On 1 Aug 2009, at 22:51, Thomas Wood wrote:
2009/8/1 Christoph Böhme christ...@b3e.net:
Thomas Wood grand.edgemas...@gmail.com schrieb:
I think all outstanding coding issues have now been dealt with.
There's one minor tagging issue to address - should the source tag
be
on the data or
Excellent summary eugene! May I also add,
trunk: pedestrians are usually not allowed to cross (unless on footbridges).
Hope the discussion gets into the conventions page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Philippines/Mapping_conventions
On 8/3/09, Eugene Alvin Villar
In order to prevent any flamewars, I believe it was decided on that
whoever created the street/node could decide the order. In truth, I
don't really care myself. If the original order of the node (before
2007) was FR - NL, it would be more correct to use that order since that
means someone
Le lundi 3 août 2009, Ben Laenen a écrit :
I have the impression that you've corrected it already now. But please
contact Neo and ask him about it, so he can watch out it doesn't happen
again. You can also immediately ask him to upload his gps tracks.
Yes, I've never used the messaging system
Hi,
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Similarly deletions can be reverted easily
No, because the osc file does not contain all information about the
previous state of the deleted object!
(It only works for untagged nodes.)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09
On Sunday 02 August 2009 23:42:13 Shaun McDonald wrote:
http://openstreetmap.co.uk redirects to the main site.
(as does .com)
The goal is to create interlinks between country communities (like most of the
actual websites do, but with a complete list). I'm not really interested by
aliases of
On Monday 03 August 2009 06:50:36 Stefan Baebler wrote:
openstreetmap.si is currently pointing to openstreetmap.org due to
hosting problems.
I will be happy to add it to the list as soon as it come back.
--
Vincent MEURISSE
___
talk mailing list
2009/8/3 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Similarly deletions can be reverted easily
No, because the osc file does not contain all information about the previous
state of the deleted object!
(It only works for untagged nodes.)
Are you sure? I deleted a pharmacy
Hi,
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Are you sure? I deleted a pharmacy in this changeset:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1990924
and it has all the tags in place.
Then I stand corrected - it seems to work for all nodes, whether tagged
or not. But it doesn't work for ways or
On 02/08/2009, at 9:56 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
yes. A residential road should be avoided if possible (slow, dangerous
and noisy for residents / playing kids), while I don't see this in
industrial or commercial context.
Not having been to Europe I can't say for sure, I wouldn't say that
On 3 Aug 2009, at 07:53, Vincent MEURISSE wrote:
On Sunday 02 August 2009 23:42:13 Shaun McDonald wrote:
http://openstreetmap.co.uk redirects to the main site.
(as does .com)
The goal is to create interlinks between country communities (like
most of the
actual websites do, but with a
Marc Coevoet wrote:
You can try the quadcopter too..
http://www.quadcopter.org/index.php5?title=Quadcopter_Home
Marc
quadcopters/hexacopters/octocopters/microcopters equipped with a camera
are much better than a satellite. Easier and cheaper to use, and most
important: satellites give only
Quadcopter!
I can imagine the stories in the press when this thing starts to fly.
Reports of a UFO has been reported over parts of Texas, there are
reports it maybe terrorists. etc.
Jack Stringer
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
--- On Mon, 3/8/09, SLXViper slxvi...@gmx.net wrote:
quadcopters/hexacopters/octocopters/microcopters equipped
with a camera
are much better than a satellite. Easier and cheaper to
use, and most
important: satellites give only rather poor quality images,
often with
lots of clouds...
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:24:55 + (GMT), John Smith
delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Mon, 3/8/09, SLXViper slxvi...@gmx.net wrote:
quadcopters/hexacopters/octocopters/microcopters equipped
with a camera
are much better than a satellite. Easier and cheaper to
use, and most
important:
--- On Mon, 3/8/09, Aun Johnsen (via Webmail) skipp...@gimnechiske.org wrote:
OSM Zeppelin finally moored up at Empire State Building?
What would the good of that be, it should be out mapping!
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
now i get to own up to having a flickr account ;-(
these roads are all the same width legally, and the actual width depends on
the grader driver.
also none of them are dry weather only roads - so when you see that marker
here it means there is no place to drive when its wet.
