Re: [OSM-talk] England, Wales, Scotland borders

2009-10-07 Thread Ed Avis
Peter Childs pchilds at bcs.org writes:

The regional development agencies have quite big budgets, actually. But I'd
agree that England needs to have it's own level.
 
I think admin_level=5 and an update to the wiki might be the best move.

I might have confused 'regions' with 'regional development agencies'.  The 
latter
do not have any real powers but the regions do at least elect MEPs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regions_of_England
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regional_development_agency

So, although for most government purposes there is no layer in between
English counties (outside London) and Westminster, the regions do just about
exist for various obscure purposes, so I'd grudgingly accept they should be
accorded an admin_level.

-- 
Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] England, Wales, Scotland borders

2009-10-07 Thread Peter Childs
2009/10/7 Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com:
 Peter Childs pchilds at bcs.org writes:

The regional development agencies have quite big budgets, actually. But I'd
agree that England needs to have it's own level.

I think admin_level=5 and an update to the wiki might be the best move.

 I might have confused 'regions' with 'regional development agencies'.  The 
 latter
 do not have any real powers but the regions do at least elect MEPs.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regions_of_England
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regional_development_agency

 So, although for most government purposes there is no layer in between
 English counties (outside London) and Westminster, the regions do just about
 exist for various obscure purposes, so I'd grudgingly accept they should be
 accorded an admin_level.

 --
 Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com


Hmm In that case should they not have the same Admin Level through out
Europe, so a Electoral Area for an MEP is the same Admin level
throughout Europe...

Or does that make life difficult, for us to organise Euro wide consistency.

Peter.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] England, Wales, Scotland borders

2009-10-07 Thread Ed Avis
Peter Childs pchilds at bcs.org writes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regions_of_England

So, although for most government purposes there is no layer in between
English counties (outside London) and Westminster, the regions do just about
exist for various obscure purposes, so I'd grudgingly accept they should be
accorded an admin_level.

Hmm In that case should they not have the same Admin Level through out
Europe, so a Electoral Area for an MEP is the same Admin level
throughout Europe...

No, because a constituency boundary or voting district is not itself an
administrative unit.  It may be, but need not be.

Constituencies for elections (from European Parliament region-blocks down
to the level of wards for local councillors) are sometimes useful information,
but they need their own tag, not admin_level.

Hmm, I may have just contradicted what I said earlier... there are still
little things like 'planned fire brigade co-ordination' which might justify
English regions being treated as an administrative or political entity.

-- 
Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] England, Wales, Scotland borders

2009-10-06 Thread Ed Avis
Igor Brejc igor.brejc at gmail.com writes:

For days now I've been trying to figure out how I could render borders 
between England, Wales and Scotland using OSM data,

   1. Borders between these countries are tagged with the same
  admin_level=4 as that of subdivisions inside England (example:
  North East England, http://osm.org/go/evykef-?relation=151164).
  Now I'm not a constitutional expert, but I think Wales and
  Scotland represent different level of territorial division than
  just a collection of England's counties.

Agreed.  These English regions are largely spurious (they have some kind
of 'development agency' with a small budget, but no real political
existence or power) and certainly not equivalent to the border between
England and Scotland or between federal states in countries like the USA
or Germany.  They look very odd on the main slippy map.

I propose to just retag them as anything other than admin_level=4, any
objections?

-- 
Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] England, Wales, Scotland borders

2009-10-06 Thread Richard Mann
The regional development agencies have quite big budgets, actually. But I'd
agree that England needs to have it's own level.

Richard

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:

 Igor Brejc igor.brejc at gmail.com writes:

 For days now I've been trying to figure out how I could render borders
 between England, Wales and Scotland using OSM data,

1. Borders between these countries are tagged with the same
   admin_level=4 as that of subdivisions inside England (example:
   North East England, http://osm.org/go/evykef-?relation=151164).
   Now I'm not a constitutional expert, but I think Wales and
   Scotland represent different level of territorial division than
   just a collection of England's counties.

 Agreed.  These English regions are largely spurious (they have some kind
 of 'development agency' with a small budget, but no real political
 existence or power) and certainly not equivalent to the border between
 England and Scotland or between federal states in countries like the USA
 or Germany.  They look very odd on the main slippy map.

 I propose to just retag them as anything other than admin_level=4, any
 objections?

 --
 Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com


 ___
 talk mailing list
 talk@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] England, Wales, Scotland borders

2009-10-06 Thread Peter Childs
2009/10/6 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
 The regional development agencies have quite big budgets, actually. But I'd
 agree that England needs to have it's own level.


I think admin_level=5 and an update to the wiki might be the best move.

