[Talk-es] semanarioOSM Nº 434 2018-11-06-2018-11-12

Hola, el semanario Nº 434, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/10965/ ¡Disfruta! semanarioOSM? ¿Dónde?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages ¿Quién?:

[talk-latam] semanarioOSM Nº 434 2018-11-06-2018-11-12

Hola, el semanario Nº 434, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/10965/ ¡Disfruta! semanarioOSM? ¿Dónde?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages ¿Quién?:

[Talk-cl] semanarioOSM Nº 434 2018-11-06-2018-11-12

Hola, el semanario Nº 434, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/10965/ ¡Disfruta! semanarioOSM? ¿Dónde?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages ¿Quién?:

Re: [Talk-it] Rete idrografica minore

Hei! Non ci avevo pensato. Dev'essere colpa dell'abitare in montagna e di essere abituato a vedere solo piccoli corsi d'acqua! Ma mi pare che anche le divisioni foceali prendano una diversificazione nel nome (mi viene in mente il Po di Goro) E rimango dell'idea che il nome sia di un corso d'acqua

Re: [Talk-us] Short 'connector' roads -- _link or not?

On 11/20/18 16:23, Andrew wrote: > The rule I've always followed is that it's the highest _link unless it's > at an intersection with a named street, in which case the names roads > just connect. > > The only exception I think could make sense is if the /*only* /function > of the connector is to

Re: [talk-au] Question Regarding multiple alt_names

Here you go Andrew https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-27.9389/153.3974 The main road shown here is the Gold Coast Hwy & has major signs saying so (& once upon a time was Highway 1!). The East-West section is Brisbane Rd (with street level signs saying so & addresses as xx Brisbane Rd).

Re: [Talk-us] Short 'connector' roads -- _link or not?

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 4:06 PM Martijn van Exel wrote: > Hi, > As I was creating more ‘unnamed roads’ challenges in MapRoulette, and spot > checking them, I came across a number of cases like this one: > > https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3313/task/6414594 > > To my mind these need to be

Re: [talk-au] Question Regarding multiple alt_names

I have an example that has bothering me for some time. This building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228033047 is on a dual named street. The ten or so houses on the Southern side of so called “Elderslie Avenue” East of Braund Road are actually Martin Close. Every other house on “Elderslie

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

sent from a phone > On 20. Nov 2018, at 19:56, Christoph Hormann wrote: > > It is also completely > non-verifiable (anyone can claim something is theirs). it is completely verifiable: you can read, hear and see that they claim it. As long as we agree that ‚anyone‘ is not sufficient (as in

Re: [talk-au] Question Regarding multiple alt_names

Do you have an Australian example? Highway name where the road segment has a different name I would create the relation and put it there. local_name is good for a local or informal or colloquial name. On Wed., 21 Nov. 2018, 4:22 am Nemanja Bračko Hi all, > > Can anyone help us, what we should

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Osmose et les codes UIC

On Sat, 17 Nov 2018, Jérôme Villafruela wrote: > Le 17/11/2018 à 16:47, Frédéric Rodrigo a écrit : > > Osmose utilise ça: > > https://ressources.data.sncf.com/explore/dataset/sncf-ter-gtfs/table/ > > Je ne sais pas ce que ça vaut pour les UIC. > > > Sur la "plateforme ouverte des données

Re: [Talk-it] Rete idrografica minore

Mah... credo che tutti gli estuari a "delta" del mondo non siano molto d'accordo... Ciao! Sergio On 2018-11-20 20:26, Ivo Reano wrote: > Scrivo a proposito dell'utilizzo di una relazione per "unire" diversi rami di > un corso d'acqua. > Se non vengo smentito penso che non sia corretto. > Un

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

Are we looking for a solution of existing problem? Or thinking of hypothetical future problems and how they could potentially be harder (but not impossible) to solve using proposed solution? With a purpose of declaring it "too difficult" so "lets do nothing"? Most of us are happy to live in

Re: [Talk-us] Short 'connector' roads -- _link or not?

