On 6 July 2010 18:48, Oliver (skobbler) osm.oliver.ku...@gmx.de wrote:
the project to the outside world. If you would ask ten people today what
openstreetmap is about you would get ten different answers, that is what you
can also see from this thread.
If you asked those same 10 people what
On 6 July 2010 23:07, Floris Looijesteijn o...@floris.nu wrote:
We are actually planning to do this again, but no guarantees, that's why
it's not mentioned yet :)
If they can't be streamed live, are they still going to be recorded?
___
talk mailing
On 7 July 2010 05:51, Nakor nakor@gmail.com wrote:
If the river/road/... is the actual boundary, shouldn't the same way be used
for both instead of having duplicate ways? I've seen this done in some
places (Ohio IIRC)
The boundary might be similar to other features, but unless you like
Due to popular demand this has been updated to include most common
highway types instead of just residential/unclassified and similar
types...
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
David Dean wanted to see areas already tagged with maxspeed=* so I
created one based on the colours from the JOSM maxspeed style sheet:
http://www.dstoecker.eu/josm/maxspeed.xml
http://maps.bigtincan.com/?z=12ll=-27.662,153.131layer=BFFFTFFF
You may need to force a refresh, the JS
BMW has been working on augmenting GPS navigation for some time now,
and it took another big step forward in recent weeks with the
announcement of its Pathfinder microNavigation system. As the name
suggests, that would supplement your basic navigation system with maps
and directions for areas not
On 5 July 2010 12:37, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Geocoding isn't freely available (unless your needs are small-scale).
Housenumbers are the key to geocoding addresses, and without geocoding many
useful applications of a map are lost, or at least made more difficult. So
I'm
On 5 July 2010 10:45, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
Generally speaking you could bot an area with the default speed limit then
just tag the higher speed roads.
You don't need to bot anything, you can easily do this sort of thing in JOSM...
The bigger problem is how do you stop some
On 5 July 2010 19:29, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
actually I don't understand why so many people complain about mapping
trees. Trees have generally a longer life cycle than buildings. I like
trees and I like to have them in the map. Why should I map postboxes?
I hardly
On 5 July 2010 08:50, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
3) use two separate relations (one amenity=school and one
amenity=place_of_worship) that both have the building as the sole
member. John might have further thoughts on this [IMHO very hacky] use
of relations.
Normally I might
On 5 July 2010 17:39, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
The only reason you gave against creating multiple nodes was you
didn't like it. Seems fine to me. Especially since the church and
school in this case are not really co-located: the centre of the
There is no church, they're using a
On 5 July 2010 18:52, Mark Pulley mrpul...@lizzy.com.au wrote:
Depends on the definition of church. If you mean 'building with pointy roof'
then no (although some church buildings don't have pointy roofs). If you
mean the congregation then yes. Depends on what the map is being used for -
if
On 5 July 2010 19:09, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
On 05/07/10 17:49, John Smith wrote:
There is no church, they're using a school hall for church based
activities...
church is a significant amenity provided by that building, surely. It is,
by all accounts, a place of worship
On 5 July 2010 20:06, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Which we're not. There is no on the ground rule, guideline, axiom,
suggestion or anything. Can we stop using this non-existent guiding
principle?
Ok, if we're not tagging physical objects what are we tagging? The
gold brick road to
On 5 July 2010 20:21, ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Interesting as the church as a building is a corruption of the original
meaning
I did try to make this point clear by stating organisation v building,
however it's a little difficult to geographically map organisations,
so all we're left with is
As per David Murn's request/suggestion/wish for a no maxspeed layer
similar to the noname layer, I made a overlay style sheet that shows
ways similar to the noname style sheet, red lines, for ways that don't
have a maxspeed=* value:
On 6 July 2010 02:08, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
What about.. draw the school as an area/building, then simply put a
single node for place_of_worship in the hall, maybe with opening_hours
or something similar.
