On 28/7/22 08:11, Tom Brennan wrote:
On 26/07/2022 5:27 pm, Warin wrote:
I have done a few of these along the Gross Valley. In many cases
there is a peak and I have taken the view that the 'head' is the top
of the peak.
I did have a look at those.
In general I would disagree with the
On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 08:15, Tom Brennan wrote:
> > natural=point only has some ~400 uses world wide, no wiki page so .. low
> > uses = no rendering. Choosing one of the additional tags will get
> > rendering .. but it should be appropriate to the feature not just
> > 'tagging for the render'
>
On 26/07/2022 5:27 pm, Warin wrote:
I have done a few of these along the Gross Valley. In many cases there
is a peak and I have taken the view that the 'head' is the top of the peak.
I did have a look at those.
In general I would disagree with the 'head' being the top of the peak,
based on
On 26/7/22 07:16, Tom Brennan wrote:
What tag do you recommend using for heads or points that are away from
the coast?
There seem to be a variety of methods people have used, none of them
particularly satisfactory:
1. Map them as a peak eg Catt Head: natural=peak
What tag do you recommend using for heads or points that are away from
the coast?
There seem to be a variety of methods people have used, none of them
particularly satisfactory:
1. Map them as a peak eg Catt Head: natural=peak
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4420272847
2. Map them as a
5 matches
Mail list logo