The rule I've always followed is that it's the highest _link unless it's at an intersection with a named street, in which case the names roads just connect. The only exception I think could make sense is if the *only *function of the connector is to connect to a service road–like in a

Re: [Talk-us] Short 'connector' roads -- _link or not?

On 11/20/18 16:06, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Hi, > As I was creating more ‘unnamed roads’ challenges in MapRoulette, and spot > checking them, I came across a number of cases like this one: > > https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3313/task/6414594 > > To my mind these need to be fixed, but

[Talk-us] Short 'connector' roads -- _link or not?

Hi, As I was creating more ‘unnamed roads’ challenges in MapRoulette, and spot checking them, I came across a number of cases like this one: https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3313/task/6414594 To my mind these need to be fixed, but I wanted to ask here first, so I can get the

Re: [talk-au] Hello!

By the way - I started collecting the Top Mapper lists for various cities in Australia using my Meet Your Mapper tool[0]. If you find it interesting you can review them here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1axVjSpcCuD14AubLzA6E00fMxRLfXBHWPQvdijwsyUM/edit?usp=sharing

Re: [Talk-us] Forest Routes

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 9:50 AM Clifford Snow wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 9:44 AM Martijn van Exel wrote: > >> It is worth noting that the current shape file available from USDA seems >> to be more comprehensive than the forest service roads layer available: >>

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

On Tuesday 20 November 2018, Andy Townsend wrote: > >Do you know a country which has a fluctuating representation of > > its borders say in schoolbooks? > > In my lifetime, lots - [...] Back in the days when i was at school typical German school maps knew at least four different types of

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

>>Do you know a country which has a fluctuating representation of its >> borders say in schoolbooks? > > In my lifetime, lots - countries (and I don't mean where boundaries > changed, but the external recogition of them did). For example, the US > only recognised the People's Republic of

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

On 20/11/2018 19:43, Tomas Straupis wrote: Do you know a country which has a fluctuating representation of its borders say in schoolbooks? In my lifetime, lots - countries (and I don't mean where boundaries changed, but the external recogition of them did).  For example, the US only

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

All borders are verifiable mostly only by checking official documents. I think you are missing something very basic here. If two official documents are in disagreement then which one is correct? Two countries claiming the same territory for example. Those apps, which cannot tolerate

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

> From a practical point of view different applications such as OSMand take a > snapshot of the database at a point in time. > How would your proposal work with these derivatives and there are quite a few > including the odd one that gets updated once or year or so. Sorry, I did not

Re: [talk-au] Hello!

Hi Joel, Nice to make your virtual acquaintance. I noticed there was a bit of discussion as to how to snap _link / ramp roads to the main highway. The Telenav team uses the convention as described on the wiki, snapping to the main road where the physical separation ends or begins. So the

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

On Tuesday 20 November 2018, Tomas Straupis wrote: > > But it would eliminate all border DISPUTES and ELIMINATE all this > political crap out of OSM discussions. Yes, sure, by allowing every mapper to map his or her specific subjective desire how the reality should look like we could eliminate

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

>From a practical point of view different applications such as OSMand take a snapshot of the database at a point in time. How would your proposal work with these derivatives and there are quite a few including the odd one that gets updated once or year or so. Are you suggesting that all

Re: [Talk-it] Rete idrografica minore

Scrivo a proposito dell'utilizzo di una relazione per "unire" diversi rami di un corso d'acqua. Se non vengo smentito penso che non sia corretto. Un corso d'acqua ha un nome sul suo intero percorso, un ramo secondario può avere un nome diverso, ma non dovrebbe avere lo stesso nome del corso

Re: [Talk-it] Priorità ad una strada invece che all'altra con lo stesso highway

On 11/20/2018 06:22 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > In un certo senso io mappo volutamente per il router, e alcuni elementi > solo per i router Tu inserisci delle informazioni "oggettive", siano esse per l'utilizzo da parte dei motori di routing o di altri consumatori di dati. Non inserisci

