[sorry, just noticed this one]
Lennard wrote:
the editor can hide all nodes with a certain tag
Potlatch doesn't do it, but it seems it's a feature just waiting for a
developer.
Potlatch can do it fairly trivially; just give it a MapCSS stylesheet that
doesn't render said tag.
cheers
Richard
Hi,
On 06/08/11 07:37, Russ Nelson wrote:
It should go on http://openairspace.org, which would be edited using
JOSM, with mapnik tiles as a background layer. The only real
disadvantage is that there would be no database-level connection
between the end of the runway and the beginning of the
Hi,
we have this recurring topic in various parts of OSM - airspace
mapping.
I'm strictly against it.
(For those not familiar with airspace, here's an example of a VFR
airspace map:
http://www.rc-network.de/magazin/artikel_02/art_02-0001/ICAO-Karte-Ausschnitt-Bild2.jpg)
My arguments
On 07/06/11 08:41, Frederik Ramm wrote:
But before I do all that, I would like to hear from the community at
large - you - whether you share my view. Do you agree that airspace
should be elsewhere but not in OSM?
+100
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
Tom Hughes wrote:
But before I do all that, I would like to hear from the community at
large - you - whether you share my view. Do you agree that airspace
should be elsewhere but not in OSM?
+100
Perfect example of something that should be possible to implement as a
completely separate
Frederik,
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
we have this recurring topic in various parts of OSM - airspace mapping.
I'm strictly against it.
[...]
But before I do all that, I would like to hear from the community at large -
you - whether you
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:41:29AM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
But before I do all that, I would like to hear from the community at
large - you - whether you share my view. Do you agree that airspace
should be elsewhere but not in OSM? Or do you think that airspace
should have a place in OSM
On 2011-06-07 09:41, Frederik Ramm wrote:
... Do you agree that airspace
should be elsewhere but not in OSM?
I fully agree with all of your points.
Bye, Andreas
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 07/06/11 11:15, Ed Avis wrote:
I think the important question is whether mapping airspace causes any harm to
people who don't care about airspace.
I believe Frederik covered that when he mentioned the problems of having
lots of objects criss-crossing areas that people are trying to work
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:15:59 + (UTC), Ed Avis wrote:
I think the important question is whether mapping airspace causes any
harm to
people who don't care about airspace. If not, best to let the people
who are
interested get on with it, however misguided they may be.
IMHO this is already
Tom Hughes tom at compton.nu writes:
I think the important question is whether mapping airspace causes any harm to
people who don't care about airspace.
I believe Frederik covered that when he mentioned the problems of having
lots of objects criss-crossing areas that people are trying to work
On 07/06/11 11:46, Ed Avis wrote:
However, I would suggest that this is not a particularly hard problem to solve;
the editor can hide all nodes with a certain tag or put them in a different
layer. Currently, available editors don't do that. The question is whether to
forbid tagging airspace
However, I would suggest that this is not a particularly hard problem to
solve; the editor can hide all nodes with a certain tag or put them in a
different layer. Currently, available editors don't do that.
JOSM does that. Particularly well, too. Have a look at the Filter stuff.
Can't speak
On 6/7/2011 7:04 AM, Lennard wrote:
However, I would suggest that this is not a particularly hard problem to
solve; the editor can hide all nodes with a certain tag or put them in a
different layer. Currently, available editors don't do that.
JOSM does that. Particularly well, too. Have a
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
we have this recurring topic in various parts of OSM - airspace mapping.
I'm strictly against it.
I'm not 100% for it, and my feeling when reading this mail was that
you are too categorically against this type of
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
4. 99% of Airspace is of almost no significance to non-pilots. Arguments
like one would like to know if the house one intends to buy is within some
kind of airspace are fantasy.
I agree with all the rest. I would say here
On 7 June 2011 13:58, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
The best long term solution to this, and other problems, would be to
have better facilities for creating and integrating overlays. Just
like Wikipedia solved some of its scoping problems by telling people
to stick it all on Wikia,
2011/6/7 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
Perfect example of something that should be possible to implement as a
completely separate database, but which can overlay any other OSM data?
+1
cheers,
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Tom Hughes writes:
On 07/06/11 08:41, Frederik Ramm wrote:
But before I do all that, I would like to hear from the community at
large - you - whether you share my view. Do you agree that airspace
should be elsewhere but not in OSM?
+100
It should go on http://openairspace.org,
19 matches
Mail list logo