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:36:47 + (GMT), John Smith
delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Mon, 3/8/09, Aun Johnsen (via Webmail) skipp...@gimnechiske.org
wrote:
OSM Zeppelin finally moored up at Empire State Building?
What would the good of that be, it should be out mapping!
Stocking up
Some sort of decently sized blimp would probably be cheaper to run and
don't need to constantly use energy to stay above the ground.
I wonder if you can get a cheap second hand blimp from somewhere...
OSM Zeppelin finally moored up at Empire State Building?
maybe http://www.airshipclub.com/
--- On Mon, 3/8/09, hanoj eha...@gmail.com wrote:
maybe http://www.airshipclub.com/
They seem to get about a bit, anyone contacted them about having a high-res
photo/video pointing downwards?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Deal all,
voting is opened:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/paleontological_site
Best regards
Marcello B.
-
( proposed: Sun Jul 19 )
Ulf Lamping wrote:
That's a small step for openstreetmap,
one giant leap for quadcopters
;-)))
Best regards,
Michael.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/1 Christiaan Welvaart c...@daneel.dyndns.org:
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Well I disagree. IMHO we should tag what is 'on the ground', not invent
things or try to tag what's in people's minds. If a government body gives
2009/8/3 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Tag the width of the surface on which users of the way are expected to
travel.
I agree and would like to add: and that is not constricted in the
full usable height
2009/8/3 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
The technical correct
term in German is Lichtraumbreite (my dictionaries don't know it in
English, maybe someone else here can help us).
now I found it, maybe it's clearance width
Martin
___
talk
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Christiaan
Welvaartc...@daneel.dyndns.org wrote:
Why would who maintains a road directly determine its administrative
classification? If a municipality decides that some road is a motorway, we
better tag it as such. In The Netherlands some provinces maintain
2009/8/3 Christiaan Welvaart c...@daneel.dyndns.org:
I don't see what you're saying here. Do you have a complete text to
replace the intro text on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway ?
NO, of course not. All I wanted to do is change the first phrase:
The highway tag is the primary
2009/8/3 James Livingston doc...@mac.com:
On 02/08/2009, at 9:56 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
yes. A residential road should be avoided if possible (slow, dangerous
and noisy for residents / playing kids), while I don't see this in
industrial or commercial context.
Not having been to
2009/8/3 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
now i get to own up to having a flickr account ;-(
these roads are all the same width legally, and the actual width depends on
the grader driver.
also none of them are dry weather only roads - so when you see that marker
here it means there is no place to
Hi,
I don't know how i did this, but I've got 3 new and -3 old messages in
my osm inbox..
Regards
Raphael
attachment: Screenshot.png___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 03/08/09 15:10, Raphael Studer wrote:
I don't know how i did this, but I've got 3 new and -3 old messages in
my osm inbox..
I think you did it by deleting messages without reading them... So you
have zero messages (because they have all been deleted) but three new
messages (because three
On Monday 03 August 2009 10:48:17 am Shaun McDonald wrote:
Why not have a page on the wiki for these two lists? One list for
national websites, and the other for those that redirect to the main
website?
I was thinking about this. I just wanted to be sure to have a quite complete
list
On Monday 03 August 2009 12:18:14 Emilie Laffray wrote:
4. At the end it is always up to the individual mapper to decide what is
narrow. While 1 meter is 1 meter.
Yes, 1 meter is 1 meter. That's why using an approximation is actually
worse than using a relative factor. Using a precise
Hi,
www.openstreetmap.is and osm.is weren't mentioned as far as I could see.
Both redirect to the normal openstreetmap.org domain.
