Re: [T(A)ILS-dev] BHDC11 - De-anonymizing Live CDs through Physical Memory Analysis

2011-01-13 Thread bertagaz
Hi, This thread on or-talk made me discover a way that might be interesting to implement to actually wipe encrypted disks key material. When you luksClose a disk/volume, it's key material is forgotten by the kernel, but still in memory (if I understood how it works). But it seems that in the

Re: [T(A)ILS-dev] BHDC11 - De-anonymizing Live CDs through Physical Memory Analysis

2011-01-14 Thread bertagaz
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:26:13AM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, Still, if the kexec method don't help in wiping key material, I suppose writing a very simple wrapper to cryptsetup that use luksSuspend then luskClose when cryptsetup is called to luksClose an encrypted disk might be an

Re: [T(A)ILS-dev] doc: warnings

2011-04-15 Thread bertagaz
Hi, Did a review and corrected some tiny typos or formulations, but so far looks like you did a great job! bert. On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 05:28:37PM +0200, sajolida wrote: Hi everybody, In the process of rewriting Tails' documentation I worked yesterday on the warning page. The idea

Re: [T(A)ILS-dev] Linux kernel shipped in upcoming 0.7.x

2011-04-18 Thread bertagaz
Hi, On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:39:18AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Hi, Input data: - a great number of Tails 0.7 users are affected by Debian bug #618665 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618665) - this bug is fixed in an updated kernel that is available in the

Re: [Tails-dev] Anonymous Blogging with WordPress and Tor

2011-07-04 Thread bertagaz
Hi, Nice email, I did some corrections though. bert. On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:38:57AM +0200, sajolida wrote: Hi, Here is the draft of the email I'm planning to send to the author of this guide. I'd like to have a quick review from you before sending it.

Re: [Tails-dev] tails-greeter conversion to dh_python2

2011-07-19 Thread bertagaz
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 01:10:21AM +0700, † wrote: 18.07.2011 04:04, intrigeri пишет: I've pushed a branch called dh_python2 into your tails-greeter Git repository. This branch converts the packaging to dh_python2; it also has a few other commits with tiny packaging improvements. Merge

Re: [Tails-dev] [gsoc] tails-greeter progress report

2011-08-05 Thread bertagaz
Hi again, Also I just notices intrigeri asked you a late question about your last week report on the tails-dev mailing list without any answer. Please see his last mail to you and tails-dev from August 04 about using a shell script. Did you answer to this question privately? bert. On Fri, Aug

Re: [Tails-dev] [gsoc] tails-greeter progress report

2011-08-05 Thread bertagaz
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 12:24:36AM +0800, † wrote: 05.08.2011 23:53, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org пишет: Also I just notices intrigeri asked you a late question about your last week report on the tails-dev mailing list without any answer. Please see his last mail to you and tails-dev from

Re: [Tails-dev] [gsoc] tails-greeter progress report

2011-08-05 Thread bertagaz
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 12:38:24AM +0800, † wrote: 05.08.2011 23:25, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org пишет: As I understood, you were also supposed to upload a Debian package to your tails repo, which I can't find. Sorry, forgot to push it. Should be available now. Seems not really, can't

Re: [Tails-dev] ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** [gsoc] tails-greeter update

2011-08-08 Thread bertagaz
Hi Max, Nice to see new commits! Comments below: On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 05:29:14PM +0800, † wrote: And another update - a bit quicker than I've expected :) Layout selection is now working for both greeter and gnome session. However it's been tested mostly with English and Русский, so if

Re: [Tails-dev] ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** group change on login

2011-08-15 Thread bertagaz
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 01:32:36AM +0800, † wrote: 15.08.2011 20:09, intrigeri пишет: The easiest workaround I can see would be to add a line in /etc/sudoers for the amnesia user, Just tried adding antry into /etc/sudoers.d from PostLogin: it doesn't affect current session. From you

Re: [Tails-dev] meeting time

2011-08-22 Thread bertagaz
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:45:51AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: † wrote (21 Aug 2011 18:24:37 GMT) : In a mean time, I've tried to add PostSession script which resets the password to default (this workaround was suggested before) but the problem is the there's already dummy script in squeeze for