Re: [talk-au] Question Regarding multiple alt_names

Hi Nemanja, You can use semicolons if there are multiple alternate names, like alt_name=Big Apple Street;Highway 666. Folks used to use name_1, name_2 but this seems to be generally discouraged now. There is also loc_name but the use of that has always been a bit unclear to me, since local

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

2018-11-20, an, 20:58 Christoph Hormann rašė: > This is not a workable approach as an universal rule. The volume of > boundary relation overlap world wide would be enormeous. You would > have a significant number of boundaries that have no practical meaning > today. Some countries have pretty

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

On Tuesday 20 November 2018, Tomas Straupis wrote: > > How should we decide which way to map disputed borders?! > > As it was mapped a week ago: BOTH ways (included in BOTH country > polygons). This is not a workable approach as an universal rule. The volume of boundary relation overlap world

[Talk-GB] Guildford Blackwell Farm redevelopment

Hi Is their anyone in the Guildford  area who can verify these edits by a new user please? They look like a part of the town's planned expansion, but I'm assuming Adam got a bit ahead of himself. He's also overlapped roads onto the railway. I've put in a changeset message to him.

Re: [Talk-it] Rete idrografica minore

Ciao, Il giorno mar 20 nov 2018, 00:30 Andrea Albani ha scritto: > Il giorno lun 19 nov 2018 alle ore 21:01 Eros Rasetto > ha scritto: > >> Ciao, vorrei sapere se esiste un metodo abbastanza semplice per inserire >> i corsi d'acqua minori su Openstreetmap tramite Josm, >> >> Ciao, > > trovo

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

2018-11-20, an, 19:59 Rory McCann rašė: > How should we decide which way to map disputed borders?! As it was mapped a week ago: BOTH ways (included in BOTH country polygons). If required - disputed territory (polygon geometry) can be mapped as "disputed=yes" with a tag

Re: [Talk-us] Forest Routes

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:27 PM Max Erickson wrote: > As other have mentioned, there are many numbered roads managed by the > USFS. They range in development from closed, abandoned log roads to > well maintained pavement. I map them using the FS prefix. > > For the general public one of the

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

OSM currently maps borders based on "physical control", which can have outcomes like this. I can see why it would be.. undesirable to some. If you think OSM should use a different rule, then please suggest another rule. We can talk about it and see what that rule would be like. It's a little more

Re: [Talk-us] Forest Routes

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 9:44 AM Martijn van Exel wrote: > It is worth noting that the current shape file available from USDA seems > to be more comprehensive than the forest service roads layer available: > https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?dsetCategory=transportation > > >

Re: [Talk-us] Forest Routes

It is worth noting that the current shape file available from USDA seems to be more comprehensive than the forest service roads layer available: https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?dsetCategory=transportation

Re: [Talk-us] Forest Routes

Worth noting that most people just call them forest service roads. I've never heard anyone call them "forest highways." On Tue, Nov 20, 2018, 9:27 AM Max Erickson As other have mentioned, there are many numbered roads managed by the > USFS. They range in development from closed, abandoned log

Re: [Talk-us] Forest Routes

As other have mentioned, there are many numbered roads managed by the USFS. They range in development from closed, abandoned log roads to well maintained pavement. I map them using the FS prefix. For the general public one of the main uses is the publication of motor vehicle access conditions:

Re: [Talk-it] Priorità ad una strada invece che all'altra con lo stesso highway

> Come non si mappa per il rendering, non si mappa per il routing! > Hmmm. In un certo senso io mappo volutamente per il router, e alcuni elementi solo per i router Quando scelgo le etichette da mettere su un elemento di tipo strada ho in mente il potenziale utente del elemento, sperando che un

[talk-au] Question Regarding multiple alt_names

Hi all, Can anyone help us, what we should do in the situation when we have more then one alt_name? Imagine the situation: RD_NAME1: New York Street RD_NAME2: Big Apple Street RD_NAME3: US Highway This is not a problem, let's say NY Street is name, US Highway is alt_name (which is part of wider

Re: [Talk-cz] Import rozvoden v Praze

Ahoj, Prosel jsem nekolik RS a i kdyz vsechny maji v datech "TYP_ZKR": "TR", v poznamce je vzdy napsano ze jde o spinaci, napr."Spinaci sidl. Dablice". Celkem jich je v Praze takto oznaceno 23. Nevim jestli jsou to vsechny, ale vsechny co uz jsou v osm oznacene jako RS maji v poznamce "Spinaci".