Btw: why do all replies go by default to osm-t...@meurisse.org instead
of t...@openstreetmap.org?
regards
___
talk
Peter Körner schrieb:
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
Hi Peter,
I don't think anybody has a reason to object to merging them. At
least me and User:Mala have been merging some of these nodes last week
and we got no blackmail so far :) I believe we went through all the
country nodes which didn't
On 1 Aug 2009, at 01:04, Stefan de Konink wrote:
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Tristan Thomas wrote:
Is there any method of adding photos etc. to OSM like there is for
Google Maps. For instance, if you navigate to somewhere on Google
Maps,
it comes up with user submitted geo-tagged photos. Is
2009/8/3 Blaž Lorger blaz.lor...@triera.net:
On Monday 03 August 2009 12:18:14 Emilie Laffray wrote:
We generally agree that there needs to be a way to assure quality of entered
data. Using two distinct tags for measured and estimated values (width and
est_width) is one possible approach. But
On Monday 03 August 2009 20:09:23 SLXViper wrote:
www.openstreetmap.is and osm.is weren't mentioned as far as I could see.
Both redirect to the normal openstreetmap.org domain.
I added them to the list
I also created a wiki page as mentioned before:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 23:11, Vincent MEURISSEosm-t...@meurisse.org wrote:
Italian website don't work with www.
no, it does work both ways. with and without the www.
the site is just a blog right now, under the blog third level domain name.
--
-S
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 20:49 +0200, Peter Körner wrote:
Peter Körner schrieb:
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
Hi Peter,
I don't think anybody has a reason to object to merging them. At
least me and User:Mala have been merging some of these nodes last
week
and we got no blackmail so far :)
On Monday 03 August 2009 23:33:04 Simone Cortesi wrote:
no, it does work both ways. with and without the www.
Oups sorry for confusion. Typing domain names the whole day gave me some
geographic troubles :) (it seems that the one not working was the Taiwanese
one but it's working now)
--
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/3 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
now i get to own up to having a flickr account ;-(
these roads are all the same width legally, and the actual width depends
on the grader driver.
also none of them are dry weather only roads - so when you
I recently was looking at this proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/cycleroad
and it seems quite reasonable to me. It is already well-hung (almost
1 year), so why don't we start voting? Who is in charge/able of
opening the voting-process? If you want to discuss about the
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Tag the width of the surface on which users of the way are expected to
travel.
I agree and would like to add: and that is not constricted in the
full usable height
I think the maxheight tag should be
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Just for my interest: is any of you familiar with the national/local
planning regulations for roads in your area? Maybe it would help to
have a look if you haven't already done so.
Yes I am, you can't read them on line, and I wasn't going to pay,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
What I'm proposing is to add additional quality assurance tags. Absence of
such tags would mean that there is no way to know how accurate data is. But
presence of such tags would give reasonable assurance on data
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Blaž Lorgerblaz.lor...@triera.net wrote:
On Monday 03 August 2009 12:18:14 Emilie Laffray wrote:
Yes, 1 meter is 1 meter. That's why using an approximation is actually
worse than using a relative factor. Using a precise number is going to
introduce errors that
2009/8/4 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Elena of Valhalla wrote:
So is it really a big change for Germany and Italy to
define the highway tag as the administrative classification of the road?
As Martin already said, yes, it would be a big change, and it would
become quite
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, you're right, 4,40 m was indeed wrong. In the EU it is 4,50 m.
That's the general maxheight (the clearance streets must have),
resulting from 4,00 maxheight for the vehicle plus 50 cm clearance.
This might
2009/8/4 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
In my opinion, marginal strip and elemental part of the road is a
little tricky to define for all kinds of ways.
yes, that's surely for streets only, small ways won't have this to be tagged.
And width:total seems
strange to me at first glance. Why
--- On Mon, 3/8/09, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
actually none of them I would consider a residential road.
They could
be everything from primary (not probable) to track,
dependant on the
surrounding and actual use (what they link).
usually we would think about
--- On Mon, 3/8/09, James Livingston doc...@mac.com wrote:
Ah, for some reason searching for bbq on the wiki doesn't
find that. Weird.
If we're going to use bbq, I'll change some of the ones
that I have done over, and add fuel=
Wikimedia wiki search is a bit hit and miss, I just search on
Thanks Jeff and Ross.
I'm using Fedora 10 Linux on a 1000H EeePC, and I've already had a go at
installing josm. But It isn't clear to me yet just which Java package(s) I
need to install first. I'm working on that in slow-time.
