- Original Message -
From: Igor Brejc
To: David Groom
Cc: David Earl ; Artem Pavlenko ; talk Openstreetmap
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers in general, mapnik rendering in
Particular
David Groom wrote:
I'll edit the wiki.
Could you
I agree with Thomas, we could tag rivers like we do for coastlines. If
the river is connected to a coastline it would be rendered by the
coastline rendering process. If it's not, it could be rendered the
same way lakes are.
If we need to draw a way across the river to close it, it's fine by
me:
-talk] Large Rivers in general, mapnik rendering
in Particular
On 8 Feb 2008, at 12:05, David Earl wrote:
On 08/02/2008 11:54, David Groom wrote:
You mean like
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/
Rivers, which
would be my ideal,
Ah, yes.
I was suggesting putting
David Groom wrote:
I'll edit the wiki.
Could you put some visual examples, please?
Artem, what i had in mind is now shown on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Rivers
David G
I'm a bit late in entering this discussion,
On 11/02/2008, Robin Paulson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 08/02/2008, David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main problem area seems to be that some people do not like the current
proposal whereby a river is divided up in to separate closed areas. The
reason being that the segment
On 08/02/2008, David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main problem area seems to be that some people do not like the current
proposal whereby a river is divided up in to separate closed areas. The
reason being that the segment crossing the river to close the area marks a
boundary which does
The proposed tag waterway = river,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Large_rivers , has
been at proposal stage for over 18 months, which seems far too long for a
tag which represents such an important feature.
The main problem area seems to be that some people do not
On Feb 8, 2008 11:09 AM, Artem Pavlenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can make osm2pgsql or coastline tools to create polygons, but why
not create them in the first place ?
Can someone enlighten me, please ?
If I wanted to draw the rivers as light blue* with dark blue
riverbanks, wouldn't
On 8 Feb 2008, at 11:27, David Earl wrote:
You could do it as a relation.
The river bank would be a set of ways (each of which shares its end
nodes with the ends of one of the others), and you could have a
role for the one or two ways which close the loop which says this
is
- Original Message -
From: Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers in general, mapnik rendering in
Particular
On Feb 8, 2008 11:39 AM, David
On 8 Feb 2008, at 11:26, Andy Allan wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 11:09 AM, Artem Pavlenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can make osm2pgsql or coastline tools to create polygons, but why
not create them in the first place ?
Can someone enlighten me, please ?
If I wanted to draw the rivers as
On Feb 8, 2008 11:39 AM, David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main problem area seems to be that some people do not like the current
proposal whereby a river is divided up in to separate closed areas. The
reason being that the segment crossing the river to close the area marks a
boundary
On 8 Feb 2008, at 10:39, David Groom wrote:
The proposed tag waterway = river,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/
Large_rivers , has
been at proposal stage for over 18 months, which seems far too long
for a
tag which represents such an important feature.
The
David Groom wrote:
Sent: 08 February 2008 10:40 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers in general, mapnik rendering in Particular
The proposed tag waterway = river,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Large_rivers ,
has
been at proposal stage for over
- Original Message -
From: Artem Pavlenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED]; talk Openstreetmap
talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers in general, mapnik rendering
On 8 Feb 2008, at 12:05, David Earl wrote:
On 08/02/2008 11:54, David Groom wrote:
You mean like
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Rivers,
which
would be my ideal,
Ah, yes.
I was suggesting putting in the connections across the river as well,
but there isn't
You could do it as a relation.
The river bank would be a set of ways (each of which shares its end
nodes with the ends of one of the others), and you could have a role for
the one or two ways which close the loop which says this is structural,
not really part of the river bank. The renderer
The large river problem is also related to the closed coastline one.
I don't like having to decide where I close coastlines at the end of a
large river.
Couldn't we tag riverbank with the same rules as coastline, and let them
both be processed by the same pre-processor ?
Using this method,
Message
From: David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, 28 January, 2008 1:16:50 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers
- Original Message -
From: Chris Hill
To: David Groom ;
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM
: Re: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers
- Original Message -
From: Simone Cortesi
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 4:20 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers
Hi,
is there anything going on withthe Large Rivers proposed feature?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php
From: David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, 28 January, 2008 1:16:50 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers
- Original Message -
From: Chris Hill
To: David Groom ;
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Large
- Original Message -
From: Chris Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED]; talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers
I've use the waterway=riverbank (as described) on the Humber estuary, the
Ouse
Hi,
is there anything going on withthe Large Rivers proposed feature?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Large_rivers
For the time being, how do I tag large water bodies? Like the Po river
in North Italy or Rhine in Deutschland?
Thanks,
S.
--
Simone Cortesi
All that
23 matches
Mail list logo
