Hi All,
I've been looking at tagwatch again and find that there are lots of bridges and
tunnels without layer tags.
These are not assumed and need to be added.
Before we all rush out and start amending the tags I've writen a script to add
layer tags to these automatically.
It is working on
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've been looking at tagwatch again and find that there are lots of bridges
and tunnels without layer tags.
These are not assumed and need to be added.
Before we all rush out and start amending the tags I've
On 7 June 2010 11:05, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
These are not assumed and need to be added.
Most bridges and tunnels could be assumed when there is water
involved, I'm pretty sure someone, might have been Steve, brought this
up on the tagging list a few months ago.
At this point
Don't do it. Automated changes almost always go wrong. And they
almost always upset a mapper who really meant for it to be that way.
As I said in my email it works correctly on a test server from a technical
point of view and yes I agree about upsetting mappers that's why I'm asking the
If you believe that you are accurately detecting a mapping problem,
consider creating an alarm system, like OSM Inspector, keepright or
the dupenodes map. Bring the potential problems to the attention of
local mappers who can then apply the changes if they are required.
This is already
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:47 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
If you can run a script over data it could also be pre-processed in a
similar manner without needing explicit tags on the objects.
I had thought that the consensus was that layer tags *are* assumed, at
least in cases
On 7 June 2010 13:31, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
I had thought that the consensus was that layer tags *are* assumed, at
least in cases like highway/bridge crossing river.
While that may have been decided on a mailing list, I'm not sure if
anyone updated the wiki to reflect it, or
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:47 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
If you can run a script over data it could also be pre-processed in a
similar manner without needing explicit tags on the objects.
I had thought that the consensus was that layer tags *are* assumed, at
least in
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Each bridge that currently does not have a layer tag would have layer=1 added.
That will be incorrect if a bridge crosses a body of water (or other
object) that has a layer tag other than zero. Which means some
renderers may
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Anyone see any issues with running this completely and on a regular basis eg
weekly cron job.
Also, one problem with doing that is it muddies the issue: if a bot is
automatically adding layer tags, does that mean that
On 7 June 2010 14:32, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Incidentally: how do current renderers (principally mapnik and
osmarender) currently behave? Are any of these assumed defaults
actually implemented, or have I got my wires crossed?
Mapnik usually renders roads on top of other
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Each bridge that currently does not have a layer tag would have layer=1
added.
That will be incorrect if a bridge crosses a body of water (or other
object) that has a layer tag other than zero. Which means some
On 7 June 2010 14:18, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
The consensus may have been that all bridges and tunnels need to have a layer
tag and that's what I'm looking at.
I don't think the wiki was updated, then again consensus is limited to
the group discussing it at the time.
http://www.itoworld.com/product/osm/map?colour=tablestyle=_default_osm_tagsarea=4687:0sort=total-show=key_values:8
I only just discovered ItoWorld, heh.
Steve
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