Re: [Talk-it] Rete idrografica minore

Il giorno mar 20 nov 2018 alle ore 15:30 Roberto Brazzelli < geom.brazze...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Ho guardato le mappature in zone attive e direi di no, > aggiungo però un dubbio...se il canale a cielo aperto finisce > su una strada (ovviamente prosegue in canale coperto ma non ho > dati per

Re: [Talk-it] Dove finiscono i dati non renderizzati?

C'è almeno un'app di navigazione che permette di ottenere tutte le informazioni sui POI presenti in SM in OSM direttamente dalla mappa: MapFactor Navigator Free (la versione che utilizza OSM e non TomTom). Sulla mappa basta cliccare su un POI e successivamente "info" Volker On Tue, 20 Nov 2018

Re: [Talk-it] Dove finiscono i dati non renderizzati?

Il 18/11/18 18:52, aldoct ha scritto: Alcuni anni dopo l'inizio della mia collaborazione al progetto OSM e dopo alcune migliaia di changset, ancora non ho capito questa cosa: se mappo un hotel ed inserisco sia il nome che tutti gli altri dati di contatto (indirizzo, telefono, sito web, email

Re: [Talk-us] Forest Routes

Frederik, I don’t remember it being widely discussed / agreed upon. When I map these roads I include the FS number (just the number) as a ref, since that is how they are signposted in the field. https://dcasler.com/2011/06/16/owl-creek-pass-getting-there-from-ridgway/

Re: [Talk-us] Forest Routes

FrederiK: The US Forest Service is part of the Department of Agriculture(USDA) and has quite an extensive network of all of their roads including logging trails. In fact it is almost too much. Here is a link to the Authority, I hope it helps. https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/ Tom Roff- HPMS/

[Talk-GB] NT paths in OSM

Hi Ian, Good that you identified OSM as a key part in this project. As noted on the forum, you probably want to avoid adding access=yes. The access tags (access, vehicle, motor_vehicle foot, etc) are a hierarchy as shown in the diagram linked below. Adding access=yes would imply that all other

[Talk-us] Forest Routes

Hi, apparently you have something in the US called "Forest Routes" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forest_Highway which even has its own kind of shield! (Yes I know, there are *many* shields. I've followed the discussions!) Is there some common understanding of how to map these, if at all? I've

Re: [Talk-ca] Tagging paths that are snowploughed?

I note that https://github.com/BikeOttawa/OSM-Bike-Ottawa-Tagging-Guide/blob/master/README.md under ploughing this recommends paths that are ploughed are tagged winter_service=no which is the opposite way round to map features in the link. No mention is made of seasonal=no. I suggest it needs

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Hot-francophone] Soyons carto, contribuons au renouvellement des serveurs OSM-France

Séverin, La campagne de dons pour les serveurs n'a pour le moment pas de limite. Lors de la dernière campagne de dons pour les serveurs, beaucoup s'étaient plaint de ne pas avoir pu donner car le délai était trop court. Mais a priori je pense qu'on la clôturera à la fin de l'année. C'est vraiment

Re: [Talk-it] Dove finiscono i dati non renderizzati?

se cerchi il nome dell'hotel e lo selezioni dall'elenco che ti si apre a sinistra, puoi vedere tutti i dati associati all'elemento. per cercare elementi sulla mappa (e dopo averli selezionati vederne i tag) consiglio http://overpass-turbo.eu/ purtroppo sulla mappa non ci sono elementi

Re: [Talk-ca] Tagging paths that are snowploughed?

