James Livingston schrieb:
Something I just thought of that would probably be worth talking about
- how does the active contributor for voting, and other things, work
if (unfortunately) the project forks?
The forked project would be able to use the regular ODbL upgrade path (a
later
On 03/10/09 06:00, John Smith wrote:
No we need a committee to decide upon a core set of values that people
should use where possible instead of naming the same thing 10
different ways, the argument over boolean values just highlights the
point.
OK, sorry, I thought that someone was
On 03/10/09 04:00, Matt Amos wrote:
are you suggesting that the best way forward is for some authority to
decree that there is One True Way of tagging noname roads and forcing
all mappers, editors and renderers to support it?
No, the best way forward is for some authority to decree that there
On 03/10/09 00:49, DavidD wrote:
Just start making the decisions and build the thing on top of OSM. It
wouldn't even be that difficult to start off. Just take planet.osm and
strip unapproved tags and build up from there.
So OSM is in a state where it only becomes usefully consistent if you
2009/10/3 Gervase Markham gerv-gm...@gerv.net:
My view is not that we should have one committee, but that groups of
people with particular expertise should come together to develop the tag
sets for particular areas (e.g. canals, mountain biking), those should
I was starting small, I thought if
On 03/10/09 01:08, Frederik Ramm wrote:
It may be your way to try and understand a conversation by looking not
at what has been said, but at who said it and what that might reveal
about their personal situation, upbringing, education, employment or
other circumstances.
I'm used to this from
On 03/10/09 05:16, Andrew Errington wrote:
If you see a street on the map with no name displayed you might think one
of two things:
1) The street has no name (and you might hum a tune by U2)
2) The street has a name but it has not been recorded
Either way, it doesn't matter.
It darn well
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, John Smith wrote:
If there is a need for more granular committees then so be it, but
there is some fairly fundamental things that need to be addressed,
like street numbering, like foot paths/cycle ways.
and street numbering has been looked at on the committee basis and a
Time to end this debate
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
regards
Konrad
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2009/10/3 Gervase Markham gerv-gm...@gerv.net:
Two reasons off the top of my head: because we don't want to spend ages
developing consistent tag sets and putting them on the wiki only to have
someone else mess around with them. And because we'd like to get some
sort of consensus before
On 03/10/2009, at 4:25 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
Wikipedia has much less need for consistency than we do (e.g. it
doesn't
matter if one article is in American English and another in Australian
English; articles are not machine-parsed) and yet they have all
sorts of
mechanisms for
I would agree that it is completely wrong to change =groceries to =greengrocer.
It would be nice if farlokko would revert these changes except where (s)he
knows that only fruit and vegetables are sold.
The descriptions given by Martin are also correct in the UK. I tend to use
=convenience, as
On 03/10/2009, at 5:02 PM, John Smith wrote:
This was not only highly frustrating but demoralising and as a result
I've not been bothered tagging any more school zones because I don't
see a point until there is a One True Way to tag school zones.
Just do what I and a lot of other people have
On 03/10/2009, at 5:02 PM, Konrad Skeri wrote:
Time to end this debate
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
How precisely is that going to end the debate?
a) Voting isn't the way to do this. It either needs consensus or a
dictator.
b) Lots of people don't care
On 03/10/2009, at 5:02 PM, Konrad Skeri wrote:
Time to end this debate
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
Oh, and this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/VotingOnTheWikiIsStupid
___
talk mailing
I believe that open street map includes tiger data, if so how long will the
2009 version be incorporated into open street map.
John
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Kevin ksamp...@uga.edu wrote:
Released October 1, 2009
http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/tgrshp2009/tgrshp2009.html
2009/10/3 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
On 03/10/2009, at 5:02 PM, John Smith wrote:
This was not only highly frustrating but demoralising and as a result
I've not been bothered tagging any more school zones because I don't
see a point until there is a One True Way to tag school zones.