[Tails-dev] automated tests

2012-06-18 Thread bertagaz
Hi, Been a long time I haven't pop up around. Hope everyone is fine here. I'm slowly recovering from my burn out and try to catch up on the todo items I left over. Still it doesn't prevent me to procrastinate. :) Lately I have played with cucumber for another project and thought it would be fun

Re: [Tails-dev] automated tests

2012-06-19 Thread bertagaz
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:53:38AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: This does look awesome! Thanks I agree ;) It requires to use jruby, as sikuli is java. But there might be other ways to implement it. Just curious: is this requirement brought in by the sikuli gem? Totally, because sikuli is

Re: [Tails-dev] automated tests

2012-06-19 Thread bertagaz
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:59:14AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Tiny remark: I think we could drop the last features component of features/cucumber/features/, so that features/cucumber/features/iceweasel/torified_browsing.feature becomes features/cucumber/iceweasel/torified_browsing.feature

Re: [Tails-dev] automated tests

2012-06-19 Thread bertagaz
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:39:17PM +0200, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:53:38AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Have you by chance found a way to *emulate* a USB 2.0 device in software? (qemu-kvm from current Debian testing/sid supports USB 2.0 passthrough, but

Re: [Tails-dev] automated tests

2012-06-20 Thread bertagaz
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:02:30AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (19 Jun 2012 11:39:17 GMT) : Also, I'm unsure about where the build happen. Do you mean where the tests are run from, or anything else? Yep, builds and tests are supposed to be started in the same

Re: [Tails-dev] automated tests

2012-06-24 Thread bertagaz
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 08:55:00AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: - file a whishlist bug, if needed, so that the Debian kernel gets these modules enabled? #678731 Nice work! So we have a reliable tested solution for this part of the tests AND in the future it will be usable in Debian. :)

Re: [Tails-dev] Fwd: Re: [tor-assistants] deb.tp.o only serves experimental builds

2012-06-28 Thread bertagaz
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:31:50PM +0200, anonym wrote: 27/06/12 23:12, intrigeri: anonym wrote (27 Jun 2012 19:35:06 GMT) : Therefore I'd like to stick with the (still stable) 0.2.2.x series, Agreed. but I'm unsure what our best option for that is. What comes to mind is yet

[Tails-dev] roadmap and broken windows

2012-08-17 Thread bertagaz
Hi, As a reminder, here's the decisions we took when discussing about the roadmap and how we'll solve the broken windows. * We'll organize sprints to work specifically on broken windows. It will likely be impossible in 2012 though, and hardly depends on fundings. But there are good

Re: [Tails-dev] roadmap and broken windows

2012-08-19 Thread bertagaz
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:22:51PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Robert Ransom wrote (17 Aug 2012 15:53:46 GMT) : re https://tails.boum.org/todo/fix_Internet_FTP_support/ : See https://bugs.torproject.org/1259 and https://bugs.torproject.org/3290 . You probably won't be able to fix this bug.

Re: [Tails-dev] Fwd: live-config_3.0.4-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-08-25 Thread bertagaz
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 05:03:50PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Hi, live-config (3.0.4-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Using /etc/live/config/* instead of /etc/live/config.d/*.conf and /live/image/live/config/* instead of /live/image/live/config.d/*.conf for consistency reasons.

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review feature/assymetric_gpgApplet [sic!]

2012-08-25 Thread bertagaz
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 09:21:22AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: anonym wrote (22 Aug 2012 08:53:02 GMT) : All is merged into experimental. Thanks. Unfortunately, I forgot to merge it at pre-freeze time, and unfortunately nobody noticed it in time since the todo/qa tag was not set after the

[Tails-dev] Upcoming release schedule plan

2012-08-25 Thread bertagaz
Hi, Following our discussions on the timeline for the next release, here is the plan we ended up with and I committed to send on this list : - Theoritically: ESR (August 28th) + 1 week = September 4th - August 23: release 0.13~rc1, do the test suite together - Week 35 - Mon 27th: ESR

Re: [Tails-dev] Please test 0.13-rc1

2012-08-27 Thread bertagaz
Hi, Done the memory wiping on shutdown test, seems to work in the expected way. I've added the liveusb-installer breaks emergency shutdown bug to the known issue page. Please remember to update this page while testing. So far, here are the remaining release tests for this RC : # Monkeysphere

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review bugfix/fix_background_readahead

2012-09-01 Thread bertagaz
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:15:41AM +, Ague Mill wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:51:04AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: As you know, I tend to think the problem fixed by this patch is not worth the risks involved at this stage of the release process, but my extra-carefulness does not extend

Re: [Tails-dev] Disabling 'PC speaker'?

