Re: [Talk-us] Slack: Do we need an Alternative (was Planning an import in Price George...)

> I'm also interested in how others feel about Slack. Is it good for the > community or should we look elsewhere? Glad you asked! I think Slack has changed the way I work for the better. Here are some advantages.. * lower barrier to entry for less technical folks * great mobile experience *

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving building=building to building=yes

sent from a phone On 9. Jun 2018, at 17:24, Michael Reichert wrote: >> So, is analysis by Christoph Hormann >> >> sufficient for this proposed edit? > > Yes +1, but the tool you describe would be nice as well ;-) cheers, Martin ___ talk

Re: [OSM-ja] 20m近い位置誤差（三次付近）？

muramotoです。 (a)位置誤差があるのか？ この辺りの地域は、全体的に東にずれているようです(OSMの公開GPSデータとの比較)。 ずれている原因は、2011年のインポートデータがそもそもずれていたためのようです。 (b)最近の編集で誤差が加えられたのか？ kkondoさんが指摘しているエリアでは、丸市様らの編集によって、上記の「ずれた」データが「正しい」位置に修正されていました。 しかし丸市様が指摘されているように、たとえば[1]のチェンジセットで「正しい」位置から再び「ずれた」位置に移動されてしまっています。

[Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2018-06-07

These are based off of Lambertus's work here: http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by asking on the talk-us@

Re: [Talk-GB] MapThePaths - new site focusing on OSM UK footpath mapping

HI Nick, Great job. It will be a really useful tool :) I echo Rob's request for a higher level of zoom if that is at all possible. I'd also suggest looking at some of the excluded 'urban' areas. Some of the unitary authorities and Metropolitan Boroughs (particularly in Pennine England) are more

Re: [Talk-GB] Footpaths - search for the missing ones

A very interesting dataset, Just a belated comment regarding the footpaths on the c.1900 maps. We do need to be careful not to infer too much about public rights. It is only modern (1960s onwards) OS maps which have shown definitive rights of way (in OSM terms designation=public_footpath). Older

Re: [Talk-it] help

Le traccie credo che impieghino qualche ora/giorno ad essere visibili sulla mappa della sito (prova anche ad aggiornare la pagina, di solito con F5). Un sistema per avere un riscontro più rapido é usare JOSM. Trovi facilmente in rete il programma (multipiattaforma). Puoi facilmente scaricare il

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving building=building to building=yes

Hi Mateusz, Am 2018-06-09 um 16:20 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: > So, is analysis by  Christoph Hormann > > sufficient for this proposed edit? Yes Best regards Michael -- Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten ausgenommen) I prefer GPG encryption of emails.

Re: [Talk-GB] Two new tools: 'Ghosts' and 'Survey Me'

Hi Robert, So, I did a partial walk through my area and I have a couple of questions. How to report false positives to the 3rd party data? Tait's Pharmacy (BD18 3HZ) certainly does not exist at mentioned location. Neither there is any track it existed before or would be exist soon.

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving building=building to building=yes

9. Jun 2018 12:54 by osm...@michreichert.de : > I did not expect you to write such a tool. It would be ok to pick some > random samples and look into their history. So, is analysis by  Christoph Hormann sufficient for this proposed edit?

Re: [Talk-GB] Two new tools: 'Ghosts' and 'Survey Me'

A couple other "Ghosts": - Total petrol stations (I'm almost certain this brand has gone now but struggled to find definitive proof) - The army recruitment shops - can't remember the name (Brian will know as he mentions this occasionaly) *Rob*

[Talk-it] help

Buongiorno, le tracce in formato gpx salvate da altri e rese (identifiable o public), si possono vedere nella mappa generale attivando la casellina (public gps traces)? Perché ho dei problemi che prima non c’erano. Grazie. Loris ___ Talk-it mailing

Re: [Talk-GB] MapThePaths - new site focusing on OSM UK footpath mapping

Hi Nick, I like this. Spent some time last night adding designations to existing OSM paths using one of the OGL datasets. A couple of questions: 1. Do you have a combined ROW dataset (bringing all the rowmaps files together)? If so could you host this somewhere. 2. Is it possible to

Re: [Talk-it] Istituzione dell'elenco degli alberi monumentali d'Italia

Mandi! Martin Koppenhoefer In chel di` si favelave... > mentre qualche centinaio di metri per noi non è sufficiente per la precisione > della posizione di un albero, per alcuni dataset questo è la norma (anche > peggio), per esempio quando si georiferenzia secondo un place oppure >

Re: [Talk-it] Istituzione dell'elenco degli alberi monumentali d'Italia

Mandi! Cascafico Giovanni In chel di` si favelave... >> > prova latitudine 45+55/60+16,04/3600 >> > e per la longitudine 12+40/60+27,3/3600 > Se intendi sul portale openstreetmap.org, non credo sia possibile: devi > almento eseguire le operazioni che ha detto Martin, p.es. >

