Re: [GTALUG] lazy jail server admin forced to act

D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote on 2024-01-07 19:29: You probably need to add a google authentication record to your domain name to | reduce the chance of your email messages being rejected by gmail. I don't know what that is. Googling responses suggest you might be talking about a Google

Re: [GTALUG] lazy jail server admin forced to act

On 2024-01-07 22:29, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote: | From: Kevin Cozens via talk | You probably need to add a google authentication record to your domain name to | reduce the chance of your email messages being rejected by gmail. I don't know what that is. I had to check the TXT

Re: [GTALUG] lazy jail server admin forced to act

| From: Kevin Cozens via talk | You probably need to add a google authentication record to your domain name to | reduce the chance of your email messages being rejected by gmail. I don't know what that is. Googling responses suggest you might be talking about a Google Worspace thing. I don't

Re: [GTALUG] lazy jail server admin forced to act

On 2024-01-07 12:27, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote: Mails from my domain have started to be rejected by gmail. To placate gmail, I've added an SPF record to my doman: Some of my email messages were winding up in other peoples spam folders. I added SPF, DKIM, and google authentication

Re: [GTALUG] lazy jail server admin forced to act

D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote on 2024-01-07 09:27: Mails from my domain have started to be rejected by gmail. To placate gmail, I've added an SPF record to my doman: Another trick to help with email delivery to Google is to implement IPv6 in Postfix if it's available. rb --- Post to

[GTALUG] video: The Dark Side of Open Source

This video was recommended to me: Chris Titus Tech: The Dark Side of Open Source Apparently Titus recommended Thorium, a mod of the Chromium browser. Now he feel burned because of a couple of non-mainstream Easter eggs. It seems mostly overwrought

[GTALUG] Reminder: GTALUG Monthly Meeting

The Dark Side of Open Source 09 January, 2024 at 07:30 PM We'll start with a review of the following YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-02fW-n4qg followed by comments and an open discussion. We're going to use Big BLue Button for this meeting:

Re: [GTALUG] meeting Tuesday?

I have a paid Zoom account, so I could easily set-up an on-line GTALug meeting without any issues. That noted I would want someone else to run the meeting as for several reasons, I don't think I would be good at that. So, if a Zoom instance on Tuesday would be useful, let me know and I'll set

Re: [GTALUG] lazy jail server admin forced to act

D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote on 2024-01-07 10:10: | You may find that you need DKIM and DMARC as well. If you’re using | postfix it’s fairly easy to hook opendkim in. | My biggest hurdle was trying to find clear concise guides. Links?

Re: [GTALUG] lazy jail server admin forced to act

| From: D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk | How to read this: | mx: | email sent by mimosa.com should only come from its servers | declared in MX DNS records More accurately, this means that mail that says it is from mimosa.com is OK if it comes from one of the

Re: [GTALUG] lazy jail server admin forced to act

| From: John Sellens via talk | You may find that you need DKIM and DMARC as well. If you’re using | postfix it’s fairly easy to hook opendkim in. Yeah. | My biggest hurdle was trying to find clear concise guides. Links?--- Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org Unsubscribe from this

Re: [GTALUG] lazy jail server admin forced to act

You may find that you need DKIM and DMARC as well. If you’re using postfix it’s fairly easy to hook opendkim in. My biggest hurdle was trying to find clear concise guides. John --- Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org Unsubscribe from this mailing list

[GTALUG] lazy jail server admin forced to act

Mails from my domain have started to be rejected by gmail. To placate gmail, I've added an SPF record to my doman: mimosa.com. IN TXT "v=spf1 mx ~all" How to read this: v=spf1: this TXT record is an SPF version 1 record mx:

Re: [GTALUG] meeting Tuesday?

D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote on 2024-01-05 22:58: The venue might be changed from our Big Blue Button room. Our host, LPI, was set to switch from BBB to some NextCloud facility. If we don't get further directions, try https://blue.lpi.org/b/eva-zjc-gjy-kgl If the BBB site isn't

Re: [GTALUG] meeting Tuesday?

I think many of us are simply snowed under? It is that time of (new) year. Speaking for myself, I have over ten servers that needs replacing yesterday (The Centos7.9 date is approaching so very fast - are others among us experiencing the same stress? ) BTW - heads up - the AlmaLinux auto