I don't do slack. Cheerio John On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, 11:01 am Yaro Shkvorets In Ottawa cycling community we moved on from seasonal to winter_service > about a week ago following a discussion on slack channel. > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM James wrote: > >> I know it's been linked before:

Re: [Talk-it] R: Inserimento dati CAI

Gianfranco Graizzaro wrote > > Hai selezionato il layer "rilievi" > > Prima di dare l'ok > > Gianfranco ecco il passaggio che mi mancava! grazie mille! non mi era mai capitato di dover selezionare qualcosa in quel box...mea culpa - Ciao, Aury -- Sent from:

Re: [Talk-ca] Tagging paths that are snowploughed?

In Ottawa cycling community we moved on from seasonal to winter_service about a week ago following a discussion on slack channel. On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM James wrote: > I know it's been linked before: > > https://github.com/BikeOttawa/OSM-Bike-Ottawa-Tagging-Guide/blob/master/README.md

Re: [Talk-ca] Tagging paths that are snowploughed?

I know it's been linked before: https://github.com/BikeOttawa/OSM-Bike-Ottawa-Tagging-Guide/blob/master/README.md On Tue., Nov. 20, 2018, 10:55 a.m. John Whelan Which means more tags on the map but at least you can see which are > definitely cleared. > > Interesting since its Ottawa I'll follow

Re: [Talk-ca] Tagging paths that are snowploughed?

Which means more tags on the map but at least you can see which are definitely cleared. Interesting since its Ottawa I'll follow this convention. Thanks John James wrote on 2018-11-20 10:53 AM: pathes that ARE cleared are tagged seasonal=no as they are NOT seasonal(closes during winter for

Re: [Talk-ca] Tagging paths that are snowploughed?

pathes that ARE cleared are tagged seasonal=no as they are NOT seasonal(closes during winter for example) On Tue., Nov. 20, 2018, 10:51 a.m. John Whelan I'm not sure exactly what you mean. Paths that not cleared are tagged > seasonal=no or tags that are cleared get the tag seasonal=no? > > The

Re: [Talk-ca] Tagging paths that are snowploughed?

I'm not sure exactly what you mean.  Paths that not cleared are tagged seasonal=no or tags that are cleared get the tag seasonal=no? The default on winter_service is yes so only the ones that are not cleared need to be tagged with winter_service=no Could you point me to a reference in map

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [Hot-francophone] Soyons carto, contribuons au renouvellement des serveurs OSM-France

Bonjour Donat, Cette levée de fonds est-elle sur un temps donné ou va-t-elle être à long terme avec des rappels à intervalles réguliers ? N'y a-t-il pas possibilité de configurer dans AssoConnect côté admin la possibilité d'un paiement via PayPal ? Il faudrait vraiment rencontrer les développeurs

Re: [Talk-ca] Tagging paths that are snowploughed?

FYI, the Ottawa cycling community is using "seasonal=no" on pathways to indicate winter maintenance. -- Amos On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 19:01, John Whelan wrote: > Yes but for the path I'm thinking of that crosses a park specifically I'm > interested in tagging it just for cycling not a more

[Talk-GB] Derby Pub Meeting tonight

A quick reminder that we are meeting as usual at the Old Silk Mill from 19.30 this evening. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nottingham/Pub_Meetup#Next_Meeting Regards, Jerry ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-de] "Ringschleifenanlagen"

Hi,  das einzige, das ich finden konnte, ist hearing_impaired:induction_loop=yes, mit nur 14 Verwendungen ist der aber auch alles andere als etabliert. Viele GrüßeAuch MichaelAm Dienstag, 20. November 2018, 15:11:29 MEZ hat Michael Wiedmann Folgendes geschrieben: Hi, gibt es ein

Re: [Talk-it] Rete idrografica minore

Ho guardato le mappature in zone attive e direi di no, aggiungo però un dubbio...se il canale a cielo aperto finisce su una strada (ovviamente prosegue in canale coperto ma non ho dati per mappare), è giusto interrompere la way del canale sulla way della strada? credo di si..e in questo caso serve

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

Tomas, If you want OSM to reconsider the disputed boundaries problem, you should analyse a selection of problems from around the world and come up with a policy that can address the issues there. As a charicature, you could say that we were faced with the choice of making a map that's illegal in