I've got Merkaartor installed, but I'm far from confident with
--- On Mon, 3/8/09, Darrin Smith bel...@beldin.org wrote:
That's a given for any 2 people.
However how the same thing is store in OSM in 2 different
areas is
the same. And that is what we are talking about here.
Ok, to do this objectively we could either mark an area as a different
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Ian Sergeantiserg...@hih.com.au wrote:
Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote on 03/08/2009 03:06:38 PM:
Calling a bush walking track a designated footpath doesn't sound
exactly right, nor does calling a bushwalker a pedestrian.
Thoughts?
We should focus on
--- On Mon, 3/8/09, j...@talk21.com j...@talk21.com wrote:
I'm using Fedora 10 Linux on a 1000H EeePC, and
I've already had a go at installing josm. But It
isn't clear to me yet just which Java package(s) I need
to install first. I'm working on that in
slow-time.
It's the normal sun-jre,
--- On Mon, 3/8/09, Darrin Smith bel...@beldin.org wrote:
You can do this I guess it's a matter of rendering. I think
this
discussion has highlighted an underlying issue that is
beyond the
rendering issue however. The underlying issue is that you
don't consider
administratively equal
John Smith wrote:
You can do this I guess it's a matter of rendering. I think
this
discussion has highlighted an underlying issue that is
beyond the
rendering issue however. The underlying issue is that you
don't consider
administratively equal a suburb and a rural named
area despite the
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Darrin Smith wrote:
What about the 90% of Australia that isn't metro areas and these
boundaries are all over the place and don't line up with towns,
They still provide general enough information to be useful.
That same 90% also has a large number of source=landsat (or
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:14:46 +1000
Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Darrin Smith wrote:
What about the 90% of Australia that isn't metro areas and these
boundaries are all over the place and don't line up with towns,
They still provide general enough information to be
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Darrin Smith wrote:
Not sure what your point here is Liz apart from interesting information?
Although it does back up what I was saying about the ABS begin
incomplete not having every designated place - I assume Beelbangera
doesn't even exist in the ABS data?
Still it
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:59:48 +1000
Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Darrin Smith wrote:
Not sure what your point here is Liz apart from interesting
information?
Although it does back up what I was saying about the ABS begin
incomplete not having every designated place -
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 20:50:22 +1000
Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Darrin Smith wrote:
But until someone has the time to fix it, it will provide someone
who doesn't know the area well enough information to be in
approximately the right place (same as most landsat traced
Ok, with a pointer from the dev list I now have 2 tile style sheets set up, one
shows admin_level=10 for darrin, and the other doesn't...
http://maps.bigtincan.com/?zoom=13lat=-28.31773lon=152.88587layers=0B
You can actually use these tiles in other apps if you can config the URL,
Apart from highway shields looking different, park benches, getting rid of
boundary names from being rendered if a centre place exists, is there anything
else needing to be done to make the map tiles look more aussie like?
___
Talk-au
Hi all,
As I've just discovered, you need to have some care when editing
anything that causes a change to a way with over 2000 nodes (e.g. a
lot of the ABS boundaries).
NEVER under any circumstances let anything happen to you editor during
the upload. You can't let JOSM crash, have network
--- On Mon, 3/8/09, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Ignoring malformed URL: {0} wrong
bloody address
Someone, somewhere other than an aussie, kiwi or pom will come across that and
wonder where all the blood come from to be on the URL :)
--- On Mon, 3/8/09, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
surface=unpaved and 4WD only :).
The strange thing is, there was a bunch of highway=unsurfaced checks, I have no
idea why they were never migrated across to surface=unpaved, updated.
Apart from Victoria and Albert does anyone know of an example where
A Husband and Wife have both had roads named after them and that these roads
intersect.
PS - I know of one such example.
Nick
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Every change I've made so far makes the roads go very whacky
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
--- On Mon, 3/8/09, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
Apart from Victoria and Albert
does anyone know of an example where
A Husband and Wife have both had roads named after
them and that these roads intersect.
Ummm does George street in Sydney count? It intersects with a
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, James Livingston wrote:
So now I get to go and extract the old way from dumps and then re-
upload it as a now way. You have been warned.
