Re: [GTALUG] Fedora Netinstall

On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 13:17:59 -0500 Bob Jonkman via talk wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Howard wrote: > > I have now updated my website install notes. I state in them that > the documentation sucks, and that all the default values work fine. I >

Re: [GTALUG] Fedora Netinstall

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Howard wrote: > I have now updated my website install notes. I state in them that the documentation sucks, and that all the default values work fine. I did not fill in the repository window. Pretty good notes, Howard!

Re: [GTALUG] Fedora Netinstall

On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 15:44:24 -0500 Bob Jonkman via talk wrote: > > Are there any down sides to using a 32-bit machine as a web- or mail > server? I'm thinking low power consumption, make that an > attractive alternate use. Bob, This machine works fine for the stuff I do

Re: [GTALUG] Fedora Netinstall

On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 10:49:08 -0500 (EST) "D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk" wrote: > | From: Howard Gibson via talk > > |I have just upgraded my 32-bit laptop to Fedora 27. The install DVD > |is no longer available for 32-bit. I had to do a Netinstall.

Re: [GTALUG] Fedora Netinstall

On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 21:15:57 + Giles Orr via talk wrote: > > > I'm reading all of this with some interest: I tried a Fedora Net Install > about four months back. And I appear to be the only person on this list > who had a problem with it. Specifically, I got to the page

Re: [GTALUG] Fedora Netinstall

On 2018-02-11 12:08 AM, Bob Jonkman via talk wrote: > > I'm already using IceCat, so the browser isn't my problem. IceCat uses the old Firefox (< 57) codebase, while Firefox 58 is available on 32-bit linux. The new code is much more memory and CPU-efficient. Stewart --- Talk Mailing List

Re: [GTALUG] Fedora Netinstall

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hugh wrote: > What's the processor? I'll have to check. It's possible the two P200s have different CPUs, since there are other differences. And I may be remembering the speed of the dead 64-bit laptop, not the 32-bit laptop. > | But now that some

Re: [GTALUG] Fedora Netinstall

| From: Bob Jonkman via talk | I have a Toshiba Satellite P200 laptop, 3 GHz dual-core CPU, 2 GBytes | RAM, 200 GByte HD, 4 USB ports, and, most wonderful of all, a 1440x900 | px 17" screen. What's the processor? I read a review of a P200 that had a Core Duo T2350 processor

Re: [GTALUG] Fedora Netinstall

On 10 February 2018 at 20:44, Bob Jonkman via talk wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hugh wrote: > > I would think that most 32-bit only laptops are not really useful > > any longer. > > I have a Toshiba Satellite P200 laptop, 3 GHz dual-core CPU, 2

Re: [GTALUG] Fedora Netinstall

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hugh wrote: > I would think that most 32-bit only laptops are not really useful > any longer. I have a Toshiba Satellite P200 laptop, 3 GHz dual-core CPU, 2 GBytes RAM, 200 GByte HD, 4 USB ports, and, most wonderful of all, a 1440x900 px 17" screen.

Re: [GTALUG] Fedora Netinstall

On 02/09/2018 10:27 PM, Howard Gibson via talk wrote: >I have just upgraded my 32-bit laptop to Fedora 27. The install DVD is no > longer available for 32-bit. I had to do a Netinstall. Netinstall is poorly > documented, but the default settings all work, I was able to select the >

[GTALUG] Fedora Netinstall

I have just upgraded my 32-bit laptop to Fedora 27. The install DVD is no longer available for 32-bit. I had to do a Netinstall. Netinstall is poorly documented, but the default settings all work, I was able to select the software I wanted, and it has all worked very well. I think I