Sorry for my fist post. This is my first proposal and I am very new to this.
I am proposing the tag:publisher.
Intent: To mark the location of a publisher. Could be a magazine,
newspaper, music, software, book, etc...
The wiki page of the proposal is at:
Sam Vekemans wrote:
I wanted to float the idea (to the general talk list) about importing
the full data base that is available, not as shapes/ways/lines, but as
nodes which show
what map features the node represents.
So for example, importing a park (in a mapped area) we would just show
In short:
Mappers need not worry about changing mapping habits. Editing is the
way it is (unlike the transition from API 0.4 to 0.5!), you're just
encourage to explain your edit session via changeset comments
This is what I usually do:
1. Download a manageable chunk via OSMXAPI.
2. Edit via
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Karl Newman siliconfi...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe we need a tag for cultural value :-P
Or use the admin_level tag.
Pieren
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Thanks :)Bonkers? ... perhaps :@)
Actually, that would be the just the 1st step. meaning that; On those
mapped areas where say - if the actual shapes were imported, you would see
'ghost lines'. .. this is not preferred. So, by just seeing the reference
points, then these shapes can be drawn in
On 18 Dec 2008, at 08:56, maning sambale wrote:
In short:
Mappers need not worry about changing mapping habits. Editing is the
way it is (unlike the transition from API 0.4 to 0.5!), you're just
encourage to explain your edit session via changeset comments
This is what I usually do:
1.
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Soundy overly complex compared to just using pdftotext and then
parsing the resulting ASCII text, unless of course there's OCR
involved which would rule out this approach.
Doesn't preserve the layout, in particular the columns, well enough. The UK
rail timetable PDF is
Sam Vekemans wrote:
Bonkers? ... perhaps :@)
Well if I've understood correctly then what you're suggesting is that we
add what amounts to presumably some tens of millions of nodes each of
which would presumably have a large number of highly duplicative tags.
If that is what you're saying
2008/12/18 Shaun McDonald sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk
On 18 Dec 2008, at 08:56, maning sambale wrote:
In short:
Mappers need not worry about changing mapping habits. Editing is the
way it is (unlike the transition from API 0.4 to 0.5!), you're just
encourage to explain your edit
Well, to be honnest, I don't see the point.
We could scroll the activities' list of any Yellow Pages company and get
hundreds of activities. All of them would deserve to be in OSM...
But how many are useful? Only the ones related to health, food, sport, culture,
education...
As nobody will
2008/12/18 Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu
So far, it looks like the majority of the country would be able to
accept a full import of everything... except the roads. .. it's only 10
or so tiles that nothing would be imported (just nodes), and less than
100 where only roads would be omitted.
I can see why someone might want to record company offices/businesses in
OSM...
But...
as I mentioned on the proposal talk page, I'm not convinced that a publisher
is an amenity... publisher could be a value for a business/business_type/etc
key which could then be used to record many other types
On Thu, December 18, 2008 07:27, maning sambale wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Nathan Mixter srmix...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Wow, Naga City is full of buildings. How did they get so many? Are those
all building=yeses? Crazy.
NAGA City GIS released their data in public domain. We are
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll just point out that I got the trunk version working fine on
Ubuntu without modifications, so people shouldn't be afraid to try it
out. There were two dependencies (dang, I should have
Yay.
OSM appears in the 100 top sites for the year ahead list in UK's
Guardian newspaper today:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/dec/18/internet-websites
Cheers
STEVE
Steve Chilton, Learning Support Fellow
Manager of e-Learning Academic Development
Centre for Educational Technology
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:31:46 -0800
Joe Hughes j...@headwayblog.com wrote:
Hugh Barnes said:
http://code.google.com/p/googletransitdatafeed/wiki/PublicFeeds
Ewww, CSV serialisations requiring their own purpose-built
validator … Like you say, we can build from it. Let's look through
Thanks Tom D,
storage requirements, which is why I have concerns about creating tens
of millions of nodes which have many duplicated tags or which will wind
up never being used and will just be deleted again.
If it's only 10 tiles of 12539, why bother with importing anything at all
for
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 03:07:30AM +, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
There's a Debian port taking shape in branches/ports/debian which is of
relevance to this thread.