I've left a broken one on western NSW
I know where it is, and I'll fix it one day
preferably when the server side of things is
just information gathering away from that going-nowhere conversation on main
talk
(does not deal with any issue concerned with the value of mapping a road
width, nor how)
After about 1870 roads surveyed to 1 chain width
earlier roads, travelling stock routes, main roads and roads forming shire
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Stephen Hopeslh...@gmail.com wrote:
Check the dates on the Wiki pages. The whole highway=path thing is
relatively recent - it may well be that the Australian Wiki advice was
written before it existed.
Maybe. But the question remains.
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Stephen Hopeslh...@gmail.com wrote:
Check the dates on the Wiki pages. The whole highway=path thing is
relatively recent - it may well be that the Australian Wiki advice was
written before it existed.
Maybe. But the
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Lized...@billiau.net wrote:
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Stephen Hopeslh...@gmail.com wrote:
Check the dates on the Wiki pages. The whole highway=path thing is
relatively recent - it may well be that the Australian
I found a SVG version of a highway shield, at least national, on wikipedia, I
should hunt through their image library some more and they might have other
useful icons that we'd be able to use to improve map rendering...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Australian_National_Highway.svg
Are national highways marked differently than other highways at all?
The reason I ask is different highways get different shields, and the national
highway network is the only one with a green shield with the word national at
the top.
Someone has put a meticulous list together, half with
--- On Mon, 3/8/09, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
On another topic - close to these two roads is Heanke
Street which is named after Helen Haenke.
I've tagged it Heanke Street since that is what is on
all the street signs but it should be Haenke Street.
I've included tag of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highways_in_Australia
Actually shields and so forth is a little bit all over the place, the shield
shown depends not only on the highway type, or if it receives federal funding,
but also proximity to a major metro area.
Can anyone suggest a good way to know what
Can anyone suggest a good way to know what highway should
be given what shield based on the current data OSM has?
I should have mentioned the wiki page on tips for aussies doesn't help...
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Route_Numbers
Maybe I'm
Thanks. I've now installed Sun JRE.
But JOSM doesn't work for me. A JOSM screen comes up, sometimes with a menu
bar at the top, and sometimes not. Which ever it is, it doesn't respond to
clicks or keystrokes and has to be aborted (not responding).
Luckily, JOSM-WebStart (
--- On Tue, 4/8/09, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
i agree
i think that is a bad bit
it comes from using one tag to do the work of two tags
In any case I've hacked together something, the shields seem a little on the
large side of things so will probably make them smaller, but this is a
http://hemanavigator.com.au/
I was looking at getting a wall map of Australia for work and look what I
found.
Really interesting device.
--
You will outgrow your usefulness.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 02:48:16 +0200, Matthias Versen s...@mversen.de
wrote:
2. place=suburb als Fläche
Normalerweise wird das place Tag nur für eine Nide genommen der die
jeweilige Mitte des Gebietes ist.
Dieses Aussage ist nicht korrekt.
Ein Polygon ist hier durchaus üblich und gerne
Jens Herrmann o...@bikelab.org wrote:
wer kann mir sagen wie Stadtteilgrenzen getaggt werden?
Vorsicht, das könnte ein rechtliches Problem sein, aber dazu weiter
unten. Zunächst einmal müsste man erst einmal den Begriff Stadtteil
definieren.
1) Da gibt es erstmal solche, die einen
Sven Geggus schrieb:
Christoph Wagner freemaps@googlemail.com wrote:
Und vor allem warum es jetzt nicht mehr geht! Weiß da irgendjemand mehr?
Ich hab mir mal svn log angesehen:
r1071 | steve | 2009-07-02
Tirkon tirko...@yahoo.de wrote:
Jens Herrmann o...@bikelab.org wrote:
wer kann mir sagen wie Stadtteilgrenzen getaggt werden?
Vorsicht, das könnte ein rechtliches Problem sein, aber dazu weiter
unten. Zunächst einmal müsste man erst einmal den Begriff Stadtteil
definieren.
1) Da gibt es
Daher müsste man zunächst einmal definieren, wie diese
unterschiedlichen Unterteilungen in der Daternbank deutlich gemacht
werden können.
