On 05/10/2009, at 8:18 PM, Marc Schütz wrote:
IMO (a) is the correct way to do this.
...
For a road, we can either choose to map it as a linear object (this
is the common case), or we can map its geometry more exactly by
using an area. In both cases, however, the object in our database
On 06/10/2009, at 10:58 PM, David Earl wrote:
On 06/10/2009 13:35, James Livingston wrote:
I can see things getting ickier than they are now if you can just
go around adding new shop= values, without having some prior
discussion to what it means. If I saw a suggested option
On 06/10/2009, at 11:30 PM, Matt Amos wrote:
so far, all the responses seem to indicate that everyone thinks
linking to OSM data by ID is OK. what about Andy's idea, though? is it
OK to take a location, name and possibly an ID as well to perform
fuzzy linking?
my view is that all the
On 11/10/2009, at 12:08 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
This proposal includes the deletion of all voting-related stuff
including the casted votes of the past.
I'd say that this helps prove the point that different people reading
different things into what pages on the wiki say. The proposal
On 03/12/2009, at 10:19 PM, Mike Collinson wrote:
- Whether friendly or unfriendly, they never have any obligation to merge in
their data improvements into our database.
- However, you or I can.
Does that make sense?
I completely agree that they don't have to do anything towards merging
On 03/12/2009, at 10:19 PM, Ed Avis wrote:
That was my interpretation too. It appears to me that if some well-meaning
body released a set of data under the ODbL (which presumably we recommend as
an appropriate licence for geodata) then the OSM project would not be able to
use it. In other
Andy,
Unfortunately it will be too late then. We h ave to seed them with
ideas, which they choose fairly soon, in order to start next year, so
we are looking for examples of projects to get them interested, rather
than hope they get interested first,
James
On 28 Oct 2008, at 14:54, Andy
', and are not really 'service' roads, which might apply to
the roads within a private industrial complex.
James
Dr James Stewart
Research centre for Social Sciences
Institute for the Study of Science, Technology and Innovation
University of Edinburgh
http://www.issti.ed.ac.uk
http://homepages.ed.ac.uk
that Russia is better
organised!
Not much help, but good luck!
James
Hello all,
I want to import populated place names from vmap0 for some regions
of Russia.
There are many blank areas in Russia without any data, so vmap0 data,
especially place names can be a quite good basis for these regions
.
In some ways the way that the name is rendered should be related to
the tag is_in - so in general members of a place have names rendered
smaller than the parent. But I am sure there are problems with this
both theortical and practical.
James
On 24 Mar 2009, at 11:45, D Tucny wrote
are in Scotland so
bikes can legally go anywhere that pedestrians can go, more or less)
James
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
streams in winter)
James
Dr James Stewart
Research centre for Social Sciences
Institute for the Study of Science, Technology and Innovation
University of Edinburgh
t: +44 131 650 6392
skype:jameskstew2
http://homepages.ed.ac.uk/jkstew/
LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/jamesks
http
, and streams that appear in storms - i.e. ephemeral.
Is it worth reinvigorating a waterways proposal on this?
James
On 7 May 2009, at 19:37, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
r changing name and moving to
a new town.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
seems to come up with a single cycle/
pedestrain path called 'The Greenway'.
Best not use that tag unless it used a bit more widely.
James
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 20:44:45 -
From: Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Good routing vs legal routing
On 06/12/2009, at 8:44 AM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Tom Hughes schrieb:
Polling the OSMF members is just the first stage - there will another
vote later when all contributors will be asked whether they want to
relicense.
With a gun at their head: Refuse: After the migration (currently 26th
On 06/12/2009, at 10:05 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
James Livingston wrote:
For example, I have inferred road positions from the CC-BY-licensed
Queensland DCDB-lite dataset, and have uploaded national park and
world-heritage areas from the CC-BY dataset on data.australia.gov.au.
As I'm
On 11/12/2009, at 8:02 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
so we don't need imported data?
In most cases we don't need imported data, but it can be useful. For example
rather than painstakingly crafting the entire coastline of Australia from a few
GPS traces and a lot of imagery (much is relatively
; the national
speed limit is different for single carriageways, dual carriageways, and
motorways (though I think all motorways are explicitly signed with the
relevant speed limit). The national speed limit has changed in the past.