Re: [Talk-GB] Footpaths - search for the missing ones

Hi all, I received an email yesterday from Chris at National Library of Scotland / GB1900 project. All public domain links so reposting it here: 1.I was curious myself to see how the distribution of footpaths looked a century ago based on the GB1900 abbreviations so I mapped the data I sent

semanarioOSM Nº 411 2018-05-28-2018-06-04

Hola, el semanario Nº 411, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/10415/ ¡Disfruta! semanarioOSM? ¿Dónde?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages ¿Quién?:

semanarioOSM Nº 411 2018-05-28-2018-06-04

Hola, el semanario Nº 411, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/10415/ ¡Disfruta! semanarioOSM? ¿Dónde?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages ¿Quién?:

semanarioOSM Nº 411 2018-05-28-2018-06-04

Hola, el semanario Nº 411, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/10415/ ¡Disfruta! semanarioOSM? ¿Dónde?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages ¿Quién?:

hebdoOSM Nº 411 2018-05-28-2018-06-04

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 411 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/10415/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

semanarioOSM Nº 411 2018-05-28-2018-06-04

Hola, el semanario Nº 411, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/10415/ ¡Disfruta! semanarioOSM? ¿Dónde?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages ¿Quién?:

hebdoOSM Nº 411 2018-05-28-2018-06-04

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 411 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/10415/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

hebdoOSM Nº 411 2018-05-28-2018-06-04

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 411 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/10415/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

hebdoOSM Nº 411 2018-05-28-2018-06-04

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 411 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/10415/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

[Talk-GB] weeklyOSM #411 2018-05-29-2018-06-04

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 411, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10415/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[Talk-ca] weeklyOSM #411 2018-05-29-2018-06-04

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 411, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10415/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[Talk-us] weeklyOSM #411 2018-05-29-2018-06-04

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 411, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10415/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[OSM-talk-ie] weeklyOSM #411 2018-05-29-2018-06-04

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 411, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10415/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[Talk-in] weeklyOSM #411 2018-05-29-2018-06-04

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 411, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10415/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[talk-ph] weeklyOSM #411 2018-05-29-2018-06-04

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 411, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10415/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #411 2018-05-29-2018-06-04

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 411, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10415/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

Re: [Talk-es] Cómo mapear un nevero artificial

Gracias, Jesús. Sí, creo que «man_made=cellar_entrance» podría valer también para un nevero artificial. En la documentación de la propuesta mencionan las «icehouses», que imagino se refieren a algo parecido a lo que sería un nevero tradicional. Documentaré este etiquetado en la página del wiki

Re: [Talk-GB] MapThePaths - new site focusing on OSM UK footpath mapping

Quick update: most of Wales now added. Also I have made one or two changes to the JavaScript code so please do Ctrl-F5 if you want to reload the site, otherwise the browser may use old code and it may not work. Apologies for the top posting by the way, it's an unfortunate limitation of

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving building=building to building=yes

Hi Mateusz, Am 2018-06-09 um 12:17 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: > Are you aware about any analysis like that? > > > > > I thought about > > > > > > - listing top contributors > > - time distribution graph (when tag was added) > > > - distribution of editors used to enter data > > > -

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving building=building to building=yes

9. Jun 2018 12:17 by matkoni...@tutanota.com : > > But I would prefer to avoid spending time on creating > > > tool that already exists. > I found  http://taghistory.raifer.tech that reveals that this tag is target of

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving building=building to building=yes

9. Jun 2018 11:36 by osm...@michreichert.de : > Did you investigate who used that tag and maybe why? Was it a bot, a > editor preset, an import or manual user input? I would like to have this > question answered before a mechanical edit. Are you aware about

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving building=building to building=yes

On Saturday 09 June 2018, Michael Reichert wrote: > > Did you investigate who used that tag and maybe why? Was it a bot, a > editor preset, an import or manual user input? I would like to have > this question answered before a mechanical edit. I had looked at this after Mateusz's announcement and

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving building=building to building=yes

8. Jun 2018 22:41 by james2...@gmail.com : > if building=building is not or was not a  wiki approved way of tagging, this > seems more on the side of linting osm tags than it does a "mass blind > edit"/import Note that just because tags are not described on

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving building=building to building=yes

Hi Mateusz, Am 2018-06-08 um 19:19 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: > building=yes is a standard way to mark building without specifying its > type. Editors wishing to specify building type would (directly or > indirectly, for example using StreetComplete) look through buildings > tagged as

Re: [Talk-es] Cómo mapear una bodega subterránea

Leyendo la wiki, este esquema de etiquetas puede servir también para definir un nevero artifical [1], llamados también fresqueras o neveras: antiguos pozos excavados para la producción de hielo que en muchos casos tienen interés arquitectónico. man_made=cellar_entrance cellar:use=storage [1]

Re: [Talk-us] Slack: Do we need an Alternative (was Planning an import in Price George...)

On 2018-06-09 1:19 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: Apart from the reasons you mentioned, having a record is also an important factor. Anything that has gone on on these mailing lists is practically archived forever and for all to see This is also a good reason to ask questions on something other than

[OSM-ja] 20m近い位置誤差（三次付近）？

こんにちは。 OSM地図上で広島県三次付近の地物を見ていて、20m近い位置誤差に気が付きました。 最近の編集で、付近の広範囲に、誤差が加えられたように見えます（私の誤解でしょうか？） 例えばこの辺りの場所です： https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=16/34.7993/132.9010 ___ Talk-ja mailing list

Re: [Talk-hr] GDPR i gasenje http://my-notes.osm-hr.org/ :-(

On 09.06.2018 02:37, Matija Nalis wrote: hopefully ce hbogner znati bolje pa uspjeti napisati privacy policy... Samo treba vidjeti po kojoj osnovi, jer mislim da na privolu ne mozemo ici (sto je i sreca, jer nikad ne bi skupili privolu od svih contributora), a niti na zakonsku obavezu. Mislim

Re: [Talk-us] Slack: Do we need an Alternative (was Planning an import in Price George...)

Hi, On 06/09/2018 04:31 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > I have objections to the use of Slack in particular, and to the use of > real-time communication tools in general (not just Slack but other tools > like IRC, HipChat, Rocket.Chat etc.). I think that while it would be ok for any of these to be