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beach
Beach areas should always meet with a natural=coastline way. Do not use
this tag for patches of sand/gravel which are not by a coastline. Note that
the natural=coastline should ideally be positioned
2010/4/9 Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net:
many towns in upstate NY have town beaches on local lakes.
In Berlin we have beaches (Oststrand [1+2] ) at the river and even in
the zoo ;-) [3]
cheers,
Martin
btw.: what about tagging (and rendering) surface=sand ? IMHO the
beaches-hack is not
2010/4/10 Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com:
Now, about paved on the outside and unpaved in the middle: given the fact that
paved roads shouldn't be tagged as tracks anyway, ...
why not? Of course they are: grade1-tracks have to be paved (or
similar surface like very compounded hardcore).
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
an John
Details anzeigen 17:04 (Vor 0 Minuten)
2010/4/10 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
- Zitierten Text anzeigen -
On 11 April 2010 00:18, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
btw.: what about tagging (and rendering) surface=sand ? IMHO
2010/4/11 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 11 April 2010 20:40, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Surely these should be tagged golf_course=bunker, or something.
I was hoping for something a little more generic since you can also
have beach volley ball areas that are no where
2010/4/12 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 12 April 2010 09:09, Steve Doerr steve.do...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
Sand is not a necessary element of a beach in any case. In fact, the
original meaning of 'beach' was: 'The loose water-worn pebbles of the
sea-shore; shingle.'
All this
2010/4/12 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
No. There are probably more OSMers that know basic English than OSMers that
know basic German. And we all know where the hyphen key is.
Don't know if that's true, but if I see how many complaints there are
about the ÖPNV-Karte, which ist just one word,
2010/4/20 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com:
Wouldn't it be great if railway=subway_entrance was rendering
+1
currently I'm mapping them with barrier=wall (U-form) and
highway=steps in the middle (and on the end subway_entrance) but it
would be nice to have them show up.
, and if
we had a
2010/4/26 Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi:
Area=yes is unnecessary.
+1
And then the buildings have
properties like architect, height, number of floors etc.
ideally yes. To find out which tags you can really find associated,
simply use tagwatch or analyse the planet ;-)
cheers,
2010/4/30 Jonathan Bennett openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk:
On 30/04/2010 09:57, Claudius Henrichs wrote:
I'm trying to get some input on how to tag a shop selling fish and
seafood from some english speaking users.
For the sake of sanity I'd use
shop=fishmonger
This describes what the
2010/4/30 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
poissonerie, surely?
Poissonnerie
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poissonnerie
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
what about a simple shop=fish ?
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2010/5/3 Seventy 7 seven...@operamail.com:
The existing walls have been tagged historic=citywalls which render as a
thick grey line in Mapnik and don't render at all in Osmarender. This is an
undocumented tag as far as I can tell.
thanks for this, I was mapping city-walls in Rome and the
2010/5/3 Seventy 7 seven...@operamail.com:
The existing walls have been tagged historic=citywalls which render as a
thick grey line in Mapnik and don't render at all in Osmarender. This is an
undocumented tag as far as I can tell.
The documented (and therefore correct?) tag is
2010/5/5 Jonas Minnberg sas...@gmail.com:
I am currently working on cleaning up stuff in Stockholm, and I was
wondering if it was OK do to things like:
* Remove cycleways parallel to other ways and add a cycleway=track to that
way instead.
no, you should rather do the opposite: remove the
2010/5/5 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 5 May 2010 23:57, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest to change leisure=park to landuse=grass if it is not a park.
This was covered in another thread, landcover isn't the same thing as
landuse, the only landuse=grass I
2010/5/5 Jonas Minnberg sas...@gmail.com:
If they aren't parks, then what are they?
They are trees or sometimes small areas of grass next to buildings. For
instance;
use landuse=grass, that's IMHO not wrong regarding landuse-use ;-) in general.
cheers,
Martin
2010/5/5 Jonas Minnberg sas...@gmail.com:
Shouldn't you expect - you know - *grass* in areas with landuse=grass ? :9
Seriously though, from the image of the actual street you can see that it is
a sidewalk. The only people who see the green surface are the ones flying
over it.
I must admit I
2010/5/5 Jonas Minnberg sas...@gmail.com:
I will not join together joining areas since there doesn't seem to
be consensus on that.
