sent from a phone
Am 25.08.2015 um 19:10 schrieb serpens-...@gmx.de:
And amenity=embassy just way to specific, nobody wants
amenity=consulate_general, ameninty=consulate etc.
why not? What is the advantage of using diplomatic instead of amenity as a key?
Why should we use the same main
Take a look at: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process
--K
On 26 August 2015 at 13:10, serpens-...@gmx.de wrote:
What is the best way to bring this on a formal way to an official tag?
Is wiki:Proposed_features the right place (it is partly about changing
existing tags not only
What is the best way to bring this on a formal way to an official tag?
Is wiki:Proposed_features the right place (it is partly about changing existing
tags not only about new tags)? Where takes a vote place about this?
Best
Serpens
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. August 2015 um 14:21 Uhr
Von:
I'm a bit lost in this thread and hope that I'm not repeating what was
already said, but there is extensive documentation on this topic in the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dembassy
and linked pages. It might be disputable whether tagging consulate generals
as
Hi,
thank you for your thoughts!
diplomatic:country=ES
I don’t think that is the best solution. Why not? As I wrote:
The destination country is not always identical with addr:country – see for
example the embassy of Ethiopia in Berlin (destination countries: Germany,
Poland, Slovak
On Tuesday 2015-08-25 16:42 +0200, serpens-...@gmx.de wrote:
The destination country is not always identical with addr:country – see
for example the embassy of Ethiopia in Berlin (destination countries:
Germany, Poland, Slovak Republic and Czech Republic), see
sent from a phone
Am 25.08.2015 um 15:16 schrieb Kieron Thwaites kieron.thwai...@gmail.com:
To take your example of a Spanish consulate in France, I would amend
it to something along these lines:
amenity=diplomatic
diplomatic=consulate
diplomatic:country=ES
name=Spanish Consulate
having an English name for a Spanish consulate to France seems kind of odd
for the tag name ;-)
That’s a joke, right? ;-)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
serpens-...@gmx.de wrote on 2015-08-25 16:43:
having an English name for a Spanish consulate to France seems kind of odd for the tag
name ;-)
That’s a joke, right? ;-)
I would not see that a joke. name= should be the locally used name, name:en=
the English one.
t.
having an English name for a Spanish consulate to France seems kind of odd
for the tag name ;-)
That’s a joke, right? ;-)
I would not see that a joke. name= should be the locally used name, name:en=
the English one.
It was just an hypothetical example and the whole discussion is not
Ah, OK. That makes more sense then. (:
--K
On 25 August 2015 at 17:15, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
On Tuesday 2015-08-25 16:42 +0200, serpens-...@gmx.de wrote:
The destination country is not always identical with addr:country – see
for example the embassy of Ethiopia in
sent from a phone
Am 25.08.2015 um 16:42 schrieb serpens-...@gmx.de:
So there is an embassy
- located in Berlin (addr:country=DE),
- the sending country is Ethiopia (diplomatic:sending_country=ET)
- and the destination countries are Germany, Poland, Slovak Republic and
Czech Republic
Hi,
While I've never tagged any form of diplomatic institution, I agree
with the rationale behind your proposal. I do have some suggestions
around implementation details.
I would argue that you wouldn't need tags specifying what country the
diplomatic institution is physically located in: one
13 matches
Mail list logo
