Well, it is possible for a human to memorize it :)
Julien « djakk »
Le lun. 19 nov. 2018 à 17:22, Mateusz Konieczny a
écrit :
> It is still not clear to me why new way of writing latitude and longitude
> is supposed to be interesting.
>
> 19. Nov 2018 16:43 by drinc...@google.com:
>
> We're re
No, all highways are areas :) Mapping them as a line is a manual
generalization ;)
djakk
Le ven. 10 août 2018 à 12:15, Andy Townsend a écrit :
>
> > So basing on your opinions, it looks like highway=* + area=yes isn't
> incorrect, it's just not documented.
>
> I'd suggest that it depends what
A linear road is also a surface, the surface is useless at zoom=8 but
useful at zoom=16.
Like waterways, both can coexist.
djakk
Le mer. 8 août 2018 à 18:19, Tobias Knerr a écrit :
> On 08.08.2018 12:49, Tomasz Wójcik wrote:
> > Due to our rules, that we shouldn't have 2 active tagging
> > sc
I don’t get why highway=footway + area=yes is considered as wrong tagging !
djakk
Le mer. 8 août 2018 à 12:52, Tomasz Wójcik a écrit :
> As highway=footway etc. tags are set to "should not be used on areas" on
> Wiki, and mapping them in combination with area=yes is not documented at
> all a
févr. 2018 à 14:22, djakk djakk a écrit :
> Yes, we should be able to tag secondary motorway or secondary motorroads. (
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/48.8719/2.4496 - https
> ://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/48.57211/-2.82279)
epublic? By similar logic the outer border of Czech
> Republic
> >> should be approximately admin_level=4 (to match US states) and trust me
> that
> >> EU integration is not yet at the point where that would be acceptable.
> :)
> >>
> >> Let's get
Matej, you don’t have to answer quickly, you can answer one time per week
if you prefer, the strong arguments will still weight well :)
djakk
Le sam. 24 févr. 2018 à 10:30, djakk djakk a écrit :
> There is 2 « independant » things in the debate :
> 1) trunk definition - what is a tr
ing to spend on arguing with some
> random person who wants to break our local road classification system
> "because it will look nicer".
>
> On 24 February 2018 at 07:59, djakk djakk wrote:
>
>> Yes, but this rendering does not change when a road crosses
Yes, but this rendering does not change when a road crosses a border ^^
djakk
Le sam. 24 févr. 2018 à 05:43, JB a écrit :
> There is something I don't get.
> Draw primary the same color as trunk and you have no more «
> discontinuity »?
> In France, some commercial map (the most sold, I think)
I would tag the amount of traffic (official count or estimation) + the
width of the lanes (bidirectional with no hard shoulder ?) + an
appropriated renderer to show heavy traffic + narrow road with a thin red
stroke.
Le ven. 23 févr. 2018 à 21:28, Mark Wagner a écrit :
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:
renderer parse access tags to decide how to represent
>> the way? (I believe that was the intention when motorroad=* was
>> proposed.)
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 3:29 PM, djakk djakk
>> wrote:
>> > Don’t worry, when the official system is good, lik in Czechi
ssification system.
>
> On 23 February 2018 at 18:06, Fernando Trebien > wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Administrative classification is not strictly related everywhere to
>> signage, structure and access rights.
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 1:12 PM, djakk dj
a clearly defined road classification, but
> please don't touch the countries where there is no doubt about what class
> any given road is.
> Happy mapping!
