On Sat, 9 Jul 2011 13:02:14 +0100
80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
3) (ok, three things), there is no map hosted as fosm.org at the
moment, there are people working on rendering (such as bigtincan) and
I'm happy to encourage such diversity as it makes the project
stronger. I'm trying to keep the
The quiet and languid mailing list of normally laid back Australians
exploded into vitriolic exchanges after a non-Australian hijacked a
thread on the list.
A number of listees found themselves offended by rash statements and
then attempts were made to claim that white was black and black was
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 11:05:28 -0700
Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
If you go look at talk@ you'll find a lot of history from the people
who now inhabit this list. In fact, several of them have either been
banned or moderated.
big snip of trash
I've known them for a lot longer than
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:32:58 +1000
Mark Pulley mrpul...@lizzy.com.au wrote:
On 15/06/2011, at 3:15 PM, John Smith wrote:
The current boundaries will be removed in the near future, so if I
were you I wouldn't spend to much time fussing over them.
Some of these boundaries have been edited
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:10:47 +1000
Mark Pulley mrpul...@lizzy.com.au wrote:
And as they won't be pulled from fosm why should I be concerned?
Did you get out of bed on the wrong side this morning?
Not everyone here has decided to give up on OSM. I'm going to decide
once I see what
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:12:25 +0100
Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
We have people subverting our CC-BY-SA license right now!!1! *zomg*
And they wouldn't be abusing our ODbL license in future.
Case: UN: http://www.unitar.org/unosat-releases-new-maps-over-haiti
I viewed these
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:12:24 +0800
James Andrewartha tr...@student.uwa.edu.au wrote:
Sadly, that's not how I understand it - particularly the terms in
place between OSM and the individual ... at the relevant time. bit
says to me that retrospective signing of the CTs to cover old
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:44:12 +1000 (EST)
John Berkers be...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
Hi,
We've got a few roads around here (Narre Warren South/Lynbrook) that
are split and not yet joined. One such road is Glasscocks Road,
which runs from Dandenong Frankston Road, through through Lynbrook
and
On Tue, 17 May 2011 22:53:42 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Sugar coat it all you want, but what action did you take against
anyone else involved?
Without wasting my time looking at the wiki
this business is as well organised as a schoolyard
Set of rules made by one group,
On Wed, 4 May 2011 20:29:22 +1000
Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/05/2011 5:18 PM, David Murn wrote:
Well, I have yet to hear any Australians complain about the freedom
of the data, other than being incompatible with the new
one-of-a-kind licence that OSM is wanting to use.
Brampton Island
http://osm.org/go/vIwcP8wt-
Also saw the same for Lady Musgrave Island.
I've not made any alterations, because I do not have any idea whether
the possibly traced outline or the ABS boundaries are correct.
Liz
___
Talk-au mailing list
On Tue, 3 May 2011 18:28:09 +0100
Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
On 27 April 2011 05:42, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir maxi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Grant Slater
openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
Wait, why did the Australian government stop using
On Sun, 01 May 2011 10:52:52 +1000
David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that you are correct. Have
you ever tried to join a committee and been rebuffed?
For the past 2 years Ive been a secretary of a national non-profit
organisation in my
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:11:29 +0100
Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
FOSM.org is hosted on a virtual machine of hypercube provided for
XAPI. Without any explanation I was banned from the FOSM when I stated
this.
Regards
Grant
OSM Sysadmin team.
Banned from the
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:17:33 +0100
Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
Unfortunately there are some very vocal (anonymous) members of the
Australian community who seem intent on creating a virtual Us vs
Them conflict in the community with exaggerated claims and mistruths.
We
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 23:24:09 +1000
David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Using my australian test extract from 21/03/2011, I found that 3390
users have made edits in the area of interest (the Australian extract
available on osmaustralia.org).
Of these 3390 users, 536 have used the tag
It asks you to agree. It doesn't ask you to accept or decline as you
wish - and doesn't say what will happen if you decline.
