Re: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead.
i totally agree with you, enough is enough. this list is for helping people if they are having problems with window eyes not for speculation as to what or what may not happen with it, all the best, john. -Original Message- From: Diana Kube via Talk Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2017 12:25 PM To: 'Stephen Clark' ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List' Subject: RE: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. This is getting really old and quite boring. All that is happening here is rampant speculation and scare mongering by a few people who either work for JAWS or have so little to do with their lives, they find this amusing. It looks like a full on campaign to undermine Window -Eyes with nothing in the way of evidence to support the conjectures. And FYI, developers age and retire. People move on to other jobs, get promoted and sometimes leave the industry altogether. It doesn't mean they can't be replaced by equally talented individuals. If you want to talk about rationality, don't make assertions unless you have proof to back it up. Sorry but comments like some unknown person said so in a forum or where particular links may or may not lead isn't evidence. Now if you have a press release or company statement, I'll be happy to listen further. Finally, it is quite telling that these rumours all come from the same few people. What does this suggest? -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+kube=netspace.net...@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Clark via Talk Sent: Saturday, 13 May 2017 3:46 AM To: Peter Duran via Talk <talk@lists.window-eyes.com> Subject: Re: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. Not only that, but go to the AI Squared web site and follow the links. That should also tell you something. Here's a little the majority of them link to the Freedom Scientific site. On 5/9/2017 8:59 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: Well, you are welcome to your personal delusions. Remember all the folks at GW Micro who did the development work are gone, so who will carry on? Peter Duran -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 6:38 PM To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com Subject: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. If you're trying to get people to stop using Window-eyes, you're probably in for a pretty good fight there. and there has been no official announcement that Window-eyes is indeed dead. people will still use it no matter what you say. On 5/9/2017 5:32 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: Well, Window-Eyes is unfortunately definitely dead. It is irrational to presuppose that VFO will support two competing screen readers, with one a lot cheeper than the other. Sad to say, JAWS won and WE lost the screen-reader wars. Those of us with technical skills ought to help NVDA to improve over time so we can keep up with Windows 10 advances. Peter Duran -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com ] On Behalf Of Vaughan Dodd via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 5:11 PM To: Russ Kiehne; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! Can one be created? Vaughan. -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.co m] On Behalf Of Russ Kiehne via Talk Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2017 1:37 a.m. To: Darrell Bowles; Peter Duran; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: Re: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! I just wished NVDA had a Window Eyes keyboard layout? -Original Message- From: Darrell Bowles via Talk Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 11:00 AM To: Peter Duran ; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! I didn't say that window-eyes would survive. And didn't I already say that JAWS, NVDA and narrator are left on the windows platform? -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dgbowles=msn@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Peter Duran via Talk Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 1:58 PM To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List' <talk@lists.window-eyes.com> Subject: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! It always amazes me when smart folks (like on this list) prefer a fanticy instead of reality. There is absolutely no reason for Window-Eyes to continue and compete with JFW. Why would they do that? There are 3 options to check out: Narrator on Windows 10, NVDA, and VoiceOver. So, get real and get to work. I suppose those of you who believe that Window-Eyes will stay around also believe that the health care bill that passed the House last week will cover everybody as promised by Trump instead of leaving 24 million folks without any health care. Peter Duran ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those o
RE: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead.
This is getting really old and quite boring. All that is happening here is rampant speculation and scare mongering by a few people who either work for JAWS or have so little to do with their lives, they find this amusing. It looks like a full on campaign to undermine Window -Eyes with nothing in the way of evidence to support the conjectures. And FYI, developers age and retire. People move on to other jobs, get promoted and sometimes leave the industry altogether. It doesn't mean they can't be replaced by equally talented individuals. If you want to talk about rationality, don't make assertions unless you have proof to back it up. Sorry but comments like some unknown person said so in a forum or where particular links may or may not lead isn't evidence. Now if you have a press release or company statement, I'll be happy to listen further. Finally, it is quite telling that these rumours all come from the same few people. What does this suggest? -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+kube=netspace.net...@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Clark via Talk Sent: Saturday, 13 May 2017 3:46 AM To: Peter Duran via Talk <talk@lists.window-eyes.com> Subject: Re: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. Not only that, but go to the AI Squared web site and follow the links. That should also tell you something. Here's a little the majority of them link to the Freedom Scientific site. On 5/9/2017 8:59 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: > Well, you are welcome to your personal delusions. Remember all the > folks at GW Micro who did the development work are gone, so who will carry on? > > Peter Duran > > > -Original Message- > From: Talk > [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] > On Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 6:38 PM > To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com > Subject: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. > > If you're trying to get people to stop using > Window-eyes, you're probably in for a pretty good fight there. and > there has been no official announcement that Window-eyes is indeed dead. > people will still use it no matter what you say. > > > > On 5/9/2017 5:32 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: >> Well, Window-Eyes is unfortunately definitely dead. It is irrational >> to presuppose that VFO will support two competing screen readers, >> with one a lot cheeper than the other. Sad to say, JAWS won and WE >> lost the screen-reader wars. >> >> Those of us with technical skills ought to help NVDA to improve over >> time > so >> we can keep up with Windows 10 advances. >> >> Peter Duran >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Talk >> [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com >> ] On Behalf Of Vaughan Dodd via Talk >> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 5:11 PM >> To: Russ Kiehne; Window-Eyes Discussion List >> Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! >> >> Can one be created? >> >> Vaughan. >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Talk >> [mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.co >> m] On Behalf Of Russ Kiehne via Talk >> Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2017 1:37 a.m. >> To: Darrell Bowles; Peter Duran; Window-Eyes Discussion List >> Subject: Re: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! >> >> I just wished NVDA had a Window Eyes keyboard layout? >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Darrell Bowles via Talk >> Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 11:00 AM >> To: Peter Duran ; Window-Eyes Discussion List >> Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! >> >> I didn't say that window-eyes would survive. And didn't I already >> say > that >> JAWS, NVDA and narrator are left on the windows platform? >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Talk >> [mailto:talk-bounces+dgbowles=msn@lists.window-eyes.com] On >> Behalf Of Peter Duran via Talk >> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 1:58 PM >> To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List' <talk@lists.window-eyes.com> >> Subject: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! >> >> >> It always amazes me when smart folks (like on this list) prefer a >> fanticy instead of reality. There is absolutely no reason for >> Window-Eyes to continue and compete with JFW. Why would they do that? >> >> There are 3 options to check out: Narrator on Windows 10, NVDA, and >> VoiceOver. So, get real and get to work. >> >> I suppose those of you who believe that Window-Eyes will stay around >> also believe that the health care bill that passed the House last >> week will > co
Re: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead.
