On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 6:32 PM Scott Allen wrote:
>
> On Sun, 30 Apr 2023 at 18:53, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> > PasberryPi Pico w lan 8720 module (I lprefer wired communications - -
> > security)
>
> I found this article:
>
On 2023-04-30 18:53, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
You likely quite disbelieve me - - - you are welcome to check for yourself.
I would be quite happy to be proven wrong!
Unless you're using DHCP, that device wouldn't be usable. What is it?
---
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
On Sun, 30 Apr 2023 at 18:53, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> beagleBoneBlack
It appears that it runs Debian Linux, so you would set an IPv4 address
with any length of mask in the usual way for Debian.
--
Scott
---
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
Unsubscribe from this mailing list
On Sun, 30 Apr 2023 at 18:53, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> PasberryPi Pico w lan 8720 module (I lprefer wired communications - -
> security)
I found this article:
https://www.raspberrypi.com/news/how-to-add-ethernet-to-raspberry-pi-pico/
If you follow it, your Pico will obtain an IP address
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 05:53:04PM -0500, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 5:21 PM James Knott via talk wrote:
> >
> > On 2023-04-30 17:55, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> > > I just spent over 1/2 hour looking at a number of SoCs (3) and
> > > microcontrollers
> > > (also 3)
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 5:21 PM James Knott via talk wrote:
>
> On 2023-04-30 17:55, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> > I just spent over 1/2 hour looking at a number of SoCs (3) and
> > microcontrollers
> > (also 3) and I can't find one where I can give it this 'classless'
> > address you're
> >
On 2023-04-30 17:55, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
I just spent over 1/2 hour looking at a number of SoCs (3) and microcontrollers
(also 3) and I can't find one where I can give it this 'classless'
address you're
talking about.
Is there nowhere to set the subnet mask? Either with / notation or
On Sun, 30 Apr 2023 at 17:56, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> I just spent over 1/2 hour looking at a number of SoCs (3) and
> microcontrollers
> (also 3) and I can't find one where I can give it this 'classless'
> address you're
> talking about.
Specifics?
--
Scott
---
Post to this mailing list
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 9:52 AM James Knott via talk wrote:
>
> On 2023-04-30 10:40, o1bigtenor wrote:
> > You seem to have this mastered - - - - then:
>
> Yep. I also had some courses when I was at IBM, in the late 90s, and
> also went for my CCNA a few years ago.
> >
> > How do I write more
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 03:44:03PM -0400, James Knott via talk wrote:
> If you're on Rogers, you get 2 IPv4 addresses.
Well I am not currently, but in a few months I will be. Currently using
Teksavvy.
--
Len Sorensen
---
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
Unsubscribe from this mailing
On 2023-04-30 16:20, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote:
| If you're on Rogers, you get 2 IPv4 addresses.
As far as I know, only if you turn off the router function of your
Rogers-supplied
box (modem/router/AP/...).
Yep, you have to use bridge mode.
---
Post to this mailing list
| From: James Knott via talk
| If you're on Rogers, you get 2 IPv4 addresses.
As far as I know, only if you turn off the router function of your
Rogers-supplied
box (modem/router/AP/...).
---
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
Unsubscribe from this mailing list
On 2023-04-30 15:40, Lennart Sorensen via talk wrote:
Yeah I certainly get a /56 IPv6 block from my ISP along with a single
IPv4 address. Works nicely.
If you're on Rogers, you get 2 IPv4 addresses.
---
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
Unsubscribe from this mailing list
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 09:35:04AM -0500, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> This sounds like a reasonable solution until you actually set up the router.
> On 192.168.0.0 - - - - well I haven't found a way to talk directly to more
> than
> 254 devices - - - - or have you?
>
> Now if you want to blow a
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 09:30:27AM -0500, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> Perhaps you might persuade my ISP to get their collective posteriors
> in gear - - - yes?
Yeah I certainly get a /56 IPv6 block from my ISP along with a single
IPv4 address. Works nicely.
--
Len Sorensen
---
Post to this
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 09:40:00AM -0500, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> You seem to have this mastered - - - - then:
>
> How do I write more than 254 addresses in ipv4 using only the quad?
>
> (You get no / anything - - - - just the 4 quads!
> The idea is that these are all permanently set - - -
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 12:18:26AM -0400, Val Kulkov via talk wrote:
> Next time you connect to some public WiFi network, execute "ifconfig" to
> see your IP address and your subnet. In my observations, airports WiFi
> networks typically use the /22 subnets (up to 1022 addresses). Most
>
On 2023-04-29 17:39, James Knott wrote:
Also, originally, all IPv4 addresses had the same size subnet, /8
This is shown in this document, about an early version of IPv4. It's
shown in the diagram on page 1 and the text on page 3, which describe
the network (8 bits) and host (24 bits)
On 2023-04-30 10:40, o1bigtenor wrote:
You seem to have this mastered - - - - then:
Yep. I also had some courses when I was at IBM, in the late 90s, and
also went for my CCNA a few years ago.
