Re: [OSM-talk] Voting on voting system for proposals

On 3/18/2015 2:43 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: Since you are involved with updating the rendering, can you tell us the process to decide what should be rendered? I realize that part of it must be stylistic, but what outside influences cause you to include a tag as part of the standard rendered OSM

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting on voting system for proposals

On 19/03/2015 2:44 PM, Clifford Snow wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Matthijs Melissen mailto:i...@matthijsmelissen.nl>> wrote: As far as I know, we don't have a policy on which tags to include in the rendering, and there is currently no consensus within the development te

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting on voting system for proposals

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Matthijs Melissen wrote: > As far as I know, we don't have a policy on which tags to include in > the rendering, and there is currently no consensus within the > development team on what the best policy would be. Personally I'm > trying to steer towards requiring

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting on voting system for proposals

On 18 March 2015 at 21:43, Clifford Snow wrote: > Paul, > Since you are involved with updating the rendering, can you tell us the > process to decide what should be rendered? I realize that part of it must be > stylistic, but what outside influences cause you to include a tag as part of > the stan

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting on voting system for proposals

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Paul Norman wrote: > Just as a clarification, this is for voting on what it takes to indicate a > tag is approved on the wiki. It is not about if a tag is approved for use, > as there is no such thing. > > No approval is needed to create a new tag, to render a tag

Re: [OSM-talk] Voting on voting system for proposals

On 3/18/2015 2:40 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: I'd like to point to the tagging mailing list, where there is currently a discussion going on, whether the current voting system for voting proposals should be changed. Just as a clarification, this is for voting on what it takes to indicate a ta

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

Le 18/03/2015 11:31, Janko Mihelić a écrit : I'm not aware of any routers that routes across areas. They do exist: http://moodwalkr.makina-corpus.net/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

Are there routers that do shortest-path routing across areas? I do not have an example of an area without additional roads ready. I'm not aware of any routers that routes across areas. There's some prior work in OpenTripPlanner - http://blog.openplans.org/2012/06/b-roll-david-solves-t

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Maps on Wikimedia

Nice one! - Enock twitter: @Enock4seth enockseth.blogspot.com | [[User:Enock4seth]] On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Alex Rollin wrote: > +1 bravo! > > -- > Alex > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) > wrote: > >> From https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Maps on Wikimedia

+1 bravo! -- Alex On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > From https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015- > March/081243.html : > (You can login on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org with your Wikipedia > account too, among others.) > > > > Hi, just a quic

[OSM-talk] Fwd: Maps on Wikimedia

From https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-March/081243.html : (You can login on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org with your Wikipedia account too, among others.) Hi, just a quick note: as part of general search and discovery work, me and Yuri are resurrecting the project

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

OK, my answer should have been more clear: 1. we need a tag for the area: stay_on_path=yes|no 2. we want routers to cross parks with stay_on_path=no ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

On 18/03/2015 10:31, Janko Mihelić wrote: 2015-03-18 11:25 GMT+01:00 Maarten Deen >: Are there routers that do shortest-path routing across areas? I do not have an example of an area without additional roads ready. I'm not aware of any routers that routes acros

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

2015-03-18 11:25 GMT+01:00 Maarten Deen : > > Are there routers that do shortest-path routing across areas? I do not > have an example of an area without additional roads ready. > I'm not aware of any routers that routes across areas. ___ talk mailing l

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

On 10/03/2015 17:02, Mike N wrote: On 3/10/2015 12:56 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote: If I understand correctly that you want routing to cross a park as long as the way in and the way out are connected to the perimeter of the park. This is only correct in parks where you are free to walk anywhere. Mos

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

On 2015-03-10 17:56, Volker Schmidt wrote: Subject: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks For example let's use parks. Both of the foot routers won't cross the park unless there's a specific path way. However, as users can wander about anywhere they like there are no marked paths, not even worn ground

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

On 10/03/2015 16:56, Volker Schmidt wrote: Subject: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks For example let's use parks. Both of the foot routers won't cross the park unless there's a specific path way. However, as users can wander about anywhere they like there are no marked paths, not

[OSM-talk] Voting on voting system for proposals

I'd like to point to the tagging mailing list, where there is currently a discussion going on, whether the current voting system for voting proposals should be changed. This is the discussion so far: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.openstreetmap.tagging/22969 Cheers, Martin