--
David James
___
talk
http://www.mobile-ent.biz/news/36033/MWC-2010-Two-thirds-of-mobile-users-want-driving-AND-walking-navigation
MWC 2010: Two thirds of mobile users want driving AND walking navigation
by Stuart Dredge | Email a friend | PrintAdd a comment
Two legs good, four tyres not necessarily better
A
Patrick Kilian wrote:
Hi all,
IIRC there was a discussion in #osm which basically went like this:
Hi
Which forum do you mean by #osm?
IRC channel I'd guess.
--
David James
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
the routes are 'live'.
In Spain they are historic, but many exist and are a point of controversy
between landowners and ecologists/historical right of way people.
James
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336
and experienced mappers
alike) from accidentally breaking other things. I'd use it when uploading house
numbers I've collected, since there would be no chance of me accidentally
pressing a key and wondering what I just did.
-- James
___
talk mailing list
talk
On 23/06/2010, at 8:56 PM, Andy Allan wrote:
Don't worry, it hasn't actually changed the meaning of anything - it's
just that the wiki is now wrong. The easy way to fix the situation is
to correct the wiki - it's as straightforward as that.
You could argue the wiki is now wrong, but you could
. We're getting more
Australian government data coming along, so what should we be doing to either
know that it can be exempted or that we shouldn't import it?
--
James Doc Livingston
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
an algorithmic change, you just have to
provide the algorithm.
--
James
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
On 09/07/2010, at 12:24 AM, Matt Amos wrote:
I agree with Andy. This is what I understand the ODbL to be saying.
Unfortunately, as with any legal text, its difficult to read and this is an
unavoidable consequence of the legal system. If you need interpretation of
the license, new or old,
On 14/07/2010, at 10:28 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I'm no expert on this sort of thing, but there are probably a lot of
well known pitfalls to avoid when trying to run an inclusive
international project in many languages. I'd think having English-only
discussion at a set time
On 14/07/2010, at 9:52 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 14 July 2010 20:59, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
What do you suggest would be acceptable / unacceptable?
I would consider things to fail if more than 5-10% of data disappears
in any region. At the very least it would be demoralising
-automatic or large scale things, I agree that good
changeset comments shouldn't be difficult to write and would be very useful,
but I'm not sure about small-scale editing when you go along with things.
--
James
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:53:11 -0400
From: nice...@att.net
To: talk@openstreetmap.org; talk...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] new bing hires updates not visible in JOSM?
On 6/13/2012 5:58 PM, Jonas Häggqvist wrote:
Remove bing.attribution.xml from the cache dir:
in
Canada)Montreal, Quebec, Canada
-James___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
in
Canada)
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
-James
== On second thought, Nashville, TN would be a much better choice than
Cleveland, OH. But I still also suggest the other cities I mentioned. Also
add Miami, FL to that list. -James
edited in over 2
months. Thanks. --James ___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Thanks for the link. And believe it or not, somebody has already reported this
same bug. LOL!https://github.com/DennisOSRM/Project-OSRM/issues/354 So, no need
for me to report it now. Still, thanks again for pointing me in the correct
direction. ;) --James
From: m...@rtijn.org
Date: Fri, 3
See: https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/4622 -James
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 02:07:09 +0100
From: dave...@madasafish.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Potlatch 2 - revert
Hi
I noticed that the edit in Potlatch 1 option has been removed from the
Edit pull-down
them know about OSM pawning
Google here.
-James
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
and they mentioned that there was a bridge collapse on an Interstate.
-James (rickmastfan67)
From: cliff...@snowandsnow.us
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 16:36:44 -0700
CC: talk@openstreetmap.org; talk...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Google Maps being praised for removing I-5 colasped
bridge quickly
it didn't correctly fix the
map.
-James
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Simple, something is wrong with the website. lol. I got nailed by it after I
had typed up a long response to a PM. :(
Seems everything else is working fine, just not the website. So, I'm thinking
there were doing a change to the site, and it fubared it unfortunately. :(
-James
Date: Mon
And now it's back up. :)
-James
From: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
To: stevag...@gmail.com; talk@openstreetmap.org
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 21:58:58 -0400
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Application error at openstreetmap.org
Simple, something is wrong with the website. lol. I got nailed by it after I
I'm personally not liking that they now have hidden the long/short links to the
map location behind buttons. Instead of just one click to get the map
location, now it's two clicks and is really annoying and slowing down work for
me. :(
-James
your e-mail arrived.