Re: [Talk-it] Inserimento dati CAI

> > > >> Mi riallaccio a quanto detto a proposito degli editor. Per esperienza so >> che josm può essere ostico per l'utente medio CAI, o in generale un >> principiante. Personalmente penso che ID sia l'editor da usare nei corsi >> introduttivi. L'obiettivo sarebbe di catturare un nuovo utente per

Re: [Talk-it] Inserimento dati CAI

On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 07:33, Aury88 wrote: > > > e ricollegandomi alla questione niubbi io avrei un problema con il task "#38 > - CAIOSM - Sicilia" > ho provato ad inserire il link WMS indicato [1] > > ma ottengo l'errore: > > "Errore: msWMSLoadGetMapParams():WMS server error. At least a layer

Re: [Talk-it] Inserimento dati CAI

On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 at 09:16, Marco Barbieri wrote: > Ciao a tutti. > ciao, > Mi riallaccio a quanto detto a proposito degli editor. Per esperienza so > che josm può essere ostico per l'utente medio CAI, o in generale un > principiante. Personalmente penso che ID sia l'editor da usare nei

[Talk-de] "Ringschleifenanlagen"

Hi, gibt es ein akzeptiertes taggen für sogenannte "Ringschleifenanlagen" (auch "induktive Höranlage", "Induktionsschleifenanlage", "Induktionsschleife" genannt) in (öffentlichen) Gebäuden? Michael -- ___ Talk-de mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

On 20/11/2018 13:09, Tomas Straupis wrote: Can you give an example where things in OpenStreetMap are mapped in a different way than overwhelming majority of world thinks? If "the UN" counts for "the overwhelming majority of the world", there are quite a few examples. The UN recognises

[Talk-it] R: Inserimento dati CAI

> e ricollegandomi alla questione niubbi io avrei un problema con il task "#38 > - CAIOSM - Sicilia" > ho provato ad inserire il link WMS indicato [1] > ma ottengo l'errore: > > "Errore: msWMSLoadGetMapParams():WMS server error. At least a layer name > requiredin LAYERS" > > ...cosa ho sbagliato

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] rappel concernant l'élection de OSMF board

Grace a Guillaume et Pascal Neis, j'ai pu faire quelques simples statistiques sur le sujet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/diary/46970 Op vr 16 nov. 2018 om 08:41 schreef Christian Quest : > Merci Guillaume pour ces infos ! > > Du coup... peux-tu transmettre très

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

2018-11-20, an, 14:33 john whelan rašė: > I think you have expressed your opinion but unfortunately whilst difficult > for you to accept traditionally OSM maps a certain way and has done > for sometime even though many governments and others would wish > we did something else. Can you give an

Re: [Talk-es] Name y name:es

Hola En maps.me es si no recuerdo mal, si metes el nombre de alguna cosa automáticamente te pone los dos etiquetados. Probablemente vengan de ahí las ediciones. Como ha dicho Daniel si es útil. Un saludo. El mar., 20 nov. 2018 a las 13:48, dcapillae () escribió: > Hola, Alejandro. > > Sí,

Re: [Talk-es] Name y name:es

Hola, Alejandro. Sí, aporta algo, no es redundante. Es un etiquetado «correcto y útil», según el wiki [1]: > «name=*» contiene "el nombre predeterminado común". > «name:código_de_idioma=*» contiene el nombre en el idioma especificado, > por ejemplo, «name:ru=Москва» contiene el nombre en idioma

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

I think you have expressed your opinion but unfortunately whilst difficult for you to accept traditionally OSM maps a certain way and has done for sometime even though many governments and others would wish we did something else. The world isn't perfect, but from a pragmatic point of view I think

Re: [Talk-it] Priorità ad una strada invece che all'altra con lo stesso highway

On 11/20/2018 12:32 PM, Sergio Manzi wrote: > Ah, credo di capire: quindi priorityè un attributo specifico del tipo di > highway e non è possibile indicarlo esplicitamente con una tag (es. > priority=0.75, per rendere la highway=unclassified "/un po' più uguale > delle altre/"...), giusto? Come