How do I write more than 254 addresses in ipv4 using only the quad?
(You get no / anything - - -
On 2023-04-30 10:35, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
This sounds like a reasonable solution until you actually set up the router.
On 192.168.0.0 - - - - well I haven't found a way to talk directly to more than
254 devices - - - - or have you?
Now if you want to blow a lot of money on routers you
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 8:28 PM James Knott via talk wrote:
>
> On 2023-04-29 21:18, Kevin Cozens via talk wrote:
> > On 2023-04-29 16:04, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> >> (My head is swimming with all the explanations on IP routing - - -
> >> have spent about 3 hours now looking at various
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 8:20 PM James Knott via talk wrote:
>
> On 2023-04-29 17:48, Scott Allen wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 at 17:39, James Knott wrote:
> >> That's only true because people have learned a lot of bad habits with IPv4.
> > No, it's because IPv4 addresses are annotated as
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 3:31 PM James Knott via talk wrote:
>
> On 2023-04-29 16:04, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> > If I set up a router using the 192.168.1.1 I can access some 254
> > distinct IP addresses from my router.
> >
> > If I set up a router using the 176.10.1.1 how many distinct IP
> >
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 at 16:04, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
>
> If I set up a router using the 192.168.1.1 I can access some 254
> distinct IP addresses from my router.
>
> If I set up a router using the 176.10.1.1 how many distinct IP
> addresses can I access?
>
> (I'm thinking some 64k worth but
On 2023-04-29 21:18, Kevin Cozens via talk wrote:
On 2023-04-29 16:04, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
(My head is swimming with all the explanations on IP routing - - -
have spent about 3 hours now looking at various documents - - - - I
just can't find a clear answer. The first statement is my
On 2023-04-29 17:48, Scott Allen wrote:
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 at 17:39, James Knott wrote:
That's only true because people have learned a lot of bad habits with IPv4.
No, it's because IPv4 addresses are annotated as x.x.x.x
Sticking with class size masks makes it easy to separate the network
On 2023-04-29 16:04, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
(My head is swimming with all the explanations on IP routing - - -
have spent about 3 hours now looking at various documents - - - - I
just can't find a clear answer. The first statement is my present
network - - - I'm trying to figure out how to
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 at 17:39, James Knott wrote:
> That's only true because people have learned a lot of bad habits with IPv4.
No, it's because IPv4 addresses are annotated as x.x.x.x
Sticking with class size masks makes it easy to separate the network
address part from the device address part.
On 2023-04-29 17:39, James Knott wrote:
That's only true because people have learned a lot of bad habits with
IPv4. Also, originally, all IPv4 addresses had the same size subnet,
/8. As that allowed only 256 networks, address classes were
introduced, to provide more, smaller networks. Then
On 2023-04-29 16:39, Scott Allen wrote:
Also, forget about address classes. They've
been obsolete for over 30 years.
That said, sticking with class sized masks and matching the network
numbers for class based networks tends to simplify addressing and make
things less confusing.
That's only
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 at 16:31, James Knott via talk wrote:
> Also, forget about address classes. They've
> been obsolete for over 30 years.
That said, sticking with class sized masks and matching the network
numbers for class based networks tends to simplify addressing and make
things less
On 2023-04-29 16:04, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
If I set up a router using the 192.168.1.1 I can access some 254
distinct IP addresses from my router.
If I set up a router using the 176.10.1.1 how many distinct IP
addresses can I access?
You're looking at the wrong numbers. What determines
Here is an OK set of videos on how IPv4 addressing works:
Pt. 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddM9AcreVqY
Pt. 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQ3T14SIlV4
Pt. 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xlzlgYGqW8
Just try to not pay attention to his millennial bro-ism and excessive use of
the
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 at 16:04, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> If I set up a router using the 176.10.1.1 how many distinct IP
> addresses can I access?
Note that for a local private LAN, you shouldn't use 176.10.x.x
The range allocated for private LANs is 172.16.x.x to 172.31.x.x
Now it's time for
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 13:04 o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> Greetings
>
> (My head is swimming with all the explanations on IP routing - - -
> have spent about 3 hours now looking at various documents - - - - I
> just can't find a clear answer. The first statement is my present
> network - - -
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 at 16:04, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> If I set up a router using the 176.10.1.1 how many distinct IP
> addresses can I access?
>
> (I'm thinking some 64k worth but dunno!)
Correct, except you can't use all 1s or all 0s as a host address, so 64k-2.
--
Scott
---
Post to this
36 matches
Mail list logo
