I have finally got around to completing part 2 of the Potlatch 2
video tutorial. This one is only just over three-and-a-half
minutes, and covers tracing roads and areas from Bing aerial
imagery. I have also renamed the video (and uploaded a retitled
part 1) to “OpenStreetMap for Beginners” to
I have no intention of getting into a debate about whether ODBL is the
best licence for OSM data here. However, I do feel the need to correct
one very important factual point regarding the Contributor Terms.
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 06:20 +0200, Mike Dupont
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
This
After a mere aeon, I have finally got around to re-recording the
voiceover for the Potlatch 2 POI tutorial. I have also trimmed
out some of the dead time, thus cutting the length to 4:23, and
added a couple of labels that pop up as I describe parts of the
screen. I've uploaded an HD version to
After a mere aeon, I have finally got around to re-recording the
voiceover for the Potlatch 2 POI tutorial. I have also trimmed
out some of the dead time, thus cutting the length to 4:23, and
added a couple of labels that pop up as I describe parts of the
screen. I've uploaded an HD version to
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:12 +0200, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote:
The history problem happens also when all contributors that are not happy
with the new ODBL license will withdraw their data.
Yes, but the hideousness of the history problem will only
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:06:00 +0100, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
Why don't you try this. Import some Ordnance Survey Street View data
into
OSM, then render it as a Produced Work with the ODbL required
attribution:
Contains information from OpenStreetMap, which is made available here
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:20 +1000, John Smith
deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I've only seen it suggested in the past about how crediting every
single contributor would be pages long, your suggestion is a good
idea, however I'm left wondering if this would make things open to
abuse, how many
Where I live there is a Parish Paths Partnership (P3) Group,
where volunteers work with the council on projects to maintain
and improve access to public footpaths and brideways, e.g.,
waymarking, replacing stiles with gates, etc. They publish a
number of suggested walks on their website (the walks
Am 14.07.2010 09:59, schrieb Ulf Lamping:
See what our (IMHO not so) respectful OSMF chairman and project founder
Steve C had to say about license (working group) critics in December
2009:
http://fakestevec.blogspot.com/2009/12/fable.html
Um, I think it is worth pointing out the word
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/07/09/aols-mapquest-looks-to-wikipedia-model-for-mapping/
Excerpts:
MapQuest, the No. 2 Internet-mapping service after Google’s, is
taking the first steps toward a Wikipedia-like model — in which
users would generate the maps themselves and combine the results
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 22:05:22 +0200, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
wrote:
SNIP
Before anyone starts massively using OS data for anything else than a
comparison, I strongly suggest to get a very clear view of this, either
by having the OS say yes ok or at least getting a statement from
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 19:00:43 +0100 Kevin Peat ke...@kevinpeat.com
wrote:
It seems odd to me that we are encouraging people to contribute using
often
pretty rubbish mobile phone gps receivers but complaining that the OS
data
is not sub-metre accurate.
I don't think sub-metre accuracy is what
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 15:03:19 +0100 Phil Monger phil...@gmail.com wrote:
Streetview is a product designed to show *streets. *Anything else is just
detail to show these in context.
I would have to agree with you there. I have been surprised at just how
out of date POIs can be compared to other OS
Oops, think that was actually an OS Explorer. Pretty sure it's the same on the
Landranger.
David
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Hi Henry
As a lurker, and someone that would be keen to contribute, can I suggest
somewhere where effort would be useful - A simple mechanism to attach
attributes to streets. Perhaps a web interface with those incomplete
streets highlighted. This would be low hanging fruit to a local, with a
Richard wrote:
Please, have patience. We will have the maps reprojected for you into a
background layer in double quick time.
I understand that the licence is compatible with OSM's current licence,
but has anyone thought about whether it is compatible with ODBL? Should
we do this before we
16 matches
Mail list logo