So if there is 10 uses/users of the hall, we need to place 10 nodes?
On 4 July 2010 18:28, Oliver (skobbler) osm.oliver.ku...@gmx.de wrote:
It is because of other reasons that major companies are not using OSM.
If companies already pay for data with more restrictive licenses than
OSM offers, then I can only assume the license issue is just a
sticking point
On 4 July 2010 23:00, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
I agree about the importance of being able to find a location via its postal
address. One of the most frequent reasons for looking up a location on an
online map is so you can find out where on a long street a particular
On 5 July 2010 00:16, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
True, but paper maps are usually not printed at a scale where including
street numbers are practical.
Other than street directories?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 5 July 2010 04:57, Oliver (skobbler) osm.oliver.ku...@gmx.de wrote:
My personal opinion is that the strengths of OpenStreetMap lies in the large
decentral knowledge. And I think it would make more sense to steer some of
this local power in a certain direction. I consider it a waste of
On 5 July 2010 06:02, Oliver (skobbler) osm.oliver.ku...@gmx.de wrote:
How do you want to find the right licensing, funding and communication
approach (to avoid the word strategy) without having a strategic goal?
There is fundamental differences between facilitating volunteers and
running a
On 4 July 2010 23:33, Mark Pulley mrpul...@lizzy.com.au wrote:
I'm planning to add a local church, but rather than having its own building,
it meets in a local primary school hall. What would be the best way to tag
this?
It's not really a church if it's a school hall, the church
(organisation)
On 3 July 2010 19:50, Konrad Skeri kon...@skeri.com wrote:
One possibility is to just use highway=link and then let the renderes
sort out the rest. A link is after all just a link no matter what it
It may not be possible for preprocessing or renderers to figure it out.
connects, so there's
On 3 July 2010 20:35, Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 July 2010 11:18, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
As a few people pointed out, we always tag some things for the
renderer, like highway=primary/secondary/etc...
I disagree that this is tagging for the renderer
On 3 July 2010 20:39, Oliver (skobbler) osm.oliver.ku...@gmx.de wrote:
license. In essence I would like to understand who is intended to benefit
from a PD-license, mappers, consumers, developers, companies, data donors? I
Some data is being released in Australia from governments under cc-by
On 3 July 2010 21:14, Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
Firstly, I haven't suggested anything for *_link roads, I've simply
disagreed with your assertion that our use of the highway tagging
represents tagging for the renderer. On balance I tend to prefer links
that know what type of road
On 3 July 2010 21:30, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
I think any road can have a link road (trunk, primary, etc), especially
any grade-separated crossings, which dont necessarily have to be
motorway. For large intersections with separate slip-lanes, I often
mark the slip lanes as
On 3 July 2010 22:40, Oliver (skobbler) osm.oliver.ku...@gmx.de wrote:
If it is for the sake of compliance with licenses of data donors then there
will always be cases that fit with one license type and don't fit with with
other license types. It might also be that the majority of data donors
On 3 July 2010 23:09, Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not OK to arbitrarily tag highways. But different parts of the
world have established different norms according to which they do so.
By norms you mean making arbitrarily decisions on highways, rather
than any kind of objective
On 3 July 2010 23:16, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
4. It is my personal opinion that advocates of share-alike licenses are
driven less by the desire to create something great, but more by the desire
to ringfence, protect, defend what they think is their property against
imaginary
On 3 July 2010 23:16, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
2. Imports and government cooperation are not crucial to OSM's success.
What would make OSM successful in your eyes?
