On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 17:44:38 +0100
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/14 ed...@billiau.net:
I've been thinking about the 12nm territorial borders on sea that
we have in many places, notably in Europe. Many of them seem to
have been auto-generated by simply placing a
2011/2/15 Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net:
2) are the positions of the lines rated as to certainty?
I know you are the man with the answer to every question, but you have
missed one
yes, I was not sure if I understood that one right. Is the question if
there can be certainty about the
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:05:15 +0100
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/15 Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net:
2) are the positions of the lines rated as to certainty?
I know you are the man with the answer to every question, but you
have missed one
yes, I was not
2011/2/15 Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net:
You mentioned that the Italian nautical border was obtained from
statute, which sounds definitive, and then noted that the datum may
have needed correcting, because if in statute before 1984 WGS84 would
not have existed.
No, I mentioned that we
the source is:
EUROSION was a project commissioned by the General Directorate
Environment of the European Commission 2002-2004.
The main source of data comes out of the United Nations Convention on
the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), where nations define and update their
sovereign claims to the ocean.
Dave,
On 02/14/11 07:52, David Murn wrote:
Im sure I remember reading a linked news story posted on this mailing
list about a soldier crossing into enemy country because of incorrect
mapping on his GPS.
In that case, should we perhaps deviate from our usual mode of operation
(anyone can add
Well there is at least one place where other information has been
taken into account:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=5lon=-9.46zoom=6layers=M
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 09:23 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
My assumption - and I'm not a boating person so I may be wrong - is that
if you're out on a boat with any working kind of navigation, you will
know where the coastline is, and therefore you will automatically know
where the 12nm
I've been thinking about the 12nm territorial borders on sea that
we have in many places, notably in Europe. Many of them seem to have
been auto-generated by simply placing a buffer around the coastline.
My first question is, do they really have legal significance? They
Just that it's
I've been thinking about the 12nm territorial borders on sea that
we have in many places, notably in Europe. Many of them seem to have
been auto-generated by simply placing a buffer around the coastline.
My first question is, do they really have legal significance? They
Just that it's
Hi,
On 14 February 2011 03:22, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I've been thinking about the 12nm territorial borders on sea that we have
in many places, notably in Europe. Many of them seem to have been
auto-generated by simply placing a buffer around the coastline.
My first
2011/2/14 ed...@billiau.net:
I've been thinking about the 12nm territorial borders on sea that
we have in many places, notably in Europe. Many of them seem to have
been auto-generated by simply placing a buffer around the coastline.
My first question is, do they really have legal
2011/2/14 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Maybe then we should only add this data where it has been changed by
treaty/agreement? Much as most people don't bother adding maxspeed tags to
every inner-city road, assuming that it is enough to put them where the
speed limit deviates from the
I agree that there is also some rubbish, e.g. this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/50899241
nobody can rightfully claim its territory (=admin_level 2) to be
extended by 200 nautic miles, and also the linked wikipedia article
doesn't imply this. Also it doesn't seem that the baseline was
2011/2/14 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
I agree that there is also some rubbish, e.g. this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/50899241
nobody can rightfully claim its territory (=admin_level 2) to be
extended by 200 nautic miles, and also the linked wikipedia article
Im sure I remember reading a linked news story posted on this mailing
list about a soldier crossing into enemy country because of incorrect
mapping on his GPS.
this one? http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3761058.ece
or this one?
Hi,
I've been thinking about the 12nm territorial borders on sea that we
have in many places, notably in Europe. Many of them seem to have been
auto-generated by simply placing a buffer around the coastline.
My first question is, do they really have legal significance? They
certainly
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I'm not saying we should delete them; but whenever I see them on the map I
tend to shrug and say well, seems like someone was trying out his PostGIS
skillz, and somehow I have the suspicion that the 12nm line as depicted
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 03:22 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I've been thinking about the 12nm territorial borders on sea that we
have in many places, notably in Europe. Many of them seem to have been
auto-generated by simply placing a buffer around the coastline.
My first question is, do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
2011-02-14 03:22, Frederik Ramm skrev:
For example, if I am inside this triangle between Scotland and Ireland,
will my legal status (concerning, say, fishing quotas, or whom I can
marry on board of my vessel, or whatever funny things influcenced
On 14 February 2011 16:52, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Would the UK coastguard have a good laugh when I claim to be in international
waters at that location?
If youre more than 12 miles from the coast (which is what is mapped)
then youre in international waters, why would they
21 matches
Mail list logo