How precisely is that going to end the debate?
a) Voting isn't the way to do this. It either needs consensus or a
dictator.
Consensus will never happen and we don't have a dictator, which makes
voting the option left.
b) Lots of people don't care about some stupid vote on the wiki
There
2009/10/3 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
On 03/10/2009, at 5:02 PM, Konrad Skeri wrote:
Time to end this debate
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
Oh, and this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/VotingOnTheWikiIsStupid
Not that I'm
2009/10/3 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
2009/10/3 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
On 03/10/2009, at 5:02 PM, Konrad Skeri wrote:
Time to end this debate
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
Oh, and this:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:07 PM, MP singular...@gmail.com wrote:
I notices few days ago user farlokko changed many shop=groceries into
shop=greengrocer worldwide.
The changeset is http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2562959
I think this change is wrong, at least for most nodes in
2009/10/3 Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com:
Actually more important question - why people which love mapping (and
I guess we all do, otherwise we wouldn't be here), are discussing such
simple things as BOOLEAN values in a midday of the Saturday? (ok, for
others it is probably very very early
On 03/10/2009, at 5:54 PM, Konrad Skeri wrote:
Consensus will never happen and we don't have a dictator, which makes
voting the option left.
I actually agree that we just need to pick one, and since yes seems
to be the most commonly used one, that should be it. However, I just
don't see how
On 03/10/2009, at 4:29 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
Because sometimes, occasionally, a benevolent dictator (a phrase
used by
lots of open source projects) has to break deadlock and dictate.
Things
are working well when that power is used very, very rarely, but it
needs
to exist. Mozilla
Roy Wallace schrieb:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I really do encourage you and all
those calling for leadership to get together, form your own advisory
board or tagging committee or whatever, create the structures you think
are required, and then
ed...@billiau.net schrieb:
Frederik said
All this is possible *within* the existing OSM framework and without any
strong leader telling us where to go. I really do encourage you and all
those calling for leadership to get together, form your own advisory
board or tagging committee or
Konrad Skeri wrote:
Time to end this debate
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/boolean_values
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
James Livingston wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
How precisely is that going to end the debate?
a) Voting isn't the way to do this. It either needs consensus or a
dictator.
It will probably demonstrate that there already *is* a consensus to use
2009/10/3 Gervase Markham gerv-gm...@gerv.net:
On 03/10/09 00:49, DavidD wrote:
Just start making the decisions and build the thing on top of OSM. It
wouldn't even be that difficult to start off. Just take planet.osm and
strip unapproved tags and build up from there.
So OSM is in a state
2009/10/3 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
That mostly works because you're talking about code, not paragraphs of
description of what a tag means. If they're knowledgeable enough to
figure it out, two people reading a chunk of code should come up the
same idea of what it does, which doesn't
2009/10/3 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
We have, time and time again, debated tagging rules. Some people,
including you, tirelessly (well, more or less) campaigned for stricter
rules, with a tight voting system and all. Others, including me, were of
the laissez-faire disposition.
I
DavidD schrieb:
If that isn't good enough what other method is there?
How do you get from where OSM is now to the goal? Until someone starts
coming up with ideas that have some connection to reality this will
get nowhere. At the moment it is not much more than a bunch of people
yelling this
John Smith wrote:
The third is generally the best option in practise most of the time,
it should comprise of no more than 10 people, preferably 5 since the
more people involved the less people are going to come to a consensus.
In my experience it's always better to have an odd number off
2009/10/3 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
John Smith wrote:
The third is generally the best option in practise most of the time,
it should comprise of no more than 10 people, preferably 5 since the
more people involved the less people are going to come to a consensus.
In my experience it's
James Livingston wrote:
b) Lots of people don't care about some stupid vote on the wiki
How do you know that?
Did you have a vote on it?
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 10/3/09, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Matt Amos writes:
forcing all mappers, editors and renderers to support it?