Not only that, but go to the AI Squared web site and follow the links. That should also tell you something. Here's a little the majority of them link to the Freedom Scientific site. On 5/9/2017 8:59 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: Well, you are welcome to your personal delusions. Remember all the folks at GW Micro who did the development work are gone, so who will carry on? Peter Duran -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 6:38 PM To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com Subject: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. If you're trying to get people to stop using Window-eyes, you're probably in for a pretty good fight there. and there has been no official announcement that Window-eyes is indeed dead. people will still use it no matter what you say. On 5/9/2017 5:32 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: Well, Window-Eyes is unfortunately definitely dead. It is irrational to presuppose that VFO will support two competing screen readers, with one a lot cheeper than the other. Sad to say, JAWS won and WE lost the screen-reader wars. Those of us with technical skills ought to help NVDA to improve over time so we can keep up with Windows 10 advances. Peter Duran -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Vaughan Dodd via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 5:11 PM To: Russ Kiehne; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! Can one be created? Vaughan. -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Russ Kiehne via Talk Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2017 1:37 a.m. To: Darrell Bowles; Peter Duran; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: Re: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! I just wished NVDA had a Window Eyes keyboard layout? -Original Message- From: Darrell Bowles via Talk Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 11:00 AM To: Peter Duran ; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! I didn't say that window-eyes would survive. And didn't I already say that JAWS, NVDA and narrator are left on the windows platform? -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dgbowles=msn@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Peter Duran via Talk Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 1:58 PM To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'Subject: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! It always amazes me when smart folks (like on this list) prefer a fanticy instead of reality. There is absolutely no reason for Window-Eyes to continue and compete with JFW. Why would they do that? There are 3 options to check out: Narrator on Windows 10, NVDA, and VoiceOver. So, get real and get to work. I suppose those of you who believe that Window-Eyes will stay around also believe that the health care bill that passed the House last week will cover everybody as promised by Trump instead of leaving 24 million folks without any health care. Peter Duran ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/dgbowles%40msn .com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/russ94577%40gm ail.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/vaughan.dodd00 1%40msd.govt.nz. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com --- This email and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this email and attachments is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the author immediately and erase all
RE: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead.
Hi Russ, Now, there's a bit of something we can sink our collective teeth into. At least we have a time-line we can work with. Thanks, Rod -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+rod_hutton=hotmail@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Russ Kiehne via Talk Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 10:07 AM To: Chris Skarstad <rascal0...@verizon.net>; talk@lists.window-eyes.com Subject: Re: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. I did see the following on another list: From: Cristóbal <crismuno...@gmail.com> I saw the WE thing over the weekend on a quick posting at some technology expo in Germany. If I recall and as others have mentioned it's tied into stand alone Office no longer being supported by MS which if I remember, is going to end in 2020. Bummer for WindowEyes folks who have invested the time to learn the application and money, but you know it was going to happen as soon as VFO acquired it. Doom and gloom aside, You're still talking nearly three years out which for technology is a lifetime. SO it's not an immediate concern I guess. -Original Message- From: Chris Skarstad via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 3:38 PM To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com Subject: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. If you're trying to get people to stop using Window-eyes, you're probably in for a pretty good fight there. and there has been no official announcement that Window-eyes is indeed dead. people will still use it no matter what you say. On 5/9/2017 5:32 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: > Well, Window-Eyes is unfortunately definitely dead. It is irrational to > presuppose that VFO will support two competing screen readers, with one a > lot cheeper than the other. Sad to say, JAWS won and WE lost the > screen-reader wars. > > Those of us with technical skills ought to help NVDA to improve over time > so > we can keep up with Windows 10 advances. > > Peter Duran > > -Original Message- > From: Talk > [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On > Behalf Of Vaughan Dodd via Talk > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 5:11 PM > To: Russ Kiehne; Window-Eyes Discussion List > Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! > > Can one be created? > > Vaughan. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Talk > [mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.com] On > Behalf Of Russ Kiehne via Talk > Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2017 1:37 a.m. > To: Darrell Bowles; Peter Duran; Window-Eyes Discussion List > Subject: Re: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! > > I just wished NVDA had a Window Eyes keyboard layout? > > -Original Message- > From: Darrell Bowles via Talk > Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 11:00 AM > To: Peter Duran ; Window-Eyes Discussion List > Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! > > I didn't say that window-eyes would survive. And didn't I already say > that > JAWS, NVDA and narrator are left on the windows platform? > > -Original Message- > From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dgbowles=msn@lists.window-eyes.com] On > Behalf Of Peter Duran via Talk > Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 1:58 PM > To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List' <talk@lists.window-eyes.com> > Subject: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! > > > It always amazes me when smart folks (like on this list) prefer a fanticy > instead of reality. There is absolutely no reason for Window-Eyes to > continue and compete with JFW. Why would they do that? > > There are 3 options to check out: Narrator on Windows 10, NVDA, and > VoiceOver. So, get real and get to work. > > I suppose those of you who believe that Window-Eyes will stay around also > believe that the health care bill that passed the House last week will > cover > > everybody as promised by Trump instead of leaving 24 million folks without > any health care. > > Peter Duran > > ___ > Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the > author > > and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. > > For membership options, visit > http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/dgbowles%40msn > .com. > For subscription options, visit > http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com > List archives can be found at > http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com > ___ > Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the > author > > and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. > > For membership options, visit > http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/russ94577%40gm > ail.com. > For subscriptio
Re: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead.
