The default for non-highways roads is bicycle=yes so even without any cycle tags the router should still take you though it, but that's a routing decision.
Omitting bicycle infrastructure tags from the roundabout helps let you know that you need to merge with traffic to go though the roundabout. On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 at 08:04, Sebastian S. <mapp...@consebt.de> wrote: > I agree that if there is nothing marked, however my question was rather > from a continuity point of view. > The roads into and out of the round about have cycle lanes. The cyclist > needs to merge with the road traffic to pass through. > Should the roundabout have cycle=designated or yes to ensure routing goes > through it? > > > On 30 December 2019 6:56:31 am AEDT, Andrew Harvey < > andrew.harv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> If there's nothing marked on the road in the roundabout, then you can >> just omit the cycle lane tag from the roundabout. >> >> On Sun., 29 Dec. 2019, 2:21 pm Graeme Fitzpatrick, <graemefi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Graeme >>> >>> >>> On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 at 16:52, David Wales <daviewa...@disroot.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I prefer to use separate ways for separate foot paths. >>>> >>> >>> As do I. >>> >>> >>>> On 28 December 2019 3:02:30 pm AEDT, Sebastian Spiess < >>>> mapp...@consebt.de> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I do welcome comments. In particular regarding how to go about the >>>>> cycle way and the roundabout. >>>>> >>>> >>> Looks OK to me, but I've also wondered how bike lanes are supposed to >>> work through roundabouts, when there's nothing marked on the road? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Graeme >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-au mailing list >>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >>> >>
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
