Re: [Talk-gb-london] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database (CID) conflation
January 2023, is it time for a > > post mortem of this incomplete project? > > > > On 15/11/2022 12:01, Whittaker, Ed via Talk-gb-london wrote: > >> Hello > >> > >> Following very helpful feedback earlier in the year, we are now > >> looking to
Re: [Talk-gb-london] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database (CID) conflation
roject? > > On 15/11/2022 12:01, Whittaker, Ed via Talk-gb-london wrote: > > Hello > > > > Following very helpful feedback earlier in the year, we are now looking > to recommence efforts to complete the migration of the TfL CID to OSM > > > > We will keep a
Re: [Talk-gb-london] Tube exits
dom too fix, but I'd be happy to put some > energy into fixing this on OSM, because I have experienced accurate exit > information being useful (and I value open data). But, at the same time, it > could be done outside OSM as well. Opinions welcome. > > This is clearly useless for routing,
Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Elmley/Hockley Brook
2023-03-28
Thread
FORD, Alexander (THE SHREWSBURY AND TELFORD HOSPITAL NHS TRUST) via Talk-gb-westmidlands
for any advice given Alex Sustainable Travel Planner for the NHS. From: Kra Ko via Talk-gb-westmidlands Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2023 8:18 PM To: talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Elmley/Hockley Brook [You don't often get
[Talk-gb-westmidlands] Elmley/Hockley Brook
of this stream r15652436 (perhaps Elmley Brook ?) Best regards ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
[Talk-gb-london] Camden's street trees dataset
would appreciate any pointers or advice. Leo___ Talk-gb-london mailing list Talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-london
Re: [Talk-gb-london] [Talk-GB] Separate sidewalks added by #waymap-project-SB in West London
it can negatively impact routing if the sidewalks aren't > joined to the roads at regular intervals, so it's easy to get wrong. > There's a justification for mapping sidewalks in some circumstances. The > thread is here: > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2021-October
Re: [Talk-gb-london] Separate sidewalks added by #waymap-project-SB in West London
> leaving crossings as nodes on the highway > > -- > Robert Skedgell (rskedgell) > > ___ > Talk-gb-london mailing list > Talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-london > _
[Talk-gb-london] TfL Cycle Infrastructure Database (CID) conflation
Hello Following very helpful feedback earlier in the year, we are now looking to recommence efforts to complete the migration of the TfL CID to OSM We will keep an eye on this board, but suggest (and welcome!) feedback to the main post on the talk-gb board (https://lists.openstreetmap.org
Re: [Talk-gb-london] [Talk-GB] Is TfL data allowed on OSM?
Sweco processes your personal data, please read here. ___ Talk-gb-london mailing list Talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-london
[Talk-gb-london] Update on TfL CID conflation plans
. ___ Talk-gb-london mailing list Talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-london
Re: [Talk-gb-london] Conflating TfL CID cycle data to OSM
. (Not that I have a clue how to actually do the latter, but.. ;) I've tagged quite a few of these in recent months. On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 4:29 PM Robert Skedgell wrote: > On 13/05/2022 16:10, Whittaker, Ed via Talk-gb-london wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > Pleased to let
[Talk-gb-london] Conflating TfL CID cycle data to OSM
___ Talk-gb-london mailing list Talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-london
Re: [Talk-gb-london] Pavement (Sidewalks)
o do. > > > > Any advice on whether I could start this remodelling would be fab. > > > > Cheers! > > Clive. > ___ > Talk-gb-london mailing list > Talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/l
Re: [Talk-gb-london] Anyone up for the task of mapping the new Lambeth electoral ward boundaries?
> link between them is dynamic, i.e. a change to one necessarily means a > change to the other. > > On 02/17/2022 3:41 PM David Davis via Talk-gb-london < > talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > > > Yeah Tom, > this is conclusion I reached too: > if a wa
Re: [Talk-gb-london] Anyone up for the task of mapping the new Lambeth electoral ward boundaries?
can be demonstrated that the > link between them is dynamic, i.e. a change to one necessarily means a > change to the other. > > On 02/17/2022 3:41 PM David Davis via Talk-gb-london < > talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > > > Yeah Tom, > this is co
Re: [Talk-gb-london] Anyone up for the task of mapping the new Lambeth electoral ward boundaries?
vely frequently, there's >>> no reason why I should use OSM when the data is incomplete, and >>> boundaries in OSM may have been altered (accidentally or otherwise). >>> They're not surveyable, the data is freely available elsewhere - I >>> don't see why it's wort
Re: [Talk-gb-london] Anyone up for the task of mapping the new Lambeth electoral ward boundaries?