Why do people keep saying that I want to use force? From where do
they get this idea? Have I ever suggested the use of force? Gun,
knife, sword, empty hand?
2009/10/3 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de:
James Livingston wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
How precisely is that going to end the debate?
a) Voting isn't the way to do this. It either needs consensus or a
dictator.
It will probably demonstrate
2009/10/3 Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com:
it has to be said that, according to my german dictionary, the word
Führer just means leader or guide. i don't know if there are
pejorative overtones to it in modern german use.
no, there aren't, it's the only word for guide, used in alpine
tourism,
Tagging the general direction of a way as incline=up/down:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/incline_up_down
Vote-Start: 2009-10-03
Vote-End: 2009-10-17
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
I think the real question is what would importing a new version of the
tiger data do to all the tiger data fixes we've spent so much time on.
On 10/3/2009 2:33 AM, John Mitchell wrote:
I believe that open street map includes tiger data, if so how long
will the 2009 version be incorporated
Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
For starters if the maintainers of JOSM Potlatch and Merkaartor encouraged
the use of yes/no it would be a way forward.
John Smith wrote:
2009/10/3 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
On 2 Oct 2009, at 21:06 , John Smith wrote:
You do if you want a consistent data set.
And what if I don't want?
There are 1000s of mappers and not everyone thinks like you and agrees with
you. If you can't
Is this the most up to date way of keeping addresses?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema
Well, I have some perl code that will parse the 2007/2008 TIGER data
files. My goal is to get the addresses imported into OSM this time
around.
I think the real question is what would importing a new version of the
tiger data do to all the tiger data fixes we've spent so much time on.
Good question - I would hope that whatever is done takes maximal
consideration for any existing edits - along the lines of OpenJump /
RoadMatcher
2009/10/4 Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net:
Is this the most up to date way of keeping addresses?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema
Well, I have some perl code that will parse the 2007/2008 TIGER data
files. My goal is to get the addresses
On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 02:24 +1000, John Smith wrote:
2009/10/4 Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net:
Is this the most up to date way of keeping addresses?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema
Well, I have some perl code that will parse the
2009/10/2 Dan Karran d...@karran.net:
2009/9/30 andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com:
It's at http://www.openstreetmap.pl/wp (see caveats below).
In terms of interface, those circles can get in the way at times so it
can be difficult to see what's under them, especially as they grow in
size
My goal is to get the addresses imported into OSM this time
around.
I agree - most newbies' first usage of openstreetmap.org is to type their
street address, then not look further when nothing is found.(I know we
aren't serving as a real time reference site, but some of these people
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
Is this the most up to date way of keeping addresses?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema
That's the scheme I use when adding addresses. There are presets for
it in
On 03/10/09 09:24, James Livingston wrote:
Just do what I and a lot of other people have done - give up on the
wiki being useful, and just go ahead and tag it however you like,
checking tagwatch and similar to see what other people are actually
using.
tagwatch tells you what tags people are
Matt Amos writes:
I point to the +1 year age of the Noname proposal and recent
inactivity and suggest that convergance isn't happening.
maybe there isn't a need for convergence here? we've got a nonames map
to help mappers decide where their time might be well-spent.
And well-spent
Sorry, I apparently was not clear enough there. I've corrected it on
the wiki. I meant to decide what values to use when boolean values are
intended. The examples given were not intended as examples when only
boolean values are allowed. Instead of bridge=jomenvisst we should use
bridge=yes, and
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 09:02:07 +0200, Konrad Skeri kon...@skeri.com wrote:
Time to end this debate
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boolean_values
I do not think that jumping over Draft and Proposed stages directly to
Voting stage for a Proposal is in accordance with
hello
This is any multi language funny poster for OSM.
