In some larger urban areas of the US (SFO, LA, etc.), we have Bing imagery
at zoom 21 (~0.05-0.06 m/pel). The Bing spec allows for one more level
(zoom 22), but a search in some of the obvious places has not turned up any
such imagery. I checked downtown LA, parts of SFO, Bellevue/Redmond WA,
I just checked the MS campus in Redmond, WA - there's nothing beyond
21 there either it seems.
Martijn van Exel +++...@rtijn.org
laziness – impatience – hubris
http://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl | http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
twitter / skype: mvexel
flickr: rhodes
On Wed, Dec
Coverage in Tampa is no better than Yahoo, and much worse than the
USGS high res ortho.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
I just checked the MS campus in Redmond, WA - there's nothing beyond
21 there either it seems.
Martijn van Exel +++...@rtijn.org
On 29 December 2010 16:23, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Coverage in Tampa is no better than Yahoo, and much worse than the
USGS high res ortho.
Most of Europe hi-res areas are same or slightly better than Yahoo!, I
think Yahoo is ~90cm and Bing maybe some 60cm. But you should check
the UK for
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:23 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 December 2010 16:23, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Coverage in Tampa is no better than Yahoo, and much worse than the
USGS high res ortho.
Most of Europe hi-res areas are same or slightly better than Yahoo!, I
5 matches
Mail list logo