Contributor terms
Please read the agreement below and press the agree button to confirm
that you accept the terms of this agreement for your existing and
future
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:58:08 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 April 2011 08:09, Kevin Sheather mobilesheath...@bigpond.com
wrote:
I have tried to use FOSM but with no success. I have opened an
account and logged in but none of the links seem to work with the
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:18:41 +1000
Alex (Maxious) Sadleir maxi...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, I hear that Kiwi OSM surveyors are having just as much trouble
convincing OSM-F that their government too has done the due diligence
on Creative Commons for geodata:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:43:06 +0100
Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com wrote:
We will not lose any data from these people whether they agree or
not, so they're safe and should be counted in the stats.
Are we counting humans or data?
___
talk mailing
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:51:06 +0200
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
One small plea: Could you refrain from saying the camp that wants to
move to the ODbL. It sounds like it's a small bunch of people when
indeed it is the overwhelming majority.
well that's just meadowdust.
The ODbL
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:44:48 -0400
Gerald A geraldabli...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't believe he meant to imply that they would be automatiically
marked as accepting; but rather that their acceptance or rejection
wouldn't have a data impact.
And thus the meaning of the question
Are we counting
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:33:36 +0200
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
SteveC said he'd let me pilot his private jet if I say yes.
As you are going to be waiting a long time to collect, could you
actually explain why you have gone from being a Public Domain activist
to an ODbL activist.
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:40:45 +0200
Fabio Alessandro Locati fabioloc...@gmail.com wrote:
In all the countries I know of ticking a checkbox is comparable to
sign a printed contract, so I thin is pointless to have a written
contract or a CopyPast thing ;)
add Australia to your list of places
I know, English is not my native one, but how it is related with
checkbox as agreeing with printed contract?
When you check that box, you agree that contract is final and valid.
If you don't want to acept the terms, you simply don't check it.
Or I don't get secret lawyers language? :)
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
To answer my own question - I guess that 'reasonably calculated to
make...' suggests you should include an attribution notice and ask
downstream users to respect it - although it doesn't mandate any
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:49:19 -0500
Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
As a side question: how many users still need to either accept or
decline?
A lot. If you look at the two files that I am using to pull data from,
you will see the users_agreed.txt file has a header in it
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 00:29:29 +0100
Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
This licence change now gives every mapper the means of undermining
the map through withholding of their own data, once freely given and
now very likely a foundation of data created by other mappers, also in
good
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:11:11 +0200
Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
wrote:
Hi,
David Murn wrote:
Out of interest Grant, what
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:34:20 +1000
David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 20:10 +0100, Grant Slater wrote:
I am sure there are going to be a few cases where difficult
decisions are going to have to be made. We will not have been the
only open source project to
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:42:00 +0100
Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 April 2011 08:31, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
So has anyone asked the FOSS gurus of licensing?
I have never seen it mentioned while I was subscribed to
legal-talk. I am quite prepared to start
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 18:02:16 +0200
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
We have a situation where those who have spent time with it, and
talked to lawyers and all, are positively sure that we do not have a
working status quo. Doing nothing is not an option. In licensing
terms, this house
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:20:27 -0400
Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
I think Frederick gave you the best answer possible. It's not that the
community was *asked* by some overarching committee, but instead that
it just floated up. Like a turd in the toilet. Frankly, I never
thought it would
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 23:50:03 +0100
Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
If this is what you have been complaining about then you have half
missed the point.
There are people who have chosen NOT TO USE OSM because of legal
ambigutity and points in the CC-BY-SA license which we
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:38:30 +0200
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
So I chose a slightly humorous response, treating Anthony as if he
really were an innocent newbie.
I didn't expect that I would have to explain the humour, but I guess
I should have known better.
Humour is quite
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:49:20 +0200
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Eric Marsden wrote:
It is not clear to me, from your message or from what I have read
on the wiki, whether choosing Decline is a irreversible decision,
or whether one would still be able later to accept
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 04:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
ThomasB toba0...@yahoo.de wrote:
Mitrovica was deleted by uboot
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7348595
could you please stop publicly blaming others for mistakes that you
personally has made?
ubot has deleted 15 ways and add some 60.
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:36:34 +0200
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 04/15/2011 05:55 PM, Kai Krueger wrote:
I thought that the new CTs were supposed to fix this issue
[...]
I have answered on legal-talk.