enjoy
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:Poster_osm.jpg
salu2
Humano
--
http://GaleNUx.com es el sistema de información para la salud
--///--
Teléfono USA:
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009, John Smith wrote:
2009/10/3 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
John Smith wrote:
The third is generally the best option in practise most of the time,
it should comprise of no more than 10 people, preferably 5 since the
more people involved the less people are going to
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 2:06 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/3 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
Frederik's point is valid - if you want a tagging committee/working
group/whatever, start one. If you want an international tagging
committee, start one. If it's better
On 10/3/09, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Matt Amos writes:
I point to the +1 year age of the Noname proposal and recent
inactivity and suggest that convergance isn't happening.
maybe there isn't a need for convergence here? we've got a nonames map
to help mappers decide
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 7:45 PM, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
The problem isn't tied to a particular mechanism, it's a social
problem where we currently don't have any form if power structure,
This isn't a problem in itself.
and the one mechanism we have for choosing stuff (voting
Erm, its been all over the mailing lists about 2 weeks ago, it was
featured on the OpenGeoData blog, it has 1,452 positive votes as I
write this
2009/10/3 Andreas Kalsch andreaskal...@gmx.de:
I have found this in the OpenStreetMap news, and I wondered why I have
given the first vote for it.
On 3 Oct 2009, at 17:42, Mike N. wrote:
It needs to follow the road way to some extent, but it might be
possible
to simplify by reducing node count so that it doesn't exactly follow
the
road. In the samples I have seen, house placement is much
different than
the road path when
2009/10/3 Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net:
On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 02:24 +1000, John Smith wrote:
2009/10/4 Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net:
Is this the most up to date way of keeping addresses?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema
Well, I
2009/10/4 Konrad Skeri kon...@skeri.com:
boolean values are allowed. Instead of bridge=jomenvisst we should use
bridge=yes, and instead of electrified=naltaseotroligt we should use
Bridge isn't listed as boolean only, you can also have bridge=viaduct
which I've used a few times.
Other values
2009/10/4 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
Do you realise that the only alternative to voluntary adoption is
enforcement? Do you really want to force your idea on others even if
they think their idea is better? /No thanks/.
That isn't the only alternative, you always have carrots not just
2009/10/4 Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com:
The OSM community is hostile to leadership even when that leadership
merely renders advice. Frederick's advice to create a committee to
I think the problem here isn't the OSM community, but a vocal minority
that don't want anything but the status quo,
2009/10/4 Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com:
no one is advocating for error. you seem to be advocating for a tag
with the sole purpose of not rendering something in a single renderer.
to me, that seems wrong.
I use a similar feature in JOSM to show me unnamed streets to know
which ones still need
Andrew Errington writes:
1) The street has no name (and you might hum a tune by U2)
2) The street has a name but it has not been recorded
Either way, it doesn't matter.
E, no, it really does matter.
If I am a map user then I can not intuit whether the name is missing, or
there
Before we get too far, I want to say that I believe that OSM will
NEVER be completely correct or consistent. Its correctness and
consistency will fluctuate up and down depending on the expectations
of the viewer.
That said, I believe it a mistake to NOT have perfect consistency as a
goal even
Peter Leemans schreef:
Zal mooi zijn om jullie nog eens in actie te zien, vond de korte 'demo'
op SOTM best indrukwekkend.
Ik zal er zelf ook twee dagen zijn, en mijn 'map-materiaal' meebrengen.
Als het nodig is kan ik eventueel de stand mee helpen bemannen (wil wel
enkele presentaties
Hallo Rob,
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:27 +0200, Rob interru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi Rik
Verder kwam ik een
duidelijk track tegen die was afgezet met een schapenhek terwijl volgens
de bordjes van Staatsbosbeheer sprake is van 'Vrij wandelen'.
ik hoop dat je dat hek ook met barrier=gate
On Saturday 03 October 2009 15:45:25 Rik de Landloper wrote:
ik hoop dat je dat hek ook met barrier=gate hebt getagged.. eventueel
nog met een barrier=fence aan beide kanten ?