2012-09-01 Thread bertagaz
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:23:54PM +0200, sajol...@pimienta.org wrote: On 24/08/12 11:19, Ague Mill wrote: Hi! I would like to blacklist the 'pcspkr' module. It is responsible for making the old-style 'PC speaker' work. On some computers, having the module loaded means loud beep at

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review bugfix/fix_background_readahead

2012-09-01 Thread bertagaz
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 11:02:22AM +, Ague Mill wrote: On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 12:35:27PM +0200, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote: Also I haven't found a corresponding ticket in the wiki, appart from the old todo/improve_boot_time_on_cd, which is marked as done. What should be written

Re: [Tails-dev] Iceweasel backports experiments

2012-09-20 Thread bertagaz
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 01:26:23PM -0400, Robert Ransom wrote: On 9/20/12, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote: Then by curiosity, I tried to see if Torbrowser's patches apply in Iceweasel source tree, starting from the current squeeze-backports version. And it

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review feature/use_ferm

2012-09-24 Thread bertagaz
Hi, On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:27:59PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Hi, Reviews welcome, candidate for the next major release. I'm not too happy with the initial commit (f00effb), because it removes the check for the needed tool existence and leaves the exit code checking to the implicit.

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review bugfix/fix_background_readahead

2012-09-26 Thread bertagaz
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 07:43:22PM +0200, a...@boum.org wrote: Hi, From: berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:28:28 +0200 Tested, works, merged into devel. Well done! I can't find it on devel. Did I miss something ou did you forget to push? Damn you nitpicker!

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review bugfix/fix_background_readahead

2012-09-27 Thread bertagaz
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 09:26:51AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (26 Sep 2012 18:28:06 GMT) : My fault, I did a simple merge and forgot the --no-ff option :/ How can I solve this? We won't rewrite history for such a tiny detail, so you cannot solve what already

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review feature/separate_Tor_streams

2012-09-30 Thread bertagaz
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:24:04AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Hi, Ague Mill wrote (26 Sep 2012 12:08:08 GMT) : htpdate lists a --proxy option. I may assume that when I don't specify this option, it will not use a proxy at all. But, the current code will still use a proxy if HTTPS_PROXY or

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-04 Thread bertagaz
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 05:33:18PM +, Ague Mill wrote: On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:21:05PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: intrigeri wrote (03 Oct 2012 17:30:10 GMT) : anonym wrote (03 Oct 2012 14:34:59 GMT) : So, with the current state of things it still looks like a bug to me, although

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review merge bugfix/udisks-do-not-make-Tails-USB-unbootable

2013-03-28 Thread bertagaz
Hi, On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 07:26:14PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, Ticket: todo/palimpsest:_do_not_make_Tails_USB_unbootable (updated and tagged todo/qa locally, can't push right now as the live website is locked / being rebuilt). Merged into experimental, candidate for 0.17.2 and 0.18

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review merge bugfix/udisks-do-not-make-Tails-USB-unbootable

2013-03-28 Thread bertagaz
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 06:22:07PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: hi, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (28 Mar 2013 13:58:38 GMT) : - Updated the ticket to pending. I can't see this. Perhaps you forgot to push your master branch? Right, forgot to push this one. Now fixed. bert.