Bye
Frederik
Frederick, it has occurred to me that if you
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:36:55 -0400
Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
this occurred to me while surveying speed limits in a somewhat rural
part of the US.
are any of the routing engines looking at the surface tag as part of
their decision making?
i ask this because in NY, the
Someone local to this guy want to speak with him?
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:58:25 -0700
From: Steve Coast st...@asklater.com
To: t...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: Hoping you can point me in the right
direction.
Original Message
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:21:59 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
An Australian Bureau of Statistics initiative to help drive
collaboration between students, developers and national and
international statistical agencies.
http://data.gov.au/2770/contest-abs-codeplay/
that
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:50:22 +0100
Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
But your suggested course of action has me confused - you are happy to
make contributions under the new CT and intend to do so, but yet you
wish to vote against the change. Your choice, I supposed.
There are 2 distinct
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:10:19 +0100
Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
I am sure there are going to be a few cases where difficult decisions
are going to have to be made. We will not have been the only open
source project to have had to make these sorts of decisions. The OSM
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:24:28 +0100
Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
So by all means state your opinion and by all means share your
opinions with other mappers. But if, once a consensus is clear, The
Community comes out in favour of the change, many of us will think
very ill of people
How else would you define the foundation?
The OSMF is a not-for-profit company registered in England and Wales,
the foundation has no paid staff and it is made up exclusively of
unpaid volenteers. The OSMF board is made up of democratically elected
volenteers. I am not an OSMF apologist,
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 23:10:40 +0200
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
We're not sacrificing countries. We saw that we have built our
project on (legal) sand, and we're moving to rectify the situation.
The patient may lose some tissue about this but he will live, and
after the wounds
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 18:53:51 +0100
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 13/04/11 15:01, Mikel Maron wrote:
Sure. But I would love to see more detailed stats, and awards/badges
integrated into user pages.
There are easy ways to do this on non-osmf servers, and integrate
into user pages.
Mitrovica is in Kosovo.
Kosovo and Serbia do not agree on Kosovo's independence.
A particular mapper has deleted the city of Mitrovica from OSM (most
edit wars change the names). It is alleged [#flossk] that this is the
second time.
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 18:22:49 +1000
Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to map some named reaches (straight portion of a stream
or river, as from one turn to another;) part of a major river.
The river (e.g.
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 13:23:57 +1000
{withheld} pheasant.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
Bearing in mind reach is also the nautical term for a tack, is it
worth considering Andrew's source map might be documenting the lines
of sailing between navigation markers (or indeed landmarks) which are
no longer
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 16:58:04 +1000
Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
If you still consider importing this data without permission was in
the best interest of the project, I'm afraid we are going to have to
agree to disagree. Others can make up their own mind.
and we have had to edit
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 08:19:39 +0100
Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
On 7 April 2011 06:58, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 April 2011 12:57, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
If the Australian issue is so important, as others have suggested
why isnt
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 11:48:55 +1000
Leon Kernan lker...@gmail.com wrote:
More importantly is it a official OSMF or semi-official LWG email,
or just some pro-ODbL people spamming everyone?
Pretty sure it's the last one. I received it a few weeks back, even
through i'd put a note on
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 11:53:02 +1000
Leon Kernan lker...@gmail.com wrote:
Supposedly it sends you to this flippant page if you decline the CT:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributor_Terms_Declined
I think the lolcat picture on that page tells us exactly what they
think of
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 04:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
All Blokes speed_13...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
I was very keen and learning ...had done a few edits not many
but I was planning on getting right into it.
I don't agree with the new licensing and have just been sitting on
the side reading.
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 07:30:29 +1000
{withheld} pheasant.cou...@gmail.com wrote:
Whilst I agree / commiserate with your basic point (been there;
done that; spent the fuel), don't you still have the raw traces
from your device? I certainly do, and consider at no point have I
ever given up my
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 23:27:57 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Also the locations have been fixed for numerous locations so if you
ever get in contact with anyone please let them know about OSM having
more accurate data than they offer, I think 30km out is still the
worst case.
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:40:15 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 April 2011 09:28, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
If the data owner doesn't grant permission under an acceptable
licence then we shouldn't relying on one interpretation of very
recent Australian
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 19:31:53 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com didn't write: (Michael Collinson
did)
For clarity:
- This will only affect (77,000) contributors who registered before
May 2010 and who have not accepted the new terms as part of the
voluntary re-licensing program.