I thought one of the goals was to have OSM used more widely? If so
government users should be given the same
On 3 July 2010 23:27, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
But the underlying idea of property is required for attribution as well; you
cannot force people to provide attribution without first claiming that the
data is yours and yours alone and only by following your license will people
be
On 4 July 2010 01:34, Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 July 2010 14:14, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 July 2010 23:09, Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not OK to arbitrarily tag highways. But different parts of the
world have established different
On 4 July 2010 01:46, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
Since a fair number of home computers pcs these days have quad cores, 6 or
more gigs of memory and 64 bit operating systems, perhaps it might make
sense to come up with a Windows stand alone solution and decentralise the
server
On 4 July 2010 01:56, Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 July 2010 16:54, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
All that has happened is the arbitrary decisions have been deferred to
someone else, in this case some government entity... That doesn't mean
highways are classified
On 4 July 2010 02:07, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
I was only thinking of using the local computer resources for the local
user, not going cloud.
For that specific problem you still have a large chunk of data to
transfer before the local computer resource can do something useful
On 4 July 2010 14:15, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 July 2010 04:21, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
Many users are only interested in the local city and not too worried about
having the latest version of the map. People have used three year old
printed maps quite
On 4 July 2010 04:21, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
Many users are only interested in the local city and not too worried about
having the latest version of the map. People have used three year old
printed maps quite happily for years and for foot, public transport and
cycling a
On 4 July 2010 07:22, Oliver (skobbler) osm.oliver.ku...@gmx.de wrote:
What would make OSM successful in your eyes?
I thought one of the goals was to have OSM used more widely?
This is the right type of question but you need to create an even more basic
understanding: I haven't seen a common
On 4 July 2010 14:34, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
The point is that *no* major company actually said, 'if you switch to
ODbL then we will use it', while it is a claim companies don't use OSM
because of cc-by-sa. I don't see the problem solved, do you?
I doubt I'd make it very
On 2 July 2010 18:55, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
In addition, it is clear that people are almost equally split between SA
licenses and PD domain, and it would be difficult to achieve any kind of
Actually there is a 3rd option, some people prefer cc-by...
On 2 July 2010 21:18, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, totally. And there are even people using osm2pgsql for processing
non-OpenStreetMap data, so one of my projects is to try to remove all
the hardcoded tags (from z-order calculations through to the type
tag on relation handling
These aren't official definitions and this isn't meant to be any kind
of tax advice so always consult an accountant etc etc etc..
To clarify a few terms first, 'Tax Deductibility Status' (TDS) means
any monetary donations enable the person or business donating to claim
this on their personal of
Forgot to include this PDF I was sent:
http://map-data.bigtincan.com/data/Water_Taxation_Win.pdf
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
If anyone wanted to do a paper at LCA2011 you'd better get in quick...
http://kangawallafox.com/2010/07/02/lca2011-call-for-papers-approaches/
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 1 July 2010 16:17, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Rather, you want multiple ways to share a name. This does sound like a
job for the renderer to me.
Or you can help things out by putting the name into a relation and
adding the segments of way as members...
On 1 July 2010 17:59, Igor Brejc igor.br...@gmail.com wrote:
This results in even more complicated situation and even more work to
maintain such data. And even if do you follow this practice, there will
still be huge amounts of legacy data which do not.
I think if two streets share the same
On 1 July 2010 19:16, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've got situations where a side road name continues across a main
road, and it looks distinctly odd (must happen all the time in grid
You also get the situation where roads are broken by dual carriage way
or other
On 1 July 2010 20:05, Jaak Laineste (Nutiteq) j...@nutiteq.com wrote:
contribution comes out, but in other regions you don't and we could
increase number of mappers with some soft compensations which cost
nothing and show appreciation to their effort.
It could also lead people to do mass
On 1 July 2010 21:11, Jaak Laineste j...@nutiteq.com wrote:
Of course, this is the obvious risk here. There are probably foursquare
users who are just adding fake venues just to get 1000 points per week etc.