Window Eyes may bnot be dead, just no future development! -Original Message- From: Ivan Cribb via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 10:21 PM To: 'Sky Mundell' ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List' Subject: RE: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. Dear Sky, Talk about W E being dead is just empty chatter for the time being. Ivan -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+icribb=iinet.net...@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Sky Mundell via Talk Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2017 2:02 PM To: 'Chris Skarstad'; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List' Subject: RE: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. Hi Chris. Its Sky here. I will tell you guys that, even before the office version of Window-Eyes came out, their were even lies told by venders about it. For example, some of the venders would say Window-Eyes was going bust, or that it isn't good, etc, etc, etc, and those factors has never helped Window-Eyes flourish at all.Even the blind institutions, like CNIB, etc, would tell lies about Window-Eyes too. I remember a list member telling me he had a blazing argument on the talkx email list with a vender and the vender told him their was no favouritism regarding JAWS and other screen readers. -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+skyt=shaw...@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 8:35 PM To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com Subject: Re: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. They may not legally be able to at this point. There may be legal things that might prevent them from making announcements before the date that has been decided. One of the VFO staff isn't going to come on here and go s guys, we're killing Window-eyes but don't tell anyone. They're going to make an official announcement. I am going to wait and see what that announcement says, how they plan to take their next action and what they decide to do. If Window-eyes operates on my system, which it clearly does, it's not dead. VFO hasn't made an official announcement that it is so in my book, that means it's still alive even if it might be in the short term. We shall wait and see. The announcement might not even happen for another year. None of us knows. I suppose the speculation will continue until it's time for them to make an announcement. Until then, we're going round in circles. i propose ignoring all speculation and window-eyes is dead announcements from non-VFO staff. On 5/9/2017 9:47 PM, Don H via Talk wrote: Wouldn't you think with all this WE is dead talk that someone from VFO would step in and say it ain't so? On 5/9/2017 8:28 PM, Nick Sarames via Talk wrote: Hmm, sounds like fake news Peter. I deal in accuracy, so if VFO discontinues WE as of July 1st 2017 (for example), then it is not dead until that date. I'm sorry if you don't care for reading the truth. On 5/9/2017 8:59 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: Well, you are welcome to your personal delusions. Remember all the folks at GW Micro who did the development work are gone, so who will carry on? Peter Duran -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 6:38 PM To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com Subject: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. If you're trying to get people to stop using Window-eyes, you're probably in for a pretty good fight there. and there has been no official announcement that Window-eyes is indeed dead. people will still use it no matter what you say. On 5/9/2017 5:32 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: Well, Window-Eyes is unfortunately definitely dead. It is irrational to presuppose that VFO will support two competing screen readers, with one a lot cheeper than the other. Sad to say, JAWS won and WE lost the screen-reader wars. Those of us with technical skills ought to help NVDA to improve over time so we can keep up with Windows 10 advances. Peter Duran -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Vaughan Dodd via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 5:11 PM To: Russ Kiehne; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! Can one be created? Vaughan. -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Russ Kiehne via Talk Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2017 1:37 a.m. To: Darrell Bowles; Peter Duran; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: Re: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! I just wished NVDA had a Window Eyes keyboard layout? -Original Message- From: Darrell Bowles via Talk Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 11:00 AM To: Peter Duran ; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! I didn't say that window-eyes would survive. And didn't I already say that JAWS, NVDA and narrator
Re: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead.
I did see the following on another list: From: CristóbalI saw the WE thing over the weekend on a quick posting at some technology expo in Germany. If I recall and as others have mentioned it's tied into stand alone Office no longer being supported by MS which if I remember, is going to end in 2020. Bummer for WindowEyes folks who have invested the time to learn the application and money, but you know it was going to happen as soon as VFO acquired it. Doom and gloom aside, You're still talking nearly three years out which for technology is a lifetime. SO it's not an immediate concern I guess. -Original Message- From: Chris Skarstad via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 3:38 PM To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com Subject: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. If you're trying to get people to stop using Window-eyes, you're probably in for a pretty good fight there. and there has been no official announcement that Window-eyes is indeed dead. people will still use it no matter what you say. On 5/9/2017 5:32 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: Well, Window-Eyes is unfortunately definitely dead. It is irrational to presuppose that VFO will support two competing screen readers, with one a lot cheeper than the other. Sad to say, JAWS won and WE lost the screen-reader wars. Those of us with technical skills ought to help NVDA to improve over time so we can keep up with Windows 10 advances. Peter Duran -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Vaughan Dodd via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 5:11 PM To: Russ Kiehne; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! Can one be created? Vaughan. -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Russ Kiehne via Talk Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2017 1:37 a.m. To: Darrell Bowles; Peter Duran; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: Re: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! I just wished NVDA had a Window Eyes keyboard layout? -Original Message- From: Darrell Bowles via Talk Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 11:00 AM To: Peter Duran ; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! I didn't say that window-eyes would survive. And didn't I already say that JAWS, NVDA and narrator are left on the windows platform? -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dgbowles=msn@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Peter Duran via Talk Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 1:58 PM To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List' Subject: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! It always amazes me when smart folks (like on this list) prefer a fanticy instead of reality. There is absolutely no reason for Window-Eyes to continue and compete with JFW. Why would they do that? There are 3 options to check out: Narrator on Windows 10, NVDA, and VoiceOver. So, get real and get to work. I suppose those of you who believe that Window-Eyes will stay around also believe that the health care bill that passed the House last week will cover everybody as promised by Trump instead of leaving 24 million folks without any health care. Peter Duran ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/dgbowles%40msn .com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/russ94577%40gm ail.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/vaughan.dodd00 1%40msd.govt.nz. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com --- This email and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or duplication
RE: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead.