>> boundaries in OSM may have been altered (accidentally or otherwise). >> They're not surveyable, the data is freely available elsewhere - I >> don't see why it's worth spending our time making sure it's replicated >> in OSM. >> >> Cheers, >> >>
[Talk-gb-london] Anyone up for the task of mapping the new Lambeth electoral ward boundaries?
!) Anyone interested this task? (A few of the existing Lambeth wards were tagged on OSM already, but the majority actually weren't. But every existing ward boundary is changing in any case...) ___ Talk-gb-london mailing list Talk-gb-london
Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] The Two Towers (at Bentley)
ay/367659836 > > > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Advertising_pillar,_Boundary_Mill,_Walsall_-_2021-11-12_-_Andy_Mabbett_-_02.jpg > > > -- > Andy Mabbett > @pigsonthewing > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk > > ______
Re: [Talk-GB] Anglican churches
ess places of worship report looks good, but for me equally as important is places of worship with no religion. Any chance of that being added? Cheers, Mike _______ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Electric forecourt
g:amenity%3Dcharging_station > > Best regards > Rob >_______ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] UK street addressing
//wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Rjw62/UK_Address_Mapping which > mentions "suggested tags" but there is no evidence that this is in use. > If correct I would be tagging as - > > addr:housenumber=99 > addr:street=Postal Street > addr:town=Smalltown > addr:city=Largertown
Re: [Talk-GB] Anglican churches
ps at e.g. https://osm.mathmos.net/nameless/amenity/place_of_worship simply denote the type of OSM object: node, way or relation. Robert. -- Robert Whittaker ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] UK street addressing
ages". Is the tag > building:part=house enough to indicate that the address is "2, Orchard > Cottages, Green Lane" and not "2, Green Lane"? > > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] UK street addressing
20-12-20 18:21, ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB wrote: > > >> Tag the houses with addr:place maybe? >> >> > IMHO a house is not a place > > >> Or, better method is to use the alternative terrace taggong scheme where >> each house is tagged as buildi
Re: [Talk-GB] UK street addressing
trict (?) >> Dependent locality >> addr:town|village|suburb|locality (?) >> Post Town >> addr:city >> Postcode >> addr:postcode >> >> >> This often becomes an issue when mapping business parks, &g
Re: [Talk-GB] UK street addressing
g of Postal Counties? They were indeed deprecated many years ago (1996), but the Post Town is AFAIK a mandatory component of a postal address, and Wikipedia agrees: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_town ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@ope
Re: [Talk-GB] UK street addressing
a clearer solution, that is. IpswichMapper -- 20 Dec 2020, 13:29 by colin.sm...@xs4all.nl: > > On 2020-12-20 14:13, ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB wrote: > > >> Marking city, town etc is not necessary in UK because Geocoders like >> nominatim can figure those out using
Re: [Talk-GB] UK street addressing
n=Smalltown > addr:city=Largertown > > Hoping someone can advise me as to the correct way to tag for the UK... > > Dave Abbott (OSM user DaveyPorcy) > ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] MapThePaths downtime
. Thanks, Nick ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Removing all stiles from bridleways
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:15:47PM +, Andy Mabbett wrote: > On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 20:57, ael via Talk-GB > wrote: > > > I would regard this as vandalism if it is removing surveyed real stiles > > to suit an ideal world where they are not permitted on brid
Re: [Talk-GB] Removing all stiles from bridleways
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020, 20:58 ael via Talk-GB, wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 08:30:01PM +, Neil Matthews wrote: > > Looks like there's been an attempt to remove all stiles from bridleways > -- > > pretty sure I've seen this done in other edits -- agree that they're a >
Re: [Talk-GB] Removing all stiles from bridleways
by > hand)? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95739504 > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb I would regard this as vandalism if it is removing surveyed real stiles to suit an ideal world where they are not permitted on bridleways. Perhaps I have misu
Re: [Talk-GB] Mapping a single Royal Mail mailbox with two references
references?_______ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb _______ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Idea - OSMUK walkers' map application -- -& server
which I am prepared to meet in the short term, I will also give accounts to trusted members of the community on request to work on the project should they wish. Nick From: OSMUK Sent: 13 December 2020 18:36 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Cc: Nick Whitelegg
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging bike ramp/ bike path down steps
Dec 13, 2020, 20:52 by talk-gb@openstreetmap.org: > Dec 13, 2020, 19:50 by ch...@c-hodges.co.uk: > >> So how should this be tagged to indicate that the bike route really does go >> down the steps? >> > Add them to bike route relation. > Obviously it applies only i
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging bike ramp/ bike path down steps
Dec 13, 2020, 19:50 by ch...@c-hodges.co.uk: > So how should this be tagged to indicate that the bike route really does go > down the steps? > Add them to bike route relation. _______ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging bike ramp/ bike path down steps