I think there is consensus that the nodes should be connected (and
I'll even go so far to say it is wrong if they are not connected). The
open question is whether
2010/5/5 Jonas Minnberg sas...@gmail.com:
Well since we need space for all those thousands of sidewalks that people
want to add maybe we better leave space around all roads anyway :)
IMHO the sidewalk (and the street) are not part of the adjacent
landuses anyway. I thought you were asking for
2010/5/5 ivom ivo.vdmaagdenb...@pandora.be:
Just wondering when the use of : of . is most appropriate with regard to
namespace tags in mind. Some examples like this tree:height=20m or
shop.restaurant.parking=yes is what I mean.
Is the : de-facto the namespace divider of choice or does the .
2010/5/6 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 6 May 2010 19:27, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
In the UK, they'd almost certainly be tagged as supermarkets, since
our stores tend to have one product area dominant (eg groceries).
Department stores are large
2010/5/6 Tyler Gunn ty...@egunn.com:
Here's the same area in OSM; I've added a lot of detail to this shopping
district including parking lots, buildings, and started to put in POIs. I
think this is a HUGE improvement over what Google Maps shows:
2010/5/6 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
From my experience (in the USA), most WalMarts and KMarts only allocate a
small percentage of their floor space to groceries. The so-called super
WalMarts have a full range of groceries; even so, the grocery section takes
up only 20 percent or
2010/5/6 Jonas Minnberg sas...@gmail.com:
landuse=lawn (For smaller areas of kept grass that are
either inaccessible or not meant to - you know - picnic on or similar).
landuse=yard (For private backyards etc, usually inaccessible, even if they
may look park-like on the satellite).
For the
2010/5/6 Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net:
most of these stores devote no more than 5 or 10% of their floorspace to
food, and are otherwise inexpensive department stores, and i'm certainly
having trouble seeing how 10% of their stock overrides the other 90% when
it comes to tagging.
I
2010/5/6 Tyler Gunn ty...@egunn.com:
On Thu, 6 May 2010 12:37:10 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
+1, nice.
cheers,
Martin
It definitely shows how incredibly pedestrian-unfriendly these big
suburban box store malls are. There are buildings in a sea of parking
lots. Lol.
sure. Mapping
2010/5/6 Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl:
On Thursday 06 May 2010 15:06:36 Jonas Minnberg wrote:
for the latter
highway=pedestrian, area=yes. For accessibility use the access-tags,
e.g. in your examples access=no and access=private.
This would really confuse I think.
This is not confusing,
2010/5/6 Petr Morávek [Xificurk] xific...@gmail.com:
To the proposed solutions in this thread:
* highway=pedestrian, area=yes - It doesn't really make sense to me to
tag private fenced and _green_ areas by highway tag.
sure, for green areas it isn't, for paved ones it IMO is.
*
2010/5/7 Petr Morávek [Xificurk] xific...@gmail.com:
* surface=grass, surface=lawn, surface=whatever - I don't like this
because what I really want to map is not that my neighbour has a lawn
behind his house, but the fact that there is a private green property
add access=private?
You
I set up a page (Draft) for additional barrier-values. If you want to
contribute I will be glad.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
2010/5/12 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types
Why not just start using these values?
I'm already using them
The whole proposal seems pretty inconsequential, it's not like you are
trying to make a well sued highway
2010/5/12 Craig Wallace craig...@fastmail.fm:
On 12/05/2010 14:41, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types
I don't think barrier=swing_gate is really needed. Its still a type of
gate, so it should just be tagged barrier=gate. Maybe
2010/5/14 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:05 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
The whole proposal seems pretty inconsequential, it's not like you are
trying to make a well sued highway tagging scheme redundant.
Do we agree there is a basic goal of
2010/5/14 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
You missed the important point I made, which was the bit about these
types of tags being incosequential in the entire scheme of things,
documenting them is more important than any vote when it won't have
any great effect on anything else.
I
2010/5/14 Jonas Minnberg sas...@gmail.com:
What about bordering buildings - ie buldings sharing walls but having
different addresses/uses ? Is it better to draw the as a single area or as
separate but with shared nodes?
IMHO the more you can separate them, the better. Usually I would
expect
2010/5/14 Petr Morávek [Xificurk] xific...@gmail.com:
And the added bonus of abusing leisure=garden tag... Let me one more
time explain what I think is wrong on this tag, so here is an example:
Step two: Which one of these lines better describes the area?
A) Place where flowers and other
2010/5/14 Petr Morávek [Xificurk] xific...@gmail.com:
That's the part of copied text from wikipedia, that really significantly
changed the meaning of leisure=garden page on OSM wiki. Take a look at
the history, only few weeks ago the content said something completely
different (although it was
2010/5/14 Jonas Minnberg sas...@gmail.com:
Oh and I forgot:
* landuse=grass overlapping landuse=wood, grass set as layer=-1
is this inside a building or are there platforms or what is the
purpose of this layer-tag?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging
2010/5/14 Jonas Minnberg sas...@gmail.com:
OK, some real world examples;
* Two overlapping wood-areas, one named, the other not.
