On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 19:29, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
>
> Yes - at least if no conflicting edits were
> done later.
>
> Otherwise it may be necessary to copy
> earlier text.
>
Wasn't able to simply revert the changes due to "other conflicting edits",
so re-pasted previous data.
Could somebody
Si ci, il y a bien des exemples où les landuse=residential ont été nommés
explicitement après ce découpage en blocs ou lotissements. Mais à chaque
fois en n'y incluant pas les rues bordées (seulement les voies privées).
Je pense même que c'est un découpage qui veut différencier le parcellaire
If you think Bristol or Aberdeen are mad then try Norwich:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/172506
Again presumably due to Norwich's history as a port and therefore
having control of the river.
Tom
On 12/09/2020 22:53, Russ Garrett wrote:
Yeah, I assume what happened is that the City
On 2020-09-12 23:53, Russ Garrett wrote:
> Yeah, I assume what happened is that the City of Bristol ended up, at
> some point, as a statutory port authority (which I think they were
> until 1991), and somehow the boundary from that has remained as their
> local authority boundary. But it's still
Yeah, I assume what happened is that the City of Bristol ended up, at
some point, as a statutory port authority (which I think they were
until 1991), and somehow the boundary from that has remained as their
local authority boundary. But it's still a fairly unique situation as
there are many other
On 12/09/2020 21:23, Russ Garrett wrote:
I've foolishly now decided to try to get to the bottom of it - the
beating of the bounds still doesn't explain why exactly it covers that
area (although I'm impressed that the Lord Mayor managed to commandeer
a warship to do so!)
AIUI, it's because
On 2020-09-12 22:23, Russ Garrett wrote:
> Incidentally, the OSM wiki page for Wales claims that the sea boundary
> between Wales and England is not well-defined:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wales#Boundary
Then the wiki is wrong. The "Welsh Zone" was most recently defined by
the:
THE
On 12/09/2020 21:11, Rob Nickerson wrote:
"extremely stupid reasons" in this case relates to an very old tradition
where the Lord Mayor of Bristol 'beats the bounds' of the city by
rowing/sailing out to the islands.
As a consequence a small wedge of the city of Bristol bounds lies within
The map of Holmpatrick LE district is different on
https://www.townlands.ie/holmpatrick/ than the map on
http://www.boundarycommittee.ie/Maps/Fingal%20LEA%20Report%20Map%202018.pdf
The skerries arent included on the boundary commission map, but are on
townlands/osm
Which is correct?
Colm
Ar
Le 12/09/2020 à 22:22, Marc Mongenet - marc.monge...@gmail.com a écrit :
Si comme le pense Philippe c'est pour nommer
les landuse, alors ce n'était pas nécessaire, ni même désirable,
d'exclure les rues.
Marc Mongenet
j'avoue ne comprends pas car ça n'a pas été nommé non plus !
Comme Jérôme
I've foolishly now decided to try to get to the bottom of it - the
beating of the bounds still doesn't explain why exactly it covers that
area (although I'm impressed that the Lord Mayor managed to commandeer
a warship to do so!)
Incidentally, the OSM wiki page for Wales claims that the sea
Bonjour
Le sam. 12 sept. 2020 à 14:40, Georges Dutreix via Talk-fr
a écrit :
>
> Je viens de tomber sur ça à La Ciotat :
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/433148353/history#map=18/43.17743/5.60195
> une emprise de rue en landuse=residential
>
> Tout le quartier est comme ça, je trouve ça
"extremely stupid reasons" in this case relates to an very old tradition
where the Lord Mayor of Bristol 'beats the bounds' of the city by
rowing/sailing out to the islands.
As a consequence a small wedge of the city of Bristol bounds lies within
Welsh water.
You get a similar situation with
This anomaly gives rise to the situation that there is a triangle (more
or less) of water near Flat Holm which is simultaneously within the
jurisdiction of Wales and the City of Bristol. It probably only matters
for things like fishing, as that was basically the reason to define
clearly the
12 Sep 2020, 15:42 by frede...@remote.org:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/11/20 23:57, Bryce Cogswell via talk wrote:
>
>> Exactly. When companies do it right nobody knows they’re doing it.
>>
>
> Except that - because they do it right - they will of course have
> documented their work on the wiki.
>
Or it
Le 12/09/2020 à 19:01, Vincent Bergeot a écrit :
Bonjour,
l'assemblée générale de la Fondation OpenStreetMap se déroulera le 12
décembre 2020.
Et pour devenir un *nouveau* membre habité à voter pour les candidats
au conseil d'administration de la fondation, il faut adhérer
aujourd'hui,
Oh wait, I remember now. This is correct for extremely stupid reasons
relating to the boundaries of the county of Bristol including a large
chunk of the Bristol Channel.