Nee ik heb ze niet getagd. Zoals in mijn eerste posting aangegeven vormt
het hek een barrier voor de geiten en niet
Hallo,
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:15 +0200, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Saturday 03 October 2009 15:45:25 Rik de Landloper wrote:
ik hoop dat je dat hek ook met barrier=gate hebt getagged.. eventueel
nog met een barrier=fence aan beide kanten ?
Nee ik heb ze niet getagd. Zoals in
Hallo Hein,
Goed aanbod. Ik heb zelf geen apparaat te leen. Maar ik dacht dat ze bij
osm-nl wel apparaten te leen hadden. Probleem is dat je alleen aan een
track op een gps niet voldoende hebt. Het is belangrijk om allerlei
zaken die je onderweg tegenkomt op te schrijven of in te praten op een
I stuffed up the Longitude of the central meridian, it should be 149.00929483.
That being said, I tested 5 different co-ords and some seem to be out/hard to
recognise bbq's.
I downloaded 7 parameter transformation tool(works with linux/wine) from
On 03/10/2009, at 5:21 PM, Evan Sebire wrote:
If someone knows a bbq that is clearly visible on the satellite
imagery that
would help to verify the procedure.
There are two at
http://maps.bigtincan.com/?z=17ll=-35.293,149.093layer=BTT
I think I did those from waypoints, but
2009/10/3 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
On 03/10/2009, at 5:21 PM, Evan Sebire wrote:
If someone knows a bbq that is clearly visible on the satellite
imagery that
would help to verify the procedure.
There are two at
http://maps.bigtincan.com/?z=17ll=-35.293,149.093layer=BTT
I
Using the Qld govt boundaries information it's possible to work out
where streets are, although some streets have been consumed and the
boundary information doesn't reflect this.
Does anyone know how roads drawn from this information should be tagged?
I just took another look at the transformation tool
http://www.actpla.act.gov.au/__data/assets/file/0016/5209/geomin32.exe
and the spreadsheet is giving out the AMG lat long not MGA.
I entered the lat long that the tool states is MGA into g'sat imagery and
presto, mark straight on top of bbq!
2009/10/3 Evan Sebire e...@sebire.org:
I just took another look at the transformation tool
http://www.actpla.act.gov.au/__data/assets/file/0016/5209/geomin32.exe
and the spreadsheet is giving out the AMG lat long not MGA.
I entered the lat long that the tool states is MGA into g'sat imagery
There is a pro version that is more or less identical to the free
version of our POI application for mobile phones, people want
something more if they think it's got more perceived value, than
something given away as freeware, which I find ironically funny.
Any way there is 50 free copies being
The problem is there is not one spreadsheet. The downloadable tool is rough
enough for these types of POI. High accuracy between AMG to MGA only can be
done with tools that use grid transformation (a bit table of values, NT file),
these are also available as a free download, but would then
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, John Smith wrote:
2009/10/3 Evan Sebire e...@sebire.org:
The problem is there is not one spreadsheet. The downloadable tool is
rough enough for these types of POI. High accuracy between AMG to MGA
only can be done with tools that use grid transformation (a bit table of
2009/10/3 Evan Sebire e...@sebire.org:
The solution exists if we want to use a free download tool. I do have source
code for performing grid transformation from NTv2 files, but I think the
effort creating an accurate tool for bbq's isn't justified.
The tool from act gov will be within a
2009/10/3 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
On 02/10/2009, at 9:01 PM, John Smith wrote:
Might have to be a multipolygon, I just can't get it to render at all
if I tell mapnik the tiles are dirty.
I've just changed it over to be a multipolygon relation - if that
works, I'll go file a bug
2009/10/3 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
Using the Qld govt boundaries information it's possible to work out
where streets are, although some streets have been consumed and the
boundary information doesn't reflect this.
Does anyone know how roads drawn from this information should be
John,
How do you mean consumed?
