-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi anonym!
> Cool! If we pick a-c-w that ticket will likely be rejected, and
> I'll open a new one about a-c-w but I'll do my best to add you as a
> watcher to that and related tickets in that case.
Thank you very much for your help!
> I'd like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi intrigeri!
> FWIW toolkit and visual rendering matters are important, but only a
> subset of what I meant with desktop integration / HIG / consistent
> UI & UX. I'm confident we can easily fix the widgets & fonts via
> purely technical means,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
intrigeri:
> What's the design for giving Anon-Connection-Wizard (and thus the
> desktop user) limited privileges on Tor? In other words, is it
> designed with OnionGrater in mind, and with a threat model in
> which the user who runs the GUI is
hi,
anonym:
> anonym:
>> intrigeri:
>>> * it integrates nicely in a GNOME desktop (e.g. in terms of HIG ⇒
>>>consistent UI & UX).
> I did a quick and dirty test:
[...]
> which starts a-c-w (but actually configuring Tor fails, which I expected).
> GNOME integration is currently not great:
anonym:
> intrigeri:
>> * it integrates nicely in a GNOME desktop (e.g. in terms of HIG ⇒
>>consistent UI & UX).
I did a quick and dirty test:
git clone https://github.com/Whonix/anon-connection-wizard
git clone https://github.com/Whonix/python-guimessages
sudo env
iry:
> anonym:
>> All this looks promising, so to answer your question whether we're
>> interested: yes! :)
>
> Hi anonym! That sounds awesome!
>
>> I haven't looked at this in detail yet (from what I saw so far I
>> think some people will be sad over it using Qt instead of GTK),
> Just in case
intrigeri:
> anonym:
>> (from what I saw so far I think some people will be sad over it
>> using Qt instead of GTK)
>
> As long as:
>
> * it's Qt5 (let's please stop adding apps that only work with the
>obsolete Qt4; we already ship Qt5 and the corresponding Python
>binding for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
anonym:
> All this looks promising, so to answer your question whether we're
> interested: yes! :)
Hi anonym! That sounds awesome!
> I haven't looked at this in detail yet (from what I saw so far I
> think some people will be sad over it using
anonym:
> (from what I saw so far I think some people will be sad over it
> using Qt instead of GTK)
As long as:
* it's Qt5 (let's please stop adding apps that only work with the
obsolete Qt4; we already ship Qt5 and the corresponding Python
binding for OnionShare and Audacity anyway);
Patrice Mannoni:
> I highly recommend against this.
Ack. But what are we supposed to do with a recommendation lacking any sort of
argumentation/motivation? Please share your thoughts!
> And hope it isn't implemented over the short-term.
Tor Launcher (even the new one) would at best be a
iry:
> Hi Tails developers!
>
> Several months ago, anonym and I had a discussion about the future of
> anon-connection-wizard on the @tor-dev[0], where he said:
>
>> [snip]
Thanks for picking up this again!
> Now, though there are still a lot of improvements can be done,
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Tails developers!
Several months ago, anonym and I had a discussion about the future of
anon-connection-wizard on the @tor-dev[0], where he said:
> That said, this approach will not be viable any more some time next
> year when the Firefox ESR
12 matches
Mail list logo