Re: [Talk-it] Priorità ad una strada invece che all'altra con lo stesso highway

Infatti: la chiave "priority" ha tutto un altro significato (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:priority). Mi scuso per la confusione... Sergio On 2018-11-20 12:32, Sergio Manzi wrote: > > Ah, credo di capire: quindi priorityè un attributo specifico del tipo di > highway e non è

Re: [Talk-at] zweisprachige Ortsnamen/Tafeln

kevin_m...@tutanota.com schrieb: > Ich hab die Diskussion hier über die zentralen  talk-at Archive auf > lists.openstreetmap.org gesehen und erlaub mir mal mich einzuklinken. Ich > werde > etwas ausführlicher aus geolinguistischer Sicht schreiben Danke für den Input übrigens. Es ist noch

Re: [Talk-it] Priorità ad una strada invece che all'altra con lo stesso highway

Ah, credo di capire: quindi priorityè un attributo specifico del tipo di highway e non è possibile indicarlo esplicitamente con una tag (es. priority=0.75, per rendere la highway=unclassified "/un po' più uguale delle altre/"...), giusto? Ciao! On 2018-11-20 12:26, Andrea Albani wrote: > Il

Re: [Talk-it] Priorità ad una strada invece che all'altra con lo stesso highway

Il giorno mar 20 nov 2018 alle ore 12:10 Sergio Manzi ha scritto: > Eccellente analisi, Andrea, ma mi sembra che ci sia anche un parametro, " > *priority*", che sia esattamente quello che Riccardo stava cercando... > > Grazie In realtà quello serve essenzialmente per dare un "peso" alle varie

Re: [Talk-it] Priorità ad una strada invece che all'altra con lo stesso highway

Eccellente analisi, Andrea, ma mi sembra che ci sia anche un parametro, "/priority/", che sia esattamente quello che Riccardo stava cercando... Ciao, Sergio On 2018-11-20 12:01, Andrea Albani wrote: > > Il giorno lun 19 nov 2018 alle ore 22:44 riccardopastoc...@alice.it >

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

2018-11-20, an, 12:42 Elena ``of Valhalla'' rašė: > looking at a map where Crimea is part of Ukraine may lead people to plan > a trip to it, only to be stopped and possibly questioned. But going to Crimea without Ukrainian visa (and not via Ukraine controlled territory) would have legal

Re: [Talk-it] Priorità ad una strada invece che all'altra con lo stesso highway

Il giorno lun 19 nov 2018 alle ore 22:44 riccardopastoc...@alice.it < riccardopastoc...@alice.it> ha scritto: > > Domanda riguardante Osmand: > 1) mantenendo sempre lo stesso highway es: tertiary > C'è possibilità di far preferire un percorso invece che un altro? > > 2) Altro esempio: immaginate

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Encore les piscines

La MapRoulette sur les piscines est finie ! 98% des 185 cas ont été corrigés. Il est bien cet outil MapRoulette ! Le 12/11/2018 à 23:06, Paul Desgranges a écrit : Oui, la tâche https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3265 permet de vérifier tous les 'leisure=swimming_pool de type nœud avec un

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Encore les piscines

La MapRoulette sur les piscines est finie ! 98% des 185 cas ont été corrigés. Il est bien cet outil MapRoulette ! Le 12/11/2018 à 23:06, Paul Desgranges a écrit : Oui, la tâche https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3265 permet de vérifier tous les 'leisure=swimming_pool de type nœud avec un

[Talk-es] Name y name:es

Últimamente veo un montón de elementos en lugares en zonas de España donde no hay lengua cooficial que están etiquetados con name y name:es con el mismo valor en ambos atributos. ¿Aporta algo este etiquetado redundante? ___ Talk-es mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

On 2018-11-20 at 11:22:46 +0200, Tomas Straupis wrote: > While I have already stated a number of negative effects (which have > so far been ignored), what positive effects does excluding Crimea from > Ukraine gives? The only way you can get to occupied territory of > Crimea from government

Re: [Talk-lt] A5 šiauriau Marijampolės

2018-11-12, pr, 12:38 Aurimas Fišeras rašė: > Aš radau tik: > http://lakd.lrv.lt/lt/projektai/via-baltica/2017-08-10 > > Pagal jį tikrinau, ar prie Puskelnių teisingai pažymėti tuneliai (53,87 > ir 54,33 km) Ar aš kažko nepastebiu, ar ten tik tekstas? Paklausiau LAKD, bet, panašu, jie irgi

Re: [Talk-cz] Založení OpenStreetMap Česká republika z.s.