I agree/. And even if they say as an example only in one year we will no longer support WE I'm sure they will give a discount on Jaws maybe those that knock Jaws should at least try it with an open mind. If you used it years ago programs improve. -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 11:35 PM To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com Subject: Re: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. They may not legally be able to at this point. There may be legal things that might prevent them from making announcements before the date that has been decided. One of the VFO staff isn't going to come on here and go s guys, we're killing Window-eyes but don't tell anyone. They're going to make an official announcement. I am going to wait and see what that announcement says, how they plan to take their next action and what they decide to do. If Window-eyes operates on my system, which it clearly does, it's not dead. VFO hasn't made an official announcement that it is so in my book, that means it's still alive even if it might be in the short term. We shall wait and see. The announcement might not even happen for another year. None of us knows. I suppose the speculation will continue until it's time for them to make an announcement. Until then, we're going round in circles. i propose ignoring all speculation and window-eyes is dead announcements from non-VFO staff. On 5/9/2017 9:47 PM, Don H via Talk wrote: > Wouldn't you think with all this WE is dead talk that someone from VFO > would step in and say it ain't so? > > On 5/9/2017 8:28 PM, Nick Sarames via Talk wrote: >> Hmm, sounds like fake news Peter. I deal in accuracy, so if VFO >> discontinues WE as of July 1st 2017 (for example), then it is not dead >> until that date. I'm sorry if you don't care for reading the truth. >> >> On 5/9/2017 8:59 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: >>> Well, you are welcome to your personal delusions. Remember all the >>> folks at >>> GW Micro who did the development work are gone, so who will carry on? >>> >>> Peter Duran >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Talk >>> [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] >>> On >>> Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 6:38 PM >>> To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com >>> Subject: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. >>> >>>If you're trying to get people to stop using >>> Window-eyes, you're probably in for a pretty good fight there. and >>> there >>> has been no official announcement that Window-eyes is indeed dead. >>> people will still use it no matter what you say. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 5/9/2017 5:32 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: >>>> Well, Window-Eyes is unfortunately definitely dead. It is >>>> irrational to >>>> presuppose that VFO will support two competing screen readers, with >>>> one a >>>> lot cheeper than the other. Sad to say, JAWS won and WE lost the >>>> screen-reader wars. >>>> >>>> Those of us with technical skills ought to help NVDA to improve >>>> over time >>> so >>>> we can keep up with Windows 10 advances. >>>> >>>> Peter Duran >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Talk >>>> [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] >>>> On >>>> Behalf Of Vaughan Dodd via Talk >>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 5:11 PM >>>> To: Russ Kiehne; Window-Eyes Discussion List >>>> Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! >>>> >>>> Can one be created? >>>> >>>> Vaughan. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Talk >>>> [mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.com] >>>> On >>>> Behalf Of Russ Kiehne via Talk >>>> Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2017 1:37 a.m. >>>> To: Darrell Bowles; Peter Duran; Window-Eyes Discussion List >>>> Subject: Re: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! >>>> >>>> I just wished NVDA had a Window Eyes keyboard layout? >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Darrell Bowles via Talk >>>> Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 11:00 AM >>>> To: Peter Duran ; Window-Eyes Discussion List >
RE: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead.