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails Jenkins setup: present and future

2013-04-12 Thread bertagaz
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 04:10:08PM +, Abel Luck wrote: Amazing! As someone whose grappling with Jenkins and Android emulators, the idea of getting it working with a complicated vagrant setup is scary. We don't really use vagrant for the jenkins build. We do explain to people who wants to

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails Jenkins setup: present and future

2013-04-13 Thread bertagaz
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 01:28:27AM +, adrelanos wrote: Sounds great. intrigeri: Tails core developers can now push stable, testing, devel and experimental branches to `gitol...@git.puppet.tails.boum.org:tails'. Whenever they do this, an ISO image is built on builder.lizard. The

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review merge feature/install_gnome-accessibility-themes

2013-04-26 Thread bertagaz
Hi, On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:15:36AM +0200, sajol...@pimienta.org wrote: As suggested on the forum [1], I created a branch to install gnome-accessibility-theme. Ticket: /todo/install_gnome-accessibility-themes Branch: feature/install_gnome-accessibility-themes Candidate for Tails 0.18.

Re: [Tails-dev] Please reviewmerge feature/obfs3

2013-04-26 Thread bertagaz
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:05:00PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Hi, the feature/obfs3 branch adapts the ClientTransportPlugin line added to torrc when needed to support the obfs3 bridges, that the new obfsproxy 0.2.x (automatically picked up by the latest Tails ISO image builds) supports.

Re: [Tails-dev] Release schedule for Tails 0.20.1

2013-08-24 Thread bertagaz
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 03:32:38PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Hi, Core developers: please volunteer for the test day, or make it clear that you can't make it ASAP, thanks! Count me in for the 09/18 release tests! bert. ___ tails-dev mailing list

[Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins

2013-09-02 Thread bertagaz
Hi, Branch: feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins Ticket: #6248 (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6248) 64f39f1 Use more unique iso name when building from jenkins. This commit introduces more unique iso name when building in jenkins so that we will be able to keep several isos per

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins

2013-09-03 Thread bertagaz
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:03:48PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Hi, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (02 Sep 2013 10:59:48 GMT) : Branch: feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins Ticket: #6248 (https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6248) 64f39f1 Use more unique iso name when building from

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins

2013-09-06 Thread bertagaz
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:02:19PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: (seems like I haven't sent this email yet, oh.) berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (03 Sep 2013 19:04:38 GMT) : All remarks have been corrected in a commit pushed in the same branch. I've tentatively merged this into my local

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/More_uniq_built_iso_name_in_jenkins

2013-09-06 Thread bertagaz
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 08:30:45PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (06 Sep 2013 16:15:41 GMT) : Ready to be merged into the remaining branches for a final review round. I was going to merge into the other branches and push to lizard, but I'll let you turn the

Re: [Tails-dev] Release schedule for Tails 0.20.1

2013-09-09 Thread bertagaz
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 01:27:42PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Needless to say, with Tor 0.2.4 in and an updated Linux kernel, it would be most welcome if everyone who can gives it a try and makes sure their usecases still work as good as before. I've missed the review'n'merge window even if I

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/linux-3.10.11

2013-09-16 Thread bertagaz
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 07:07:06PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Hi, = please review feature/linux-3.10.1, and merge it into devel. Reviewed, tested successfully, so merged into devel. Congrats! bert. ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org

[Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/Sign_jenkins_builds_artifacts

2013-09-28 Thread bertagaz
Hi, The feature/Sign_jenkins_builds_artifacts branch add the ability to our build-tails script to automatically sign the build result when run in a jenkins environment. It has been merged into the experimental branch of lizard's Tails repo, and tested on jenkins.tails.boum.org. The result can be

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/Sign_jenkins_builds_artifacts

2013-09-29 Thread bertagaz
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 01:36:28PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (28 Sep 2013 09:22:16 GMT) : Please merge this branch in experimental, devel, stable, testing and feature/wheezy if happy with it. I'd be happy too, but the branch is based on devel, so I can't

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/same-startpage-custom-url-as-tbb

2013-10-15 Thread bertagaz
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 12:39:37PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Hi, this branch makes Tails use the same custom Startpage search URL as the TBB. This disables the new broken family filter, that e.g. is being assholish about LGBT stuff. See https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/8839

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/Debian-proposed-updates

2013-10-15 Thread bertagaz
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:31:10PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Hi, the next point release for Squeeze (6.0.8) is scheduled for Saturday October 19th. We'll have built 0.21~rc1 already at this point, so if we want it to have a set of packages as close as possible to the final ISO's, then we need

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge test/fix-detection-of-used-display

2013-10-15 Thread bertagaz
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:41:35AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Hi, the test suite never starts on my new test suite VM since it's looking for a file that never appears. Fixed in branch test/fix-detection-of-used-display. Please review and merge into devel. Tested, updated and merged into

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge (again) security/vidalia_in_its_own_user

2013-10-21 Thread bertagaz
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 03:03:42PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Hi, Branch: security/vidalia_in_its_own_user (no APT stuff) No ticket. Please review and merge into testing (and devel) in time for 0.21 final. Tested, merged and pushed into devel and testing. bert.