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 11:24:32 +0200
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
without their database (i.e. georeferenced images made available
through the streetview api) you would never be able to find your
house in billions of fotos, nor know where a certain foto was taken
for
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 12:03:16 +0200
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/4/3 Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net
While I'm not in the habit of collecting information from Google
StreetView, it is fair to say that if I go to the public library
and in the thousands of volumes
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:20:22 + (UTC)
Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
I think you can assume that if no 'source' tag is set, the feature is
done by traditional OSM mapping (survey, or GPS trace, or local
knowledge, or perhaps tracing from aerial imagery).
The use or not of source was
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:32:21 +0100
SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
On 28/03/2011 15:30, Maurizio Napolitano wrote:
I found today this article
A qualitative enquiry into OpenStreetMap making
Author: Yu-Wei Lina
*Single Article Purchase:* US$41.00
I didn't find the
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:09:30 +1100
Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:32:21 +0100
SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
On 28/03/2011 15:30, Maurizio Napolitano wrote:
I found today this article
A qualitative enquiry into OpenStreetMap making
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:07:25 +1300
Robin Paulson robin.paul...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2011 12:26, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
Speaking as someone with a background in science I think I agree
with Elizabeth's interpretation.
I get the impression the study is much more
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:25:21 +
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 25/03/11 14:13, Simon Poole wrote:
I've personally been in contact with quite active mappers that
months after August 2010 didn't realize that they could actually
sign up to the CTs (this includes mappers that
The LWG has posted draft minutes on the OSMF wiki.
https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_109hj8txbg3
I hope there are no errors in these figures for later correction.
From http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stats the total number of users
is approaching 375,000.
From the LWG minutes, 163,732
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:01:43 +0100
Matthias Meißer dig...@arcor.de wrote:
Might be the legal talklist a better place to discuss this very
specific topic? I guess there are more users that are familar with
the process itself.
Matthias
The LWG minutes indicate that Mike is to ask the
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:59:20 -
Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd place the coastline at the low water mark because you know then
that its always true. The coastline at the high water mark is only
true a couple of times a day or whatever. Then it needs a
high_water_mark way
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 18:49:25 +0100
Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
We need a reliable process for dealing with these.
Currently, the License Working Group has been doing some work but it
feels that it is not dealing with the issues adequately and some
issues not at all.
What
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 11:00:13 +1100
David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 20:52 -0300, Diego Woitasen wrote:
This is the matrix showing how the tolls are calculated:
If you need a laff, try the wiki page on countryside
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Countryside
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/03/11/3161861.htm
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 09:24:50 +0100
Andreas Perstinger andreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote:
Would you ask a question specific to the US on talk-au (or any other
country-specific list)?
Why do people have the impression that subsribing to legal-talk is
somehow more difficult than subscribing to
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 10:23:22 +0100
ant antof...@gmail.com wrote:
So the only situation I'd enforce a turn restriction
in is when the road is tagged bicycle=lane. Otherwise I'd ignore it.
I'm not sure in which country you are living, but in mine (au) a signed
turn restriction applies to all
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 13:01:57 +0100
Andreas Perstinger andreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote:
All of the lists suffer from endless discussion of the same points
with very little action ever occurring - and reading the amateur
lawyers on legal-talk arguing with the professional lawyers is a
form
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 03:45:45 -0800 (PST)
Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Joseph Reeves wrote:
without explaining in layman's terms what this means.
http://old.opengeodata.org/2008/01/07/the-licence-where-we-are-where-were-going/index.html
Follow-ups to legal-talk please, so
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 13:34:17 +0100
Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
Anyway, just did a quick test ...
I'm shocked. That's almost the exact route I took yesterday.
Same test here and same result... The differences being the result of
a couple of mistakes in
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 22:17:33 +0100
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
John,
john whelan wrote:
The intention is to try to understand a bit more about it.
The legal-talk mailing list is an excellent place to ask questions
about ODbL.
Bye
Frederik
/sarcasm
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 12:36:32 +1100
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 7:12 AM, ant antof...@gmail.com wrote:
very nice! I've checked some of my daily bicycle routes. Of four
routes two are perfect, and two have become too long--obviously in
favour of the use of
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:14:53 +
Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
The name of the company is McDonalds, so anything belonging to them
should be McDonalds's.