Dear Sky, Talk about W E being dead is just empty chatter for the time being. Ivan -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+icribb=iinet.net...@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Sky Mundell via Talk Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2017 2:02 PM To: 'Chris Skarstad'; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List' Subject: RE: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. Hi Chris. Its Sky here. I will tell you guys that, even before the office version of Window-Eyes came out, their were even lies told by venders about it. For example, some of the venders would say Window-Eyes was going bust, or that it isn't good, etc, etc, etc, and those factors has never helped Window-Eyes flourish at all.Even the blind institutions, like CNIB, etc, would tell lies about Window-Eyes too. I remember a list member telling me he had a blazing argument on the talkx email list with a vender and the vender told him their was no favouritism regarding JAWS and other screen readers. -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+skyt=shaw...@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 8:35 PM To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com Subject: Re: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. They may not legally be able to at this point. There may be legal things that might prevent them from making announcements before the date that has been decided. One of the VFO staff isn't going to come on here and go s guys, we're killing Window-eyes but don't tell anyone. They're going to make an official announcement. I am going to wait and see what that announcement says, how they plan to take their next action and what they decide to do. If Window-eyes operates on my system, which it clearly does, it's not dead. VFO hasn't made an official announcement that it is so in my book, that means it's still alive even if it might be in the short term. We shall wait and see. The announcement might not even happen for another year. None of us knows. I suppose the speculation will continue until it's time for them to make an announcement. Until then, we're going round in circles. i propose ignoring all speculation and window-eyes is dead announcements from non-VFO staff. On 5/9/2017 9:47 PM, Don H via Talk wrote: > Wouldn't you think with all this WE is dead talk that someone from VFO > would step in and say it ain't so? > > On 5/9/2017 8:28 PM, Nick Sarames via Talk wrote: >> Hmm, sounds like fake news Peter. I deal in accuracy, so if VFO >> discontinues WE as of July 1st 2017 (for example), then it is not dead >> until that date. I'm sorry if you don't care for reading the truth. >> >> On 5/9/2017 8:59 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: >>> Well, you are welcome to your personal delusions. Remember all the >>> folks at >>> GW Micro who did the development work are gone, so who will carry on? >>> >>> Peter Duran >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Talk >>> [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] >>> On >>> Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 6:38 PM >>> To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com >>> Subject: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. >>> >>>If you're trying to get people to stop using >>> Window-eyes, you're probably in for a pretty good fight there. and >>> there >>> has been no official announcement that Window-eyes is indeed dead. >>> people will still use it no matter what you say. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 5/9/2017 5:32 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: >>>> Well, Window-Eyes is unfortunately definitely dead. It is >>>> irrational to >>>> presuppose that VFO will support two competing screen readers, with >>>> one a >>>> lot cheeper than the other. Sad to say, JAWS won and WE lost the >>>> screen-reader wars. >>>> >>>> Those of us with technical skills ought to help NVDA to improve >>>> over time >>> so >>>> we can keep up with Windows 10 advances. >>>> >>>> Peter Duran >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Talk >>>> [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] >>>> On >>>> Behalf Of Vaughan Dodd via Talk >>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 5:11 PM >>>> To: Russ Kiehne; Window-Eyes Discussion List >>>> Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! >>>> >>>> Can one be created? >>>> >>>> Vaughan. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>&
RE: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead.
Hi Chris. Its Sky here. I will tell you guys that, even before the office version of Window-Eyes came out, their were even lies told by venders about it. For example, some of the venders would say Window-Eyes was going bust, or that it isn't good, etc, etc, etc, and those factors has never helped Window-Eyes flourish at all.Even the blind institutions, like CNIB, etc, would tell lies about Window-Eyes too. I remember a list member telling me he had a blazing argument on the talkx email list with a vender and the vender told him their was no favouritism regarding JAWS and other screen readers. -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+skyt=shaw...@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 8:35 PM To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com Subject: Re: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. They may not legally be able to at this point. There may be legal things that might prevent them from making announcements before the date that has been decided. One of the VFO staff isn't going to come on here and go s guys, we're killing Window-eyes but don't tell anyone. They're going to make an official announcement. I am going to wait and see what that announcement says, how they plan to take their next action and what they decide to do. If Window-eyes operates on my system, which it clearly does, it's not dead. VFO hasn't made an official announcement that it is so in my book, that means it's still alive even if it might be in the short term. We shall wait and see. The announcement might not even happen for another year. None of us knows. I suppose the speculation will continue until it's time for them to make an announcement. Until then, we're going round in circles. i propose ignoring all speculation and window-eyes is dead announcements from non-VFO staff. On 5/9/2017 9:47 PM, Don H via Talk wrote: > Wouldn't you think with all this WE is dead talk that someone from VFO > would step in and say it ain't so? > > On 5/9/2017 8:28 PM, Nick Sarames via Talk wrote: >> Hmm, sounds like fake news Peter. I deal in accuracy, so if VFO >> discontinues WE as of July 1st 2017 (for example), then it is not dead >> until that date. I'm sorry if you don't care for reading the truth. >> >> On 5/9/2017 8:59 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: >>> Well, you are welcome to your personal delusions. Remember all the >>> folks at >>> GW Micro who did the development work are gone, so who will carry on? >>> >>> Peter Duran >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Talk >>> [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] >>> On >>> Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 6:38 PM >>> To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com >>> Subject: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. >>> >>>If you're trying to get people to stop using >>> Window-eyes, you're probably in for a pretty good fight there. and >>> there >>> has been no official announcement that Window-eyes is indeed dead. >>> people will still use it no matter what you say. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 5/9/2017 5:32 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: >>>> Well, Window-Eyes is unfortunately definitely dead. It is >>>> irrational to >>>> presuppose that VFO will support two competing screen readers, with >>>> one a >>>> lot cheeper than the other. Sad to say, JAWS won and WE lost the >>>> screen-reader wars. >>>> >>>> Those of us with technical skills ought to help NVDA to improve >>>> over time >>> so >>>> we can keep up with Windows 10 advances. >>>> >>>> Peter Duran >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Talk >>>> [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] >>>> On >>>> Behalf Of Vaughan Dodd via Talk >>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 5:11 PM >>>> To: Russ Kiehne; Window-Eyes Discussion List >>>> Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! >>>> >>>> Can one be created? >>>> >>>> Vaughan. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Talk >>>> [mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.com] >>>> On >>>> Behalf Of Russ Kiehne via Talk >>>> Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2017 1:37 a.m. >>>> To: Darrell Bowles; Peter Duran; Window-Eyes Discussion List >>>
Re: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead.