I bet TomH will probably mark it as a duplicate very soon. lol.
-James
From: t...@macwright.org
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 19:09:27 -0400
To: dave...@madasafish.com
CC: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Upgraded map controls
Hi James,
That issue has been reported
On 14/04/2011, at 6:57 PM, Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
This method seems a much more satisfactory way of doing things to me
-- assuming it could work legally (IANAL). We would still have the
flexibility to re-license if we needed to without individual mappers
being able to hold their data
On 14/04/2011, at 8:06 AM, Francis Davey wrote:
On 13 April 2011 22:24, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
* If so, how do we know what data must be removed in a switch to ODbL?
That clause doesn't appear to put any obligation on you to remove
data. All it requires of you
On 15 June 2011 11:56, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 10:39 +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
On 15 June 2011 09:36, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Hi all
As promised
will be purged from the database in Phase 5.
James Andrewartha
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
of 40k for
associatedStreet. Unfortunately the tools don't seem to understand it
yet, e.g. searching for 19 third avenue, york, nominatum gets the
wrong house:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?relation=1021672
Cheers
James
2. the role=house should also work with closed ways and relations
there are still Cash lanes, I'm betting the routers direct everybody onto the
E-ZPass Express lanes.
-James___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Does anybody know why they were moved the other day on the wiki? I think it
might have just been an honest mistake by the user, but is there any way to
revert it so that the original history is back in place for Key:highway?
-James
Pieren, I don't think it was moved back per say. It seems to me that somebody
just copied the last good version from before the move and then pasted it over
the redirect. Thus, that's why the history [1] the talk page [2] didn't
return to the main page.
-James
[1] - http
the new feed link is for my watch area
manually and updated it in my RSS feed reader [4].
Still, there needs to be some tweaks to the history part of the new design.
-James
[1] -
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changesets/feed?bbox=-80.54%2C40.358%2C-79.526%2C40.779
[2] - http
with this. There is now no way to link somebody to a specific
page if a user has several questionable edits that aren't within his last ~20
edits. This is something IMO that needs to be brought back ASAP.
-James
Virginia and it was
exactly how I did it in the OSM data on the most recently opened segment of
that highway.
I just thought that this was interesting and wanted you guys to know about this.
-James
___
talk mailing
See this tweet I got back from them asking the same question:
https://twitter.com/MapQuestTech/status/436876342861512704
-James
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
Hi all,
I've been trying to find the best way to extract global admin boundaries
for admin_level 2 - 4 (or more, depending on size). Up until now, XAPI has
been my go-to, but that seems to tap out at anything more than 10 or 20
degrees square.
[moreover, and this might be due to a mistake on my
and other interchange reconfigurations in the
Statesville, NC area), but wanted to add the extra note info but couldn't since
that part didn't show up.
So, I hope you can get the notes part fixed and working. I tried it in both
IE-11 (patched all the way) and Firefox Beta 29.
-James
I just hope that the 'tertiary_link' casing problem can be fixed soon. In some
places, that looks horrible.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
I just hope that the 'tertiary_link' casing problem can be fixed soon. In some
places, that looks horrible.
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/753
-James
in the future Martijn?
-James
[1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/22050738
[2] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/22262496
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
I like! Do you know if people comment on a changeset you make, will you
automatically get an e-mail mentioning said comment, or will you be in the dark
and have to stumble across said comment?
-James
___
talk
Here's the only mentions of 'OpenStreetMap' on their site:
http://www.frogsparks.com/?s=openstreetmaplang=en
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Yup, exactly, I was running many small queries in parallel. Aggregating
them into one query resolved it. If the query bbox grows too big--right
now looking at ~60% of the DRC, but will need to expand the query to run
across all of the Congo Basin--then I'll divide into country-sized queries
but
Yeah, that all makes sense. I had spent a lot of time trying to limit the
area I was searching against, and the result was a *429 Too Many Requests*
error.
Thanks Bryce and Roland.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Roland Olbricht roland.olbri...@gmx.de
wrote:
Hi all,
Was unsure what the
Hi all,
Was unsure what the best practices for querying overpass were, and was
wondering if someone could point me in a good direction.