But we have simple solution for that: blocking. First user, then IP. Just
like any
On 2 July 2010 14:07, Robin Paulson robin.paul...@gmail.com wrote:
up till now, i've corrected mistakes as i've seen them, but he does so
much it's become a hell of a job, and feels like pointless duplication
of effort
That's not helping him, generally if I spot mistakes I send a short
email
On 29 June 2010 16:55, Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com wrote:
However, I would not use 'unclassified' for the above reason nor
'residential' if there were no houses and it was rural rather than urban. I
would normally go for track - but add sufficient further tags (tracktype=
and/or
On 30 June 2010 08:30, Dylan Semler dylan.sem...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm really not sure where recreation ground fits in and how it differs from
a park. As mentioned in the discussion on the recreation ground wiki
page[1], the fact that it is under landuse= whereas park and pitch are under
On 29 June 2010 23:18, Markus marku...@bigpond.com wrote:
I am not sure if it is an approved tag. Although I quite like the idea of
it.
If it serves a useful purpose and it doesn't duplicate the
functionality of another tag already well used, then just use it,
tags don't need to be official,
On 30 June 2010 11:55, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you actually going to put the fact that it is a State forest
anywhere? Sure, landuse=forest is not a problem, but some sort of tag
stating that it is a state forest (as opposed to private land) sounds
appropriate.
Most state
You should have sent this to the tagging list...
On 28 June 2010 21:08, Stan Berka stan.be...@gmail.com wrote:
I have frequently a tagging dilemma. See this example: Coburn Rd on this
location: http://osm.org/go/z...@yoeg-- (N of US 2). It was tagged as
residential, but I've been there two
On 28 June 2010 21:27, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Unclassified with paved=no or surface=gravel?
I was recently exploring Siberia (behind my computer!) and saw some
primary roads where it was obvious from a website (by that mapper) that
these were sand and dirt roads.
So I wouldn't
On 28 June 2010 22:12, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
track is more towards you better have 4WD and you ought to have a
reason to be using this although these aren't hard rules.
You can use normal cars on what I'd consider tracks, but they are
usually a lot less maintained and are in
The Centre for Spatial Law and Policy has launched. From the entry:
The Centre for Spatial Law and Policy, a non-profit organization
focusing on the legal and policy issues associated with the
collection, use and distribution of spatial and location data, opened
its doors in Richmond, VA today.
On 29 June 2010 14:33, colliar colliar4e...@aol.com wrote:
I can not get onto any wiki page.
Any problems ?
From what I've been able to gather it's been down for an hour or so.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 28 June 2010 01:38, Johnny Rose Carlsen o...@wenix.dk wrote:
Hi Alan,
It's a siren, they are pretty common in Denmark.
In Denmark they are used as part of a general warning system, I don't
know the use of the sirens in your area.
Similar things exist in various places for tornado
I just found a site that lists the location of their tornado warning sirens...
http://www.springfield.il.us/Safety/Fire_Dept/Sirens.htm
Their larger map doesn't look very nice, maybe someone could do up a
better OSM based image to offer to them :)
___
On 28 June 2010 14:32, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
There was some discussion about them on the talk-us mailing list back in May:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2010-May/003230.html
I noticed during that discussion there was talk about homeland
security and some
On 27 June 2010 17:51, Tom Brennan webs...@ozultimate.com wrote:
Fair enough. However, I think it's out of date enough that you could just
make the changes anyway. It will probably spur some Sydneysiders to then
tidy it up.
This thread prompted at least one person to update their info a
On 28 June 2010 08:16, Tom Brennan webs...@ozultimate.com wrote:
Like this ?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-33.7127lon=150.4666zoom=15layers=000BFTF/dirty
I filled in all the streets in this area back in April.
As David wrote, you need to view the individual tiles and add dirty to the end:
On 28 June 2010 10:24, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
Current practice seems to be tagging them all as boundary=national_park,
regardless of whether they're National Parks or other things like State
Forests. Would adding national_park=state_forest and similar to the tags be
a
On 27 June 2010 00:08, Tom Brennan webs...@ozultimate.com wrote:
With the high res Nearmap imagery, the places to go are between Penrith and
Blacktown. At least half of those suburbs still need their residential
streets named. Perhaps we should use it to suggest places for people to go
if
On 25 June 2010 16:10, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
I think you misunderstand my proposal. I agree that is_in is redundant and
should not be added to the map. As you say, it can be derived from admin
boundaries. However, not every programmer might want to have to download all
the admin
On 25 June 2010 20:23, Chris Jones roller...@sucs.org wrote:
Any overhead is typically a percentage of the stored data for indexes
and such, you cant just magically get rid of it!