They may not legally be able to at this point. There may be legal things that might prevent them from making announcements before the date that has been decided. One of the VFO staff isn't going to come on here and go s guys, we're killing Window-eyes but don't tell anyone. They're going to make an official announcement. I am going to wait and see what that announcement says, how they plan to take their next action and what they decide to do. If Window-eyes operates on my system, which it clearly does, it's not dead. VFO hasn't made an official announcement that it is so in my book, that means it's still alive even if it might be in the short term. We shall wait and see. The announcement might not even happen for another year. None of us knows. I suppose the speculation will continue until it's time for them to make an announcement. Until then, we're going round in circles. i propose ignoring all speculation and window-eyes is dead announcements from non-VFO staff. On 5/9/2017 9:47 PM, Don H via Talk wrote: Wouldn't you think with all this WE is dead talk that someone from VFO would step in and say it ain't so? On 5/9/2017 8:28 PM, Nick Sarames via Talk wrote: Hmm, sounds like fake news Peter. I deal in accuracy, so if VFO discontinues WE as of July 1st 2017 (for example), then it is not dead until that date. I'm sorry if you don't care for reading the truth. On 5/9/2017 8:59 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: Well, you are welcome to your personal delusions. Remember all the folks at GW Micro who did the development work are gone, so who will carry on? Peter Duran -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 6:38 PM To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com Subject: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. If you're trying to get people to stop using Window-eyes, you're probably in for a pretty good fight there. and there has been no official announcement that Window-eyes is indeed dead. people will still use it no matter what you say. On 5/9/2017 5:32 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: Well, Window-Eyes is unfortunately definitely dead. It is irrational to presuppose that VFO will support two competing screen readers, with one a lot cheeper than the other. Sad to say, JAWS won and WE lost the screen-reader wars. Those of us with technical skills ought to help NVDA to improve over time so we can keep up with Windows 10 advances. Peter Duran -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Vaughan Dodd via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 5:11 PM To: Russ Kiehne; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! Can one be created? Vaughan. -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Russ Kiehne via Talk Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2017 1:37 a.m. To: Darrell Bowles; Peter Duran; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: Re: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! I just wished NVDA had a Window Eyes keyboard layout? -Original Message- From: Darrell Bowles via Talk Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 11:00 AM To: Peter Duran ; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! I didn't say that window-eyes would survive. And didn't I already say that JAWS, NVDA and narrator are left on the windows platform? -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dgbowles=msn@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Peter Duran via Talk Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 1:58 PM To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'Subject: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! It always amazes me when smart folks (like on this list) prefer a fanticy instead of reality. There is absolutely no reason for Window-Eyes to continue and compete with JFW. Why would they do that? There are 3 options to check out: Narrator on Windows 10, NVDA, and VoiceOver. So, get real and get to work. I suppose those of you who believe that Window-Eyes will stay around also believe that the health care bill that passed the House last week will cover everybody as promised by Trump instead of leaving 24 million folks without any health care. Peter Duran ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/dgbowles%40msn .com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com ___ Any views or opinions presented in
Re: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead.
No, it's not smart business. Besides, I thought there would be an announcement in June. On 5/9/2017 9:47 PM, Don H via Talk wrote: > Wouldn't you think with all this WE is dead talk that someone from VFO > would step in and say it ain't so? > > On 5/9/2017 8:28 PM, Nick Sarames via Talk wrote: >> Hmm, sounds like fake news Peter. I deal in accuracy, so if VFO >> discontinues WE as of July 1st 2017 (for example), then it is not dead >> until that date. I'm sorry if you don't care for reading the truth. >> >> On 5/9/2017 8:59 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: >>> Well, you are welcome to your personal delusions. Remember all the >>> folks at >>> GW Micro who did the development work are gone, so who will carry on? >>> >>> Peter Duran >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Talk >>> [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On >>> >>> Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 6:38 PM >>> To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com >>> Subject: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. >>> >>>If you're trying to get people to stop using >>> Window-eyes, you're probably in for a pretty good fight there. and there >>> has been no official announcement that Window-eyes is indeed dead. >>> people will still use it no matter what you say. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 5/9/2017 5:32 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: Well, Window-Eyes is unfortunately definitely dead. It is irrational to presuppose that VFO will support two competing screen readers, with one a lot cheeper than the other. Sad to say, JAWS won and WE lost the screen-reader wars. Those of us with technical skills ought to help NVDA to improve over time >>> so we can keep up with Windows 10 advances. Peter Duran -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Vaughan Dodd via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 5:11 PM To: Russ Kiehne; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! Can one be created? Vaughan. -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Russ Kiehne via Talk Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2017 1:37 a.m. To: Darrell Bowles; Peter Duran; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: Re: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! I just wished NVDA had a Window Eyes keyboard layout? -Original Message- From: Darrell Bowles via Talk Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 11:00 AM To: Peter Duran ; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! I didn't say that window-eyes would survive. And didn't I already say >>> that JAWS, NVDA and narrator are left on the windows platform? -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dgbowles=msn@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Peter Duran via Talk Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 1:58 PM To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'Subject: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! It always amazes me when smart folks (like on this list) prefer a fanticy instead of reality. There is absolutely no reason for Window-Eyes to continue and compete with JFW. Why would they do that? There are 3 options to check out: Narrator on Windows 10, NVDA, and VoiceOver. So, get real and get to work. I suppose those of you who believe that Window-Eyes will stay around also believe that the health care bill that passed the House last week will >>> cover everybody as promised by Trump instead of leaving 24 million folks without any health care. Peter Duran ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the >>> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit >>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/dgbowles%40msn >>> >>> .com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the >>> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit >>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/russ94577%40gm >>> >>> ail.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can
Re: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead.