/me suddenly gains an interest
I'd already got an svn checkout but hadn't got as far as doing anything
with it.
Equally roads don't usually run over buildings - which could be case if
reversed. Basically auto-rendering of these two can not be correct for
all cases/zooms.
Needs intelligence to say nudge that building away from the road in
this instance - later?
Cheers
STEVE
Steve Chilton, Learning
On 18 Dec 2008, at 10:49, Hugh Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:30:31 +
OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Andy Street m...@andystreet.me.uk
wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 19:59 +, OJ W wrote:
How about making an iphone app where people can just
Doesn't get my vote. If it's a feature already why would we want to have to
recreate it manually. Also by just importing nodes how can we
visually/easily tell what nodes relate to what feature, especially if
features overlap or cross.
I can understand the difficulty in adding new data into
On 18 Dec 2008, at 10:52, Steve Chilton wrote:
Equally roads don’t usually run over buildings – which could be case
if reversed. Basically auto-rendering of these two can not be
correct for all cases/zooms.
Needs intelligence to say “nudge that building away from the road in
this
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:24:29AM +, Steve Chilton wrote:
OSM appears in the 100 top sites for the year ahead list in UK's
Guardian newspaper today:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/dec/18/internet-websites
I like the comment for Where’s the Path:
“Let down by OS's absurd
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Nathan Mixter srmix...@hotmail.com wrote:
Just wondering. Shouldn't buildings be rendered behind roads.
Not if the building is over the road
http://picasaweb.google.com/hemrajpathare/CopenhagenPhotos#5225837680766253506
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 03:19:02PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Rather than try to centralize everything we know about the world into
OSM, we would be better off figuring out how multiple databases can be
tightly connected.
There’s the added bonus that when you make a project independent from
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Peter Miller
peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
I assure you public transport timetables are very complex and one most
certainly can't implement it as tags to the OSM model.
Given that we have
* Unlimited numbers of key/value pairs per object
* Recursivable
OJ W wrote:
Sent: 18 December 2008 11:19 AM
To: Nathan Mixter
Cc: openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] buildings and roads
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Nathan Mixter srmix...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Just wondering. Shouldn't buildings be rendered behind roads.
Not if the building is over the
Or literally through the building !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gate_Tower_Building
This case is also interesting when it comes to tagging layers. what
takes precedence in rendering, the road or the building?
OJ W wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Nathan Mixter srmix...@hotmail.com
I like the comment for Where’s the Path:
“Let down by OS's absurd OpenSpace restrictions.”
and if you try clicking on that site, you'll discover it's let down by what
appears to be a restriction on the number of page hits imposed by OS.
Presumably that limit has been reached today as a
2008/12/17 Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com:
So for example, importing a park (in a mapped area) we would just show
the outline dots of the park, and the user can connect the dots and
show it the 'right' way osm-style.
So we would discard the knowledge of the sequence in which the
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Iván Sánchez Ortega
i...@sanchezortega.es wrote:
Well, there is still a lot of data to import (land use and boundaries
IIRC), but I was too lazy to program the conversion script to take into
account the OSM relationships needed to correctly tag the
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 04:17:24AM -0800, Donald Allwright wrote:
I like the comment for Where’s the Path:
“Let down by OS's absurd OpenSpace restrictions.”
and if you try clicking on that site, you'll discover it's let down by
what appears to be a restriction on the number of page
I used to catch a train which was exactly 15 minutes late every day
(for a year or more). Writing down when it actually leaves rather
than when the timetable says it should leave, would be quite useful
for someone planning to take that train...
Sounds like the dreaded 17:35 from Bath to
I think that would be an excellent idea, however don't assume transit
authorities will always give you the data because they often won't for
various reasons. There is not however a problem as far as I know in
people collecting their own timetable information from printed
material and entering
On 18 Dec 2008, at 13:46, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
I think that would be an excellent idea, however don't assume transit
authorities will always give you the data because they often won't
for
various reasons. There is not however a problem as far as I know in
people collecting their own
Could someone who is able to please set up a new 'talk-transit' list
with the description 'For discussion of public transport/transit
related topics including rail/bus/tram/ferry/paratransit/shared taxis
etc'
I am happy to be an administrator for it if one is needed and no doubt
others
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:57 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Karl Newman siliconfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Maybe we need a tag for cultural value :-P
Or use the admin_level tag.
