2015-10-08 10:26 GMT+02:00 Maarten Deen :
> Making a relation for each concession greatly improves maintainability.
> You only have to load one relation in JOSM to get all lines and work from
> there.
> I would be really cross if someone decides to delete those relations :P
>
On 2015-10-08 09:44, Jo wrote:
The way I do it (and in no way am I saying it is the only way or the
correct way to do it, but it seems to hold up fine) is make one
relation for each seperate destination (usually two: a->b and b->a,
sometimes 4: a->c->b, a->d->b, b->c->a and b->d->a) and group
2015-10-08 9:39 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
>
> 2015-10-08 4:12 GMT+02:00 Clifford Snow :
>
>> If the bus travels over the same way going two different directions, is
>> the way added twice to the relationship, which means ignoring the JOSM
>>
> Where is this master-master documented? I think some may shoot it
>> down, calling it a category. I use the operator and network tags to
>> group 'concessions', although here in Belgium they correspond to the
>> provinces.
>>
>
> It is not documented.
> In the Netherlands we have at present 35
2015-10-08 4:12 GMT+02:00 Clifford Snow :
> If the bus travels over the same way going two different directions, is
> the way added twice to the relationship, which means ignoring the JOSM
> warning message? Or is the way only entered once with just no
> forward/backward
On 2015-10-08 10:47, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-10-08 10:26 GMT+02:00 Maarten Deen :
Making a relation for each concession greatly improves
maintainability. You only have to load one relation in JOSM to get
all lines and work from there.
I would be really cross if someone
2015-10-08 17:37 GMT+02:00 Clifford Snow :
> Looks like I need to find a different route, something easier. What I
> picked looked easy, only 4 stops, but over 100km long.
>
> My plan is to do as suggested, a relationship for each direction. When
> done, I'll look at a
Looks like I need to find a different route, something easier. What I
picked looked easy, only 4 stops, but over 100km long.
My plan is to do as suggested, a relationship for each direction. When
done, I'll look at a master relation for all.
So two questions:
1) When looking at the bus routes in
are
availablehttp://mw1.gstatic.com/crisisresponse/firstlook/2015/firstlook_PO_054370506010_01_2015_05_13_maptiles/11899_6808_14.png
regard
Pierre
De : Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl>
À : osm <talk@openstreetmap.org>
Envoyé le : Jeudi 8 octobre 2015 11h28
Objet : Re: [OSM-talk
sent from a phone
> Am 08.10.2015 um 17:37 schrieb Clifford Snow :
>
> 1) When looking at the bus routes in Rome, I noticed bus_stops are group
> together in the relation, not interspersed between ways. I would have thought
> that the stops would be in spatial order
sent from a phone
> Am 08.10.2015 um 17:37 schrieb Clifford Snow :
>
> 2) Is it necessary to use forward/backward if the ways are in order?
if you have one relation per direction you should not need these roles (afaik)
cheers
Martin
I'm trying to add my first bus route. I'm struggling to understand how to
properly add the relation. The route, like most bus routes, loops back over
the same ways. So my questions:
If the bus travels over the same way going two different directions, is the
way added twice to the relationship,
El 07/10/2015 8:12 pm, Clifford Snow escribió:
I'm trying to add my first bus route. I'm struggling to understand how
to properly add the relation. The route, like most bus routes, loops
back over the same ways. So my questions:
If the bus travels over the same way going two different
Hi,
I wrote something about it here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Polyglot/diary/28401
It's written as a reaction to how the stops are mapped in Germany. The way
I see it, the nodes next to the ways are the more important ones, so they
are the ones that get added to the route relations and
I am keen to know the right answer. Last time I tried it I ended up
creating two routes. One for outbound, and one for inbound. Having both
together in the same relation was a bit claustrophobic. I think I found a
discussion somewhere which resulted in the same conclusion, but I can't
remember
On 2015-10-08 04:12, Clifford Snow wrote:
I'm trying to add my first bus route. I'm struggling to understand how
to properly add the relation. The route, like most bus routes, loops
back over the same ways. So my questions:
If the bus travels over the same way going two different directions,
is
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 08:50:30PM +0200, Ondrej Novy wrote:
i think it's time to cleanup bus routes concept
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Public_Transportation
* forward/backward_stop can't work if you map bus_stop as standalone waypoint
* stop_number is useless because
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 08:50:30PM +0200, Ondrej Novy wrote:
There is a proposal on the table that solves all these things and much
more:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Oxomoa/Public_transport_schema
I like this proposal, it seems to cover most things that I can think off.
I've
Hi all,
i think it's time to cleanup bus routes concept
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Public_Transportation
* forward/backward_stop can't work if you map bus_stop as standalone waypoint
* stop_number is useless because we have ordered relations
* if bus goes from place A
19 matches
Mail list logo