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/linux-3.10.11

2013-10-21 Thread bertagaz
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 02:29:51PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: intrigeri wrote (20 Oct 2013 11:45:54 GMT) : Actually, please merge feature/linux-3.10.11 into testing only, and please merge feature/linux-3.11-1 into devel (it his feature/linux-3.10.11 in, plus the revert, plus the switch to

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge bugfix/world-readable-persistence-state-file

2013-10-22 Thread bertagaz
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 02:19:13PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Hi, * branch: bugfix/world-readable-persistence-state-file, both in the tails-greeter and main Git repositories (+ APT) * ticket: https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6374 This branch fixes #6374, that was discovered while

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/perl5lib

2013-11-15 Thread bertagaz
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 04:40:48PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, I'll try to avoid pushing a huge review'n'merge request about incremental updates at the last minute before the 0.22 freeze, so here we go for a first batch. That's very kind of yours, and I must say that I'm impressed by the

Re: [Tails-dev] Testing feature/ff24 [Was: Release schedule for Tails 0.22]

2013-11-15 Thread bertagaz
Hi, On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:16:48AM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Kill Your TV wrote (14 Nov 2013 21:26:22 GMT) : As reported in IRC, I tested using KVM [...] Testing this branch on commit 0f5eab28. It seems that the unsafe browser now works. I can use it to navigate on the web. It also refuses

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review whisperback:a4dfd008

2013-11-25 Thread bertagaz
Hi, On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:51:10PM +, Alan wrote: Please review the following commit in whisperback master (yes, I know it's bad to work on master...) commit a4dfd008a9b11c9f6d41d4e25de891c21af6d235 Author: Tails developers amne...@boum.org Date: Tue Oct 29 14:15:05 2013 +

Re: [Tails-dev] Release schedule for Tails 0.22

2013-11-25 Thread bertagaz
Hi, Given Alan is in a review'n'merge hell of a mood, I'm committing to the following: On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:49:35PM +, Alan wrote: Hi, intrigeri wrote (24 Sep 2013 17:51:54 GMT) : * feature/incremental-upgrades: I should have a beta ready to be reviewed'n'merged by

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/incremental-upgrades

2013-11-28 Thread bertagaz
of action is: 1. Someone does the code review, makes sure the changes are self-contained enough not to break anything else, and merges into devel in time for the 0.22 freeze. No testing at this stage. (It's late, just as planned and announced previously. bertagaz

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/incremental-upgrades

2013-11-29 Thread bertagaz
as planned and announced previously. bertagaz volunteered to review'n'merge it already.) Ok, didn't see any problems in there so I merged it, in git and APT. Updated the tickets too. I hope my lame perl understanding didn't miss something in iuk's code, but maybe this review wasn't needed. bert

Re: [Tails-dev] Scripts for importing Transifex translations, please review

2013-11-30 Thread bertagaz
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 04:08:35PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, winterfa...@riseup.net wrote (29 Nov 2013 14:14:46 GMT) : Please review and merge: - repo winterfairy/tails, branch import-translations (based on devel) Merged and pushed some refactoring commits on top. bertagaz

Re: [Tails-dev] Tor Browser branding in Tails?

2013-12-02 Thread bertagaz
features/images/IceweaselRunning.png -- does that part of the new Iceweasel/Tor browser still look the same? (Sorry, I don't have time (or the bandwidth) to check this myself right now.) The window titlebar icon doesn't change so I hope it does not break the test suite. bertagaz

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge bugfix/back-to-linux-3.10 [Was: Fix sdmem on Intel graphic hardware, please review]

2013-12-05 Thread bertagaz
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 02:43:21PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, intrigeri wrote (01 Dec 2013 19:19:51 GMT) : Done. Didn't see issues when building and starting it. Plus it had lot of tests lately. So merged into testing and devel, both in git and APT. bert.

