On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 13:58, Ewen Hill wrote:
>
> Just to note that you can ride on a footpath if you are 12 or under OR as an
> adult riding with a child 12 or under. This is a national standard in all
> states I believe.
I believe it's only nsw and vic that have these age based rules.
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 06:42, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> On 29/9/19 10:41 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> >
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access says designated means
> > "...in general this means that there is a (explicit) sign saying
> > something like 'pedestrians allowed', or a
*# Discussion F: landuse=residential*
*...*
*QUESTION*
*How is the best way to approach this? *
*I welcome your comments.*
Herbert.Remi
This is the fifth in your 'discussion' series, and prior to that you
presented two 'Topics' and 3 or more other long emails. *However you have
yet to respond
Just to note that you can ride on a footpath if you are 12 or under OR as
an adult riding with a child 12 or under. This is a national standard in
all states I believe.
In Victoria, you will see sometimes a pedestrian and cyclist on a white
rectangle sign or a blue directional street name style
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 13:31, Herbert.Remi via Talk-au <
talk-au@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> # Discussion F: landuse=residential
>
> ## The Issue
>
> I am very interest in improving quality and consistency. In this case, the
> question is inconsistent or incomplete? I have discovered that many
>
On 30/09/19 13:30, Herbert.Remi via Talk-au wrote:
I have not had the time to review OSM Wiki on this, unfortunately.
What I have seen in the editor is that some mappers have mapped the
whole suburb with one polygon, while others have mapped every city
block. The latter sort of makes sense
# Discussion F: landuse=residential
## The Issue
I am very interest in improving quality and consistency. In this case, the
question is inconsistent or incomplete? I have discovered that many residential
areas have still not been mapped.
### Specifics: landuse=residential
There is a land
Hi, just thought I would mention if you get the waiver that you could use
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GO-Sync to manage in the conflation. I am
one of the developers and plan on doing a lot of work on it over the summer. If
you need help, send me an email.
Thanks
Reuben
On 14/9/19
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 09:06, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> I was more interested in how consistently they are installed in
> Queensland.
>
Sorry! In my part of the GC, I've seen the shared path signs along the GC
Oceanway. One other shared path nearby, they're "painted" on the path
itself, rather
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 7:30 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Examples of the signs are given on the linked page
>
>
>
Yeap, the law is the same as the ACT. I was more interested in how
consistently they are installed in Queensland. In the ACT as a rule they
don't put them up (but they will use
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 06:44, Andrew Davidson wrote:
>
> Does anyone know what the situation in Queensland is? Do they bother
> putting up the signage?
>
https://www.qld.gov.au/transport/safety/rules/wheeled-devices/bicycle#footpath
Riding on a separated pathOn a separated path, you can only
On 29/9/19 10:41 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access says designated means
"...in general this means that there is a (explicit) sign saying
something like 'pedestrians allowed', or a pedestrian icon."
So if signposted for a particular mode, I'd use
On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 at 21:33, Andy Townsend wrote:
> They're designed for use by foot
> and bicycle traffic, and foot and bicycle traffic is at the very least
> actively encouraged from using them in preference to the parallel
> roads. Whether that should be "=yes" or "=designated" on these
On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 at 20:35, Andrew Davidson wrote:
> On 28/9/19 8:55 am, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> > If the way is specifically for a particular mode, then use
> > mode=designated. So a shared cycle pedestrian path is
> > foot=designated+bicycle=designated.
>
> Actually in Australia if a path is
On 29/09/2019 11:34, Andrew Davidson wrote:
On 28/9/19 8:55 am, Andrew Harvey wrote:
If the way is specifically for a particular mode, then use
mode=designated. So a shared cycle pedestrian path is
foot=designated+bicycle=designated.
Actually in Australia if a path is designated for bicycles
29 Sep 2019, 12:34 by thesw...@gmail.com:
> On 28/9/19 8:55 am, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>
>> If the way is specifically for a particular mode, then use mode=designated.
>> So a shared cycle pedestrian path is foot=designated+bicycle=designated.
>>
>
> Actually in Australia if a path is
On 28/9/19 8:55 am, Andrew Harvey wrote:
If the way is specifically for a particular mode, then use
mode=designated. So a shared cycle pedestrian path is
foot=designated+bicycle=designated.
Actually in Australia if a path is designated for bicycles then you
can't walk on it:
17 matches
Mail list logo
