Andy Street schrieb:
I'd like to include these paths in OSM[1] as they do exist on the ground
but would like to tag them in such a way that their use is discouraged
(e.g. higher cost in routing, warning signs on walking maps). Has anyone
mapped something similar
we discussed in talk.de just
When the A3 bypass[0] was constructed the route crossed several existing
rights of way. Rather than building bridges or underpasses it appears
that the planners struck on the novel idea of asking pedestrians to walk
across four lanes of heavy traffic moving at 70-80 mph.
I'd like to include these
Andy Street schrieb:
When the A3 bypass[0] was constructed the route crossed several existing
rights of way. Rather than building bridges or underpasses it appears
that the planners struck on the novel idea of asking pedestrians to walk
across four lanes of heavy traffic moving at 70-80 mph.
When the A3 bypass[0] was constructed the route crossed several
existing
rights of way. Rather than building bridges or underpasses it
appears
that the planners struck on the novel idea of asking
pedestrians to walk
across four lanes of heavy traffic moving at 70-80 mph.
I've seen a number
I'd be tempted just to draw the ways on, stick maxspeed tags on the
A3, and hope that whichever routing engine you have in mind can put
a penalty on paths that cross roads with high maxspeeds and no light
controlled crossing on the node(s).
I'm definitely new to the OSM scene, but this
When the A3 bypass[0] was constructed the route crossed several existing
rights of way. Rather than building bridges or underpasses it appears
that the planners struck on the novel idea of asking pedestrians to walk
across four lanes of heavy traffic moving at 70-80 mph.
I'd like to include these
6 matches
Mail list logo