I'm trying to query Overpass for a small amount of data over many small,
sparsely populated areas. Was wondering if it made more sense to run
separate queries
a note for
them to be field checked if the building design doesn't match any of the normal
designs, or is inside a gas station/WalMart and can't be verified for sure
since those locations can/do change often sometimes to another brand.
-James
It's been fixed. Thanks for handling the e-mail part Hans.
-James
From: hans.dekryge...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 05:55:34 -0700
To: rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
CC: talk@openstreetmap.org; talk...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] PennLive.com using OSM without attribution?
Just
Turnpike.
My question is, is this allowed with the current license, or do they still need
to have the attribution on the image (or right below it)?
If somebody that is more knowledgeable in this would like to contact them about
this if they are in the wrong, please, be my guest.
-James
simple one-node intersections as-is)?
I'm very curious to see what others have to say about this to see how I'll move
forward when I map in the future. Also, don't hesitate to respond at the
Google Group post or the GitHub one too as I get the e-mail notifications from
them as well.
-James
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/will-republicans-impeach-pennsylvania-supreme-court-justices-20180222.html
(ignore what the article is about)
Just happen to see a thumbnail and clicked on the article since I noticed the
OSM base map. Nowhere that I can find does it give credit to
lid=IwAR21V_nmDDNPWg4pLDBqc7XmjwATOTQtlLD9slWEBFENEnMkBOO8TL4CiOc>
Deadline for Submission: Thursday 31st Jan, 2019.
Regards,
*Magige **M. **James*
*Environmental Planner and Manager*
*/GIS and Remote Sensing specialist. *
*Kenyatta University*
*phone no:+2540707
Greetings. I am one of the coordinators for the mSpray organized mapping.
We are aware of the issues that have been raised and we are working on them.
James
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
and
ST_IsClosed on the MultiLineString and they return false. Am I making a
bad assumption here?
I'll be in a lot of trouble if I don't figure this out soon so some
help would be greatly appreciated. :)
Thanks,
James
___
talk mailing list
talk
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:28:09 +0100
Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 March 2010 17:20, James Le Cuirot ch...@aura-online.co.uk
wrote:
The relationship analyzer says that the segment for Kent is closed.
http://betaplace.emaitie.de/webapps.relation-analyzer/analyze.jsp
not quite sure. Is this likely to be a
mistake? And if this isn't the right way to fix a self-intersection,
what is? My edit is here.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4289465
James
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:23:44 +0100
James Le Cuirot ch...@aura-online.co.uk wrote:
And I have tried actually but that site is still
reporting problems and PostGIS still isn't accepting it. I thought the
problem was that the ways went back on themselves, though they didn't
actually cross, so I
On 30/09/2009, at 1:00 AM, Matt Amos wrote:
yes. but since there hasn't been any case law on what substantial
means (at least in europe, yet)
The reason I asked was because we had decision (Nine Network vs IceTV)
from our High Court a few months ago, regarding the meaning of
substantial
On 26/09/2009, at 3:02 AM, Mike Collinson wrote:
- A very much re-worked Contributor Terms is now virtually complete
and you can see a snapshot at
http://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_1kqzg8dhr
.
Something I just thought of that would probably be worth talking about
- how does the
On 03/12/2009, at 6:12 AM, Mike Collinson wrote:
We have now fully updated the OSM Contributors agreement section of the
main proposal. I hope that meets concerns about clarity of the change-over
process.
http://www.osmfoundation.org/images/3/3c/License_Proposal.pdf
A while ago on the
On 09/12/2009, at 11:46 AM, Anthony wrote:
A transfer of copyright is a transfer of exclusive rights. In the US, and
probably in other jurisdictions as well, it must be signed and in writing.