Is this related to the comment you made on my diary entry at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/morb_au/diary/8140 ?
I've also added my own tagging examples at a new page at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data.australia.gov.au/Queensland if that
helps.
2009/10/3 Brendan Morley morb@beagle.com.au:
How do you mean consumed?
Some land owners have taken over the land when it's probably still
crown land. For example:
http://maps.google.com.au/?ie=UTF8ll=-26.158115,152.64636spn=0.007184,0.013937z=17
Horswoord Road mostly doesn't exist, yet the
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 22:29:13 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/3 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
Using the Qld govt boundaries information it's possible to work out
where streets are, although some streets have been consumed and the
boundary information doesn't
2009/10/3 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 22:29:13 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/3 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
Using the Qld govt boundaries information it's possible to work out
where streets are, although some streets have been
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:46:22 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/3 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 22:29:13 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/3 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
Using the Qld govt boundaries
I intended to fix it as soon as I could work out what tags were
needed, but I thought I'd give an example of what is possible thanks
to the new data becoming available.
Ok, so now a quick description of how you did this.
--
Cheers
Ross
___
2009/10/3 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
I intended to fix it as soon as I could work out what tags were
needed, but I thought I'd give an example of what is possible thanks
to the new data becoming available.
Ok, so now a quick description of how you did this.
Brendan has set up a WMS
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:25:44 +1000, John Smith wrote:
2009/10/3 Brendan Morley morb@beagle.com.au:
How do you mean consumed?
Some land owners have taken over the land when it's probably still
crown land. For example:
Ok, so now a quick description of how you did this.
Brendan has set up a WMS server of property boundaries, and things
that aren't boudnaries show up as black areas and it's possible to
guess which is roads depending how straight the gaps are between
boudnaries.
Here's a before shot of
2009/10/4 Brendan Morley morb@beagle.com.au:
That's one of the reasons why I'm tagging DCDB-derived roads with note=DCDB
indicates a right of way in this location. Needs a field survey to confirm
highway type and actual alignment. Sometimes the road formation does not
exist!
That was just
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 00:15:21 +1000, Ross Scanlon wrote:
Ok, so now a quick description of how you did this.
Brendan has set up a WMS server of property boundaries, and things
that aren't boudnaries show up as black areas and it's possible to
guess which is roads depending how straight the
On 02/10/2009, at 8:33 PM, James Livingston wrote:
I converted the World Heritage Area file on my machine, and just
uploaded one of the areas[1]. Does it look okay to people? If so,
I'll go ahead and do the rest of the WHA data.
Right, so it turns out that my randomly chosen one was a
2009/10/4 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
Right, so it turns out that my randomly chosen one was a complete
fluke - in most cases the World Heritage Areas and the National Parks
don't have the same boundaries. There is however a proposed tagging
scheme for UNESCO World Heritage areas/places,
2009/10/4 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
On 04/10/2009, at 12:33 PM, John Smith wrote:
whc:criteria:7=yes
whc:criteria:8=yes
whc:criteria:9=yes
Given there's a finite set of criteria (ten of them) that sounds good.
It may be extended in future, which might be problematic for embedding
Hallo zusammen!
Auch in Landshut haben wir es endlich geschafft, ein kleines Treffen auf
die Beine zu stellen:
am: 05.10.2009 (Achtung, übermorgen! :-) )
um: 20:00
im: Rieblwirt, Freyung 631
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=48.53672mlon=12.15913zoom=17
Gäste sind natürlich auch herzlich
Hallo!
JOSM wird immer komfortabler aber auch immer komplizierter.
Könnte nicht mal einer der Fachleute die JOS-Hilfe entsprechend
aktualisieren?
Z.B.:
Ich versuche Daten hochzuladen und erhalten Konflikt auf Datenebene 1,
Konflik muss zunächst gelöst werden. Das sagt mir natürlich wenig. Die
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