I was under the impression that it was incremental data from minutely updates...
Mapping and cadastral information for Russia have not previously been
openly and freely available. These products were edited, censored
often and in many cases the work was simply not completed, thus the
framework for building a modern digital cadastre system did not exist.
Times change and the
On 24 June 2010 23:00, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can I see some documentation on this theft?
Why dont you start with some dcma takedown notices for the people selling
them, and see what happens?
You do realise DCMA is only for sites hosted in the US
On 25 June 2010 00:22, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:
And I still haven't read why you think this is better, apart from rendering
issues.
As Andy said, the burden of demonstrating the goodness of a change is up to
who
wants to make that change.
I've been following this thread and
On 25 June 2010 00:28, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
overall disk use ~ 130 GB and growing about 2.5 GB/week at the moment.
Is there a way to reduce this overhead without re-importing?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 25 June 2010 02:59, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
download a section of map. As well as taking care of the different kinds of
link road, these could also provide 'is_in', 'leading_to' and 'dead_end' for
dead_end can't be guessed at, it could be bad mapping, is_in is
redundant, you can
On 25 June 2010 04:37, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
I'm not sure I understand your question.
Over time, the overhead increases, not just the amount of data.
You can import a bounding box or extract and have smaller tables.
You can import without --slim, if you have the hardware for
On 23 June 2010 21:29, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
I'm not going to start an edit-war, I'd prefer someone with the proper rights
to revert that edit. Then we can start discussing the matter, and file bugs
where needed.
What are these proper rights to which you refer? The page isn't
On 24 June 2010 00:13, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Without attempting to express much of an interest in tagging
discussions, it would be great if you were to use the word sidewalk
to describe the paths-along-the-edge-of-roads. The word footway might
footpath=* :)
On 23 June 2010 19:39, Tom Brennan webs...@ozultimate.com wrote:
The best work on the SRTM data is probably by Sean Williams (Dooghan) on
gpsaustralia.net. He has created Garmin IMG files with 5m contours,
though with 90m data, 5m is pretty optimistic. Looks nice though.
I've just updated the wiki and the data file on the server to include
operator=mainroads.qld.gov.au this way we can track the number km of
roads that are state or local for statistical purposes.
I also updated the wiki and the data file yesterday after getting
advice on proper attribution.
On 21 June 2010 16:11, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
If historical data is really desired then it seems like there need to
be some features added to support it. By default historical data
should obviously not be rendered but it also shouldn't even show up in
By default things should
On 21 June 2010 21:03, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
And exactly how do you propose that we get accurate coordinates for the
positions of streets in 1665 other using a modern surveyed overlay? I
don't think Samuel Pepys supplemented his diary with GPS derived WGS84
coordinates. :-)
On 22 June 2010 01:15, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
I've got a PostGIS database created and maintained with osm2pgsql. For
some of the Mapnik rendering I'm doing, I'd like to see whether ways
belong to relations. (Specifically, whether a highway=* way is a member
of a route=road
On 21 June 2010 17:59, Markus marku...@bigpond.com wrote:
It does look like the data is from about 10 to 15 years ago.
Could I use this data instead.
https://www.ga.gov.au/products/servlet/controller?event=GEOCAT_DETAILScatno=64459
I couldn't see where to download it, the files some times
On 21 June 2010 22:12, Leon Kernan lker...@gmail.com wrote:
There seems to be an unintended side effect to this statement:
The maritime borders are 12nm out to sea from the coastline.
That is the general case, but in Qld I think it's 12nm from the edge
of the barrier reef...
