Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

Generally yes. There are a few different treatments. The two main ones are where the straight through cycle traffic remains to the left of a separated barrier. Best example I can think of is at Ian Parade near concord. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/PR6ShOVEl-hNO91xjsDwLQ And there is also

Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 at 19:42, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > For safety I think you will find all bicycle lanes end before any > roundabout and restart after the roundabout.. helps stop cars exiting over > cyclists, well it is supposed to... > The exception to that could be 3 road

Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

The default for non-highways roads is bicycle=yes so even without any cycle tags the router should still take you though it, but that's a routing decision. Omitting bicycle infrastructure tags from the roundabout helps let you know that you need to merge with traffic to go though the roundabout.

Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

I agree that if there is nothing marked, however my question was rather from a continuity point of view. The roads into and out of the round about have cycle lanes. The cyclist needs to merge with the road traffic to pass through. Should the roundabout have cycle=designated or yes to ensure

Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

If there's nothing marked on the road in the roundabout, then you can just omit the cycle lane tag from the roundabout. On Sun., 29 Dec. 2019, 2:21 pm Graeme Fitzpatrick, wrote: > > Thanks > > Graeme > > > On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 at 16:52, David Wales wrote: > >> I prefer to use separate ways for

Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

I am an occasional editor who fixes the occasional mistake affecting cyclists. As a cyclist I am one of many cyclists equally baffled by bike lanes that start and end randomly. Maybe we are expected to teleport. One such type in my suburb is short sections (3metres) of lane marking with the

Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

Thanks Graeme On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 at 16:52, David Wales wrote: > I prefer to use separate ways for separate foot paths. > As do I. > On 28 December 2019 3:02:30 pm AEDT, Sebastian Spiess > wrote: >> >> >> I do welcome comments. In particular regarding how to go about the cycle >> way and

Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

Hi Andrew, thanks for all these hints. I probably should have read up on the tags a bit better. A case of too late mapping. I've followed your suggestions and added the tags up and downstream of the roundabout with this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78947187 I do welcome

Re: [talk-au] parking and bike lane

Hi Sebastian, 1. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes is says "Use the lanes =* key to tag how many traffic lanes there are on a highway ." and "Count excludes cycle lanes.". So in this case there are only 2 traffic lanes. So simply use: