Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Campsite properties

2019-09-11 Thread Sven Geggus
Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > (While I wouldn't have picked the key "permanent_camping" myself if > it's only on a seasonal or annual basis, I think it's probably fine, > and I can't think of a better English term.) I can not talk for other countries, but in Germany this setting is definitely

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Campsite properties

2019-09-10 Thread Jez Nicholson
I fixed the image linkit didn't like the space between '=' and 'File:' On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 1:19 PM Sven Geggus wrote: > Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > > > That's an interesting idea. I don't know much about this concept > > myself, so it would be better if this were kept separate. Is it

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Campsite properties

2019-09-10 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
> Is it allowed to add images from Wikipedia to OSM-Wiki? Yes, and all you have to do is write image= File:Dauercamper_Asel_Sued_Edersee_20101024.JPG in the Description box, for example. I've updated the new page with the image and some more details, like that it needs to be added to a camp_site,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Campsite properties

2019-09-10 Thread Sven Geggus
Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > That's an interesting idea. I don't know much about this concept > myself, so it would be better if this were kept separate. Is it like > renting a summer cabin, or more like having a permanent spot in a > mobile home park (eg for fixed caravans)? No this is all about

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Campsite properties

2019-09-04 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
Sven, Thank you for your comments, I appreciate having your involvement in this proposal. >> 2) Deprecate bbq=* (use barbecue_grill=* instead). > > Well, in practice according to taginfo there are zero campsites featuring an > additional bbq or barbecue_grill tag. Mainly this is used for

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Campsite properties

2019-09-04 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
Correct. And often there is a greywater drain at each individual camp pitch, but only one sanitary_dump_station where caravans and RVs can empty their sewage tank. On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:15 AM Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 4. Sep 2019, at 21:00, Sven Geggus >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Campsite properties

2019-09-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 4. Sep 2019, at 21:00, Sven Geggus wrote: > > Is there a difference between a greywater_drain and a > sanitary_dump_station? greywater is wastewater without feces, e.g. from sinks and showers, while I would guess that a sanitary dump station is for sewage. Cheers

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Campsite properties

2019-09-04 Thread Sven Geggus
Hello, first of all, as the author of http://opencampingmap.org I basically support any approach to streamline the tagging of campsites! However, I would also like to point out, that the main problem we currently have with campsite mapping in OSM ist not _inaccurate_ tagging but _no_ additional

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Campsite properties

2019-08-28 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
It's been a week since the RFC for this proposal focused on campsites and related tourism features. It which would: 1) Deprecate booking=* (use reservation=* instead) 2) Deprecate bbq=* (use barbecue_grill=* instead). 3) Create new wiki pages: amenity=greywater_drain amenity=power_supply

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Campsite properties

2019-08-22 Thread Joseph Eisenberg
I didn’t invent the tag, it’s already been used several hundred times. I suppose the idea was “scout (camp) = yes/no” - its a property that describes the type of camp as “scout”. It could be used with access = yes or = private depending on the camp. There is also leisure=summer_camp which might

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Campsite properties

2019-08-22 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 11:39, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > scout=yes/no > I was wondering what "scout" referred to, till I looked at the page & saw reference to Girl Scouts etc! This should possibly be scout*s*=yes/no ? (Although I have seen references out here to non-Scouting people camping in