Generally it's a good idea to tidy up your area, given you know the
area, so in this case: either you know the extent of the named area in
real life, or you
2010/5/14 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 15 May 2010 05:27, Jonas Minnberg sas...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh and I forgot:
* landuse=grass overlapping landuse=wood, grass set as layer=-1
Are you mixing up landuse and land cover by any chance?
you're insisting on this one? Yes, you are
2010/5/14 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_garden
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_garden
I don't really see what the big deal is, leisure=garden can mean a lot
of different things to a lot of different people, so it needs to be
sub-tagged,
+1
2010/5/14 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
On Sat, 15 May 2010, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
what if someone decides not to cut his grass? It would IMHO still be a
garden.
My grass is rarely cut (climatic reasons) and we have left the main grassed
area to become /meadow/.
It's not a garden now in any
2010/5/15 Petr Morávek [Xificurk] xific...@gmail.com:
but before neither ;-)
I disagree, it was pretty simple to ask myself if the area is Place
where flowers and other plants are grown in a decorative and structured
manner or for scientific purposes. - Botanical garden - yes, Japanese
2010/5/14 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 15 May 2010 05:50, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for opening a new thread.
I filed a bug for surface=grass, we also possibly need one for
natural=beach, surface=sand|gravel etc...
+1
encourage people to change
2010/5/15 Jonas Minnberg sas...@gmail.com:
Is it OK to use information you find on map-signs next to streets or
suburban areas?
Usually they show the houses and street names in a certain area (residential
or commercial most often).
None I have found have ever had any sort of copyright text on
2010/5/16 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
+1
I submitted a ticket to revert this change :
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2970
Mapnik cannot display all tags and all information in OSM. Showing all
private things will result of an unreadable map.
It depends on the way the information is
2010/5/16 Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.com:
That doesn't matter for OSM. All things are copyrighted, you said it
yourself. Whether it's fact or knowledge doesn't matter.
no, you can't put copyright on facts.
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing
2010/5/17 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
it doesn't seem to work for e.g. amenity=drinking_water
(you list just Osmarender, but it is also displayed in Mapnik, the
cyclemap and JOSM and probably others as well).
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing
2010/5/16 Zeke Farwell ezeki...@gmail.com:
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:29 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO yes, as natural is mainly about landcover (what you physically
encounter on the spot) while landuse is about usage.
If you want do some extremely detailed
2010/5/17 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Jonas Minnberg sas...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm kind of considering if this is right or not - if a road is the divider
between two landuses, is it still best to unglue it from the landuse(s) and
move it into one or the other?
2010/5/18 Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com:
Use access=permissive instead of access=customer and you get what's in
use for years.
+1
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
2010/5/18 Petr Morávek [Xificurk] xific...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I had finally some time to write down some proposal of sub-tagging for
leisure=garden as discussed earlier.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Garden_specification
Since I'm no big gardener any comments and
There is maybe also some potential conflict with allotment gardens?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2010/5/19 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com:
I would call the first access=destination and the second access=permissive.
yes, by thinking it over I also see some space for a restriction
between permissive and private and destination is more elegant cause
it uses an already introduced value for
2010/5/19 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 19 May 2010 12:56, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
or at least a more specific tag than man_made=gps_receiver. If you
want a dedicated tag use sth. like plate_tectonic_monitoring
I wasn't feeling inspired today, which is why
2010/5/19 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
One problem I have with the concept of access=destination, even beyond the
fact that it says right of access, is that parking lots quite often aren't
connected to the places they serve. Something like access=customer is
therefore *more general*. The parking
2010/5/19 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
yes, I guess it helps more to speak German ;-). In German highway=ford
translates to Furt and this is the definition in OSM. Mostly you can
guess the meaning of tags by typing them into an
English-German-dictionary and look up the various
2010/5/19 Petr Morávek [Xificurk] xific...@gmail.com:
I see your point... I think the wiki definition of
landuse=recreation_ground is a bit in conflict with common sense (like
the leisure=garden was) and it should be changed.
I don't think so. Recreation ground is a term that is refering to
2010/5/23 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 23 May 2010 08:24, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
If so, then a relation would be a sensible suggestion
I think we have used relation for Tourist Route in Australia.
