Generally yes. There are a few different treatments. The two main ones are where the straight through cycle traffic remains to the left of a separated barrier.
Best example I can think of is at Ian Parade near concord. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/PR6ShOVEl-hNO91xjsDwLQ And there is also the fully separated off-ramp on-ramp style treatment. There are also a few of those around Concord. And also going through the large roundabouts at North Nowra. And other places. As for cycle-lanes actually going through roundabouts. Well, the classic example would be on Darling Drive. There used to be two where the cycle-lanes went straight through, and there is one remaining. It's a terrible piece of infrastructure though. There are some others around the place. If they don't cross exists they can be okay - but the ones crossing exits are dangerous. https://goo.gl/maps/r3LG7XajfvbEBRBQA As much as we'd all like to have OSM to be our representation of how cycle-friendly a road is, OSM in Sydney is already suffering a fair bit from people entering their own interpretation of what is cycle infrastructure. So, I really think the best thing is to map it as it is. But appreciate the motivation to try and let others know about the continuity of a cycle route. Thanks, Ian. On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 at 19:42, Warin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 31/12/19 16:42, Ian Sergeant wrote: > > IMO clearly no. > > A router may even prefer to route around roundabouts and prefer a route > where cycling amenity is actually continuous. Map it how it is, and the > router can decide based on the preferences (weightings) of the rider. > > Ian. > > > On Mon, 30 Dec 2019, 8:05 am Sebastian S., <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I agree that if there is nothing marked, however my question was rather >> from a continuity point of view. >> The roads into and out of the round about have cycle lanes. The cyclist >> needs to merge with the road traffic to pass through. >> Should the roundabout have cycle=designated or yes to ensure routing goes >> through it? >> >> >> On 30 December 2019 6:56:31 am AEDT, Andrew Harvey < >> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> If there's nothing marked on the road in the roundabout, then you can >>> just omit the cycle lane tag from the roundabout. >>> >>> On Sun., 29 Dec. 2019, 2:21 pm Graeme Fitzpatrick, < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Graeme >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 at 16:52, David Wales <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I prefer to use separate ways for separate foot paths. >>>>> >>>> >>>> As do I. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 28 December 2019 3:02:30 pm AEDT, Sebastian Spiess < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I do welcome comments. In particular regarding how to go about the >>>>>> cycle way and the roundabout. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> Looks OK to me, but I've also wondered how bike lanes are supposed to >>>> work through roundabouts, when there's nothing marked on the road? >>>> >>> > For safety I think you will find all bicycle lanes end before any > roundabout and restart after the roundabout.. helps stop cars exiting over > cyclists, well it is supposed to... > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