Bass Strait seems
On 21 June 2010 19:43, Markus marku...@bigpond.com wrote:
The data is part of the GIG Dataset - 250K scale
Follow this link and choose Topography with Innamincka as an example for the
keyword and press show me results.
I can't comment about all datasets, but I downloaded that particular
On 22 June 2010 05:27, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Unless otherwise noted, all Geoscience Australia material on this
website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5
Australia Licence.
You will need to tag at least all ways with:
source=Geoscience Australia
Recently David Dean asked for some data and he was given access to it
with a favourable license (cc-by).
This dataset only covers Qld Govt funded roads, this doesn't include
local government roads.
While there was additional information attached to the data, it was
mostly internal references so
On 20 June 2010 17:07, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Alex S. m...@swavely.com wrote:
Some would like to see it kept and marked historical, but deleting ways
Oh? Could you elaborate?
Some people would like to be able to map the 4th dimension
On 20 June 2010 21:19, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
It might be better to tag all the roads which are known to be good and safe
for cyclists to use. Perhaps cycle=recommended might be a good tag.
Black and white rarely exist in the real world, you'd need some kind
of scale so routing
On 20 June 2010 14:11, {Tim} m526244+osm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/20/2010 11:40 AM, John Smith wrote:
If you've made the changes you were going to make, then go for it,
anyone that was going to comment would have by now.
Your timing uncanny. I just finished typing wiki entry:
http
On 20 June 2010 16:59, rran...@ihug.com.au rran...@ihug.com.au wrote:
The TZ files installed are compiled. I looked at the Australian source file
in the tzdata source. I have attached this file. It is not primary source,
but I have found it to be accurate.
Thanks for that...
On 20 June 2010 21:05, Markus marku...@bigpond.com wrote:
I am interested in adding some of the lakes and creeks in the national parks
to OSM.
Just to confirm this source to be ok to use.
The data doesn't belong to ga.gov.au, they link to psu.edu and on that
page it says the data is quite out
On 20 June 2010 21:24, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
The data doesn't belong to ga.gov.au, they link to psu.edu and on that
page it says the data is quite out of date, did you look at the
rivers/streams data from data.australia.gov.au?
The dataset I was thinking about only covers
Pity it's not going to be available for some time...
Germany's new TanDEM-X radar satellite is scheduled to lift off from
Baikonur Cosmodrome at 04:15 Berlin time on 21 June — that's 10:14 pm
Eastern today (20 June). Flying in close formation with its twin
satellite, TerraSAR-X, TanDEM-X will
David Dean did a follow-up interview on ABC national radio this morning:
http://blogs.abc.net.au/queensland/2010/06/open-street-maps.html
You can listen to the interview online and the interview last year:
http://blogs.abc.net.au/queensland/2009/05/make-your-own-m.html
On 20 June 2010 06:17, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
At the very least some sort of note=* explaining *why* the road is
considered hazardous would be nice.
There is various organisations that label tracks as various difficulty
levels, maybe there is an organisation that has come up with a
On 19 June 2010 20:04, Craig Feuerherdt craigfeuerhe...@gmail.com wrote:
The only DEM that I know about is the 9second product from Geoscience
Australia - http://www.ga.gov.au/meta/ANZCW0703011541.html It does cost $100
and probably has some stringent use/distribution limitations.
You want the
On 19 June 2010 22:19, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
no I don't know
the licence asks for attribution
but whether the new proposed new system is going to provide appropriate
attribution?
The new license has a requirement for attribution so I don't think
that's a problem. I think cc-by is ok,
Craig pointed to me to this site:
http://www.thelist.tas.gov.au/listmap/listmap.jsp?cookieteststate=checkllx=13.0lly=5116000.0urx=712000.0ury=5662000.0layers=268
Which was in relation to better DEM information, but they also have
half decent aerial imagery for most of the state, however the
901 - 1000 of 3639 matches
Mail list logo
