I'm just still not sure if we should categorise paths so they display
correctly with the current limitations of a rendering algorithm.
When reading the main wiki
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Cycleway ) I understand the
definition of cycleway to mean bicycle only paths or
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Evan Sebire e...@sebire.org wrote:
I'm just still not sure if we should categorise paths so
they display
correctly with the current limitations of a rendering
algorithm.
What limitation? :)
We're currently in the process of defining how things render how we choose, we
On Thursday 06 Aug 2009 09:21:59 John Smith wrote:
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Evan Sebire e...@sebire.org wrote:
I'm just still not sure if we should categorise paths so
they display
correctly with the current limitations of a rendering
algorithm.
What limitation? :)
We're currently in the
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Evan Sebire e...@sebire.org wrote:
A complicated solution would be to have user options
similar to non-web
applications. Tick-box to emphasise paths that have
bicycle = yes tag. The
current cycle map is good but tick-boxes for other
properties such as fuel,
bbq,
On Thursday 06 Aug 2009 10:13:47 John Smith wrote:
--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Evan Sebire e...@sebire.org wrote:
A complicated solution would be to have user options
similar to non-web
applications. Tick-box to emphasise paths that have
bicycle = yes tag. The
current cycle map is good but
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:30:02 +0200
Evan Sebire e...@sebire.org wrote:
Maybe slightly off-topic but does the current rendering engine obey the width
parameter? I wanted to fix up a river that is in some parts 10m wide and
others 100m. Would setting the width be the correct way to make it
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Evan Sebire wrote:
A complicated solution would be to have user options similar to non-web
applications. Tick-box to emphasise paths that have bicycle = yes tag. The
current cycle map is good but tick-boxes for other properties such as fuel,
bbq, motel etc. The rendering
--- On Wed, 5/8/09, John Henderson j...@talk21.com wrote:
Is this intentional? Or an oversight?
That's only a guide for specific things, the main map features should be
checked first.
I'd expect them to be highway=cycleway, making the
bicycle=yes tag
redundant.
If you mean what I
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, John Henderson wrote:
I expect to be mapping some of these sooner or later. I note that
there's no
highway=value
tag given at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Rail_Trail
s
Is this intentional? Or an oversight?
I'd expect them
Noted.
As far as I'm aware, all railtrails are designed predominantly for bicycle
use. This is a reflection of both the distances usually involved and the users
they attract. I do see the occasional walker on a railtrail, and these, horse
riders and wheelchair users are also encouraged to
10 matches
Mail list logo