The correct grammar for that would be McDonalds'
___
talk mailing list
21, 2011, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:21:49 +1100
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Just out of curiosity, am I the only normal person on this email
list?
Steve
everyone's odd except thee and me and even then i'm worried about
thee
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 11:01:59 +0100
Frank Steggink stegg...@steggink.org wrote:
Which I think is basically why the airports import didn't get
reverted. There was bad data but also a lot of good data and no
better option for separating the two than just leaving it all in
the map.
This
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:21:49 +1100
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Just out of curiosity, am I the only normal person on this email list?
Steve
everyone's odd except thee and me and even then i'm worried about thee
sorry i can't recall the exact words of the quote nor do i know
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/02/18/3142067.htm
anyone fixing this on the map?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:56:03 +1100
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:25 PM, John Smith
deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope I meant what I said, access:caravan=* same with access:4wd=*
As I understand it, foot, motorcar, bicycle, hgv etc are all
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:56:54 -0500
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Since giving long ground-level ways nonzero layers screws up every
place they cross another way, it seems clear what should be done.
-1 is used for rivers commonly over long distances where traced and no
idea where
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:07:48 +1100
David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 00:04 +, David Groom wrote:
I just want to draw attention to the survey at
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/WFVK6XS
, the link was mentionedn Richard Weait's email to this list on 1
Feb,
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:44:38 +0100
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/14 ed...@billiau.net:
I've been thinking about the 12nm territorial borders on sea that
we have in many places, notably in Europe. Many of them seem to
have been auto-generated by simply placing a
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:49:40 +0200
Ivan Petrushev ivanat...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you suggest me a power-user GPS application for Android?
I've recently switched from my Sony Ericsson K800 to Android and
really miss MapNav. Most of the android apps I've tried are really
naive - there is a map,
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:05:15 +0100
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/15 Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net:
2) are the positions of the lines rated as to certainty?
I know you are the man with the answer to every question, but you
have missed one
yes, I
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:33:52 +0100
Esben Stien b...@esben-stien.name wrote:
Is there some kind of application that can help me with plotting the
smartest route in a set of points, if you're supposed to visit all the
points?
Imagine a salesman, who has to visit 10 locations. Is there some
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:36:53 +0100
Kay Drangmeister k...@drangmeister.net wrote:
However: OSM data integrity is at stake, and you are endangering it,
willfully and knowingly. While you seem to understand the reasoning
behind the OSM contribution policy, you fail to obey it.
You are
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:59:45 +
Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
On 10/02/11 19:37, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:36:53 +0100
Kay Drangmeisterk...@drangmeister.net wrote:
Let's get this completely fair, and remove all the work of others
who have been caught tracing
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:43:42 -0500
Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Joseph Reeves
iknowjos...@gmail.com wrote:
But that's got nothing to do with the licensing change - that's an
issue of you ripping off Google Maps.
It has nothing at all to do with me ripping
obvious time change between two sets of photos here
http://www.bing.com/maps/?v=2cp=-31.607381813961595~143.33909511566418lvl=17dir=0sty=hwhere1=Wilcannia%2C%20NSWq=Wilcannia%20NSW
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
I will be very happy to hear of any complaints/requests/places where
you think the detector should work but it fails/any other feedback.
Thanks,
Ido
I've made one attempt only at tracing a dirt road in dry country with
the detector. I found its usefulness less than zero, as the
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 13:45:52 -0500
Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
A small thing perhaps, but the next step requested by the board prior
to 31 March is Phase 3, which adds the decline option to the current
accept option. I expect that the improved CTs (1.2.4) will be
available at the
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:19:17 +0200
Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
For example, when you spider the web and find references to
5, 20 and 48 Lion Street, Pretoria, then it may help the user who is
mapping that street. Perhaps it's a cul de sac and now he doesn't need
to travel all the way
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:38:02 +0100
Maurizio Napolitano napoo...@gmail.com wrote:
My spoken Italian is much better than my written Italian, which isn't
any advertisement, so I used Google translate
http://tinyurl.com/6emlz6h
___
talk mailing list
1 - 100 of 376 matches
Mail list logo
