Ed Avis wrote:
Note that David Ellams is one step ahead and has already created some
video
tutorials on how to use Potlatch 2.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Video_tutorials
That's only one piece of the puzzle.
Agreed. Not everyone likes watching videos, nor are they very easy to go
groppo otto wrote:
I have made subtitles in English and Italian for David Ellams video
tutorials [1] [2] with Universal Subtitles.
That's great! So far we have English, Italian and Dutch. I hope speakers of
a few other tongues rise to the challenge.
Cheers
David
--
View this message in
JohnSmitty wrote:
As I said before, you can easily do this with copyright, use CC-by-ND
instead of CC-by-SA, but if something is licensed as CC-by-SA it can
legally be derived from as long as the resulting work is also
CC-by-SA.
What I am saying is that Creative Commons guidance appears to
Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
Let me try copyright-only examples.
I can take up the full text of all of the works of William
Shakespeare, compile it into a book with annotations, and release the
book under CC-BY-SA. Now since the original text by Shakespeare is
already in the public domain, I
http://www.pocketgpsworld.com/Navigon-Add-22-Million-POIs-To-SatNav-Devices--1060.php
An interesting development. If I understand things correctly (and assuming
CC-by-SA holds water for data), they can charge for these derived data sets,
but they would still have to be CC-by-SA, and so anyone who
Steve Doerr wrote:
Yes, there's no such word as 'trailor'!
That is embarrassing! Unfortunately, I then copied and pasted the mistake
into several other columns, too. Fixed.
Cheers
David
--
View this message in context:
Peter Miller wrote:
Assuming we are supporting these second format then where should the
look-up
table be that gives the values? This page is having a go at it but doesn't
seem to be doing a very good job!
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Maxspeed
What about updating
Sorry this has taken so long, folks. I have been fighting my video editing
software (and/or my hardware), which has prevented me from achieving a good
a result as I wanted.
In the end I have had to settle for a lower res version, and it has some
rough edges. The worst of these is that in a few
Jean-Guilhem Cailton wrote:
Where is your first video?
http://www.vimeo.com/18559427
However, the sound quality is very poor. I have just re-recorded the
voiceover (which I have been meaning to do for a month) and also trimmed out
some of the pauses to make it about shorter. I will probably
Pieren wrote:
And after a quick check on the FR addresses, I've seen that about 10% of
the
post codes are wrong.
Yes, I think this may be a very useful additional resource, and I commend
Mapquest for releasing it, but please don't anyone think about a global bulk
upload.
I just checked
The Cabinet Office's Office for Civil Society has just published a report
citing international examples of The Big Society. Case study number 1 is
OpenStreetMap:
http://www.arnaudriegert.com/wp-content/uploads/international-examples-big-society.pdf
Cheers
David
--
View this message in context:
Sorry, Tom. I meant to reply to your feedback.
Tom Chance wrote:
Not sure if I'm also in Richard's you lot club, but I produced a fairly
easy going introduction to OSM and Potlatch 2 including a video last year:
http://www.openecomaps.co.uk/contribute.php
I need to redo the video now I've
:
http://www.vimeo.com/18559427
Cheers
David (davespod)
P.S. I’d consider releasing this CC0 to maximise worry-free re-editing and
re-use. However, I’m slightly concerned there might be howls of anguish if
OSM data is in a CC0 video. I suspect it would be fair use, as would using
Bing imagery
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
That is absolutely _brilliant_!
Thanks for your kind words. Thanks to Tom, too. I will try to find time
later to respond to suggestions made both here and by private mail.
(Summary: I agree with some and disagree with others!)
My faith in human nature is restored. :)
tutorials?).
Here it is:
http://www.vimeo.com/18559427
Cheers
David (davespod)
P.S. I have no particular interest in having my name in lights and I’d
consider releasing this CC0 to maximise worry-free re-editing or plagiarism.
However, I’m slightly concerned there might be howls of anguish if OSM
Richard wrote:
For those who are similarly humourously challenged may I point out that I
have checked and no, the OS
OpenData licence does not refer to pubic sector information. [...]
Oops! It may read as a sense of humour failure, but it was actually a
literacy failure. Maybe, therefore,
Richard wrote:
Mike Collinson wrote
It incorporates the Open Government License for pubic sector
information
I sincerely hope it doesn't say that!
I'm afraid it does. So, the question is does the modification of the terms
invalidate the part of the OGL guaranteeing ODC-by compatibility?
Joseph Reeves wrote:
Sorry, but I find this to be a really negative attitude; there's loads
of people that want to draw a line on the map for the first time, but
less who want to tidy existing streets, or just add POIs. What would
be wrong, for example, with collecting the first GPS trace of
Steve Bennett wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org
wrote:
you should not map from any imagery area you know nothing more about.
If there's consensus for this view, get it documented on the wiki, and
call it policy.
Steve Bennett wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:33 AM, davespod osmli...@dellams.fastmail.fm
wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.1
See item 3.*
Very interesting. That line was added by Ben in January 2009, and
that sentence hasn't been touched since.
Bah! You're
Richard Mann wrote:
I wouldn't recommend remote tracing, but if you do it with due care,
or maybe to supplement stuff you have surveyed (or maybe even just
seen out of the window when passing),
I completely agree that supplementing stuff you have surveyed or even
tracing something you have
(and whether MS would be willing to buy it!). Here's hoping!
David (davespod)
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Steve-Coast-Joins-Microsoft-as-Principle-Architect-of-Bing-Mobile-tp5767431p5771900.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com
This is just a general plea to those using bots. Please use your immense
powers with extreme caution. There seems to me to have been an increase in
bot edits lately, and some of them are becoming very bold.
I've seen shop=pet_supplies changed to shop=pet and some similar
examples of late, that
Apologies to legal-talk, it would have helped if I had quoted the original
proposal that started the thread
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:17 AM, ce-test wrote:
A fork as stipulated should not be necessarily about a group of people
leaving OSM , but about we (OSM) deciding to continue in two or
Jukka Rahkonen writes:
I have understood that uploaded GPS track logs that we have now are
effectively public domain. They are facts (even they do not allways
tell the truth) and they miss all the creativity so they are not
copyrightable.
Everybody can use at least individual tracks for
There is likely to be a considerable difference between the average speed
and the maximum speed, particularly along streets that are badly congested
at different times of day. The average speed is useful for routing
decisions,
but should be tagged separately from the maximum speed.
Even
26 matches
Mail list logo