Ahoj, On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 10:29, Petr Schönmann wrote: > Ahoj, jediné o co mi jde je sledovat změny v dokumentech spolku, pokud se > udějou. Pokud to dokáže wiki a upozorní mne tak to bude stačit. Nastavím si > sledování. > U stanov by se změny prakticky dít neměly, u ostatních budoucích

Re: [Talk-cz] Založení OpenStreetMap Česká republika z.s.

OK út 20. 11. 2018 v 10:29 odesílatel Petr Schönmann napsal: > > Ahoj, jediné o co mi jde je sledovat změny v dokumentech spolku, pokud se > udějou. Pokud to dokáže wiki a upozorní mne tak to bude stačit. Nastavím si > sledování. > > > út 20. 11. 2018 v 9:28 odesílatel Tom Ka napsal: >> >>

Re: [Talk-cz] Založení OpenStreetMap Česká republika z.s.

Ahoj, jediné o co mi jde je sledovat změny v dokumentech spolku, pokud se udějou. Pokud to dokáže wiki a upozorní mne tak to bude stačit. Nastavím si sledování. út 20. 11. 2018 v 9:28 odesílatel Tom Ka napsal: > Ahoj, mozne to urcite je, ale nedava mi to moc smysl - co presne by > jsi tim

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

> If you ask students to contribute to the map and at the same time say > "btw they are in favour of evil Russian aggression" then of course > students (at least in Lithuania) will give it the thumbs-down. But if > you patiently explain the "on-the-ground rule" and that using this rule > has many

[Talk-se] Server down

Server been down for a couple of days, can anyone enlighten me on how the server is maintained? ___ Talk-se mailing list Talk-se@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se

Re: [Talk-se] Tile server availability

I just learned last night that it was down. Some of the services, such as the hydda-styles, are available again while many map proxy services (ek, etc) are still down. > 19 nov. 2018 kl. 23:58 skrev Brian Gaze : > > Hi, > > Is the OSM tileserver (https://{s}.tile.openstreetmap.se) no longer

Re: [Talk-cz] Založení OpenStreetMap Česká republika z.s.

Ahoj, mozne to urcite je, ale nedava mi to moc smysl - co presne by jsi tim chtel dosahnout? Oba dokumenty jsou ve finalnim tvaru, zadne dalsi upravy stanov nejsou mozne, u agendy je to taky vysledna verze. Pokud by to melo mit smysl, musel by to byt extrakt do textu (z .odt), takze to stejne bude

Re: [Talk-cz] Maps.me - nefunkční odkaz mmwatch.osmz.ru

út 20. 11. 2018 v 8:28 odesílatel Miroslav Suchy napsal: > > Možná by stálo za to, místo toho dát návod, jak si přidat obecné hlídání > > změn v území zájmu - tj. > > nasměrovat to na whodidit . > > Na to teď nemám čas. Možná později. Ale

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

Hi, On 20.11.2018 09:13, Tomas Straupis wrote: > How can I ask students to contribute to the map, which makes such a > damaging statement and has data which cannot be used to produce maps? *You* are making the statement, and publicly misinterpreting OSM's motivations. In doing so, it is *you*

Re: [Talk-cz] Import rozvoden v Praze

TR Trafostanice RS Rozpínací stanice Někdy se TR bez přečíslování mění na RS P. -- Původní e-mail -- Od: r00t Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 19. 11. 2018 21:02:38 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Import rozvoden v Praze "Ahoj, > Všechny ne, některé jsou právě

  1   2   >