So maybe listers should consider sending a copy of their messages on this list to the VFO customer service or tech support or Doug or anyone else in the organization and see if they react or respond? On 5/9/2017 9:47 PM, Don H via Talk wrote: Wouldn't you think with all this WE is dead talk that someone from VFO would step in and say it ain't so? On 5/9/2017 8:28 PM, Nick Sarames via Talk wrote: Hmm, sounds like fake news Peter. I deal in accuracy, so if VFO discontinues WE as of July 1st 2017 (for example), then it is not dead until that date. I'm sorry if you don't care for reading the truth. On 5/9/2017 8:59 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: Well, you are welcome to your personal delusions. Remember all the folks at GW Micro who did the development work are gone, so who will carry on? Peter Duran -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 6:38 PM To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com Subject: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. If you're trying to get people to stop using Window-eyes, you're probably in for a pretty good fight there. and there has been no official announcement that Window-eyes is indeed dead. people will still use it no matter what you say. On 5/9/2017 5:32 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: Well, Window-Eyes is unfortunately definitely dead. It is irrational to presuppose that VFO will support two competing screen readers, with one a lot cheeper than the other. Sad to say, JAWS won and WE lost the screen-reader wars. Those of us with technical skills ought to help NVDA to improve over time so we can keep up with Windows 10 advances. Peter Duran -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Vaughan Dodd via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 5:11 PM To: Russ Kiehne; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! Can one be created? Vaughan. -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Russ Kiehne via Talk Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2017 1:37 a.m. To: Darrell Bowles; Peter Duran; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: Re: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! I just wished NVDA had a Window Eyes keyboard layout? -Original Message- From: Darrell Bowles via Talk Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 11:00 AM To: Peter Duran ; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! I didn't say that window-eyes would survive. And didn't I already say that JAWS, NVDA and narrator are left on the windows platform? -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dgbowles=msn@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Peter Duran via Talk Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 1:58 PM To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'Subject: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! It always amazes me when smart folks (like on this list) prefer a fanticy instead of reality. There is absolutely no reason for Window-Eyes to continue and compete with JFW. Why would they do that? There are 3 options to check out: Narrator on Windows 10, NVDA, and VoiceOver. So, get real and get to work. I suppose those of you who believe that Window-Eyes will stay around also believe that the health care bill that passed the House last week will cover everybody as promised by Trump instead of leaving 24 million folks without any health care. Peter Duran ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/dgbowles%40msn .com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/russ94577%40gm ail.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/vaughan.dodd00 1%40msd.govt.nz. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives
Re: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead.
Wouldn't you think with all this WE is dead talk that someone from VFO would step in and say it ain't so? On 5/9/2017 8:28 PM, Nick Sarames via Talk wrote: Hmm, sounds like fake news Peter. I deal in accuracy, so if VFO discontinues WE as of July 1st 2017 (for example), then it is not dead until that date. I'm sorry if you don't care for reading the truth. On 5/9/2017 8:59 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: Well, you are welcome to your personal delusions. Remember all the folks at GW Micro who did the development work are gone, so who will carry on? Peter Duran -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 6:38 PM To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com Subject: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. If you're trying to get people to stop using Window-eyes, you're probably in for a pretty good fight there. and there has been no official announcement that Window-eyes is indeed dead. people will still use it no matter what you say. On 5/9/2017 5:32 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: Well, Window-Eyes is unfortunately definitely dead. It is irrational to presuppose that VFO will support two competing screen readers, with one a lot cheeper than the other. Sad to say, JAWS won and WE lost the screen-reader wars. Those of us with technical skills ought to help NVDA to improve over time so we can keep up with Windows 10 advances. Peter Duran -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Vaughan Dodd via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 5:11 PM To: Russ Kiehne; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! Can one be created? Vaughan. -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Russ Kiehne via Talk Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2017 1:37 a.m. To: Darrell Bowles; Peter Duran; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: Re: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! I just wished NVDA had a Window Eyes keyboard layout? -Original Message- From: Darrell Bowles via Talk Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 11:00 AM To: Peter Duran ; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! I didn't say that window-eyes would survive. And didn't I already say that JAWS, NVDA and narrator are left on the windows platform? -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dgbowles=msn@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Peter Duran via Talk Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 1:58 PM To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'Subject: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! It always amazes me when smart folks (like on this list) prefer a fanticy instead of reality. There is absolutely no reason for Window-Eyes to continue and compete with JFW. Why would they do that? There are 3 options to check out: Narrator on Windows 10, NVDA, and VoiceOver. So, get real and get to work. I suppose those of you who believe that Window-Eyes will stay around also believe that the health care bill that passed the House last week will cover everybody as promised by Trump instead of leaving 24 million folks without any health care. Peter Duran ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/dgbowles%40msn .com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/russ94577%40gm ail.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/vaughan.dodd00 1%40msd.govt.nz. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com --- This email and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any use,
Re: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead.