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020, 19:14 David Woolley, wrote: > On 13/12/2020 19:05, Edward Catmur via Talk-GB wrote: > > Also, the steps should have bicycle=dismount, not =yes. This will allow > > people who can't dismount to go around by the road. > > Only if it is illegal to try
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging bike ramp/ bike path down steps
penstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/51.40521/-2.45026, and I've >> seen similar on canal towpaths - in the latter case in particular it can >> be crucial for route-planning even manually, as the next access can be a >> long way away. >> >> So how should this be tagged to indicate t
Re: [Talk-GB] Idea - OSMUK walkers' map application -- -& server
, Nick Whitelegg via Talk-GB , wrote: > > Hello Andy, > > Thanks for this. > > My own feeling regarding what server we need is "start small, to get it > going" and then as soon as OSMUK can commit to funding (*if* they can, of > course) and/or several people share
Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track
From: Martin Wynne Sent: 13 December 2020 14:01 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track On 13/12/2020 13:45, Nick wrote: > what do people think of Overlapping ways i.e. one is a road and > a duplicate is a bridleway? Not elegant and something I
Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track
github.com/navit-gps & https://www.navit-project.org/ etc. ael ___________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 10:44:24AM +, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote: > IMHO, if it leads on to another road, track, etc. it is not a "driveway", but > could be a track, a bridleway, a service road, or something else. FWIIW, I would very definitely tag that as a service road
Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track
, all day (or why map?). The problem >>> imo is "fudging it for the renderer", or "outright lying for >>> the renderer". In this case, I'd say track is a valid choice - >>> I think even for the wh
Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track
access road to single house and forest neither highway=track nor highway=service service=driveway really matches. Dec 13, 2020, 11:44 by talk-gb@openstreetmap.org: > IMHO, if it leads on to another road, track, etc. it is not a "driveway", but > could be a track, a bridleway
Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track
ure that I am not being attributed to posts I didn't make. Thanks, Nick From: Peter Neale Sent: 13 December 2020 10:44 To: Nick Whitelegg ; Edward Bainton Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track IMHO, if it leads on to an
Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track
n round here, relatively speaking, and I await correction by my olders. On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 09:09, Nick Whitelegg via Talk-GB wrote: >Getting back to this case, this is the farm drive. Beyond the >cattle-grid the public bridleway continues left through the farm >buildings, an
Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track
or why map?). The problem imo is "fudging it for >> the renderer", or "outright lying for the renderer". In this case, I'd say >> track is a valid choice - I think even for the whole length, if by >> "driveway" we infer something, short, tidy, and subu
[Talk-GB] MapThePaths downtime next weekend Dec 19/20
be used for experimenting with creating an OSM UK walkers' map. I will be willing to give shell accounts to trusted members of the OSM UK community (people I know personally or mailing list regulars). More on that later. Nick ___ Talk-GB mailing list
Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track
proved since.. Nick From: Martin Wynne Sent: 12 December 2020 14:30 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track On 12/12/2020 13:15, Andy Townsend wrote: > > Ultimately, if "something needs doing", "someo
Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 10:54:54PM +, ael via Talk-GB wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 09:11:32PM +, Martin Wynne wrote: > > On 12/12/2020 17:37, Andy Townsend wrote: > > > > something about myself, is to map and provide rendering for the area:highway >
Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track
choice for a name, but something along those lines is the only thing that I think the majority of mappers could reasonably use widely. ael ___________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track
of nowhere. > > An example of that is at: > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/52.2816/-2.4320 > > What is the process for getting something done about this? > > thanks, > > Martin. > > _______ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB
Re: [Talk-GB] Idea - OSMUK walkers' map application -- -& server
Hello Seán, Thanks for that, sounds a great idea! Would be a great addition to any UK countryside map once you have opened your API. Nick From: Seán Lynch Sent: 11 December 2020 21:03 To: Nick Whitelegg Cc: Andy Townsend ; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject
Re: [Talk-GB] Newbie damage alert in West Midlands and London
...@garrett.co.uk] Sent: 09 December 2020 19:53 To: Colin Smale Cc: Talk-GB Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Newbie damage alert in West Midlands Ah I ran into his work this afternoon by pure chance and reverted one of these changesets (95506246) and left a comment - no reply as yet. It looked like vandalism to me
Re: [Talk-GB] Idea - OSMUK walkers' map application -- -& server
/> Disclaimer<http://www.solent.ac.uk/disclaimer/disclaimer.aspx> From: Andy Townsend Sent: 11 December 2020 13:40 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Idea - OSMUK walkers' map application -- -& server On 11/12/2020 09:59,
[Talk-GB] Is "GB revert request log" wiki page something that should be recommended?
