sent from a phone
> On 20. Nov 2018, at 19:56, Christoph Hormann <[email protected]> wrote: > > It is also completely > non-verifiable (anyone can claim something is theirs). it is completely verifiable: you can read, hear and see that they claim it. As long as we agree that ‚anyone‘ is not sufficient (as in _one_ individual) for entering it in OSM, we could probably come up with a definition of what is a significant claim that merits integrating it. Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
