On 15 January 2011 11:38, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
I've updated the details, for version 3751.
I wonder if Ben would be so kind as to have a standard tile URL, I
haven't dug into the current TMS/WMS code to see if you can supply
custom URLs, alternatively using a web server
On 15/01/11 09:38, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I've updated the details, for version 3751.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Andrew Harveyandrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
I've put some details on how to add NearMap back in for the latest
JOSM versions on the wiki,
On 15/01/11 10:06, John Smith wrote:
On 15 January 2011 12:03, 4x4falconi...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
How do you get it to show on the imagery menu list?
Add another layer to the list:
tms:http://localhost:port/
Or something to that effect, depending where you are pulling the images from.
On 15 January 2011 12:15, 4x4falcon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Already done this using the BTC redirect but was hoping to use the
SlippyMap Plugin Custom Tile Source method as the redirect is very slow.
Same thing for tiles...
Slippy map integrated with WMS, tms = tile map source (I assume)
The URL format is pretty much Google-compatible, and there's also the format
that was added for Potlatch (with the three ! characters).
See
http://forum.nearmap.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19t=751p=1262hilit=url+format#p1262
Please note that I'm not making any specific comment whatsoever regarding
On 15 January 2011 13:29, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
The URL format is pretty much Google-compatible, and there's also the format
that was added for Potlatch (with the three ! characters).
See
http://forum.nearmap.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19t=751p=1262hilit=url+format#p1262
Might
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:02 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 January 2011 11:38, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
I've updated the details, for version 3751.
I wonder if Ben would be so kind as to have a standard tile URL, I
haven't dug into the current
On 15 January 2011 13:57, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
You can use NearMaps current tile API in josm 3751, as I described on
the wiki, No redirecting necessary,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps#version_3751.2B
This is what it should look like,
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:29:01 +0800
Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Also: we're being linked like crazy from several major media sources,
so if you can ensure you have a decent-size browser cache and avoid
trying to spider down large areas of tiles, that'd be very helpful in
reducing the
Er... there's lots! Most of the FairFax media sites picked up the Sydney
Morning Herald article yesterday, and now that the latest Brisbane CBD and
Oxley surveys are up, the Brisbane Courier Mail and Brisbane Times linked
directly to us this morning (both seem to be rotating many stories about
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 13:03:10 +0800
Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Er... there's lots! Most of the FairFax media sites picked up the
Sydney Morning Herald article yesterday,
On the bright side at least there is now an end point and some kind of
finality which many including myself have spent at least the last 6
months asking for, the whole license change over has been one debacle
after another and I doubt it could have been intentionally dealt with
in a worst manner
Does the recent board minutes mean any talks with Nearmap have concluded?
https://docs.google.com/View?id=d38xqz5_6fj2bcdcm
Because the latest CT draft still seems to include sections that were
objected to:
http://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_933xs7nvfb
I've put some details on how to add NearMap back in for the latest
JOSM versions on the wiki,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NearMap_PhotoMaps#SlippyMap_Plugin_Custom_Tile_Source
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 09:49 +1100, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I've put some details on how to add NearMap back in for the latest
JOSM versions on the wiki,
Why? Did you fail to read the minutes that were posted? Basically OSMF
has given itself the ultimate authority to remove all non-compliant data
So, whens the aussie fork coming?
David
world-wide
osm-f...@googlegroups.com
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 1:15 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 09:49 +1100, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I've put some details on how to add NearMap back in for the latest
JOSM versions on the wiki,
Why? Did you fail to read the minutes that were posted? Basically
Yes, hopefully the OSM-Foundation will provide a full planet.osm file.
... However, to be on the safe side (there is no benifit for
osm-foundation to help), having a bunch (i'd say at least 10) copies
of the latest planet.osm scattered across many websites / offlines and
external hard drives
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
But you are right in questioning my above quip because as far as I know (and
I don't follow it too closely)
Then kindly STFU. Is that unreasonable?
Steve
___
Talk-au mailing
Sorry If I am stupid here,
but is it not possible to use CC-BY data for tracing to create new
CC-BY-SA data, just not the other way around?
According to the compatibility chart,
http://learn.creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/cclearn-explanations-cc-license-compatability.pdf
By can be
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Mike Dupont
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
I find that it scares me that OSM tools are being locked down.
One we have flash tools that need a non free runtime, and developers
who dont give a damn,
then we have this silverlight drama about to unfold.
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
You can of course fork whatever you like, but allow me to point out that
(1) if you are unhappy with the slippy map plugin, why not fork that instead
of the whole editor.
(2) the slippy map plugin can be configured
On 27 November 2010 19:08, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
You can of course fork whatever you like, but allow me to point out that
(1) if you are unhappy with the slippy map plugin, why not fork that
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Warning, if you use this imagery, you will most likely not be able to agree
to the CTs at any time in the future. When OSM changes its license, all your
contributions will be have to be removed from the live OSM
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:59 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this mean talks with Nearmap has failed to come to an amicable
arrangement?
From http://www.mail-archive.com/talk-au@openstreetmap.org/msg06524.html
Where, Ben Last said:
I asked Richard F to remove NearMap
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:57:25 -0500
Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:59 AM, John Smith
deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this mean talks with Nearmap has failed to come to an amicable
arrangement?
From
On 26 November 2010 08:59, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this mean talks with Nearmap has failed to come to an amicable
arrangement?
before:
On 26 November 2010 20:18, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I can tell, we are still talking with Nearmap to find a compromise
acceptable to both party. The last email I exchanged with Ben Last was last
night. I don't think we are near a breakdown in communication at
That is funny, I hope we don't get into a forking of josm as well. OMG.
The osm trac is taking forever to load, how lame.
Luckily we are using github, which has real performance :
https://github.com/openstreetmap/josm-plugins/commit/7402a2349583a250db930b8ac41b5ffa9885acc0#commitcomment-203309
On 26 November 2010 10:24, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 November 2010 20:18, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com
wrote:
As far as I can tell, we are still talking with Nearmap to find a
compromise
acceptable to both party. The last email I exchanged with Ben Last
On 26 November 2010 10:32, Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
That is funny, I hope we don't get into a forking of josm as well. OMG.
The osm trac is taking forever to load, how lame.
Luckily we are using github, which has real performance :
Great Grant,
thanks alot!
so john, you gotta talk to big fred :
nearmap does not support the planned license change so we'd rather
have people using bing
Hope I am helping the discussion not harming.
peace and love,
thanks,
mike
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Grant Slater
nearmap does not support the planned license change so we'd rather
have people using bing --frederik
Where is the license information from bing that makes deriving
information from their maps compatiable with OSM?
Time to fork josm... fjosm!
___
I find that it scares me that OSM tools are being locked down.
One we have flash tools that need a non free runtime, and developers
who dont give a damn,
then we have this silverlight drama about to unfold. The tools should
not be dependant on one license or server or one point of view.
We need
34 matches
Mail list logo