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/monkeysign

2013-12-09 Thread bertagaz
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 08:39:58PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, please review'n'merge feature/monkeysign into devel (candidate for 0.23). Ticket: #6338 Merged even if this might need a bit of documentationi though, as monkeysign errors out with a backtrace if one don't use the --no-mail

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge bugfix/unsafe-browser-vs.-FF24

2013-12-11 Thread bertagaz
. bertagaz volunteered to take care of it. Merged. bert. ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/torbutton-1.6.5.1

2013-12-12 Thread bertagaz
and detect issues ASAP. Please review'n'merge into devel (not testing, IMHO it's not worth it). bertagaz volunteered to take care of it. Merged into APT, but git refused to merge it in devel, already up-to-date it says, surprisingly. :) Shall I merge into testing and experimental too, now

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge bugfix/tor-0.2.4-is-stable [Was: Build broken, stay tuned (or try bugfix/tor-0.2.4-is-stable)]

2013-12-15 Thread bertagaz
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:50:06PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, intrigeri wrote (13 Dec 2013 13:38:02 GMT) : all our branches currently fail to build since deb.tpo's tor-0.2.4.x-squeeze APT source was deprecated, as Tor 0.2.4.x was declared stable. = please review

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge bugfix/use-our-own-sqlite

2013-12-15 Thread bertagaz
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 04:31:17PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, Mike Homey has made his last Iceweasel package use some in-tree libraries instead of the system one, and hence has removed some of these libraries from mozilla.d.n's squeeze-backports repository. Too bad we need these

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/monkeysign

2013-12-17 Thread bertagaz
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:06:53AM +, sajol...@pimienta.org wrote: intrigeri: Merged I push a minor documentation fix with commit f0762cd. Shall I merge it myself? That seems minor and relevant, I guess you can. :) even if this might need a bit of documentationi though, as

Re: [Tails-dev] Last steps toward enabling incremental upgrades by default [Was: Please test incremental upgrades (from 0.22~rc1 to 0.22~rc2)]

2013-12-17 Thread bertagaz
phase three tickets accordingly: https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/6014 Yay. Congrats, I'm excited to see this coming in the wild! Next steps: * bertagaz reviews feature/incremental-upgrades-integration (but does not merge it yet) and hopefully ACK's it; ETA? I'll try to do

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/monkeysign

2013-12-17 Thread bertagaz
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:27:57PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (17 Dec 2013 11:44:11 GMT) : Doesn't piping it to Mutt work? monkeysign currently being command-line only, I was thinking more of Mutt users than Claws Mail's ones when I thought we

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/monkeysign

2013-12-18 Thread bertagaz
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:26:32AM +0100, intrigeri wrote: berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (17 Dec 2013 22:29:20 GMT) : I've just reported this problem upstream. Being the one that raised the issue. I could have done that myself after our discussion. Credits, etc... I felt it was my

Re: [Tails-dev] Last steps toward enabling incremental upgrades by default [

2013-12-18 Thread bertagaz
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:36:29PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (17 Dec 2013 18:10:18 GMT) : Congrats, I'm excited to see this coming in the wild! :) ... and I'm scared to discover the remaining bugs we've missed :] Next steps: * bertagaz

[Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge test/rjb-migration

2013-12-24 Thread bertagaz
Hi, Now that a more recent libvirt containing patches to support the removable flag for USB devices has been uploaded to Wheezy-backports, I've updated the test/rjb-migration feature branch so that installation now is easy for anyone running Wheezy. Test process of this branch should be to start

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge test/rjb-migration

2013-12-26 Thread bertagaz
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 08:36:57PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (24 Dec 2013 11:39:27 GMT) : and then run the test suite. I get the same error you had a week ago or so: Call to virDomainCreateWithFlags failed: unsupported configuration:

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge test/rjb-migration

2013-12-27 Thread bertagaz
it looks like the Windows camouflage script misses an update for FF24. Reported as #6536, will try to fix in time for 0.22.1 as it's a regression. I'm testing a fix for this. Once I'm done with validating this part of the test suite, I'll ask bertagaz to review all the commits I've

Re: [Tails-dev] Release schedule for Tails 0.22.1

2013-12-29 Thread bertagaz
soon (Torbutton and Iceweasel prefs updates). bertagaz said he would take care of these ones today: * #6496 (Drop sqlite3, nss and nspr backports from our APT repository) * #6477 (getTorbuttonUserAgent differs from browser user-agent) I'll finish these tonight, already spend my afternoon

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge test/rjb-migration

2013-12-29 Thread bertagaz
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 07:36:15PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (27 Dec 2013 09:36:32 GMT) : Just one word to sum up my feelings: hurray! :) :) The test suite is now entirely green for me, with the two known exceptions that are documented (git grep XXX --

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/torbrowser-24.2.0esr-1+tails1

2013-12-29 Thread bertagaz
listed on the ticket from our APT repo. Then, we can 1. drop the corresponding temporary APT pinning rules since they won't be needed anymore; 2. take care of #6497 (I'm on it). Assigned to bertagaz for review, candidate for 0.22.1. Done, branch merged in devel (git and APT repo), packages

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge bugfix/6536-IE-icon-in-Windows-camouflage-mode

2013-12-29 Thread bertagaz
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:55:39AM +0100, intrigeri wrote: berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (29 Dec 2013 23:37:53 GMT) : Candidate for 0.22.1 = please merge into stable and devel. While testing other branches, I tested this one too, so I merged it too. Cool! It seems you forgot to merge

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/torbrowser-24.2.0esr-1+tails1

2013-12-29 Thread bertagaz
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:53:30AM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (29 Dec 2013 23:34:43 GMT) : Assigned to bertagaz for review, candidate for 0.22.1. Done, branch merged in devel (git and APT repo), packages removed from the APT repo, in the devel suite

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/torbutton-1.6.5.3 (#6566)

2014-01-05 Thread bertagaz
for the sake of easing bug reporting upstream etc. It passes the automated test suite (torified_browsing, unsafe_browser features). Candidate for 0.22.1 = please merge into stable and devel. No commits, only an APT merge to do. Assigned to bertagaz, but if e.g. Alan wants to do it, I'm sure

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/dont_autostart_iceweasel + test/dont_autostart_iceweasel

2014-01-09 Thread bertagaz
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:52:20AM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, intrigeri wrote (09 Jan 2014 10:26:11 GMT) : I patched it so it needs another review before merging. Sorry... I'll take care of it. Updated the ticket. Done and merged. Now, what about the test/dont_autostart_iceweasel

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/dont_autostart_iceweasel + test/dont_autostart_iceweasel

2014-01-10 Thread bertagaz
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 05:53:49PM +0100, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:52:20AM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, intrigeri wrote (09 Jan 2014 10:26:11 GMT) : I patched it so it needs another review before merging. Sorry... I'll take care of it. Updated

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.3] bugfix/8082-remove-PulseAudio-warning

2014-10-14 Thread bertagaz
Hi, On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:58:38PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Hi, please merge bugfix/8082-remove-PulseAudio-warning into devel, for Tails 1.3. Merged, congrats. bert. ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org

Re: [Tails-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: build_Tails_ISO_experimental #1457

2014-12-23 Thread bertagaz
Hi, On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 06:29:31PM +, Alan wrote: These are the result of review and merges that built fine on my machine. I don't understand where is the problem... Network troubles as I read it : Translation-en 404 Not Found Fetched 24.5 MB in 40min 47s (10.0 kB/s) W: Failed to

[Tails-dev] Lizard services outage

2015-01-01 Thread bertagaz
Hi, To prepare Lizard to host its new shiny hardware, it needs to get its kernel upgraded to the Wheezy-backports one to support such new bones. But the upgrade seems to raise troubles in the virtual network firewalling, so expect outages of Lizard's services today while I'm trying to debug it