Peter.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


[OSM-talk] England, Wales, Scotland borders

2009-10-04 Thread Igor Brejc
Hi,

For days now I've been trying to figure out how I could render borders 
between England, Wales and Scotland using OSM data, but I keep stumbling 
into same issues. Frankly, I think the way these things are tagged in UK 
is a mess (I don't know what the situation is in other places):

   1. Borders between these countries are tagged with the same
  admin_level=4 as that of subdivisions inside England (example:
  North East England, http://osm.org/go/evykef-?relation=151164).
  Now I'm not a constitutional expert, but I think Wales and
  Scotland represent different level of territorial division than
  just a collection of England's counties. And anyway, the
  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative
  states level 4 is used for England/Scotland/Wales border and
  doesn't mention anything else.
   2. There is no way to render JUST land borders. Maritime borders
  (territorial waters) are tagged exactly the same way as their
  continental counterparts. And even if you accept this limitation
  and decide to render territorial waters they are usually cut off
  in the available UK OSM extracts.
   3. England's coast is also tagged as a border, but Wales' and
  Scotland's isn't.

Please take my criticism as a constructive one. I'm trying to use OSM 
data in a real-life situation and I think borders are some of the more 
important data, since they are usually visible in smaller-scale maps 
(but usually _without_ marked territorial waters). The way UK's borders 
are now tagged, the only way to render them usefully would be to 
manually collect a list of OSM ways' IDs.

Of course I could go and edit these things myself, but since I'm not 
usually covering this part of the world, I don't want to step on other 
people's toes :)

Best regards,
Igor

-- 
http://igorbrejc.net


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


[OSM-talk] England, Wales, Scotland borders

2009-10-04 Thread Peter Miller

On 4 Oct 2009, at 08:12, Igor Brejc wrote:

 Hi,

 For days now I've been trying to figure out how I could render borders
 between England, Wales and Scotland using OSM data, but I keep  
 stumbling
 into same issues. Frankly, I think the way these things are tagged  
 in UK
 is a mess (I don't know what the situation is in other places):

   1. Borders between these countries are tagged with the same
  admin_level=4 as that of subdivisions inside England (example:
  North East England, http://osm.org/go/evykef-?relation=151164).
  Now I'm not a constitutional expert, but I think Wales and
  Scotland represent different level of territorial division than
  just a collection of England's counties. And anyway, the
  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative
  states level 4 is used for England/Scotland/Wales border and
  doesn't mention anything else.
   2. There is no way to render JUST land borders. Maritime borders
  (territorial waters) are tagged exactly the same way as their
  continental counterparts. And even if you accept this limitation
  and decide to render territorial waters they are usually cut off
  in the available UK OSM extracts.
   3. England's coast is also tagged as a border, but Wales' and
  Scotland's isn't.

 Please take my criticism as a constructive one. I'm trying to use OSM
 data in a real-life situation and I think borders are some of the more
 important data, since they are usually visible in smaller-scale maps
 (but usually _without_ marked territorial waters). The way UK's  
 borders
 are now tagged, the only way to render them usefully would be to
 manually collect a list of OSM ways' IDs.

 Of course I could go and edit these things myself, but since I'm not
 usually covering this part of the world, I don't want to step on other
 people's toes :)

I have cross-posted this to talk-gb and I suggest that we continue the  
conversation there.

We certainly need to use different levels for the UK and england/ 
scotland/wales but as always with borders it is a bit sensitive about  
how one does it. Is Scotland a 'country' or a 'region' etc.

Regards,



Peter





 Best regards,
 Igor

 -- 
 http://igorbrejc.net


 ___
 talk mailing list
 talk@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


[Talk-GB] [OSM-talk] England, Wales, Scotland borders

2009-10-04 Thread Peter Miller

On 4 Oct 2009, at 08:12, Igor Brejc wrote:

 Hi,

 For days now I've been trying to figure out how I could render borders
 between England, Wales and Scotland using OSM data, but I keep  
 stumbling
 into same issues. Frankly, I think the way these things are tagged  
 in UK
 is a mess (I don't know what the situation is in other places):

   1. Borders between these countries are tagged with the same
  admin_level=4 as that of subdivisions inside England (example:
  North East England, http://osm.org/go/evykef-?relation=151164).
  Now I'm not a constitutional expert, but I think Wales and
  Scotland represent different level of territorial division than
  just a collection of England's counties. And anyway, the
  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative
  states level 4 is used for England/Scotland/Wales border and
  doesn't mention anything else.
   2. There is no way to render JUST land borders. Maritime borders
  (territorial waters) are tagged exactly the same way as their
  continental counterparts. And even if you accept this limitation
  and decide to render territorial waters they are usually cut off
  in the available UK OSM extracts.
   3. England's coast is also tagged as a border, but Wales' and
  Scotland's isn't.

 Please take my criticism as a constructive one. I'm trying to use OSM
 data in a real-life situation and I think borders are some of the more
 important data, since they are usually visible in smaller-scale maps
 (but usually _without_ marked territorial waters). The way UK's  
 borders
 are now tagged, the only way to render them usefully would be to
 manually collect a list of OSM ways' IDs.

 Of course I could go and edit these things myself, but since I'm not
 usually covering this part of the world, I don't want to step on other
 people's toes :)

I have cross-posted this to talk-gb and I suggest that we continue the  
conversation there.

We certainly need to use different levels for the UK and england/ 
scotland/wales but as always with borders it is a bit sensitive about  
how one does it. Is Scotland a 'country' or a 'region' etc.

Regards,



Peter





 Best regards,
 Igor

 -- 
 http://igorbrejc.net


 ___
 talk mailing list
 t...@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb