point on each road then
join the nodes in a clockwise direction it will give a reasonable roundabout
when rendered.
BTW, Potlatch Mercator handle roundabouts now (Mercator for year(s) now)
BlueMM
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@... writes:
2009/9/23 BlueMM bluemm1975-...@...:
I think the preferred attribution scheme is to use source=gps as that is
what the actual source is survey is ambiguous with proper survey
equipment.
No, source=survey isn't ambiguous at all it's spelt out
John Smith delta_foxt...@... writes:
I think I finally figured out where boundary names are coming from, can
others confirm that boundary names are no longer being rendered please.
[SNIP]
As you probably expected, I see the same as you...
BlueMM
John Smith-129 wrote:
[[snip]]
Does anyone think this is a good idea?
Use network=D for D classified roads, if they exist.
Use network=detour for NSW classified detour routes
Use network=alt_NR for Alternate NR routes
Sounds like a good idea to me
--
View this message in context:
John Smith-129 wrote:
--- On Mon, 17/8/09, BlueMM bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com wrote:
But my point was if they *are* consistent (same shield design), why
specify state?
Consistent to what?
Some states have gone to a alphanumeric system, some use the old NH
shields and those
John Smith-129 wrote:
--- On Tue, 11/8/09, BlueMM bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've found Google Maps directions in Australia to be very
good in the past, it
seems to pick the best route the majority of the time.
At times I've been routed along no through roads, other times google
John Smith-129 wrote:
--- On Tue, 11/8/09, BlueMM bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've found Google Maps directions in Australia to be very good in the
past, it
seems to pick the best route the majority of the time.
At times I've been routed along no through roads, other times google
John Smith-129 wrote:
--- On Mon, 17/8/09, BlueMM bluemm1975-...@yahoo.com wrote:
A few questions:
1. I presume the addr:country=Australia is manditory for this to work,
but
:state optional? I could imagine only needing state for state specific
sheilds (ie. nationally consistent ones
ages ago to
put a street name in a relation when it is broken up by many residential
roundabouts...
BlueMM (checking how posting from Nabble.com works compared to Gmane.org,
which has broken posting at the moment)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/I%27ve-been-trying-to-fix
as they are mentioned elsewhere, therefore I think it should be reverted. I'm
not a big fan of the implication to look at other copyrighted maps as reference,
I think writing that down could lead us down a very grey path.
/My opinion
Of course, my opinions won't keep me warm at night :-)
BlueMM
that this is mainly for signs as opposed to subjective opinion
like the smoothness debacle seems to help as well.
Of course, an en-au localisation of JOSM (Aust. translation) could show
offroad tags as 4wd so Australian JOSM users will recognise it instantly.
BlueMM
boundries/nodes with
existing copyright data :-(
Therefore, I support the local chapter idea, even if I don't yet know what is
involved.
BlueMM
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
).
BlueMM
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
, since mappers are going to
continue either way. BTW, I don't understand your last sentence, why do they
need to do more work? I imagine all Yahoo! traced data needs to be verified
anyway, and to ideally all GPS stuff should be confirmed by another person (QA
and all).
Cheers,
BlueMM
://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.openstreetmap.region.au), much better so
far (even forces bottom-posting)...
Cheers,
BlueMM
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
15 matches
Mail list logo