Hmm, sounds like fake news Peter. I deal in accuracy, so if VFO discontinues WE as of July 1st 2017 (for example), then it is not dead until that date. I'm sorry if you don't care for reading the truth. On 5/9/2017 8:59 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: > Well, you are welcome to your personal delusions. Remember all the folks at > GW Micro who did the development work are gone, so who will carry on? > > Peter Duran > > > -Original Message- > From: Talk > [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On > Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 6:38 PM > To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com > Subject: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. > > If you're trying to get people to stop using > Window-eyes, you're probably in for a pretty good fight there. and there > has been no official announcement that Window-eyes is indeed dead. > people will still use it no matter what you say. > > > > On 5/9/2017 5:32 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: >> Well, Window-Eyes is unfortunately definitely dead. It is irrational to >> presuppose that VFO will support two competing screen readers, with one a >> lot cheeper than the other. Sad to say, JAWS won and WE lost the >> screen-reader wars. >> >> Those of us with technical skills ought to help NVDA to improve over time > so >> we can keep up with Windows 10 advances. >> >> Peter Duran >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Talk >> [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On >> Behalf Of Vaughan Dodd via Talk >> Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 5:11 PM >> To: Russ Kiehne; Window-Eyes Discussion List >> Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! >> >> Can one be created? >> >> Vaughan. >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Talk >> [mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.com] On >> Behalf Of Russ Kiehne via Talk >> Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2017 1:37 a.m. >> To: Darrell Bowles; Peter Duran; Window-Eyes Discussion List >> Subject: Re: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! >> >> I just wished NVDA had a Window Eyes keyboard layout? >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Darrell Bowles via Talk >> Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 11:00 AM >> To: Peter Duran ; Window-Eyes Discussion List >> Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! >> >> I didn't say that window-eyes would survive. And didn't I already say > that >> JAWS, NVDA and narrator are left on the windows platform? >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dgbowles=msn@lists.window-eyes.com] On >> Behalf Of Peter Duran via Talk >> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 1:58 PM >> To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'>> Subject: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! >> >> >> It always amazes me when smart folks (like on this list) prefer a fanticy >> instead of reality. There is absolutely no reason for Window-Eyes to >> continue and compete with JFW. Why would they do that? >> >> There are 3 options to check out: Narrator on Windows 10, NVDA, and >> VoiceOver. So, get real and get to work. >> >> I suppose those of you who believe that Window-Eyes will stay around also >> believe that the health care bill that passed the House last week will > cover >> >> everybody as promised by Trump instead of leaving 24 million folks without >> any health care. >> >> Peter Duran >> >> ___ >> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the > author >> >> and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. >> >> For membership options, visit >> > http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/dgbowles%40msn >> .com. >> For subscription options, visit >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >> List archives can be found at >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >> ___ >> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the > author >> >> and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. >> >> For membership options, visit >> > http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/russ94577%40gm >> ail.com. >> For subscription options, visit >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >> List archives can be found at >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >> >> ___ >> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the > author >> and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. >> >> For membership options, visit >> > http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/vaughan.dodd00 >> 1%40msd.govt.nz. >> For subscription options, visit >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >> List archives can be found at >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >> >>
RE: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead.
Well, you are welcome to your personal delusions. Remember all the folks at GW Micro who did the development work are gone, so who will carry on? Peter Duran -Original Message- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 6:38 PM To: talk@lists.window-eyes.com Subject: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead. If you're trying to get people to stop using Window-eyes, you're probably in for a pretty good fight there. and there has been no official announcement that Window-eyes is indeed dead. people will still use it no matter what you say. On 5/9/2017 5:32 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote: > Well, Window-Eyes is unfortunately definitely dead. It is irrational to > presuppose that VFO will support two competing screen readers, with one a > lot cheeper than the other. Sad to say, JAWS won and WE lost the > screen-reader wars. > > Those of us with technical skills ought to help NVDA to improve over time so > we can keep up with Windows 10 advances. > > Peter Duran > > -Original Message- > From: Talk > [mailto:talk-bounces+peterduran2015=outlook@lists.window-eyes.com] On > Behalf Of Vaughan Dodd via Talk > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2017 5:11 PM > To: Russ Kiehne; Window-Eyes Discussion List > Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! > > Can one be created? > > Vaughan. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Talk > [mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.com] On > Behalf Of Russ Kiehne via Talk > Sent: Wednesday, 10 May 2017 1:37 a.m. > To: Darrell Bowles; Peter Duran; Window-Eyes Discussion List > Subject: Re: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! > > I just wished NVDA had a Window Eyes keyboard layout? > > -Original Message- > From: Darrell Bowles via Talk > Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 11:00 AM > To: Peter Duran ; Window-Eyes Discussion List > Subject: RE: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! > > I didn't say that window-eyes would survive. And didn't I already say that > JAWS, NVDA and narrator are left on the windows platform? > > -Original Message- > From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dgbowles=msn@lists.window-eyes.com] On > Behalf Of Peter Duran via Talk > Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 1:58 PM > To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'> Subject: No future; Window-Eyes is dead! > > > It always amazes me when smart folks (like on this list) prefer a fanticy > instead of reality. There is absolutely no reason for Window-Eyes to > continue and compete with JFW. Why would they do that? > > There are 3 options to check out: Narrator on Windows 10, NVDA, and > VoiceOver. So, get real and get to work. > > I suppose those of you who believe that Window-Eyes will stay around also > believe that the health care bill that passed the House last week will cover > > everybody as promised by Trump instead of leaving 24 million folks without > any health care. > > Peter Duran > > ___ > Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author > > and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. > > For membership options, visit > http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/dgbowles%40msn > .com. > For subscription options, visit > http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com > List archives can be found at > http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com > ___ > Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author > > and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. > > For membership options, visit > http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/russ94577%40gm > ail.com. > For subscription options, visit > http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com > List archives can be found at > http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com > > ___ > Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author > and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. > > For membership options, visit > http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/vaughan.dodd00 > 1%40msd.govt.nz. > For subscription options, visit > http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com > List archives can be found at > http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com > > --- > This email and any attachments may contain information that is confidential > and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any > use, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this email and > attachments is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please > notify the author immediately and erase all copies of the email and > attachments. The Ministry of Social
RE: Until VFO says so, Window-eyes is not dead.
I'm much happier with this subject line - smile! Alison ___ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com