>
> On 22 February 2018 at 16:20, djakk djakk wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I totally agree with you,
Hello,
I totally agree with you, the definition you provide, administrative-free,
tends to the same osm map between countries.
djakk
Le jeu. 15 févr. 2018 à 19:18, Fernando Trebien
a écrit :
> Landing on this discussion several months late. I've just heard of it
> by reading a wiki talk page [
Wikidata+OSM as the long name, and w+OSM or wOSM as the short name ? :)
2017-09-16 23:11 GMT+02:00 Yuri Astrakhan :
> The new service is getting more and more usage, but it lacks the most
> important thing - a good name. So far my two choices are:
>
> * wikosm
> * wikidosm
>
> Suggestions? Vote
; as used in Japan or UK, with trunk as
super-primary, or a new key "importance" which almost duplicates the
highway value (trunk or super_primary, primary, secondary, tertiary,
quaternary, local)
Maybe I should make a test map and come back later :)
djakk
2017-08-24 2:09 GMT+02:00 Greg
motorway but it has a sidewalk)
djakk
Le mer. 23 août 2017 à 13:33, Martin Koppenhoefer
a écrit :
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> On 23. Aug 2017, at 11:54, djakk djakk wrote:
>
> I think there are five keys to tag a road :
> 1) its importance in the network (super-pri
tagging system shuffles those 5 keys, "motorway" implies 2)
motorway signs 3) no at-grade intersections 4) large lanes 5) asphalt
surface, but for 1) it could be super-primary or just primary (think about
suburban motorways network).
djakk
Le mer. 23 août 2017 à 11:14, djakk djakk a écri
01:26, Greg Troxel a écrit :
>
> djakk djakk writes:
>
> > Yes Martin, I meant "physical characteristics". In the US, a road is
> tagged
> > "trunk" according to its physical characteristics, as Greg said
> previously
> > in this thread.
>
Yes Martin, I meant "physical characteristics". In the US, a road is tagged
"trunk" according to its physical characteristics, as Greg said previously
in this thread.
Le mar. 22 août 2017 à 11:06, Martin Koppenhoefer
a écrit :
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>
ester Caine a écrit :
> On 21/08/17 21:09, djakk djakk wrote:
> > Actualy, "highway=*" shuffles importance and characteristic of roads.
> > May we add an "importance" key to roads ?
>
> Having spent the last week using OSMAND to navigate around the
> W
Actualy, "highway=*" shuffles importance and characteristic of roads. May
we add an "importance" key to roads ?
djakk
Le dim. 20 août 2017 à 13:14, djakk djakk a écrit :
> Well, it is technically possible, but I was thinking about performance and
> stylesheet-main
Well, it is technically possible, but I was thinking about performance and
stylesheet-maintenance issues ;)
Le dim. 20 août 2017 à 12:49, ajt1...@gmail.com a
écrit :
> On 20/08/2017 11:36, djakk djakk wrote:
> >
> > Why I want to do that ? To improve openstreetmap, this is a wo
I'm pretty sure that the use of "trunk" in UK or in Japan is about the
importance of the road, not about its characteristics :
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/vBqrj5uGYBw05cd57g9TAg (this is the trunk
road linked in my previous mail ; there is pavement on the right side)
Why I want to do that ? T
>
> So basically: please don't go adjusting roads in the US away from
> established rough consensus because you think it ought to be different.
Of course ;-)
Le dim. 20 août 2017 à 04:00, Greg Troxel a écrit :
>
> djakk djakk writes:
>
> > In England and Japan
ee no reason why a trunk road has to continue inside village
> boundaries, where the maxspeed is e.g. limited to 50.
>
> regards
>
> m
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 5:30 PM, djakk djakk
> wrote:
> > "strategic" may not be the right word (my english is
"strategic" may not be the right word (my english is rusty :) )
The thing is, I want to avoid those dotted highway=trunk like this :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/48.5884/-1.4035 (trunk then primary
in the town then trunk again), I'd prefer trunk - still trunk in the town -
trunk, like in
table definition is
> found. For example, in the Netherlands an "autoweg" is usually mapped to
> highway=trunk. These roads are indicated by a standard sign which you may
> recognise (I don't know where you come from I'm afraid):
>
>
> https://nl.wikipedia.org/wi
Hello,
highway=trunk is very different between countries, in France it is used for
motorway-like roads (dual carriageway), so the same road is sometimes
highway=primary and sometimes highway=trunk (example with the N7 road :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/46.6303/3.2700), whereas in England
29 matches
Mail list logo