uld be restored. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Idea - OSMUK walkers' map application -- -& server
ny Shield Sent: 10 December 2020 17:36 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Idea - OSMUK walkers' map application -- -& server Hi I like the idea. Can it be extended to be a UK based map which is has greater prominence to aspects such as the recent discussion about cyc
Re: [Talk-GB] FWD: Re: House number ranges that are only odd or even
ces - it is common to have on street corner address from two streets in one building (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.07413=19.93361#map=19/50.07413/19.93361 and three nearby buildings), mapping this as an interpolation would not work (and least I think so) - and yes, is easier to map and import
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging of shared use paths
!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sqF_1bNzLwyaHTn2LSmJFvQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192 Although the signs have a red background, so that may be a temporary order (temporary as in several years’ duration). ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging of shared use paths
here anyway. Motorways excepted. Are there any public cycleways from which pedestrians are actually banned? cheers, Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tal
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging of shared use paths
ling is that a highway should be mapped at the highest level of >> permitted usage. The assumption is that pedestrians can go almost >> anywhere anyway. Motorways excepted. >> >> Are there any public cycleways from which pedestrians are actually
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging of shared use paths
ng Group, and they have suggested that I ask > the community here to see what the consensus is. > I don't mind what the outcome is, however I am not satisfied with the sole > reason being because it renders differently. > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94598759 > >
[Talk-GB] FWD: Re: House number ranges that are only odd or even
Date: 10 Dec 2020, 18:34 From: ipswichmap...@tutanota.com To: mattatt...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] House number ranges that are only odd or even > This issue also came to my mind. addr:interpolation on a building doesn't > seem appropriate. JOSM, for example, renders it as a dotte
Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging of shared use paths
community here to see what the consensus is. I don't mind what the outcome is, however I am not satisfied with the sole reason being because it renders differently. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94598759 Thank you, _______ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-
[Talk-gb-westmidlands] Hereford area deletions by TL5100
New user TL5100 | OpenStreetMap <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TL5100> has deleted a lot of stuff in Hereford, Ledbury and Worcester area. Can someone check their work and revert if necessary ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list T
Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field
> and which the landowners say should not be ridden. > > If there is a path on the ground, it should be in OSM. Set access=no, certainly, but the path itself should be in the database. _______ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://li
Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field **Do tag for the USER**
le. I am all in favour of tagging PROWs even where there is nothing on the ground, but in a way distinct from "proper" paths/ways. Agreed: do not tag for the renderer, but do tag for the user. ael ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field
route that people actually use! Nick From: nathan case Sent: 08 December 2020 15:11 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field That's a fair viewpoint and I'm open to changing my method. But what would you suggest
Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field
n that a non-existent path > blighting a walk is less likely. Of course if you report it as obstructed > to the HA and get a suitable reply then you have substantial personal > knowledge about the PRoW. > > Jerry > > PS. As an aside does anyone know if there is an article in the
Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field
it's been declared disused. DaveF ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field
On 08/12/2020 12:42, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: Ah sorry, I shall remove it then Robert. I have drawn it freehand based on what I'd seen on their site as a right of way. Presumably then, if there's no established path, I can never add it to OSM because the definitive map is my only source
Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field
Thanks. I'll go back and have a closer look. It was part of a long ride so I didn't do much checking at the time. Mark On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, 12:30 Dave F via Talk-GB, wrote: > > > On 08/12/2020 09:36, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: > > Hello. I've just added a missing public bridle
Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field
recording, the source of the path is ultimately the definitive map? How does that work? Mark On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, 12:19 Robert Whittaker (OSM lists), < robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 09:39, Mark Lee via Talk-GB > wrote: > > Hello. I've just adde
Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field
On 08/12/2020 12:08, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 09:39, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479) which is detailed on the Wiltshire Definitive Map. Generally these maps have
Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field
