On 6 June 2010 12:21, Dave F. wrote:
>> highway=steps area=yes?
>>
>>
> A very good question posed by Alex. I have a few wide steps (~50m) in my
> city.
>
> It's a good start for a solution from Nathan, but it would need a
> direction tag in order for the renderers to know which way the steps
> we
2010/6/7 Steve Bennett :
> Interesting problem. Seems related to the general "how to map a street
> as an area without sacrificing the properties of streets" problem. Use
> an area, and a relation, with the relation specifying which way(s) are
> the top and bottom?
+1, as long as the lateral side
2010/6/6 Roy Wallace :
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Dave F. wrote:
>>
>> Off the top of my head I'm thinking of a line within the area that
>> defines the direction. it would have to be linked to the boundary by
>> using relations(?)
>
> Yup that is how I think also. Still no complete soluti
Interesting problem. Seems related to the general "how to map a street
as an area without sacrificing the properties of streets" problem. Use
an area, and a relation, with the relation specifying which way(s) are
the top and bottom?
Steve
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
> On
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Dave F. wrote:
>
> Off the top of my head I'm thinking of a line within the area that
> defines the direction. it would have to be linked to the boundary by
> using relations(?)
Yup that is how I think also. Still no complete solution, but probably
worth refining
Zitat Dave F.:
> Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> Alexander Menk wrote:
>>
>>> is there any better way for mapping "very wide steps" (100 m, half
>>> circle) instead of putting lots of steps next to each other.
>>>
>>
>> highway=steps area=yes?
>>
>>
> A very good question posed by Alex. I ha
Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> Alexander Menk wrote:
>
>> is there any better way for mapping "very wide steps" (100 m, half
>> circle) instead of putting lots of steps next to each other.
>>
>
> highway=steps area=yes?
>
>
A very good question posed by Alex. I have a few wide steps (~50m) in
Alexander Menk wrote:
>is there any better way for mapping "very wide steps" (100 m, half
>circle) instead of putting lots of steps next to each other.
highway=steps area=yes?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/l
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Alexander Menk
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> is there any better way for mapping "very wide steps" (100 m, half
> circle) instead of putting lots of steps next to each other.
>
> This is what I am talking about:
>
> http://www.addismap.com/exhibition/media/front-view.jpg
>
> An
Hi!
is there any better way for mapping "very wide steps" (100 m, half
circle) instead of putting lots of steps next to each other.
This is what I am talking about:
http://www.addismap.com/exhibition/media/front-view.jpg
And here the area on OSM:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/811059
10 matches
Mail list logo
