Re: [OSM-talk-ie] religion=* and denomination=*

2020-10-30 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie
Oct 30, 2020, 14:51 by colmmoor...@hotmail.com: > Hi, > > Apologies to the list and Mateusz for the confusion. :) Also apologies if I > step on religious toes. > >> From: Mateusz Konieczny >> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-ie] religion=* and denomination=* >> >> Disclaimer: I never visited Ireland

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] religion=* and denomination=*

2020-10-28 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie
I am really sorry for offtopic and quoting offlist message. Not sure what happened, I just used standard reply. Oct 28, 2020, 19:54 by talk-ie@openstreetmap.org: ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] religion=* and denomination=*

2020-10-28 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie
Huh, I though that secularization/atheisation of Ireland was quite far reaching and nearly complete. (good thing that I included that diclaimer) "crucifixes in most classrooms" applies also to Poland, but "school boards pray at the start of board meetings" would be likely to be considered as

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] religion=* and denomination=*

2020-10-27 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie
Disclaimer: I never visited Ireland 27 paź 2020, 14:41 od colmmoor...@hotmail.com: > 3. Holy wells, mass rocks and the like. These are predominantly Roman > Catholic, but possibly with pagan origins. > Are they still used by pagans/new age people? For OSM purposes current usage matters, not

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Some of the 3300 parks in OSM Ireland are just patches of grass.

2020-10-18 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie
did. without me knowing > the local conditions. > Yes, it would require verification. From your email I understood that you verified some cases and found it to be a bare grass area without park. > > On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 at 13:00, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie < > talk-ie@openstreetma

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Some of the 3300 parks in OSM Ireland are just patches of grass.

2020-10-18 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie
Oct 18, 2020, 11:59 by br...@hollinshead.net: > As part of my researches into what features we have on OSM that might > interest someone wishing to make use of outdoor facilities, I find on the > Island of Ireland we have close to 3,300 parks to choose from, wow! > (leisure=park). On closer

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] some of my inconsistent tagging - cure sought

2020-09-20 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie
Sep 20, 2020, 11:20 by a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk: > On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 21:06, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie > wrote: > >> >> For start note >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct >> - but fixing your own edits falls under

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] some of my inconsistent tagging - cure sought

2020-09-18 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie
For start note https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct - but fixing your own edits falls under one of exceptions Typical such edit would use Overpass Turbo ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_turbo ) to find elements for editing and exporting it to either

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Tagging of LEAs that changed in 2019

2020-09-11 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie
Is it a former administrative boundary? I would comply delete it if it no longer administrative boundary. 11 Sep 2020, 13:27 by br...@hollinshead.net: > Under Si 615 of 2018 many of the LEAs in Dublin were altered. After > creating the new ones, I added historic=yes and end dates to the ones

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Estimate of number of building=* in Ireland

2020-05-14 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie
May 15, 2020, 00:04 by davecor...@gmail.com: > The fact that so many buildings are being mapped as building=yes when more > accurate tagging is plainly obvious makes this an utterly frustrating > project. > > Saying that others can come along after and correct it is a totally > avoidable

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Estimate of number of building=* in Ireland

2020-05-14 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie
both building=residential and landuse=residential are valid tagging (though, if possible then building=house or other more specific value is preferable) May 14, 2020, 12:47 by t4d...@gmail.com: > The residential tag should be used for an area not a house. > > On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 14:38,

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Tagging in the building tasks

2020-01-25 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie
hem all as > houses since that would be the least wrong tagging overall.  > > On Sat, 25 Jan 2020, 08:48 Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie, <> > talk-ie@openstreetmap.org> > wrote: > >> It is typically much faster to add just >> geometries. Maybe whoever was do

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Tagging in the building tasks

2020-01-25 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie
> Dave  > > > On Sat 25 Jan 2020, 07:51 Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie, <> > talk-ie@openstreetmap.org> > wrote: > >> 24 Jan 2020, 23:05 by >> davecor...@gmail.com>> : >> >> > I'm wondering if there is something I'm missing her

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Tagging in the building tasks

2020-01-24 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ie
24 Jan 2020, 23:05 by davecor...@gmail.com: > I'm wondering if there is something I'm missing here. Why are we not > tagging buildings with the correct tagging? > building=yes is correct Adding specific building type is also correct and desirable, but mapping all buildings as building=yes is