Re: [Tails-dev] Automated builds specification

2015-01-26 Thread bertagaz
Hi, On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 08:14:55PM +0100, bertagaz wrote: On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 08:07:46PM +, sajolida wrote: bertagaz: 0. We might also want a mechanism for devs to pro-actively state they want to keep their branches being build even if the last commit was older than

Re: [Tails-dev] AdBlock Plus in Tails' Tor Browser

2015-01-26 Thread bertagaz
Hi, This answer might pop up late now that #8665 is in Ready for QA state, still it might bring new questions. Sorry for that. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:49:10AM +0100, intrigeri wrote: mercedes508 wrote (22 Jan 2015 17:54:53 GMT) : And I'm wondering how important the fingerrint issue is,

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.3] feature/7999-Vietnamese-input

2015-02-04 Thread bertagaz
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 11:07:31AM +0100, intrigeri wrote: this branch adds support for Vietnamese input via the IBus Unikey engine. Please review'n'merge into devel for 1.3. I'm not much comfortable with the workaround of Debian bug #714932, I think the patch lying in this bug report would

Re: [Tails-dev] Sandboxing Tor Browser: strategy for tracking upstream AppArmor profile

2015-02-04 Thread bertagaz
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 12:10:31PM +0100, anonym wrote: On 04/02/15 11:36, intrigeri wrote: [...] Good enough? Shall we try that and see? I've implemented #3 already, and can do #1 and #2 for Tails 1.3.1. I'm convinced and have nothing more to add than well done!. :) I do too. That

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.3] bugfix/quote-wrappers-arguments (#8830, #8603)

2015-02-05 Thread bertagaz
) affects e.g. Git cloning over SSH, which should be tested when reviewing #8680 too, so I've assigned this new merge request to bertagaz (who took #8680 a week ago) for review. bertagaz, if that's not OK with you, please de-assign yourself. Tested by hand, wget and git works fine, so merged

Re: [Tails-dev] Automated builds specification

2015-01-19 Thread bertagaz
Hi, On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 08:07:46PM +, sajolida wrote: bertagaz: 0. We might also want a mechanism for devs to pro-actively state they want to keep their branches being build even if the last commit was older than the last release. IIRC If I understand correctly, adding

Re: [Tails-dev] Automated builds specification

2015-01-18 Thread bertagaz
Hi, Some thoughts and questions, raised in parts from past IRL discussions. Consider it like a ping for this thread. :) On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 08:07:13PM +0100, Jurre van Bergen wrote: Hi, For the first iteration, which is automatically build of interesting branches, we need to specify:

Re: [Tails-dev] review and merge feature/7752-keyringer

2015-02-10 Thread bertagaz
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 11:49:40AM +, sajolida wrote: Emma Peel: sajolida sajol...@pimienta.org wrote: Ticket: https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/7752 Branch: feature/7752-keyringer into devel Milestone: 1.3 At the end of the documentation it says: Make sure to update

Re: [Tails-dev] Automated builds specification

2015-02-19 Thread bertagaz
Hi, On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:32:59PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: bertagaz wrote (16 Feb 2015 14:32:57 GMT) : On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:49:02PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: That's a logical awesome idea I'm ashamed not to have had sooner. Still, it seems that it comes too late, after some

Re: [Tails-dev] Automated builds specification

2015-02-19 Thread bertagaz
Hi, On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 04:39:22PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: bertagaz wrote (16 Feb 2015 12:03:12 GMT) : Ack, sounds reasonable. However from what I've seen, it sometimes means a lot of branches so I wonder if we scaled our infra enough for that, as we didn't include this branches in our

Re: [Tails-dev] Automated builds specification

2015-02-16 Thread bertagaz
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:29:45PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: Hi, bertagaz wrote (18 Jan 2015 16:39:28 GMT) : 0. Do we think we might also need or want a mechanism to blacklist a branch, or we should just assume that our algos will only select the right ones and not hit any corner cases

Re: [Tails-dev] Automated builds specification

2015-02-16 Thread bertagaz
Hi, Thx for the extensive review! On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:49:02PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: We're already drafted some scenario's on: https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/automated_builds_and_tests/autobuild_specs/ I have a few concerns, though: * Scenario 2 : developer doesn't make it

  1   2   >