Pieren
That wouldn't work in this case, because as the OP mentioned, San
Hi,
after about 10 days from the first OSM archeo mapping party, the first
CC-BY-SA map of the ruined and partially buried Roman city near modern
Naples (Italy) is emerging from Mapnik.
Here you can find some results of our work (which is not finished
yet):
Karl Newman wrote:
That wouldn't work in this case, because as the OP mentioned, San Jose
and San Francisco have equal admin_level rankings (county seat) and
San Jose is larger in both area and population.
As an aside, San Francisco is unique in the USA (as far as I know) in
that the
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:37 AM, Adam Killian vi...@bonius.com wrote:
Karl Newman wrote:
That wouldn't work in this case, because as the OP mentioned, San Jose and
San Francisco have equal admin_level rankings (county seat) and San Jose is
larger in both area and population.
As an aside,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Simone Cortesi after about 10 days
from the first OSM archeo mapping party, the first
CC-BY-SA map of the ruined and partially buried Roman city near modern
Naples (Italy) is emerging from Mapnik.
Really very nice work !
I have to say that there is a
El Jueves, 18 de Diciembre de 2008, Simone Cortesi escribió:
where can these boundary data be found?
The details can be found over here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Philippines_Data_Import#Naga
Cheers,
--
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es
El Jueves, 18 de Diciembre de 2008, Karl Newman escribió:
Maybe we need a tag for cultural value :-P
Or use the admin_level tag.
That wouldn't work in this case, because as the OP mentioned, San Jose and
San Francisco have equal admin_level rankings (county seat) and San Jose is
larger
Hi,
Sam Vekemans wrote:
And so, im not sure that the local are mappers would want to have a manual
merge (wiping out what they did, importing all the roads, then slowely
bringing back the OSM roads if any are needed)
By having the roads which were not mapped available as nodes to be traced,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Iván Sánchez Ortega
i...@sanchezortega.eswrote:
El Jueves, 18 de Diciembre de 2008, Karl Newman escribió:
Maybe we need a tag for cultural value :-P
Or use the admin_level tag.
That wouldn't work in this case, because as the OP mentioned, San Jose
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Iván Sánchez Ortega
i...@sanchezortega.es wrote:
El Jueves, 18 de Diciembre de 2008, Karl Newman escribió:
Maybe we need a tag for cultural value :-P
Or use the admin_level tag.
So, cultural_level tag?
Nothing more subjective ? ;-)
Say the truth : we
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
Nothing more subjective ? ;-)
Say the truth : we need a tag for rendering in case of name collision
when the category (city) and admin_level (county seat) are the same
(forget population which is even worst in this example).
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Karl Newman siliconfi...@gmail.com wrote:
That's the sort of thing automated renderers have difficulty sorting out.
Maybe we need a tag for cultural value :-P
(I would hazard a guess that San Jose has a larger economic impact,
though.)
I have suggested that
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Iván Sánchez Ortega
i...@sanchezortega.es wrote:
El Jueves, 18 de Diciembre de 2008, Karl Newman escribió:
Maybe we need a tag for cultural value :-P
Or use the admin_level tag.
So,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Gustav Foseid gust...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Karl Newman siliconfi...@gmail.comwrote:
That's the sort of thing automated renderers have difficulty sorting out.
Maybe we need a tag for cultural value :-P
(I would hazard a guess that
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Nick Whitelegg
nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
I think that would be an excellent idea, however don't assume transit
authorities will always give you the data because they often won't for
various reasons. There is not however a problem as far as I know in
people
One of the main strengths of OpenStreetMap is that we have access to
the raw data, and one of the best ways we can illustrate this power,
whilst also reinforcing the idea that the map is just a rendering of
the data, is to create custom renders.