, 8 December 2020, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: > > Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway ( > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479) which is detailed on the > > WIltshire Definitive Map. It runs across a field and doesn't appear to > have > > been in u
Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field
On 08/12/2020 09:36, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479) which is detailed on the WIltshire Definitive Map. It runs across a field and doesn't appear to have been in use recently, I couldn't see
Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 09:36:31AM +, Mark Lee via Talk-GB wrote: > Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway ( > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882278479) which is detailed on the > WIltshire Definitive Map. It runs across a field and doesn't appear to have > been in
[Talk-GB] Bridleway across field
. Thanks, Mark ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] British Waterways
On 07/12/2020 12:52, SK53 wrote: but other operators too Also note that British Waterways Marinas Ltd has now become Aquavistq Waterside Ltd ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Nominatim oddity
oth dim and out of place... Why does > Nominatim return "Britanniarum Regnum" as the country name for objects > in the UK? For example: > > https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=N=21279378=place > > Mark > > ________
Re: [Talk-GB] Nominatim oddity
compton.nu/ _______ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] British Waterways
is important here. Is it necessary to just check tagging (handling other operator tags, for example wikipedia:operator, wikidata:operator)? Should you check surrounding OSM data? Aerial imagery? Research situation? ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Idea - OSMUK walkers' map application
)? Thanks, Nick From: Nick Whitelegg via Talk-GB Sent: 04 December 2020 15:40 To: Talk-GB Subject: [Talk-GB] Idea - OSMUK walkers' map application Hi, Just floating an idea for a possible OSMUK site, namely an OSMUK 'semi-official' web application for walkers
Re: [Talk-GB] OSM UK's first tile layer
simplifies shapefiles in a similar way when they are opened in JOSM. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Inland Border Facilities
ww.openstreetmap.org/way/700736522#map=16/52.4744/23.3651=N> - just fence mapped and some objects inside, no tag for the entire feature _______ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Idea - OSMUK walkers' map application
I - adopted by all councils for problem reporting would be a great thing to have. Nick From: David Woolley Sent: 04 December 2020 16:49 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Idea - OSMUK walkers' map application On 04/12/2020 16:38, Nick Whitelegg
Re: [Talk-GB] Idea - OSMUK walkers' map application
From: Jon Pennycook Sent: 04 December 2020 15:51 To: Nick Whitelegg Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Idea - OSMUK walkers' map application For reporting problems, maybe FixMyStreet might be interested - see https://osm.fixmystreet.com/ They have sold a product to some councils to allow
[Talk-GB] Idea - OSMUK walkers' map application
spx> ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] FWD: Re: High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tasking manger to add this?
-- Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox: https://tutanota.com Date: 1 Dec 2020, 11:25 From: ipswichmap...@tutanota.com To: robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Cr
[Talk-GB] FWD: Re: High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tasking manger to add this?
-- Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox: https://tutanota.com Date: 1 Dec 2020, 11:23 From: ipswichmap...@tutanota.com To: scolebou...@joda.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tas
Re: [Talk-GB] High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tasking manger to add this?
for use, not point in keeping it a secret. --- https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?spiregrain spiregrain_...@ksglp.org.uk On Fri, 30 Oct 2020, at 6:47 PM, Mark Goodge wrote: On 30/10/2020 18:37, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote: Oct 30, 2020, 16:28 by talk-gb@openstreetmap.org: It has
Re: [Talk-GB] High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tasking manger to add this?
it a secret. --- https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?spiregrain spiregrain_...@ksglp.org.uk On Fri, 30 Oct 2020, at 6:47 PM, Mark Goodge wrote: On 30/10/2020 18:37, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote: Oct 30, 2020, 16:28 by talk-gb@openstreetmap.org: It has come to my attention
Re: [Talk-GB] Recycling Points
28 Nov 2020, 10:48 by robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com: > I guess the problem is that recycling_type=container is being used > both for individual containers and for mini sites with a group of > containers. > Is it really a problem? ___ Tal
Re: [Talk-GB] Recycling Points
> >>> https://www.aberdeencity.gov.uk/services/bins-and-recycling/find-your-nearest-recycling-centre >>> >>> A Recycling Point being a cluster of recycling containers in, say, at the >>> end of your local supermarket car park. Often given a name by the Council
Re: [Talk-GB] electric fences
be used. Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] electric fences
to know that there is one > somewhere in the field. The position might be important if there is an > alternative gate or other access which could be used. > > Martin. > > ___ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@opens
Re: [Talk-GB] Footways bikes can go on
DaveF ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] FWD: Revert the "Felixstowe to Nuneaton" relation
I am forwarding this here because it seems like the "talk-gb-midanglia" mailing list is no longer active. Date: 14 Nov 2020, 17:44 From: ipswichmap...@tutanota.com To: talk-gb-midang...@openstreetmap.org Subject: Revert the "Felixstowe to Nuneaton" relation > https:
