I mean, people use amenity=charging_station [1], which has a name=* tag. And I
think Europe imported a bunch of these over a decade ago. Maybe it's ME who is
behind the curve here? Dian and/or Phil linked this / raised this already.
Regarding what Warin says, OSM just MIGHT be either "a" or
There is also a "site relation" [1] (a relation with type=site), useful as a
grouping at a single site. I'm not saying this is how EV things have been
done, are or will be, rather something to consider as a "might be." These are
relations so it's good for them to be orderly and structured,
Hey Andrew,
I'm not sure I agree with you that naming a supercharger is equivalent
to the naming of a supermarket branch.
To me, the supercharger seems more akin to a petrol pump, and while you
might map individual pumps only the service station would be named.
Phil raises a good point
For multiple chargers you could use a 'named' area rather than individual
chargers. The individual chargers could also be points with details on
output etc, especially if they differ
Cheers - Phil
-Original Message-
From: Ian Steer
Sent: Monday, 26 December 2022 9:56 AM
To:
Maybe just name them as Tesla Charger at this Place 1, 2, 3 & so on?
Thanks
Graeme
On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 at 09:00, Ian Steer wrote:
> I also agree - but if there are several superchargers at the same location,
> do they all get the same name? (probably)
>
> Ian
>
> On 16 December 2022 1:33:21
I also agree - but if there are several superchargers at the same location,
do they all get the same name? (probably)
Ian
On 16 December 2022 1:33:21 pm AEDT, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
>I think it's reasonable for it to have a name like "Tesla Supercharger
>Hollydene, NSW". If Tesla refers to it as
I agree with you here. In my view OSM aim should be to have the charger mapped
with a 'name' and/or reference so other data consumers can find and relink with
additional information.
On 16 December 2022 6:55:53 pm AEDT, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>On 16/12/22 09:54, Phil Wyatt
Yes indeed, charging cost is something that is already in flux give the general
rise of energy cost and it is going to hopefully be showing cost benefits when
we charge during the day when the sun is high.
I agree that this is an attribute that is better left off since it will likely
not age
Hi Andrew,
I agree with this.
On 16 December 2022 1:33:21 pm AEDT, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
>I think it's reasonable for it to have a name like "Tesla Supercharger
>Hollydene, NSW". If Tesla refers to it as such, and you might ask someone
>to meet you at the Tesla Supercharger Hollydene, then
9 matches
Mail list logo