Great examples of these are the Mapnik and
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Karl Newman siliconfi...@gmail.com wrote:
You're still missing the point about San Jose--it's larger in both area and
population (and probably in economic activity as well), and is located
within an hour's drive of San Francisco, but San Francisco is better
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:39 AM, Karl Newman siliconfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:37 AM, Adam Killian vi...@bonius.com wrote:
Karl Newman wrote:
That wouldn't work in this case, because as the OP mentioned, San Jose
and San Francisco have equal admin_level rankings (county
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Gustav Foseid gust...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Karl Newman siliconfi...@gmail.comwrote:
You're still missing the point about San Jose--it's larger in both area
and population (and probably in economic activity as well), and is located
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Elena of Valhalla
elena.valha...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, not that likely, but I wouldn't use a tag with a different meaning
when we can just add another specific one;
Is that really so different ? It is a renderer issue. Mapnik decides
to not draw one of the names
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Karl Newman siliconfi...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure it is. If a lot of people want to live in a place, in general that
should make it more notable. Besides, I was only suggesting using population
as a tiebreaker for equal place key values. It's not the final answer,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Gustav Foseid gust...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Karl Newman siliconfi...@gmail.comwrote:
Sure it is. If a lot of people want to live in a place, in general that
should make it more notable. Besides, I was only suggesting using
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Hugh Barnes list@hughbris.com wrote:
I can sympathise with your pragmatism, and was starting realise that
must be what's behind your choice. Sad but true. I still think while
you can accept CSV, you should want to cast into XML pretty soon to
make it nice
Gustav wrote:
How many values should we have for populated places?
We have 4 now (hamlet/village/town/city). Should we
add more? Reduce to fewer? Maybe just one?
Perhaps something could be done similar to boundary with so many
admin_levels and some sort of default mapping from the existing
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
I was wondering however, if any of the authorities in gtfs-data-
exchange would mind their data about the positioning of bus stops to
be imported into OSM. Might be worth asking them at some point. The
current bus
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 03:07:30AM +, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
There's a Debian port taking shape in branches/ports/debian which is of
relevance to this thread.
just tested, very promising ! and works like a
That is the rare exception. Not the norm
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Nathan Mixter srmix...@hotmail.com wrote:
Just wondering. Shouldn't buildings be rendered behind roads.
Not if the building is over the road
I hope these flies. We are only a style sheet away from making topical maps.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Tim Waters (chippy)
Sent: 18 December 2008 4:38 PM
To: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Tomas Straupis
tomasstrau...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
While fixing some validation errors I've found an interesting case and
would like to get your opinion on how to deal with it.
There is a school stadium mapped. Stadium has a usual oval and two starting
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
Perhaps something could be done similar to boundary with so many
admin_levels and some sort of default mapping from the existing 4
places to their new numeric equivalent (a bit like footway and some
combination of tags
Karl Newman wrote:
As an aside, San Francisco is unique in the USA (as far as I know) in
that the city and county have the same extents.
Oh, so THAT'S why San Francisco's unique! I've always wondered. ;)
-Beej, proud Bay Area citizen
___
talk
Hi,
I use josm for my editing but hadn't used it for a while - in
particular, the yahoo imagery with the wms plugin. So I rather dumbly
thought I should upgrade the wms plugin before I started, without
checking if that was ok. Now I find it is no longer using firefox, but
webkit. I'm really
As a datapoint, Google renders SF and SJ the same way until you
zoom out
far enough, and then SJ disappears.
FWIW,
-Beej
Strange.
In the catholic hierarchy, San Jose (Jesus' father) is clearly above San
Hi,
graham wrote:
Does anyone have the new version running on gentoo?
Not me, but the SVN
(svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/editors/josm/plugins/wmsplugin) has
a webkit-image.cpp that you can compile and use if you want.
Alternatively, is there a copy of the old plugin I
can revert to
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/12/18/2047203
chrb writes Following on from the discussion about Apple disabling GPS
in Egyptian iPhones, we have a new case of the conflict between the
traditional secrecy of government, and the widening availability of
cheap, accurate GPS devices
On 18 Dec 2008, at 17:28, Joe Hughes wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Hugh Barnes list@hughbris.com
wrote:
I can sympathise with your pragmatism, and was starting realise that
must be what's behind your choice. Sad but true. I still think while
you can accept CSV, you should
On 18 Dec 2008, at 17:44, Joe Hughes wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
I was wondering however, if any of the authorities in gtfs-data-
exchange would mind their data about the positioning of bus stops to
be imported into OSM. Might be
I have bought opensantamap.org.
