On 15/03/2015 11:21 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 14.03.2015 um 23:49 schrieb mick bare...@tpg.com.au:
One issue I hope those people expending mental energy on improving the tagging
scheme will keep in mind are the limitations existing in GIS packages in
respect of the number of fields
Am 14.03.2015 um 23:49 schrieb mick bare...@tpg.com.au:
One issue I hope those people expending mental energy on improving the
tagging scheme will keep in mind are the limitations existing in GIS packages
in respect of the number of fields and the maximum field length.
This is not an
-talk] Second decade visions
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 03:54:34 +0100
Daniel Koć dan...@xn--ko-wla.pl wrote:
W dniu 13.03.2015 13:03, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
indeed, man_made=works is working the same way as amenity=school, it
is used on the whole area, and also place_of_worship
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 03:54:34 +0100
Daniel Koć dan...@xn--ko-wla.pl wrote:
W dniu 13.03.2015 13:03, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
indeed, man_made=works is working the same way as amenity=school, it
is used on the whole area, and also place_of_worship is used on the
whole sacred area
W dniu 13.03.2015 13:03, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
indeed, man_made=works is working the same way as amenity=school, it
is used on the whole area, and also place_of_worship is used on the
whole sacred area (which typically coincides with the church).
That's what we have now (forgetting
2015-03-13 0:33 GMT+01:00 Daniel Koć daniel@koć.pl:
The schoolyard is not that different than churchyard or even industrial
area. There can be some special facilities inside (pitch, cemetery,
warehouse) that can have special purposes (recreation, religious cult,
storing goods) - or not at
How about just less chat*, more mapping?
Cheers,
Andy
* endless tagging list discussions, wikivotes etc.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2015-03-12 13:08 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
[landuse=farmland; farmland=greenhouse_horticulture] instead of
[landuse=greenhouse_horticulture]
this was discussed and is kind of an edge case. Could also be seen as
industrial usage maybe? Officially I guess that
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote
there are no actual cases of landuse=copper_mine in our db, zero. The
1000 landuse=mine (very few compared to a total of 13M landuse tags and
104K cases of quarry). Please let's talk about actual tags,
while this sounds nice for the green poodle with 6 legs, I'd be interested
in real cases where our current schemes should be changed
[landuse=farmland; farmland=greenhouse_horticulture] instead of
[landuse=greenhouse_horticulture]
[landuse=industrial; industrial=salt_pond] instead of
2015-03-12 12:06 GMT+01:00 Daniel Koć daniel@koć.pl:
1. It should be more uniform (like amenity=school - landuse=school
for the school areas).
this might be a philosophical question, but I believe that amenity=school
for the whole area is more precise than amenity=school on just a building.
W dniu 12.03.2015 12:26, SomeoneElse napisał(a):
How about just less chat*, more mapping?
1. I make so much mapping that I don't want any more, thank you very
much! =}
2. More mapping won't create the opportunity to rethink anything
strategic-wise, it will just give us more data (which is
W dniu 12.03.2015 12:48, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
this might be a philosophical question, but I believe that
amenity=school for the whole area is more precise than amenity=school
on just a building. The outdoor areas of schools typically serve for
recreation purposes, and recreation is
On 11/03/2015 9:53 AM, Daniel Koć wrote:
4. Redesigning some key tagging schemes
I think that will be one of the hardest think to change, but while tag
crafting is mostly a grassroot process, we need to rethink some of
them in a more systematic way.
For example amenity=school should be
W dniu 11.03.2015 7:27, Jo napisał(a):
My solution is to use MapCSS and filtering in JOSM to cope with this
problem.
I know this method and it's good enough for now, but I was talking about
strategic thinking, not about the advanced functionality of just one
tool.
It should be something
W dniu 10.03.2015 3:52, Alex Barth napisał(a):
Casting the net a little wider:
What do you think are the big topics and challenges for OpenStreetMap
as we're about to go into the second decade? What does this mean for
State of the Map?
I'm not sure what does this mean for SotM (?), but here
16 matches
Mail list logo
