On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Jon Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 11:09 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At present they can achieve the same effect using off line file and
merging layers before rendering.
To make the process more smooth maybe some (or all) of the
Lat night I attended a steering group meeting for my local Connect2 [1]
project in north east Birmingham [2]. One of the things that the group could
benefit from is rapid response on mapping so that it can discuss route
options for the new cycle/walk routes to be built under the project. OSM is
This too is my dream, by agregating physical features done by
volunteers, we will eventually gather a very rich geospatial info than
any other mapping agency. For fairly complete areas, I believe it can
now be used for planning. But as I understand (correct me if I am
wrong), OSM is for mapping
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lat night I attended a steering group meeting for my local Connect2 [1]
project in north east Birmingham [2]. One of the things that the group could
benefit from is rapid response on mapping so that it can
maning sambale:
Sent: 04 June 2008 9:47 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Enabling communities to use OSM as a planning tool
This too is my dream, by agregating physical features done by
volunteers, we will eventually gather a very rich geospatial info than
any other mapping
Donald Allwright
Sent: 04 June 2008 9:56 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Enabling communities to use OSM as a planning tool
One thought that occurs to me is that there will be many, disparate groups
wishing to use OSM to plan stuff, only a very small proportion of which
Hi Andy,
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:54:53 +0100, Andy Robinson \(blackadder-lists\)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This brings me to the point though. Currently we map physical features as
they exist and in some cases the alignment of known construction, what we
do not do is use OSM as a planning tool.
Tom Chance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent: 04 June 2008 11:02 AM
To: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Enabling communities to use OSM as a planning tool
I've had similar thoughts for our project in Sutton (London):
http
but would need to use vector data from the database for
past/future features.
elvin
From: Andy Robinson \(blackadder-lists\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 4 June 2008 08:54:53 BDT
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Enabling communities to use OSM as a planning tool
Lat night I attended
One thought that occurs to me is that there will be many, disparate groups
wishing to use OSM to plan stuff, only a very small proportion of which
would eventually become reality. I'm not sure if it would be appropriate
to add these features to the main OSM database.
I would also agree that
Hi
From: elvin ibbotson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This topic reminded me of some thoughts I had about time-based tagging but
did not pursue. I have a professional interest in planned features but a
leisure interest in historic features such as
ancient roads. The OSM database could include both
Hi
From: elvin ibbotson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This topic reminded me of some thoughts I had about time-based tagging but
did not pursue. I have a professional interest in planned features but a
leisure interest in historic features such as
ancient roads. The OSM database could include both
Hi
From: elvin ibbotson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This topic reminded me of some thoughts I had about time-based tagging but
did not pursue. I have a professional interest in planned features but a
leisure interest in historic features such as
ancient roads. The OSM database could include both
Hi,
Stephen Gower wrote:
You can, of course, do what you like, but I'd urge you not to do
this without an improvement in the editors. If I come to edit near
a junction and find 15 people have sketched out how they see the
junction could be improved, that's a lot of ways that don't
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:09:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thought that occurs to me is that there will be many, disparate groups
wishing to use OSM to plan stuff, only a very small proportion of which
would eventually become reality. I'm not sure if it would be appropriate
On Jun 4, 2008, at 20:39 , spaetz wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:09:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thought that occurs to me is that there will be many,
disparate groups
wishing to use OSM to plan stuff, only a very small proportion of
which
would eventually become
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 11:09 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At present they can achieve the same effect using off line file and
merging layers before rendering.
To make the process more smooth maybe some (or all) of the following
can
be implemented:
1) Enable the render to use multiple
17 matches
Mail list logo