Tourist routes aren't only used for winery tours, maybe there needs to
be a
2010/5/28 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
When tagging an area leisure=marina, do you include:
- just the area on water
- the water and the immediate area around it (ie, slipways, mooring points
etc)
- facilities like boat storage
I would include all of these. Probably this is a use
2010/5/29 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
Please compare this situation to what happened recently with the
meaning of highway=*. Do you think highway=* tags are used to tag for
the renderer? In some ways, yes, they are. But more specifically,
highway=* tags are a very general and sometimes
2010/5/28 sylvain letuffe li...@letuffe.org:
showed the labels, but we created a list of cities because *those*
*are* the cities in Italy.
So every città in Italy is tagged place=city ? So you can have a 1 to 1
cittàcity ?
So all this are tagged place=city :
2010/5/30 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
If Neopaganism is what is meant, then why wasn't it used?
+1
I also think that neopagan is closer to what is probably meant and
avoid confusion with the christian point of view of seeing all
non-christians as pagans.
cheers,
Martin
2010/5/31 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
IMHO, if there is not signage or some sort of official designation to
back it up, this kind of subjective, user-supplied information belongs
somewhere other than the OSM database.
It's certainly valuable,
if it is, I believe we should also put it
2010/5/31 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
leisure=track is for racing animals like greyhounds/horses, although
the map features page also suggests cycling.
Besides cyclists and animals, isn't leisure=track used for tracks for
running humans as well (like you can find in a stadium)?
2010/5/31 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
By permanent you presumably mean stable. Nodes and ways have IDs,
so it doesn't seem like a difficult problem to me.
if you're talking about static (OSM-)data this is indeed simple,
otherwise it requires quite some effort: nodes are deleted, moved,
2010/5/31 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
together under a single banner. Buildings/temples and other places of
worship still exist from these religions, like ancient Greek and Roman
temples, pyramids in Egypt and south America, Stone Henge in the UK
and native scared sites in various
2010/5/31 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
...but it's not a reason to accept everything, especially data
changing daily.
yes, I totally agree that highly dynamic data like actual traffic jams
are not to be put into OSM database, but here the suggestion was to
put information about typical locations
2010/5/28 sly (sylvain letuffe) sylv...@letuffe.org:
First, I'm aware that full classification of every populated places is not
possible world wide with one tag only, ...The problem I see with actual place
usage is that it is not
standardazided world wide ...
IMHO place is a rough estimate
2010/6/1 Martin Simon grenzde...@gmail.com:
2010/6/1 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
If you can read German I also suggest this one, which is not
comparable to the English version:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stadt
How about this approach?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
2010/6/1 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
A large factory may consist of a number of smaller parts, some of which are
workshops. Other areas may be assembly lines / bottling plants / first aid
posts.
of course, it might also have its own fire department, police, shops,
restaurants, traffic enforcement,
2010/6/2 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 2 June 2010 17:50, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a french word meaning ... 'shop'.
So, what is suggested is shop=shop as a french reader could interpret it.
Ain't english grand?
From wikipedia: A boutique, from the French word for
2010/6/2 Martin Simon grenzde...@gmail.com:
For example, I've been in a Croatian Island for mapping, er, vacation
last year. The capital of this island has half the population of the
village in Germany where I lived in my childhood, but it's a real
town,
so simply tag it as place=town,
2010/6/3 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2010/6/2 y...@o2.pl y...@o2.pl:
Hi,
I'm wondering how to tag sedimentation tank at a sewage treatment. I'm
thinking about 'landuse=reservoir' + 'man_made=sedimentation_tank'.
+1, good suggestion
I don't think it is useful (like
2010/6/3 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 3 June 2010 22:59, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
probably I wouldn't tag it as landuse=reservoir. Tag the tanks just as
sedimentation_tank but use the landuse for the whole area (maybe
industrial or something more specific
2010/6/3 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
#2 is a tower for historical reasons only imho,
yes, it might have been higher in the past presuming that the ground
level now is higher, and the same as for #1 applies;
#1 is just some
shed/building, I wouldn't consider it a tower it isn't
2010/6/3 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
This thread has gone from communication towers to other towers, in any
case for #1 I'd be hard press to call this a tower, even if it had
elevation due to geographical features, I'd go for command centre or
something similar before I'd ever
2010/6/3 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
if you see it in its historical context, it does look much more like a
tower though:
http://www.checkpoint-bravo.de/grafik/ausstellung.jpg
It isn't a tower, but it functioned as a watchtower
So is a tower in OSM
2010/6/7 y...@o2.pl y...@o2.pl:
I was also thinking about marketplace=street_market rather than
bazaar. But maybe there is a place for both tags, e.g. bazaar IMO
looks like
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kapali_Carsi-Grand_Bazar-Istanbul-Sep08.jpg,
this looks like highway=pedestrian to
2010/6/8 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
power=sub_station
voltage:from=330kV
voltage:to=100kV
following recent discussions on Talk-DE, this would be power=station,
while the power station (generating station) itself is called
power=generator. At least that's what they wrote.