Shaun
On 18 Dec 2008, at 18:18, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
I hope these flies. We are only a style sheet away from making
topical maps.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-
Hey all,
This is sort of a general question with a specific example, namely,
Marin County.
Marin County (just north of the Golden Gate Bridge and San Francisco,
California) already exists in OSM. It's made of bad TIGER data that has
been partially corrected (by myself and others). Streams and
Hi all,
Such great feedback from my latest 'rant: importing GeoBase nodes'
Thanks :)
What this did was sparked some major issues that need to be addressed.
I think this is more important, than going deeper on that rant.
I created a new wiki page Importing Government Data
Use a powertool like JOSM to go over it and see how much has changed,
and coordinate with the users who've made changes in that area.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Beej Jorgensen b...@beej.us wrote:
Hey all,
This is sort of a general question with a specific example, namely,
Marin County.
Marin County (just north of the Golden Gate Bridge and San Francisco,
California) already exists in OSM. It's made of bad TIGER
2008/12/19 Tomas Straupis tomasstrau...@gmail.com
Hello
While fixing some validation errors I've found an interesting case and
would like to get your opinion on how to deal with it.
There is a school stadium mapped. Stadium has a usual oval and two
starting
tails. It is mapped as
Cool :)
what can be done is creating a section for all the options for
importing government data - including the ones that were 'mud' but
state 'why' it was rejected.
Also list pending or aproved stuff
I got a start;
disaproved:
blow away data and replace on-mass
-slap on imported data create
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:41:59 +1100
Matt White mattwh...@iinet.com.au wrote:
I have a sneaking suspicion that National Parks and State Forests are
defined by acts of Parliament at the federal and state levels
respectively, so the co-ord are probably in Hansard somewhere...
Well,
Hugh Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:41:59 +1100
Matt White mattwh...@iinet.com.au wrote:
I have a sneaking suspicion that National Parks and State Forests are
defined by acts of Parliament at the federal and state levels
respectively, so the co-ord are probably in
hallo jürgen,
bei mir war eine osminog.exe im verzeichnis !
wo hast du heruntergeladen ?
gruß Jan :-)
FrauSuhrbier schrieb:
Jan Tappenbeck schrieb:
Moin!
wenn man das Programm für die Konvertierung von osm-mp (Routing)
startet, dann kommt ein Dialog.
Kann man den Vorgang auch per
addi...@gmx.net (Johann H. Addicks) writes:
[...]
Aber wenn man schon Aufwand für die Befestigung an einem
erhöhten Standpunkt treibt, dann kann ich auch besser gleich
etwas besseres als die übliche kleine 4x4cm² Planarantenne
Cool, eine 16 cm^4 messende Antenne habe ich wirklich noch
Für den Zahlen/Daten/Fakten-Teil der OSM-Presseinformation (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Presseteam/Presseinformation#Zahlen.2C_Daten.2C_Fakten
) suche ich Informationen über die Infrastruktur des Projektes (also
Server usw.)
Wo stehen die Server?
Was wird verwendet?
Wofür werden sie
Hallo !
da versucht man nun möglichst genau zu messen und beim Zeichen setzt
man die Symbole per Maus solala auf die Markierungen.
Wäre es nicht denkbar eine Art Objektfang zu erstellen der als
Nodeeinfügepunkt dirkte den POI-Definitionspunkt fäßt.
Vergleichbares ist ja schon beim Einfügen
Hallo !
weiß einer von Euch wer die Bug-Seite pflegt?
Wäre vielleicht ein deutschsprachiger Abschnitt ganz hilfreich.
gruß Jan :-)
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Hallo,
Gibt es seit dem 19.11. (Version 1086ff.)