I can confirm the boundary in OSM matches the one in OS Boundary Line.
That relation could probably do with a note tag on it,
I'm pretty sure Flat Holm is part of Cardiff - Steep Holm is in
England but it also isn't in Bristol as far as I know. There's
definitely something weird going on with the boundaries there but it
also looks like nothing has changed around there in a while. Curious.
On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 18:39,
This island, in the bristol Channel between Weston super Mare and Barry
seems to be in two countries at once. It's on the Welsh side of the
national boundary but also in South West England City of Bristol. This is
either a map error with the Welsh boundary or a legal anomaly I don't know
which.
Bonjour,
l'assemblée générale de la Fondation OpenStreetMap se déroulera le 12
décembre 2020.
Et pour devenir un *nouveau* membre habité à voter pour les candidats au
conseil d'administration de la fondation, il faut adhérer aujourd'hui,
jusqu'à minuit. Cette mesure avait été prise suite à
Merci Gad pour tes encouragements
N'hésitez pas à compléter la section des exemples ou proposer des
illustrations pour les valeurs qui n'en ont pas encore.
Par exemple les pompes à vis, à aubes, injecteurs et autres éjecteurs à air
comprimé.
Bon weekend
François
Le mer. 9 sept. 2020 à 05:48,
Je pense que l'auteur a voulu découper les zones résidentielles selon les
des blocs lotis (afgin ensuite de pouvoir en nommer certains) et qu'il a
ensuite rempli les trous laissés vides le long des rues qui les divisent.
Cependant c'est une subdivision arbitraire: les landuse=residential ne sont
Hi,
On 9/11/20 23:57, Bryce Cogswell via talk wrote:
> Exactly. When companies do it right nobody knows they’re doing it.
Except that - because they do it right - they will of course have
documented their work on the wiki.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ##
Bonjour,
Je viens de tomber sur ça à La Ciotat :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/433148353/history#map=18/43.17743/5.60195
une emprise de rue en landuse=residential
Tout le quartier est comme ça, je trouve ça assez lourd, et ça me semble
même être un contresens puisque la zone
Hi,
It's good that it is disabled for Ireland. My inner tidiness freak wouldn't
like relabelling 10,000 pubs. :)
Colm
---
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens
Hi,
I think Brian's approach is reasonable. I would make sure they are tagged with
dates, even so far as adding the date to the name.
Colm
---
Never doubt that a small group of
On 11/09/2020 15:17, Mike Thompson wrote:
I will thank Ron for the change and try to start a dialog with our DWG
about AllTrails asking their users to contact the DWG directly with
map errors.
Yes - that'd be great.
The wider issues in addition to their support process are that (1) lots
Concordo con quanto espresso da Martin: un'informazione incompleta è
infinitamente meglio di un'informazione errata.
L'informazione incompleta ti dice già "ehi, sono incompleta", mentre quella
errata è indistinguibile da una vera. E un nome di via errato su una mappa
mi sembra davvero grave.
Un
12 Sep 2020, 03:41 by graemefi...@gmail.com:
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 20:01, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au <>
> talk-au@openstreetmap.org> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sep 2, 2020, 06:06 by >> thesw...@gmail.com>> :
>>
>>> On 2/09/2020 10:38 am, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>>>
Did a
20 imprecisioni su 20 oggetti invece sì??
canfe
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com]
Inviato: sabato 12 settembre 2020 10:25
A: openstreetmap list - italiano
Oggetto: Re: [Talk-it] R: R: R: R: R: Edit automatici su nome strade
sent from a
sent from a phone
> On 12. Sep 2020, at 10:21, canfe wrote:
>
> Ritengo che se ne peggiorano 5 ma se ne migliorano 95 la cosa è a vantaggio
> di chi usa la mappa.
direi decisamente di no. Un errore ogni 20 oggetti sarebbe gravissimo,
renderebbe completamente inutilizzabile la mappa.
Ciao
Sicuramente per fare un lavoro ben fatto bisognerebbe controllarsi tutte le vie.
Ma comunque non verrebbe fatto, come non vengono risolte le note che stanno lì
da anni, gli errori, moltissimi invero, segnalato da OSMOSE e altri…
Insomma a scapito di un 5% si perde il 95% di lavoro.
Il discorso
Ritengo che se ne peggiorano 5 ma se ne migliorano 95 la cosa è a vantaggio di
chi usa la mappa.
Cantone Ferruccio (canfe)
Da: Simone Saviolo [mailto:simone.savi...@gmail.com]
Inviato: martedì 8 settembre 2020 08:51
A: openstreetmap list - italiano
Oggetto: Re: [Talk-it] R: R: R: R: Edit
33 matches
Mail list logo