or in
2010/6/7 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:46 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Martin, I don't really know what you mean. Perhaps I don't understand
the type=area proposal properly. Can you give us a full example (i.e.
the tags) of how you
2010/6/9 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
So just to summarise, you would have a relation:
type=area
highway=steps
step_count=15 (already documented on the wiki)
with way members:
role=lower,
role=upper, and two
role=lateral (I don't think these values need to be prefixed with steps:)
2010/6/9 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
0 for the lowest way
1 is at higher elevation than 0
2
3
sorry, forget about this, it makes things too complicated.
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http
2010/6/9 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Yes, but this scheme will never work because it's totally at odds with
English. When English is your second language, all tags seem equally
arbitrary, but English speakers will expect power=station to be a
power station, and power=sub_station to be a
2010/6/10 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
validator gives warnings about the lower/upper way because these ways do not
have any tag.
Do we need a tag for these ways ?
IMHO it shouldn't as the way is part of a relation. It doesn't for
mp-relations for instance.
cheers,
Martin
2010/6/10 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/957489
I still do not know where to put the information that you have to drop steps
from the bottom and not from the top.
if you have different amount of steps inside the area, you will
currently have to
2010/6/10 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
Have a look:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/display/17927910
I said it is even more complicated and even on this picture you do not see all
steps !
OK, but the steps on the picture are not that complicated. You need
only 2 relations: one with 11
2010/6/10 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2010/6/10 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
Have a look:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/display/17927910
I said it is even more complicated and even on this picture you do not see
all
steps !
OK, but the steps on the picture
2010/6/10 Elena of Valhalla elena.valha...@gmail.com:
On 6/10/10, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 10.06.2010 15:23, schrieb Pieren:
1. I know some motorways which are not oneway.
not in Europe
yes, in Germany. If the Road is in/under cronstuction and also some ends of
motorways.
2010/6/10 Elena of Valhalla elena.valha...@gmail.com:
On 6/10/10, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Zeichen_334.svgfiletimestamp=20060506221325
everything in between is a motorway.
In Italy e.g. the end of motorway sign (like
2010/6/12 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
why not just service=motorway?
To me, service=motorway implies that the feature is a motorway. How
would you describe the feature? - use that as the value.
+1, that's why it is considered appropriate: the service area is
indeed part of the
2010/6/12 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
class than the segments that prohibit bikes. They should be tagged
highway=motorway bicycle=yes or bicycle=designated.
+1, that's the point: tag the exception, and not bicycle=no on every
other piece of motorway. At least for motorways this
2010/6/15 Zeke Farwell ezeki...@gmail.com:
Well aeroway=helipad is documented on the wiki. Doesn't render currently
though.
It does render in t...@h, mapnik doesn't show it.
What about creating a site-relation for airports, where the runways
are entered and the application can then decide
2010/6/15 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
And since
there isn't much difference between a shoulder and a bike lane
there is a huge difference IMO. The presence of a bike lane suggests
that the road was thought (or later adapted) also for bicycle use, it
will usually be convenient to enter
2010/6/16 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
The problem with using subjective tagging is you can't easily quantify
it, where as things like air traffic is objective.
But what you can do is compare it to the surrounding / context /
nationwide / worldwide. It's like the highway key for
2010/6/17 Zeke Farwell ezeki...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:21 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
Everything you talked about above is specifically about rendering, not
about mapping, in terms of mapping airports you really need to base
things on a 1:1 basis
If you
2010/6/17 char...@cferrero.net:
The highway tag is the primary tag used for highways. It is often the
only tag. It is a very general and sometimes vague description of the
importance of the highway for the road grid.
The term importance isn't defined
Why shouldn't importance not be
2010/6/17 Alex Wardle awar...@gmx.com:
Could people please look and vote on this proposal.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Advanced_stop_line
IMHO before voting you should make the actual tags to describe the
situation more visible on the proposal page. There were also
2010/6/18 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
The first one is motorway_link, the second primary (because it's
two-way), the third primary_link, the fourth could be just about
anything from trunk to service. Mapnik makes a mess if a link
intersects a service, but that's cos
1 - 100 of 771 matches
Mail list logo