Man sollte häufiger updaten und sich die neuen Features ansehen ;-)
Das Featuere ist noch etwas experimentell, aber Du kannst ja mal damit
experimentieren ;-)
Habe auch schon etwas gefunden was verbessert werden sollte. Ich hatte eine
Hallo Frederik,
Gibt es seit dem 19.11. (Version 1086ff.)
Ein herzliches Dankeschön!
Dir und all denen die JOSM zu einem so tollen Werkzeug machen.
Gruss, Markus
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Hallo Jan,
... oder gibt es das schon ?
Ja: Bearbeiten - Punkt hinzufügen oder Shift-D
Geht auf viele Kommastellen genau:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/de:Genauigkeit_von_Koordinaten
Gruss, Markus
___
Talk-de mailing list
Hallo Markus,
ich will ja nicht einen Punkt über die Werte definieren.
Ich möchte, dass beim Definieren eines Nodes und klicken in einem
gewissen Umkreis um den POI das dieser autom. die Koordinate des POI
übernimmt.
Aber das andere, mit dem Dialog, hatte ich auch schon gesucht !
Gruß Jan
Wolfgang Wienke schrieb:
Hallo!
Bernd Raichle schrieb:
Besser ist IMHO ein eingetragenes Ortsschild als _kein_ eingetragenes
Ortsschild. Wenn einem die Tags nicht passen, kann die spaeter jemand
anderes immer noch entsprechend korrigieren bzw. so umsetzen, dass ein
Router/Renderer/... was
Hallo Miriam,
da ich ja erst mal einen Punkt kennen muß
Seit ich weiss wie diese Dinger aussehen,
sehe ich sie überall...
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Altitude#Referenzhöhe
Gruss, Markus
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Hallo zusammen,
im Rahmen eines Seminars an der Uni Bonn kartieren wir zur
Zeit ein Stück des Kottenforstes in Bonn. Wir stehen jetzt
vor dem Problem, dass wir eine Route-Relation, die einen
Rundweg beinhaltet nicht dazu beommen, dass er gerendert
wird.
Im Wiki steht dazu der sinnvole Satz,
Tobias Wendorff schrieb:
Achja: BITTE Realname posten ... Netiquette.
Die Forderung nach Realname-Postings ist gerade in Zeiten steigender
staatlicher Vollüberwachung, aber auch im Interesse eines klein
gehaltenen Google-Suchprofils absurd. Aber selbstverständlich kann den
Realname-Fanatikern
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 01:04:00AM +, Johann H. Addicks wrote:
Schau Dir mal die Antennen an, von denen jha Links gepostet hat (die
für 159EUR und die von Leica). Das sind beides Choke Ring-Antennen.
Ich bin mir bei diesem Ding für 159FRZ nicht sicher, ob das eine ist.
Der Anbieter
Hallo Sebastian,
Im Wiki steht dazu der sinnvole Satz, dass der Weg ein
Symbol braucht. Leider fehlt die Beschreibung, wie man
dieses einbaut. Das geht so:...
... bedeutet, dass hier noch Handlungsbedarf besteht.
Bisher werden weder Relationen, noch dazugehörige Symbole angezeigt.
Dafür
Am Donnerstag 18 Dezember 2008 schrieb Garry:
Guenther Meyer schrieb:
hmm, ich hatte immer gedacht, dass die highway-typen unclassified und
residential rein von der strasse gesehen identisch sind.
der einzige unterschied ist der, dass bei einem eine bebauung vorhanden
ist (egal ob
Am Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2008DE 09:19:22DE schrieb Sebastian Niehaus:
Auf dem Fahrrad wird das eher schwierig und auf anderen
Straßenverkehrsfahrzeugen vermutlich auch.
Wenn Du siehst, was sich Amateurfunker teilweise als Antennen ans Auto,
Fahrrad, sonstigen Fortbewegungsmitteln oder den
Hallo Christian,
ich habe mich gerade nochmals in der EPSG-Datenbank umgesehen und
festgestellt, dass dort ETRS89 (EPSG:4258) und WGS84 (EPSG: 4326) als
identisch (Unterschied1m) betrachtet wird. Zumindest gelten bei der
Umrechnung die selben Parameter.
ETRS89 verwendet das Ellipsoid GRS80 ,
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