Nun zur Ermittlung der Grenzen der Stadtteile/Ortsteile. Wie will man
diese erfassen? Es gibt schließlich keine Grenzmarkierungen.
Ohne die
Mirko Küster schrieb:
Einfach irgendwas annhemen und lustig verschieben ist ehrlich gesagt für die
Tonne. Hat bei mir in der Ecke diese Woche auch einer gemeint. Nach dessen
toller Bearbeitung kratze die Uferstraße schon im Wasser und aus S Kurven
wurden auf einmal Z Kurven. Hätte nur
Sven Anders s...@anders-hamburg.de wrote:
Stadtteilgrenzen unter Uhrheberrechtsschutz zu stellen ist IMHO Unfug.
Im Grunde gebe ich Dir Recht. Aber ich sehe das mal analog zu der
Erfassung der ÖPNV Routen und Haltestellen, wo es uns auch nicht
gestattet ist, diese auf Grundlage der
Hallo,
Sven Anders wrote:
Stadtteilgrenzen unter Uhrheberrechtsschutz zu stellen ist IMHO Unfug. Stell
dir mal vor was das für eine Presse gebe wenn die Stadt Hamburg einen OSM
Mapper verglagt, weil er Stadtteilgrenzen abgemalt hat.
Denke ich auch.
Das Projekt verfolgt zwar generell die
Am Sonntag, 2. August 2009 21:44:20 schrieb Stefan Schwan:
Hi!
Am 2. August 2009 16:18 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com:
Am 1. August 2009 18:29 schrieb TeamAdiac teamad...@gmx.de:
Am Samstag, den 01.08.2009, 16:44 +0200 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
Am 1. August 2009
Moin Moin !
der Zieltermin für das Jakobsweg-Projekt [1] kommt immer näher und in
Hamburg ist noch ein Stück von ca. 2 km Länge [2] nicht geschlossen.
Leider ist es mir aus beruflichen Gründen nicht möglich diese Strecke
noch abzuradeln.
Würde sich einer von Euch bereiterklären dieses
Garry garr...@gmx.de wrote:
Dann sollte man auf der englischen Seite deutlich darauf hinweisen dass
es landesspezifische
Unterschiede geben kann (z.B. weil es die englische trunk gar nicht in
Deutschland gibt, dafür aber die gelben Autobahnen)
und die jeweilige landeseigene Seite berücksichtigt
Andreas Neumann schrieb:
Hi,
k.A. ob ich hier richtig bin... Aber weiß jemand, warum in letzter Zeit
der Renderer von Mapnik mal Multipolygone von Gebäude richtig darstellt
und mal nicht?
Genauer: Ich hab ein Haus mit Loch drin mit ner multipolygon-Relation.
Läuft der Renderer drüber stellt
Jan Tappenbeck schrieb:
[2]
http://www.tappenbeck.net/osm/maps/deu/maps4osm.php?id=22zoom=14lat=53.53739lon=9.9485layers=B00T
OT: was ist das denn für ein riesiger Overlay-Haufen? :o
Gibt's da keine elegantere Möglichkeit dafür?
Grüße
Liebe Leute,
Die letzten beiden Tage waren eine schöne Sache.
Über 40 Personen mappten in 2er Teams (per Auto, Fahrrad und zu Fuß) jeweils im
Landkreis Tirschenreuth
(Oberpfalz) in 26 unterschiedlichen Gemeinden, auch die Presse war vor Ort.
Nachdem am Samstag vorrangig das Gebiet rund um
moin !
OT: was ist das denn für ein riesiger Overlay-Haufen
das ganze soll doch eine übersicht der mir bekannten Jakobswege sein -
über den Schalter Relationen kömmst Du auf eine Übersicht.
Gruß Jan :-)
SLXViper schrieb:
Jan Tappenbeck schrieb:
[2]
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Im Zweifel wuerde ich es drauf ankommen lassen, dass die Stadt mir einen
boesen Brief schreibt - dann kann ich die Grenze immer noch loeschen und
den Brief auf meine Webseite tun.
Beim Austesten von Grenzen könnte leider selbst Letzteres
problematisch
1 - 100 of 357 matches
Mail list logo