One key difference is that someone who is granted a nonexclusive license does
not have the power
On 12/12/2009, at 7:07 AM, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
But if the foundation wants to have copyright in the data I think
it's trivial for it to have some by doing *some* of the maintenance
edits on behalf of the foundation or one person (or more) transferring
their rights instead of everyone
On 11/02/2010, at 8:14 PM, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
Agreed, trying to ask them would be a good thing. Has helped in some
cases in the past where authorities (city government or the like)
re-thought their license :-)
The Australian Toilet Map data got discussed on talk-au back in December, and
On 15/06/2010, at 7:24 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
2. create a data set derived from OSM with number of road kilometres in
each tile
I'd argue that this step could be seen as creating a Produced Work not a
derived database. Consider if you rendered a heat map of OSM where each pixel
in the
On 13/07/2010, at 10:47 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
Anybody who can suggest a way to accurately predict the
user numbers and data % and location and the extent where blank spots
might arise should help us to allay these fears. But I think that
there are simply too many variables to predict the
a number of
Australian groups would disagree - including our government.
--
James
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
On 16/07/2010, at 6:28 PM, Andy Allan wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:53 PM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
There's only one undeniable fact in this whole affair. Exactly 100% of all
contributors have signed up to CC-BY-SA and have indicated that they are
willing to contribute their data under
On 17/07/2010, at 4:12 AM, Simon Ward wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:01:08PM +1000, James Livingston wrote:
* It also uses contract law, which makes things a *lot* more complicated
Despite my strong bias towards copyleft, I thought this was a problem
with the license. Unfortunately
On 17/07/2010, at 4:58 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I noticed something that had escaped my attention until now. The
contributor terms say that OSMF will release the data under ODbL 1.0,
CC-BY-SA 2.0 or another free and open license accepted by 2/3 of active
members.
Notice the absence of
On 17/07/2010, at 6:34 PM, Heiko Jacobs wrote:
Michael Barabanov schrieb:
Consider two cases:
1. Current license does not cover the OSM data (I think that's the OSMF
view). In this case, OSMF can just change to ODBL without asking anyone.
2. Current license does cover the OSM data.
On 20/07/2010, at 9:10 AM, Emilie Laffray wrote:
To the best of my knowledge, violating a contract and making the data
available doesn't make the data public domain.
Indeed.
The relevant question is then Is hosting a copy of ODbL licensed material
(e.g. a planet dump) on your website without
On 26/08/2010, at 2:12 AM, Simon Ward wrote:
I don’t know if that’s how legal types read it, but couldn’t it also be
taken transitively as follows:
1. CTs allow licensing under ODbL 1.0;
2. ODbL 1.0 allows licensing under a compatible licence, or later
version of the ODbL;
3. By (1)
On 25/08/2010, at 5:41 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
There is also a very practical reason against fixing anything, and
*specifically* a share-alike requirement, in the CT, and that is that in
order to make *clear* what you want you will have to write half a license
into the CT.
I completely
On 30/08/2010, at 10:03 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
If the majority of the community (including OSMF and the sysads who run the
servers) agrees with the license change, why should the onus of forking be on
the license-change agreers? If this is indeed the case, then the ones who
should
forcing them to make it available in such as way
that a contract would be formed. Host a copy of the planet or an extract for
people to download with just a link, and I would think that you'd get a
contract of adhesion at best, and that concept doesn't exist in some places.
IANAL, etc - James
On 30/08/2010, at 3:24 PM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think that was already sorted out under the issue of wikipedia point
importing,
the OSM data is under the jurisdiction of England and has to obey
english copyright law. no?
No, people are bound by the copyright law where they
On 27/08/2010, at 1:36 AM, Anthony wrote:
Or you could just assign the task of deciding what it means to
someone. Whether or not a future license is share alike shall be
determined by a vote of the OSMF board.
Sure, except I don't know that will really help. If people want certainty that
all
On 04/09/2010, at 10:30 PM, Rob Myers wrote:
If it absolutely has to be one thing or the other I'd say it is a Produced
Work.
Does it have to be though? I can't see anything in the ODbL that says Derived
Database and Produced Work are mutually exclusive.
A produced work is:
a work (such as
on my account
into those I can agree for and those I can't? and what licenses are the
CTs compatible with? ?
3) On the above, how do I split the edits on my account?
--
James Livingston
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http
anywhere?
If not, can we get good answers and add them to a FAQ?
--
James
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
?
--
James
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
the
licence isn't quite the same.
I for example have had to say No, because you now have to give an answer
to edit, but would almost certainly change that to a Yes at the last minute
(subject to figure out how to split incompatible data into it's own
account).
--
James
601 - 700 of 1373 matches
Mail list logo
